Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Another source:
InflationData: Gasoline Inflation
And the cost of gas is simply one more deflection from the original question: Is the GOP actively opposing recovery for political purpose?
Please post the list of fixes that Obama came up with which are currently blocked by the GOP.
Thanks!
Colorado House Democrats: Multiple Democratic Jobs and Transparency Bills Killed by House Republicans in Committee this Week
This one from the R's:
Seven Jobs Bills that President Obama and Senate Democrats Have Ignored | Facebook
a detailed history of the Stimulus Act, debate and partisan arguments:
Economic Stimulus - The New York Times
Please post the list of fixes that Obama came up with which are currently blocked by the GOP.
Thanks!
Colorado House Democrats: Multiple Democratic Jobs and Transparency Bills Killed by House Republicans in Committee this Week
This one from the R's:
Seven Jobs Bills that President Obama and Senate Democrats Have Ignored | Facebook
a detailed history of the Stimulus Act, debate and partisan arguments:
Economic Stimulus - The New York Times
We need multiple jobs and transparency bills? You mean $787 billion wasn't enough?
How much more do we need to spend?
And transparency? How about some transparency in the New Black Panther prosecution?
Or about the gun running fiasco? Or bribing the senate candidate in Pennsylvania?
Thanks for your link about Obama and Senate Democrats making things worse.
Please post the list of fixes that Obama came up with which are currently blocked by the GOP.
Thanks!
Colorado House Democrats: Multiple Democratic Jobs and Transparency Bills Killed by House Republicans in Committee this Week
This one from the R's:
Seven Jobs Bills that President Obama and Senate Democrats Have Ignored | Facebook
a detailed history of the Stimulus Act, debate and partisan arguments:
Economic Stimulus - The New York Times
We need multiple jobs and transparency bills? You mean $787 billion wasn't enough?
How much more do we need to spend?
And transparency? How about some transparency in the New Black Panther prosecution?
Or about the gun running fiasco? Or bribing the senate candidate in Pennsylvania?
Thanks for your link about Obama and Senate Democrats making things worse.
In February 2009, Democrats in Congress passed a $787 billion stimulus bill requested by President Obama to shore up a reeling economy. By the end of that year, most economists had concluded that the package had helped stave off a far deeper recession.
But the bill was bitterly assailed by Republicans and Tea Party conservatives, and stimulus became a politically radioactive word. With unemployment still close to 10 percent, Mr. Obama in 2010 pushed a series of "jobs bills,'' only to find them blocked by Republicans and conservatives or whittled down in response to worries about the deficit.
From this article which the willfully ignorant partisan members of the New Right will ignore:
Economic Stimulus - The New York Times
At $275,000 Per Job,lets hope & pray the Hopey Changey One doesn't try to create anymore Jobs. That aint "Stimulus",that's just retarded.
Colorado House Democrats: Multiple Democratic Jobs and Transparency Bills Killed by House Republicans in Committee this Week
This one from the R's:
Seven Jobs Bills that President Obama and Senate Democrats Have Ignored | Facebook
a detailed history of the Stimulus Act, debate and partisan arguments:
Economic Stimulus - The New York Times
We need multiple jobs and transparency bills? You mean $787 billion wasn't enough?
How much more do we need to spend?
And transparency? How about some transparency in the New Black Panther prosecution?
Or about the gun running fiasco? Or bribing the senate candidate in Pennsylvania?
Thanks for your link about Obama and Senate Democrats making things worse.
I suggest you read the link to the NYT's article. I know that many self described conservatives believe the NYT's and all MSM is trash, so if you don't that's fine, but don't pretend Obama and the Democrats have made things worse. In 2008 we were at the bink of an economic calamity, maybe as dangerous as the Great Depression.
And don't petend you know anything about economics or how jobs are created. If you did you would offer potential solutions, as it is you appear to have no ideas of your own and can only offer the ubiquitous "ain't it awful".
Colorado House Democrats: Multiple Democratic Jobs and Transparency Bills Killed by House Republicans in Committee this Week
This one from the R's:
Seven Jobs Bills that President Obama and Senate Democrats Have Ignored | Facebook
a detailed history of the Stimulus Act, debate and partisan arguments:
Economic Stimulus - The New York Times
We need multiple jobs and transparency bills? You mean $787 billion wasn't enough?
How much more do we need to spend?
And transparency? How about some transparency in the New Black Panther prosecution?
Or about the gun running fiasco? Or bribing the senate candidate in Pennsylvania?
Thanks for your link about Obama and Senate Democrats making things worse.
I suggest you read the link to the NYT's article. I know that many self described conservatives believe the NYT's and all MSM is trash, so if you don't that's fine, but don't pretend Obama and the Democrats have made things worse. In 2008 we were at the bink of an economic calamity, maybe as dangerous as the Great Depression.
And don't petend you know anything about economics or how jobs are created. If you did you would offer potential solutions, as it is you appear to have no ideas of your own and can only offer the ubiquitous "ain't it awful".
We need multiple jobs and transparency bills? You mean $787 billion wasn't enough?
How much more do we need to spend?
And transparency? How about some transparency in the New Black Panther prosecution?
Or about the gun running fiasco? Or bribing the senate candidate in Pennsylvania?
Thanks for your link about Obama and Senate Democrats making things worse.
I suggest you read the link to the NYT's article. I know that many self described conservatives believe the NYT's and all MSM is trash, so if you don't that's fine, but don't pretend Obama and the Democrats have made things worse. In 2008 we were at the bink of an economic calamity, maybe as dangerous as the Great Depression.
And don't petend you know anything about economics or how jobs are created. If you did you would offer potential solutions, as it is you appear to have no ideas of your own and can only offer the ubiquitous "ain't it awful".
Let's see, how would I create jobs?
Waste $787 billion on shovel ready (chuckle) jobs, pass a new entitlement to give the Feds control over an additional one-sixth of the economy and threaten to have the EPA regulate CO2 as if it were mercury (nice lite bulbs!).
And demonize business owners.
Yeah, and maybe have a few $1.5 trillion deficits in a row.
That should keep unemployment below 8%, right?
We need multiple jobs and transparency bills? You mean $787 billion wasn't enough?
How much more do we need to spend?
And transparency? How about some transparency in the New Black Panther prosecution?
Or about the gun running fiasco? Or bribing the senate candidate in Pennsylvania?
Thanks for your link about Obama and Senate Democrats making things worse.
I suggest you read the link to the NYT's article. I know that many self described conservatives believe the NYT's and all MSM is trash, so if you don't that's fine, but don't pretend Obama and the Democrats have made things worse. In 2008 we were at the bink of an economic calamity, maybe as dangerous as the Great Depression.
And don't petend you know anything about economics or how jobs are created. If you did you would offer potential solutions, as it is you appear to have no ideas of your own and can only offer the ubiquitous "ain't it awful".
Let's see, how would I create jobs?
Waste $787 billion on shovel ready (chuckle) jobs, pass a new entitlement to give the Feds control over an additional one-sixth of the economy and threaten to have the EPA regulate CO2 as if it were mercury (nice lite bulbs!).
And demonize business owners.
Yeah, and maybe have a few $1.5 trillion deficits in a row.
That should keep unemployment below 8%, right?
I suggest you read the link to the NYT's article. I know that many self described conservatives believe the NYT's and all MSM is trash, so if you don't that's fine, but don't pretend Obama and the Democrats have made things worse. In 2008 we were at the bink of an economic calamity, maybe as dangerous as the Great Depression.
And don't petend you know anything about economics or how jobs are created. If you did you would offer potential solutions, as it is you appear to have no ideas of your own and can only offer the ubiquitous "ain't it awful".
Let's see, how would I create jobs?
Waste $787 billion on shovel ready (chuckle) jobs, pass a new entitlement to give the Feds control over an additional one-sixth of the economy and threaten to have the EPA regulate CO2 as if it were mercury (nice lite bulbs!).
And demonize business owners.
Yeah, and maybe have a few $1.5 trillion deficits in a row.
That should keep unemployment below 8%, right?
So, you're either a liar or serously confused. $787 Billion was not authorized for "shovel ready jobs" and the rest of your post is nothing more than an insipid parroting of Right Wing propaganda.
I suggest you read the link to the NYT's article. I know that many self described conservatives believe the NYT's and all MSM is trash, so if you don't that's fine, but don't pretend Obama and the Democrats have made things worse. In 2008 we were at the bink of an economic calamity, maybe as dangerous as the Great Depression.
And don't petend you know anything about economics or how jobs are created. If you did you would offer potential solutions, as it is you appear to have no ideas of your own and can only offer the ubiquitous "ain't it awful".
Let's see, how would I create jobs?
Waste $787 billion on shovel ready (chuckle) jobs, pass a new entitlement to give the Feds control over an additional one-sixth of the economy and threaten to have the EPA regulate CO2 as if it were mercury (nice lite bulbs!).
And demonize business owners.
Yeah, and maybe have a few $1.5 trillion deficits in a row.
That should keep unemployment below 8%, right?
So, you're either a liar or serously confused. $787 Billion was not authorized for "shovel ready jobs" and the rest of your post is nothing more than an insipid parroting of Right Wing propaganda.
At $275,000 Per Job,lets hope & pray the Hopey Changey One doesn't try to create anymore Jobs. That aint "Stimulus",that's just retarded.
Let's see, how would I create jobs?
Waste $787 billion on shovel ready (chuckle) jobs, pass a new entitlement to give the Feds control over an additional one-sixth of the economy and threaten to have the EPA regulate CO2 as if it were mercury (nice lite bulbs!).
And demonize business owners.
Yeah, and maybe have a few $1.5 trillion deficits in a row.
That should keep unemployment below 8%, right?
So, you're either a liar or serously confused. $787 Billion was not authorized for "shovel ready jobs" and the rest of your post is nothing more than an insipid parroting of Right Wing propaganda.
$787 billion was promised to keep the unemployment rate below 8%.
I think a new unemployment number came out today.
Do you know what it was?
How many jobs is Obama's war on Big Oil creating?
So, you're either a liar or serously confused. $787 Billion was not authorized for "shovel ready jobs" and the rest of your post is nothing more than an insipid parroting of Right Wing propaganda.
$787 billion was promised to keep the unemployment rate below 8%.
I think a new unemployment number came out today.
Do you know what it was?
How many jobs is Obama's war on Big Oil creating?
The economy is a mess, no one disputes that. The fact that you and others on the right blame only Obama and only Democrats is clear and convincing evidence of your ignorance and partisanship.
Why lie and write that $787 billion was autorized for shovel ready projects? Did you not know the act had other provision including tax cuts?
War on big oil is hyperbole (a form of the lie). Our nation has had an energy crisis since the first oil embargo by OPEC, likely before you were born. The GOP has held the White House for twenty of the last 30 years, and under Bush II both the White House and both houses of Congress for the first four years of this decade. Holding big oil accountable isn't a war, though I suspect those who work in an industry which had free reign for years must feel so. Even so, if Obama has declared war on big oil, it sure hasn't hurt their bottom line.
So, you're either a liar or serously confused. $787 Billion was not authorized for "shovel ready jobs" and the rest of your post is nothing more than an insipid parroting of Right Wing propaganda.
$787 billion was promised to keep the unemployment rate below 8%.
I think a new unemployment number came out today.
Do you know what it was?
How many jobs is Obama's war on Big Oil creating?
The economy is a mess, no one disputes that. The fact that you and others on the right blame only Obama and only Democrats is clear and convincing evidence of your ignorance and partisanship.
Why lie and write that $787 billion was autorized for shovel ready projects? Did you not know the act had other provision including tax cuts?
War on big oil is hyperbole (a form of the lie). Our nation has had an energy crisis since the first oil embargo by OPEC, likely before you were born. The GOP has held the White House for twenty of the last 30 years, and under Bush II both the White House and both houses of Congress for the first four years of this decade. Holding big oil accountable isn't a war, though I suspect those who work in an industry which had free reign for years must feel so. Even so, if Obama has declared war on big oil, it sure hasn't hurt their bottom line.
