rhodescholar
Gold Member
- Banned
- #21
Demonstrating is a crime. Association is a crime. Speech is a crime.
You're mentally ill, it's really quite sad.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Demonstrating is a crime. Association is a crime. Speech is a crime.
They did nothing Shia Sherri? You were there? Sounds like you are making a complete fool of yourself by blindly defending without knowing the facts. Why don't you just![]()
Perhaps you can tell us what American kids would get if they threw firebombs at the authorities. In some Muslim countries, kids doing things like that would be shot dead in the street. However, maybe Frau Sherri thinks it is quite OK that Palestinian kids do this and should be let off with a friendly pat on the head.What did they do?
They were born Palestinian.
So... we're to believe that throwing firebombs is not a crime when the throw'ers are "Palestinian" and the throw'ees are Israeli?
They did nothing, allegations of Zio Nazis are rather meaningless.
How the fuck do you know what they did ? Were you there?
You are such a stupid bitch, and you make no sense when you talk
What did they do?
They were born Palestinian.
They were throwing firebombs a Israeli Military Checkpoint. Apparently the " lawyer" can't comphrehend what she's reading.![]()
![]()
Toasty, it makes sense in Bizarro Nazi-Sucking World where what passes for a 'heart' among such pious pseudo-pacifist prevaricators resides........
L'il Nazi-suckers like that imagine that screeching 'Zio Nazi' and 'genocide' and other conspiranutter BS filth is somehow an 'argument'....
They were born Palestinian.
They were throwing firebombs a Israeli Military Checkpoint. Apparently the " lawyer" can't comphrehend what she's reading.![]()
![]()
No, they were not. And that is not what is written in the article either. LEARN to read.
They were born Palestinian.
They were throwing firebombs a Israeli Military Checkpoint. Apparently the " lawyer" can't comphrehend what she's reading.![]()
![]()
No, they were not. And that is not what is written in the article either. LEARN to read.
They were throwing firebombs a Israeli Military Checkpoint. Apparently the " lawyer" can't comphrehend what she's reading.![]()
![]()
No, they were not. And that is not what is written in the article either. LEARN to read.
How do you know 'they were not'?
Where you there?
No, they were not. And that is not what is written in the article either. LEARN to read.
How do you know 'they were not'?
Where you there?
Accusations of Zionazis establish guilt of absolutely no crimes by anyone.
You claim they committed a crime, the burden is on you to prove it with real evidence, not fruits of Apartheid Kangaroo courts.
These courts have no legitimacy and are recognized as denying Palestinians their rights to fair trials, rights they have under intl law and inherent God given rights they have as human creations of God.
How do you know 'they were not'?
Where you there?
Accusations of Zionazis establish guilt of absolutely no crimes by anyone.
You claim they committed a crime, the burden is on you to prove it with real evidence, not fruits of Apartheid Kangaroo courts.
These courts have no legitimacy and are recognized as denying Palestinians their rights to fair trials, rights they have under intl law and inherent God given rights they have as human creations of God.
The closed circuit camera recordings will have captured the crimes on film.
Accusations of Zionazis establish guilt of absolutely no crimes by anyone.
You claim they committed a crime, the burden is on you to prove it with real evidence, not fruits of Apartheid Kangaroo courts.
These courts have no legitimacy and are recognized as denying Palestinians their rights to fair trials, rights they have under intl law and inherent God given rights they have as human creations of God.
The closed circuit camera recordings will have captured the crimes on film.
Well, let us see that evidence, Zionist!
And, when you do not present it, as it will be impossible for you to produce evidence of guilt when there is no guilt of a crime, you will be disclosed for all you are!
The closed circuit camera recordings will have captured the crimes on film.
Well, let us see that evidence, Zionist!
And, when you do not present it, as it will be impossible for you to produce evidence of guilt when there is no guilt of a crime, you will be disclosed for all you are!
The Court saw the evidence produced by the Israeli authorities. That is why they were found guilty.
Well, let us see that evidence, Zionist!
And, when you do not present it, as it will be impossible for you to produce evidence of guilt when there is no guilt of a crime, you will be disclosed for all you are!
The Court saw the evidence produced by the Israeli authorities. That is why they were found guilty.
Apartheid courts have no legitimacy.
Still waiting to see that evidence.
Each Palestinian is as guilty as Daniel was of committing a crime, before he was thrown into that lion's den, and Israeli detention is their lion's den.
No, they were not. And that is not what is written in the article either. LEARN to read.
How do you know 'they were not'?
Where you there?
Accusations of Zionazis establish guilt of absolutely no crimes by anyone.
You claim they committed a crime, the burden is on you to prove it with real evidence, not fruits of Apartheid Kangaroo courts.
These courts have no legitimacy and are recognized as denying Palestinians their rights to fair trials, rights they have under intl law and inherent God given rights they have as human creations of God.
I certainly do not envy Zionists facing the God whose creations they so deliberately mistreat, in such a horrid fashion. The wrath of God, that is something to contemplate!
Well, let us see that evidence, Zionist!
And, when you do not present it, as it will be impossible for you to produce evidence of guilt when there is no guilt of a crime, you will be disclosed for all you are!
The Court saw the evidence produced by the Israeli authorities. That is why they were found guilty.
Apartheid courts have no legitimacy.
Still waiting to see that evidence.
Each Palestinian is as guilty as Daniel was of committing a crime, before he was thrown into that lion's den, and Israeli detention is their lion's den.
How do you know 'they were not'?
Where you there?
Accusations of Zionazis establish guilt of absolutely no crimes by anyone.
You claim they committed a crime, the burden is on you to prove it with real evidence, not fruits of Apartheid Kangaroo courts.
These courts have no legitimacy and are recognized as denying Palestinians their rights to fair trials, rights they have under intl law and inherent God given rights they have as human creations of God.
I certainly do not envy Zionists facing the God whose creations they so deliberately mistreat, in such a horrid fashion. The wrath of God, that is something to contemplate!
So you were not there, and you basically admit of not having a clue.
Sher, words like "wrath of God" don't make you look sound overly sane.
I would have get checked by someone if I were you.
Accusations of Zionazis establish guilt of absolutely no crimes by anyone.
You claim they committed a crime, the burden is on you to prove it with real evidence, not fruits of Apartheid Kangaroo courts.
These courts have no legitimacy and are recognized as denying Palestinians their rights to fair trials, rights they have under intl law and inherent God given rights they have as human creations of God.
I certainly do not envy Zionists facing the God whose creations they so deliberately mistreat, in such a horrid fashion. The wrath of God, that is something to contemplate!
So you were not there, and you basically admit of not having a clue.
Sher, words like "wrath of God" don't make you look sound overly sane.
I would have get checked by someone if I were you.
When people like Sherry launch themselves into such feverish, chest-heaving, "wrath-of-god" screeching tirades, it's best to calm them with soothing, user friendly monosyllable terms until she can revisit her med prescriptions.