Is this story true?

So the claim here is that blacks and single moms can't do things for themselves and need the Government to provide it for them? Sounds a bit racist and sexist to me.

Yup and who says the taxpayers have to bankroll these folks. Let em get a job and take care of themselves. If they had to pay their own way they might think about having another illegitimate kid that someone else has to support.

Sympathy: Sorry I could give shit one.
 
So you guys destroyed the health care system for no reason? That doesn't seem very smart.
That's what Statists do...focus on the wrong problem. Have a leak in the roof? Tear down the entire building instead of repairing the leak.
Bad roof, bad building in this case. The new one will hold many more people but it won't be as fancy, and it will cheaper to heat.

thats for the regular people....how about the house they build for the rich people?....
 
That's what Statists do...focus on the wrong problem. Have a leak in the roof? Tear down the entire building instead of repairing the leak.
Bad roof, bad building in this case. The new one will hold many more people but it won't be as fancy, and it will cheaper to heat.

thats for the regular people....how about the house they build for the rich people?....
The rich will do what they always do, buy their access to a better system.
 
Last edited:
So you guys destroyed the health care system for no reason? That doesn't seem very smart.
That's what Statists do...focus on the wrong problem. Have a leak in the roof? Tear down the entire building instead of repairing the leak.
Bad roof, bad building in this case. The new one will hold many more people but it won't be as fancy, and it will be cheaper to heat.

Nothing wrong with the building that wasn't caused by government intrusion into the management of the building.

However, I am fully convinced that adding a large number of patients to the system while reducing the number of providers cannot have a positive effect on quality of health care. But, not being a lamebrain liberal/socialist, I could be wrong. Perhaps there really is such a thing as a free lunch.
 
Wasn't ObamaCare supposed to fix all that was wrong with healthcare...
Nope.

So you guys destroyed the health care system for no reason? That doesn't seem very smart.

And here is the irony...

The GOP said the following.....
1) The ACA will NOT be deficit neutral
2) The ACA will likely cost many Americans an increase in cost of ;policies
3) The ACA will likely result in the loss of preferred doctor
4) The ACA will likely result in the loss of preferred policy

And over 40 times they tried to have it repealed at the cost of reputation and criticism.

And now that it has all of the above mentioned AND predicted problems?

The democrats are blaming the GOP for not coming up with ideas to fix it.
 
If the obama media said it's true, it's true. It is also true that 70% of poor blacks and single mothers live in major metropolitian centers with democrat mayors.

This is almost like confirmation. When Katz deflects you know its true
 
I saw a report on TV that said 70% of poor blacks and single moms live in the 26 states where white Republican Governors refused health care for poor blacks and single moms.

Is that true?

If the fall within the poverty line they receive healthcare.
 
That's what Statists do...focus on the wrong problem. Have a leak in the roof? Tear down the entire building instead of repairing the leak.
Bad roof, bad building in this case. The new one will hold many more people but it won't be as fancy, and it will be cheaper to heat.

Nothing wrong with the building that wasn't caused by government intrusion into the management of the building.

However, I am fully convinced that adding a large number of patients to the system while reducing the number of providers cannot have a positive effect on quality of health care. But, not being a lamebrain liberal/socialist, I could be wrong. Perhaps there really is such a thing as a free lunch.
There is no free lunch. There are problems and there are solutions better or worse, and the fix for this what other Western nations use not what the US has mostly gotten away with for the last six decades.
 
I saw a report on TV that said 70% of poor blacks and single moms live in the 26 states where white Republican Governors refused health care for poor blacks and single moms.

Is that true?

Obama fixed it, remember? If there is a problem democrats own it now.
 
Bad roof, bad building in this case. The new one will hold many more people but it won't be as fancy, and it will cheaper to heat.

thats for the regular people....how about the house they build for the rich people?....
The rich will do what they always do, buy their access to a better system.

even a Democrat rich guy?.....Franco and a few other liberals here say their rich people are different,they have your back.....they just dont do things like that.....they would give up their wealth to help us poor regular slobs......
 
thats for the regular people....how about the house they build for the rich people?....
The rich will do what they always do, buy their access to a better system.

even a Democrat rich guy?.....Franco and a few other liberals here say their rich people are different,they have your back.....they just dont do things like that.....they would give up their wealth to help us poor regular slobs......

you mean like John Kerry....multi millionaire who bought his yacht in a non tax state so he did not have to pay sales tax in his own state?
 
I saw a report on TV that said 70% of poor blacks and single moms live in the 26 states where white Republican Governors refused health care for poor blacks and single moms.

Is that true?

Dunno. Would say though that often what's said on tv news is true, but phrased in a highly specific way so that the greater point might be untrue, but as-phrased it is true. Like "Over half the sky is not-blue (oweing to night-side, and clouds.)" = True. "The sky is blue." Also true but only from a specific point-of-view. TV News often states things like this. So while it may be true, it might only be true in a very specific context.

In the cited instance, it might be true, but as phrased be a false equivilency. In that the poor blacks and single moms might well be poor but have nohting to do with refusal of health care, or that they're in states with Republican governors.

Is it possible that these single mothers are part of these 14 million?

Here is a link of a private Blue Cross study that raised that issue: http://coverageforall.org/pdf/BC-BS_Uninsured-America.pdf
"Of the 44.7 million non-elderly uninsured individuals identified in the 2004 Census Current Population Survey (CPS) data,
nearly one-third — almost 14 million —
were reachable through existing government health programs such as Medicaid and the State Children’s Health Insurance Program (SCHIP) under current rules!

.........AND Obama counted them as part of the 46 million uninsured even though all his CMS had to do is register them!

So why are they counted as "uninsured" more like UNINFORMED as maybe these single black moms are!
 
The rich will do what they always do, buy their access to a better system.

even a Democrat rich guy?.....Franco and a few other liberals here say their rich people are different,they have your back.....they just dont do things like that.....they would give up their wealth to help us poor regular slobs......

you mean like John Kerry....multi millionaire who bought his yacht in a non tax state so he did not have to pay sales tax in his own state?
You don't get rich by paying all the taxes you either could or should. The rich do not appreciate the Taxman. Their politics matters very little, if at all.
 
I saw a report on TV that said 70% of poor blacks and single moms live in the 26 states where white Republican Governors refused health care for poor blacks and single moms.

Is that true?

Dunno. Would say though that often what's said on tv news is true, but phrased in a highly specific way so that the greater point might be untrue, but as-phrased it is true. Like "Over half the sky is not-blue (oweing to night-side, and clouds.)" = True. "The sky is blue." Also true but only from a specific point-of-view. TV News often states things like this. So while it may be true, it might only be true in a very specific context.

In the cited instance, it might be true, but as phrased be a false equivilency. In that the poor blacks and single moms might well be poor but have nohting to do with refusal of health care, or that they're in states with Republican governors.

Is it possible that these single mothers are part of these 14 million?

Here is a link of a private Blue Cross study that raised that issue: http://coverageforall.org/pdf/BC-BS_Uninsured-America.pdf
"Of the 44.7 million non-elderly uninsured individuals identified in the 2004 Census Current Population Survey (CPS) data,
nearly one-third — almost 14 million —
were reachable through existing government health programs such as Medicaid and the State Children’s Health Insurance Program (SCHIP) under current rules!

.........AND Obama counted them as part of the 46 million uninsured even though all his CMS had to do is register them!

So why are they counted as "uninsured" more like UNINFORMED as maybe these single black moms are!
 
The rich will do what they always do, buy their access to a better system.

even a Democrat rich guy?.....Franco and a few other liberals here say their rich people are different,they have your back.....they just dont do things like that.....they would give up their wealth to help us poor regular slobs......

you mean like John Kerry....multi millionaire who bought his yacht in a non tax state so he did not have to pay sales tax in his own state?

that fucker has someone lay out his underwear for christsakes....
 
even a Democrat rich guy?.....Franco and a few other liberals here say their rich people are different,they have your back.....they just dont do things like that.....they would give up their wealth to help us poor regular slobs......

you mean like John Kerry....multi millionaire who bought his yacht in a non tax state so he did not have to pay sales tax in his own state?
You don't get rich by paying all the taxes you either could or should. The rich do not appreciate the Taxman. Their politics matters very little, if at all.

tell that to Franco.....im sure you will be called a rwdupe hater.....with a ...lol at the end....
 
even a Democrat rich guy?.....Franco and a few other liberals here say their rich people are different,they have your back.....they just dont do things like that.....they would give up their wealth to help us poor regular slobs......

you mean like John Kerry....multi millionaire who bought his yacht in a non tax state so he did not have to pay sales tax in his own state?
You don't get rich by paying all the taxes you either could or should. The rich do not appreciate the Taxman. Their politics matters very little, if at all.

Are you saying everyone else appreciates the taxman? Lol.
 
you mean like John Kerry....multi millionaire who bought his yacht in a non tax state so he did not have to pay sales tax in his own state?
You don't get rich by paying all the taxes you either could or should. The rich do not appreciate the Taxman. Their politics matters very little, if at all.

Are you saying everyone else appreciates the taxman? Lol.

I, for one, love seeing just how much of the money I earn is taken from me each pay period. Sure I could use the money I earn, maybe invest it or buy something I want and stimulate the economy with my purchasing power, but it is far more invigorating to see the taxman take his share and leave me the rest to try to stretch.
 
Is this story true?

If you posted it without a source cite, then I doubt it.
 

Forum List

Back
Top