Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Unlock unbeatable offers today. Shop here: https://amzn.to/4cEkqYs 🎁
moslem vs. Christian
moslem vs. Jew
moslem vs. Hindu
Anyone notice a pattern here?
From the FBI, dumbass!And where did that work of fiction come from? Why don't you list all the terrorist attacks from "Jewish Extremists". Oh wait, let me guess. 9/11, right?
moslem vs. Christian
moslem vs. Jew
moslem vs. Hindu
Anyone notice a pattern here?
Almost as often: moslem vs. moslem.
Those mass murders via car bombings of shia vs. sunni are spectacularly successful.
No they're not. Bill Clinton in his own words:
"The deal was so good that I couldn't believe that anyone would be foolish to say no.
-------------------------------
Is this the same guy who "pardoned" Marc Rich, who bribed his brother-in-law, Hugh Rodham?
The same guy who "did NOT have 'sex' with that little Jewish girl?
That guy is your reference on truth and justice?
Yes, that's him.
I don't like Bill Clinton but this is documented history. Not that facts or common sense would make any difference to anyone that supports the terrorists.
moslem vs. Christian
moslem vs. Jew
moslem vs. Hindu
Anyone notice a pattern here?
Yeah! In memorable words of Gabriel Schoenfeld "The FBI's failure to see clear warning signs in the Fort Hood case revives the question of whether it's up to the task of countering terrorism. Before his murderous rampage, Maj. Nidal Malik Hasan was exchanging e-mails with a radical Yemen-based imam with ties to the 9/11 hijackers. FBI investigators examined intercepts - and, finding that their "content was explainable by his research," concluded "that Hasan was not involved in terrorist activities or terrorist planning." It did not warn the Army of the potential menace."From the FBI, dumbass!And where did that work of fiction come from? Why don't you list all the terrorist attacks from "Jewish Extremists". Oh wait, let me guess. 9/11, right?
Had the US chosen NOT to invade and occupy two countries which had little to do with the 911 hijackers, murdering, maiming, displacing, and incarcerating millions of innocent Muslims along the way, Major Hasan would've had no reason to turn to terror. If one-third of the citizens of 1948 Palestine had chosen NOT to inflict a Jewish state on their country, 911 itself becomes less likely.Yeah! In memorable words of Gabriel Schoenfeld "The FBI's failure to see clear warning signs in the Fort Hood case revives the question of whether it's up to the task of countering terrorism. Before his murderous rampage, Maj. Nidal Malik Hasan was exchanging e-mails with a radical Yemen-based imam with ties to the 9/11 hijackers. FBI investigators examined intercepts - and, finding that their "content was explainable by his research," concluded "that Hasan was not involved in terrorist activities or terrorist planning." It did not warn the Army of the potential menace."From the FBI, dumbass!And where did that work of fiction come from? Why don't you list all the terrorist attacks from "Jewish Extremists". Oh wait, let me guess. 9/11, right?
Maj. Hassan was not a jihadist! He was just a person who wanted out of the military and did not want to be sent to Iraq. He wrote many letters to his commanding officers requesting a discharge, but to no avail. He went off, because they wouldn't let him out of the army.
Maj. Hassan was not a jihadist! He was just a person who wanted out of the military and did not want to be sent to Iraq. He wrote many letters to his commanding officers requesting a discharge, but to no avail. He went off, because they wouldn't let him out of the army.
Looks as if GeorgieP is an apologist for Muslim terrorists and and murderers. Not a big step from apologizing to helping out the muhajirun, eh Georgie?Had the US chosen NOT to invade and occupy two countries which had little to do with the 911 hijackers, murdering, maiming, displacing, and incarcerating millions of innocent Muslims along the way, Major Hasan would've had no reason to turn to terror. If one-third of the citizens of 1948 Palestine had chosen NOT to inflict a Jewish state on their country, 911 itself becomes less likely.Yeah! In memorable words of Gabriel Schoenfeld "The FBI's failure to see clear warning signs in the Fort Hood case revives the question of whether it's up to the task of countering terrorism. Before his murderous rampage, Maj. Nidal Malik Hasan was exchanging e-mails with a radical Yemen-based imam with ties to the 9/11 hijackers. FBI investigators examined intercepts - and, finding that their "content was explainable by his research," concluded "that Hasan was not involved in terrorist activities or terrorist planning." It did not warn the Army of the potential menace."From the FBI, dumbass![/size][/i]
Say your sorry. drivel!
I don't make apologies for the greatest purveyor of violence on earth because of an accident of birth, Hoss. Israel is a strategic asset in the US Empire, and, imho, that's the only reason the Jewish state exists in its present form today. I see Major Hasan as a victim of Empire who made the wrong choice about who's really at fault..."time served" would be my sentence.Looks as if GeorgieP is an apologist for Muslim terrorists and and murderers. Not a big step from apologizing to helping out the muhajirun, eh Georgie?Had the US chosen NOT to invade and occupy two countries which had little to do with the 911 hijackers, murdering, maiming, displacing, and incarcerating millions of innocent Muslims along the way, Major Hasan would've had no reason to turn to terror. If one-third of the citizens of 1948 Palestine had chosen NOT to inflict a Jewish state on their country, 911 itself becomes less likely.
Say your sorry. drivel!
Nuffin, Benedict.I don't make apologies for the greatest purveyor of violence on earth because of an accident of birth, Hoss. Israel is a strategic asset in the US Empire, and, imho, that's the only reason the Jewish state exists in its present form today. I see Major Hasan as a victim of Empire who made the wrong choice about who's really at fault..."time served" would be my sentence.Looks as if GeorgieP is an apologist for Muslim terrorists and and murderers. Not a big step from apologizing to helping out the muhajirun, eh Georgie?Had the US chosen NOT to invade and occupy two countries which had little to do with the 911 hijackers, murdering, maiming, displacing, and incarcerating millions of innocent Muslims along the way, Major Hasan would've had no reason to turn to terror. If one-third of the citizens of 1948 Palestine had chosen NOT to inflict a Jewish state on their country, 911 itself becomes less likely.
Say your sorry. drivel!
What's yours?
American? With that Gaza accent. Hoo boy!!!
You can't re-write history.I served in the military-----in fact part of my job was deciding WHO WAS UNFIT for service I assure you----anyone who wants out can get out. To suggest that a PSYCHIATRIST would not know how to get out of military service is quite a joke Hasan was and is a filthy and disgusting murdering pig. A doctor who murders his own patient population is not fit to be called HUMAN or even a slime mold------he did what he did for his disgusting and perverse "god" as a disgusting a perverse-----thing
I think its both dangerous and immoral to make excuses for the acts of a mass murder with slogans and cliches.Had the US chosen NOT to invade and occupy two countries which had little to do with the 911 hijackers, murdering, maiming, displacing, and incarcerating millions of innocent Muslims along the way, Major Hasan would've had no reason to turn to terror. If one-third of the citizens of 1948 Palestine had chosen NOT to inflict a Jewish state on their country, 911 itself becomes less likely.Yeah! In memorable words of Gabriel Schoenfeld "The FBI's failure to see clear warning signs in the Fort Hood case revives the question of whether it's up to the task of countering terrorism. Before his murderous rampage, Maj. Nidal Malik Hasan was exchanging e-mails with a radical Yemen-based imam with ties to the 9/11 hijackers. FBI investigators examined intercepts - and, finding that their "content was explainable by his research," concluded "that Hasan was not involved in terrorist activities or terrorist planning." It did not warn the Army of the potential menace."From the FBI, dumbass![/size][/i]
Say your sorry. drivel!
Unfortunately, that's not the case for Hassan.I think its both dangerous and immoral to make excuses for the acts of a mass murder with slogans and cliches’.
It should be clear by now that some ideologically inspired sociopathology is at work when the most heinous and vicious crimes are committed with such regularity within a group adhering to that ideology.
Nothing that I've read could be construed (at least by me), to indicate the actions of Hasan were "insane" or that he was “the victim of empire”, or that we should invent other excuses to provide an allowance for mass murder. In fact, his gun collecting and the distribution of his belongings prior to his mass murder indicated a rational, reasoned thought process… as much as planning a mass murder can be described as rational and reasoned.
History shows repeatedly that otherwise "pious Moslems" seem to have no trouble at all slaughtering infidels (and other moslems) as if they were cattle. This is simply because they have already defined the infidels and those other moslems as the chief cause of islam's ills.
Unfortunately, that's not the case for Hassan.I think its both dangerous and immoral to make excuses for the acts of a mass murder with slogans and cliches.
It should be clear by now that some ideologically inspired sociopathology is at work when the most heinous and vicious crimes are committed with such regularity within a group adhering to that ideology.
Nothing that I've read could be construed (at least by me), to indicate the actions of Hasan were "insane" or that he was the victim of empire, or that we should invent other excuses to provide an allowance for mass murder. In fact, his gun collecting and the distribution of his belongings prior to his mass murder indicated a rational, reasoned thought process as much as planning a mass murder can be described as rational and reasoned.
History shows repeatedly that otherwise "pious Moslems" seem to have no trouble at all slaughtering infidels (and other moslems) as if they were cattle. This is simply because they have already defined the infidels and those other moslems as the chief cause of islam's ills.
All he wanted, was to be out of the army.
Yeah, poor guy. That's all he wanted. Quite a legitimate excuse to open fire and massacre about 14 unarmed men and women during a military graduation ceremony.Unfortunately, that's not the case for Hassan.I think its both dangerous and immoral to make excuses for the acts of a mass murder with slogans and cliches’.
It should be clear by now that some ideologically inspired sociopathology is at work when the most heinous and vicious crimes are committed with such regularity within a group adhering to that ideology.
Nothing that I've read could be construed (at least by me), to indicate the actions of Hasan were "insane" or that he was “the victim of empire”, or that we should invent other excuses to provide an allowance for mass murder. In fact, his gun collecting and the distribution of his belongings prior to his mass murder indicated a rational, reasoned thought process… as much as planning a mass murder can be described as rational and reasoned.
History shows repeatedly that otherwise "pious Moslems" seem to have no trouble at all slaughtering infidels (and other moslems) as if they were cattle. This is simply because they have already defined the infidels and those other moslems as the chief cause of islam's ills.
All he wanted, was to be out of the army.
Gee somehow those are not the percentages reflected on the FBI's most wanted terrorist list? Did you pull these stats out of uranus?Except that muslim's are responsible for only 6% of all terrorist acts in the US since 1980.Yes, that's him.
I don't like Bill Clinton but this is documented history. Not that facts or common sense would make any difference to anyone that supports the terrorists.
moslem vs. Christian
moslem vs. Jew
moslem vs. Hindu
Anyone notice a pattern here?
The last 67 years of history shows repeatedly how Christians, pious and otherwise, are willing to slaughter thousands of children on the opposite side of the planet for a paycheck. Major Hasan committed his crime against soldiers which makes it slightly less reprehensible than American crimes committed during Desert Storm, a time period Hasan earned medals in.I think its both dangerous and immoral to make excuses for the acts of a mass murder with slogans and cliches.Had the US chosen NOT to invade and occupy two countries which had little to do with the 911 hijackers, murdering, maiming, displacing, and incarcerating millions of innocent Muslims along the way, Major Hasan would've had no reason to turn to terror. If one-third of the citizens of 1948 Palestine had chosen NOT to inflict a Jewish state on their country, 911 itself becomes less likely.
Say your sorry. drivel!
It should be clear by now that some ideologically inspired sociopathology is at work when the most heinous and vicious crimes are committed with such regularity within a group adhering to that ideology.
Nothing that I've read could be construed (at least by me), to indicate the actions of Hasan were "insane" or that he was the victim of empire, or that we should invent other excuses to provide an allowance for mass murder. In fact, his gun collecting and the distribution of his belongings prior to his mass murder indicated a rational, reasoned thought process as much as planning a mass murder can be described as rational and reasoned.
History shows repeatedly that otherwise "pious Moslems" seem to have no trouble at all slaughtering infidels (and other moslems) as if they were cattle. This is simply because they have already defined the infidels and those other moslems as the chief cause of islam's ills.
"Hasan's slaughter seems almost charitable by comparison."The last 67 years of history shows repeatedly how Christians, pious and otherwise, are willing to slaughter thousands of children on the opposite side of the planet for a paycheck. Major Hasan committed his crime against soldiers which makes it slightly less reprehensible than American crimes committed during Desert Storm, a time period Hasan earned medals in.I think its both dangerous and immoral to make excuses for the acts of a mass murder with slogans and cliches.Had the US chosen NOT to invade and occupy two countries which had little to do with the 911 hijackers, murdering, maiming, displacing, and incarcerating millions of innocent Muslims along the way, Major Hasan would've had no reason to turn to terror. If one-third of the citizens of 1948 Palestine had chosen NOT to inflict a Jewish state on their country, 911 itself becomes less likely.
Say your sorry. drivel!
It should be clear by now that some ideologically inspired sociopathology is at work when the most heinous and vicious crimes are committed with such regularity within a group adhering to that ideology.
Nothing that I've read could be construed (at least by me), to indicate the actions of Hasan were "insane" or that he was the victim of empire, or that we should invent other excuses to provide an allowance for mass murder. In fact, his gun collecting and the distribution of his belongings prior to his mass murder indicated a rational, reasoned thought process as much as planning a mass murder can be described as rational and reasoned.
History shows repeatedly that otherwise "pious Moslems" seem to have no trouble at all slaughtering infidels (and other moslems) as if they were cattle. This is simply because they have already defined the infidels and those other moslems as the chief cause of islam's ills.
"Case in point. Article 54 of the Geneva Conventions clearly states that destroying or rendering useless items essential to the survival of civilian populations is illegal under international law and a war crime.
"Hard then to explain the 1991 US bombing of electrical grids that powered 1,410 water-treatment plants for Iraq's 22 million people.
"An excerpt from a 1998 US Air Force document, entitled 'Strategic Attack,' chillingly explains: 'The electrical attacks proved extremely effective ... The loss of electricity shut down the capital's water treatment plants and led to a public health crisis from raw sewage dumped in the Tigris River.'
"A second US Defense Intelligence Agency document, 1991's 'Iraq Water Treatment Vulnerabilities,' predicted how sanctions would then be used to prevent Iraq from getting the equipment and chemicals necessary for water purification, which would result in 'a shortage of pure drinking water for much of the population' leading to 'increased incidences, if not epidemics, of disease.'"
46,900 Iraqi children died due to US bombs and UN sanctions.
Hasan's slaughter seems almost charitable by comparison.
Material Breach: US Crimes in Iraq
