Is the GOP intentionally preventing a recovery?

[Synthaholic]

When you put money in the bank that means it isn't being invested?
Damn, how stupid are you?

The Bank of New York has started charging negative interest rates for large deposits. Just like I said they should. Just like you dismissed.

You need any of that explained to you?

Paying for insurance. Is the cost more then the interest paid?

What insurance? Link to your made-up, bullshit comments, please.

 

[Contumacious]

Is the GOP intentionally preventing a recovery?

If they are , they are using tools given to them by those , like you, who are of the fascist/socialist persuasion.

When Hitler came to power he used the same interventionist laws which have been adopted by previous administrations.


Those who cannot learn from history are condemned to repeat it?

George Santayana

.

 

[Full-Auto]

The Bank of New York has started charging negative interest rates for large deposits. Just like I said they should. Just like you dismissed.

You need any of that explained to you?

Paying for insurance. Is the cost more then the interest paid?

What insurance? Link to your made-up, bullshit comments, please.

You didnt read your own links? OH BROTHER

The cost is for the increased insurance required. Levied for those that have placed more cash in to an account above their normal monthly limit.



If you wish to stay with stupidity, I wont stop you.

 

[Dot Com]

5-star thread. Republicorp knows that their masters/the wealthy righties will contribute to them regardless of the condition of the economy because they're good water-carriers.

 

[Synthaholic]

Paying for insurance. Is the cost more then the interest paid?

What insurance? Link to your made-up, bullshit comments, please.

You didnt read your own links? OH BROTHER

The cost is for the increased insurance required. Levied for those that have placed more cash in to an account above their normal monthly limit.



If you wish to stay with stupidity, I wont stop you.

WHY they do it isn't my concern!

I stated that banks SHOULD do it, and it was dismissed by that wingnut poster. Then they DID IT. Which makes me look CORRECT while making that wingnut poster look WRONG. Especially when he uses 'comrade' references in dismissing what - evidently - is CAPITALISM.

 

[Toddsterpatriot]

What insurance? Link to your made-up, bullshit comments, please.

You didnt read your own links? OH BROTHER

The cost is for the increased insurance required. Levied for those that have placed more cash in to an account above their normal monthly limit.



If you wish to stay with stupidity, I wont stop you.

WHY they do it isn't my concern!

I stated that banks SHOULD do it, and it was dismissed by that wingnut poster. Then they DID IT. Which makes me look CORRECT while making that wingnut poster look WRONG. Especially when he uses 'comrade' references in dismissing what - evidently - is CAPITALISM.

You stated that the central bank should do it.
They're not.
That makes you wrong.
And stupid.

 

[Toddsterpatriot]

The Bank of New York has started charging negative interest rates for large deposits. Just like I said they should. Just like you dismissed.

You need any of that explained to you?

Do I need to explain the difference between customer deposits and excess reserves?

The Bank of New York has started charging negative interest rates for large deposits.

Just like I said they should.


You cannot spin your way out of your previous statements.

I won't spin out of my statement pointing out your ignorance.

 

[Full-Auto]

What insurance? Link to your made-up, bullshit comments, please.

You didnt read your own links? OH BROTHER

The cost is for the increased insurance required. Levied for those that have placed more cash in to an account above their normal monthly limit.



If you wish to stay with stupidity, I wont stop you.

WHY they do it isn't my concern!

I stated that banks SHOULD do it, and it was dismissed by that wingnut poster. Then they DID IT. Which makes me look CORRECT while making that wingnut poster look WRONG. Especially when he uses 'comrade' references in dismissing what - evidently - is CAPITALISM.

Then you ran your mouth and were exposed.

Dont bitch youre just a pointed out parrot.

 

[Synthaholic]

You didnt read your own links? OH BROTHER

The cost is for the increased insurance required. Levied for those that have placed more cash in to an account above their normal monthly limit.



If you wish to stay with stupidity, I wont stop you.

WHY they do it isn't my concern!

I stated that banks SHOULD do it, and it was dismissed by that wingnut poster. Then they DID IT. Which makes me look CORRECT while making that wingnut poster look WRONG. Especially when he uses 'comrade' references in dismissing what - evidently - is CAPITALISM.

You stated that the central bank should do it.
They're not.
That makes you wrong.
And stupid.

You're a liar. Show me where I ever said central bank.

 

[Synthaholic]

You didnt read your own links? OH BROTHER

The cost is for the increased insurance required. Levied for those that have placed more cash in to an account above their normal monthly limit.



If you wish to stay with stupidity, I wont stop you.

WHY they do it isn't my concern!

I stated that banks SHOULD do it, and it was dismissed by that wingnut poster. Then they DID IT. Which makes me look CORRECT while making that wingnut poster look WRONG. Especially when he uses 'comrade' references in dismissing what - evidently - is CAPITALISM.

Then you ran your mouth and were exposed.

Dont bitch youre just a pointed out parrot.

In what way? And why do you feel a need to defend Todd?

 

[Wry Catcher]

Is the GOP intentionally preventing a recovery?

If they are , they are using tools given to them by those , like you, who are of the fascist/socialist persuasion.

When Hitler came to power he used the same interventionist laws which have been adopted by previous administrations.


Those who cannot learn from history are condemned to repeat it?

George Santayana

.

I fully agree with Santayana and wonder why the New Right chooses to pursue policies which will eventually lead to civil unrest? I believe trickle down/supply side theory is a means to make America a plutocracy; the leaders of the Tea Party movement are plutocrats who have taken our country further down that road and Citizens United v. FEC forebodes the death of our Republic.

It is ironic that the working men and women of this country pay taxes and their interests are not represented by many members of the Congress - the sad part being that many who march in Tea Party parades don't understand they are supporting 'King George'. These 535 elected officials are beholden to the corporate crowd and the wealthies among us, an oligarchy who 'donate' money keeping them in power and buy (not influence) laws which protect the power elite at the expense of the hoi polloi.

Asserting I hold a "fascist/socialist persuasion" may make you feel superior or intellectually elite but it proves only that you're a partisan who holds opinions as immutable truths and that suggests a closed intellect locked by intolerance and a need to avoid congnitive dissonance at all costs.

 

[Toddsterpatriot]

Corporations have record cash on hand because they're reluctant to invest in expansion during this Administration's astounding hostility to business.

Why should they, when they know their success will be punished?

Raising their taxes will get them to invest. LOL!

I'm in favor of saying "invest it or it will be taxed".

Maybe we need to follow Sweden's lead and have a negative interest rate for excess bank reserves.

Here you go, dim one.

 

[Charles_Main]

My the Delusional thinking in this thread is astounding.

 

[Toddsterpatriot]

WHY they do it isn't my concern!

I stated that banks SHOULD do it, and it was dismissed by that wingnut poster. Then they DID IT. Which makes me look CORRECT while making that wingnut poster look WRONG. Especially when he uses 'comrade' references in dismissing what - evidently - is CAPITALISM.

Then you ran your mouth and were exposed.

Dont bitch youre just a pointed out parrot.

In what way? And why do you feel a need to defend Todd?

Why would my exposure of your idiocy need defending?

 

[Wry Catcher]

My the Delusional thinking in this thread is astounding.

Really! Hard to believe some can be deluded to believe the GOP is fiscally conservative, yet some do. Or that the GOP is stronger on defense. Considering the incongrous beliefs of the GOP such as, throwing money at education is wasteful, but throwing money to the defense industry is not.

 

[hippie2049]

Mitch McConnell agrees with Chuck. I'd provide video but this my first post and I need at least 15 posts before I can post a url. Anyhow Mitch is quoted as saying "Our top political priority should be to deny Obama a second term."

Cutting spending in a recession or during the recovery of a recession is a terrible practice.

 

[KissMy]

Mitch McConnell agrees with Chuck. I'd provide video but this my first post and I need at least 15 posts before I can post a url. Anyhow Mitch is quoted as saying "Our top political priority should be to deny Obama a second term."

Cutting spending in a recession or during the recovery of a recession is a terrible practice.

If Congress Just Cut Future Spending In The Debt Limit Bill, Then Why Are The Unfunded Liabilities Climbing?

See: US Debt Clock

Social Security, Prescription Drug, Medicare & Total US Unfunded Liabilities are all still climbing rapidly. They are currently around $115 Trillion.

 

[hippie2049]

Mitch McConnell agrees with Chuck. I'd provide video but this my first post and I need at least 15 posts before I can post a url. Anyhow Mitch is quoted as saying "Our top political priority should be to deny Obama a second term."

Cutting spending in a recession or during the recovery of a recession is a terrible practice.

If Congress Just Cut Future Spending In The Debt Limit Bill, Then Why Are The Unfunded Liabilities Climbing?

Social Security, Prescription Drug, Medicare & Total US Unfunded Liabilities are all still climbing rapidly. They are currently around $115 Trillion.

Unfunded liabilities continue to rise because they are unfunded, congress did not cut them enough or completely, and tricky accounting by not including them in our debt.

I agree that the US carries too much debt. The government needs to curtail spending and raise taxes, but not now. The debt is a long term problem, the sad shape of our economy is an immediate problem. Our top priority should be to revive the economy. Cutting spending will cost jobs and revenue. The bailout should have been two-fold: one part to target the financial institutions and the other to target the demand side via public works. The US economy has a demand side problem in that unemployment and home foreclosures are both high so people are afraid to spend. Due to the lack in demand the recovery is slow which makes banks wary of lending. We need to grow our GDP and get people back to work, and when the economy is healthy we should target the debt.

To quote you I had to remove your link because I am not allowed urls.

 

[Wry Catcher]

Mitch McConnell agrees with Chuck. I'd provide video but this my first post and I need at least 15 posts before I can post a url. Anyhow Mitch is quoted as saying "Our top political priority should be to deny Obama a second term."

Cutting spending in a recession or during the recovery of a recession is a terrible practice.

If Congress Just Cut Future Spending In The Debt Limit Bill, Then Why Are The Unfunded Liabilities Climbing?

See: US Debt Clock

Social Security, Prescription Drug, Medicare & Total US Unfunded Liabilities are all still climbing rapidly. They are currently around $115 Trillion.

Social Security would be fine if it had been placed in a locked box and not spent by The Congress. It seems the RX drug act was one more effort to get money from hard working Americans, many who had retired, and redistriubte their incomes to the shareholders of and executives employed by Big Pharma.

Income taxe paid by working Americans - and those who are retired - fund fiascos like the invasion and occupation of Iraq and failures such as the war on drugs, the war on poverty and the war on terror.

The Republican Party is now under the command and control of radicals who hold this truth to be self evident: I got mine, screw eveyone else. Don't think for a minute Boehner's first priority is you, his focus is on keeping the Speaker's gavel; Cantor's goal is taking it from him.

 

[KissMy]

Mitch McConnell agrees with Chuck. I'd provide video but this my first post and I need at least 15 posts before I can post a url. Anyhow Mitch is quoted as saying "Our top political priority should be to deny Obama a second term."

Cutting spending in a recession or during the recovery of a recession is a terrible practice.

If Congress Just Cut Future Spending In The Debt Limit Bill, Then Why Are The Unfunded Liabilities Climbing?

See: US Debt Clock

Social Security, Prescription Drug, Medicare & Total US Unfunded Liabilities are all still climbing rapidly. They are currently around $115 Trillion.

Social Security would be fine if it had been placed in a locked box and not spent by The Congress. It seems the RX drug act was one more effort to get money from hard working Americans, many who had retired, and redistriubte their incomes to the shareholders of and executives employed by Big Pharma.

Income taxe paid by working Americans - and those who are retired - fund fiascos like the invasion and occupation of Iraq and failures such as the war on drugs, the war on poverty and the war on terror.

The Republican Party is now under the command and control of radicals who hold this truth to be self evident: I got mine, screw eveyone else. Don't think for a minute Boehner's first priority is you, his focus is on keeping the Speaker's gavel; Cantor's goal is taking it from him.

Social Security was placed in a locked box. Democrats should never have let LBJ unify the budget. This is exactly why you can't trust the government with your money.