Shusha
Gold Member
- Dec 14, 2015
- 13,451
- 2,411
- Thread starter
- #361
You know. I think it all depends on what Tin man means by the word "Acquired".
Well, what he is trying to prove is that "Palestine" acquired land in the same way that Jordan, Syria, Lebanon and Iraq did. And then Israel stole it from "Palestine" using military force.
What he is having difficulty grasping is that there is no way to differentiate between "Palestine" and "Israel". Just as there is no way to differentiate between "Jordan" and the "Hashemite Kingdom of Jordan". They are the same legal entity -- a geographical label of a defined territory, which transitioned by achieving the four criteria necessary, to being States.
He is foolishly trying to prove that "Palestine" was indeed a State, even though it did not meet the criteria, while simutaneously trying to prove the "Israel" was not a State, even though it did meet the criteria.