Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
The reason for the crime rate falling does indeed change the "fact" you state. Anti-crime legislation caused the decrease in crime nationwide and if you want to tie a decreased crime rate to guns, consider that it may be because 15% less households now own guns.The fact the anti gunners cannot escape.......
More Americans bought guns starting in the 1990s.......all the way up to 357,000,000 million guns in 2016....and our gun murder rate went down.....our violent crime rate went down.......
No other argument they can make changes that fact....
Normal people owning and actually carrying guns does not increase the gun crime rate......
And as more proof.....
Britain confiscated guns....and their gun crime rate stayed the same.....
In fact....it went up 4% last year, and their violent crime rate went up 27%....after they confiscated guns....
You base it on LEGAL ownershipThat is why so few kids are killed with guns.....74.2 million kids......48 accidentally killed with guns in 2014....down from 2013 when 69 kids were killed accidentally with guns.......and this while 37,000,000 million new guns were purchased by new gun owners....again making your whole point about guns stupid.
More guns bought and carried, and the gun murder rate, the gun accident rate went down......not up.
The gun accident rate went up. You base it on ownership not the number of guns bought moron.
You think she was an illegal gun owner?
Pro-Gun Mom Shot By Son Must Take Gun Safety Class
So there's one
What about that article about Chicago you posted?
And accidents happen always have always will. If you really care about accidental deaths then why don't you concentrate on those accidents that kill far more that accidental gun shots?
The gun ones really should never happen. People need to use cars for tranportion. People need to bathe. Almost nobody ever needs a gun and the accidents are completely avoidable.
Well, well, well. You sure are quickly educating me back into my original stance of get rid of all the goddam things.Wait... I thought you sought compromise...?Keeping the rifles you have without detachable magazines, that don't shoot up to 12-20 people in one minute.We already have that.What have you offered the pro-gun side in return for, say, a ban on 'assault weapons'?
How about hunting rifles without detachable magazines? That don't shoot up to 12-20 people in one minute.
What do you offer us that we do not already have, in exchange or giving up something we already have?
How is it compromise to give you something without receiving something from you in return?
"Give me something and I'll let you keep something you already have" isn't a proposal for compromise, its a demand for acquiescence.
(And just so you know.... I have an old bolt-action Enfield that will fire 10 rounds in 10 seconds with a 5 second reload. That's 40+ dead people per minute)
The reason for the crime rate falling does indeed change the "fact" you state. Anti-crime legislation caused the decrease in crime nationwide and if you want to tie a decreased crime rate to guns, consider that it may be because 15% less households now own guns.The fact the anti gunners cannot escape.......
More Americans bought guns starting in the 1990s.......all the way up to 357,000,000 million guns in 2016....and our gun murder rate went down.....our violent crime rate went down.......
No other argument they can make changes that fact....
Normal people owning and actually carrying guns does not increase the gun crime rate......
And as more proof.....
Britain confiscated guns....and their gun crime rate stayed the same.....
In fact....it went up 4% last year, and their violent crime rate went up 27%....after they confiscated guns....
Those are also facts.
Well, well, well. You sure are quickly educating me back into my original stance of get rid of all the goddam things.Wait... I thought you sought compromise...?Keeping the rifles you have without detachable magazines, that don't shoot up to 12-20 people in one minute.We already have that.What have you offered the pro-gun side in return for, say, a ban on 'assault weapons'?
How about hunting rifles without detachable magazines? That don't shoot up to 12-20 people in one minute.
What do you offer us that we do not already have, in exchange or giving up something we already have?
How is it compromise to give you something without receiving something from you in return?
"Give me something and I'll let you keep something you already have" isn't a proposal for compromise, its a demand for acquiescence.
(And just so you know.... I have an old bolt-action Enfield that will fire 10 rounds in 10 seconds with a 5 second reload. That's 40+ dead people per minute)
I do think, though, that it would be a compromise to allow some hunting rifles rather than none. That is apparently what some people think the gun grabbers are after.
The reason for the crime rate falling does indeed change the "fact" you state. Anti-crime legislation caused the decrease in crime nationwide and if you want to tie a decreased crime rate to guns, consider that it may be because 15% less households now own guns.The fact the anti gunners cannot escape.......
More Americans bought guns starting in the 1990s.......all the way up to 357,000,000 million guns in 2016....and our gun murder rate went down.....our violent crime rate went down.......
No other argument they can make changes that fact....
Normal people owning and actually carrying guns does not increase the gun crime rate......
And as more proof.....
Britain confiscated guns....and their gun crime rate stayed the same.....
In fact....it went up 4% last year, and their violent crime rate went up 27%....after they confiscated guns....
Those are also facts.
. Sarah Palin has got to be thinking YESSSSSss. That battle ax who now is found out to be a republican assassin instead of a journalist, is gonna pay for her bull crap, and it's about time.
Is there something in the rest of Couric's documentary that concerns you? Y'all have sure been whining about this 8 second issue. I agree it was a dirty trick. It doesn't mean the rest of it isn't accurate. Way too much protest here, ladies.
Anytime a retard lib lies and gets caught they come up with some stupid excuse.
Is there something in the rest of Couric's documentary that concerns you? Y'all have sure been whining about this 8 second issue. I agree it was a dirty trick. It doesn't mean the rest of it isn't accurate. Way too much protest here, ladies.
You base it on LEGAL ownershipThat is why so few kids are killed with guns.....74.2 million kids......48 accidentally killed with guns in 2014....down from 2013 when 69 kids were killed accidentally with guns.......and this while 37,000,000 million new guns were purchased by new gun owners....again making your whole point about guns stupid.
More guns bought and carried, and the gun murder rate, the gun accident rate went down......not up.
The gun accident rate went up. You base it on ownership not the number of guns bought moron.
You think she was an illegal gun owner?
Pro-Gun Mom Shot By Son Must Take Gun Safety Class
So there's one
What about that article about Chicago you posted?
And accidents happen always have always will. If you really care about accidental deaths then why don't you concentrate on those accidents that kill far more that accidental gun shots?
The gun ones really should never happen. People need to use cars for tranportion. People need to bathe. Almost nobody ever needs a gun and the accidents are completely avoidable.
I thought your "total ban' stance was because the pro-gun side would not compromise.Well, well, well. You sure are quickly educating me back into my original stance of get rid of all the goddam things.Wait... I thought you sought compromise...?Keeping the rifles you have without detachable magazines, that don't shoot up to 12-20 people in one minute.We already have that.What have you offered the pro-gun side in return for, say, a ban on 'assault weapons'?
How about hunting rifles without detachable magazines? That don't shoot up to 12-20 people in one minute.
What do you offer us that we do not already have, in exchange or giving up something we already have?
How is it compromise to give you something without receiving something from you in return?
"Give me something and I'll let you keep something you already have" isn't a proposal for compromise, its a demand for acquiescence.
(And just so you know.... I have an old bolt-action Enfield that will fire 10 rounds in 10 seconds with a 5 second reload. That's 40+ dead people per minute)
The media have been engaging in this kind of deception for decades and are never held accountable for it. The sycophants don't mind being lied to as long as they're being told what they want to hear.
