Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
I've already said. But I don't mind repeating it for those with such limited capacity to retain information. Their powers include impeachment. It's up to them to decide if that's the road they want to go down.It's up to the [current] Attorney General. Should trump lose the next election, the new Attorney General will rise to his/her own determinations, at which time, Trump will no longer be shielded by being a sitting president. Meanwhile, it's up to the current Congress what to do for now within their powers.Nope, not at all....yep...
"That's not the correct way to say it," Mueller said. "We did not reach a determination as to whether the president committed a crime."
That statement was more in line with his report, and with his earlier opening statement to the Judiciary Committee, where he said, "Based on Justice Department policy and principles of fairness, we decided we would not make a determination as to whether the President committed a crime. That was our decision then and it remains our decision today."
Meaning there was not enough to indict. It is basic English. If there were enough they would and would impeach. That was what happened with Starr and Clinton. Again your fellow Leftists agree. You're an outlier.
He did not make any determination on criminality or the lack of criminality, when it came to the president, because he was not allowed to make an indictment, even if he did find colossal evidence that he committed a crime..... thus, he was not going to make a definitive decision that us in the public would see....
if you had watched the hearing, Mueller made that very clear... and thru the congressional questioning it became clear that the president likely committed obstruction of an official hearing, multiple times.... but Mueller was not going to hand down that determination, express such, out loud...
it is up to Congress to handle it in other constitutional means if they deem such is necessary, so that we do not become a lawless Nation, where the president, is above the law and constitution.
It's Mueller Time!
It’s up to the AG. This is tiresome. You see what you want to see.
And that would be? Step up, Fawn. You pussy.
Too late.You're a smart guy, why don't you read the report? That's not what it says.126 undisclosed meetings. "I love it". Flynn lied, manafort lied, gates lied, papadoulos lied, Cohen lied... All intelligence agencies and the report all agree Russia weighed in on tRump's side... tRump just recently said if offered information my a foreign government he would take it... WikiLeaks coordinated email dumps...
How much more do you need?
2 yrs
$25mil
No conspiracy no obstruction
How much more do you need?
Even CNN says the Republicans won
They've become rhetorical kamikazes. They've passed the the failsafe point and no longer have enough fuel to get back.
Does it hurt to be as mentally retarded as you?
Truthfully?
It hurts me to realize that in the time we find ourselves, there are so many grown people in places of great authority who have completely sold out to cynical surrender.
Not American greatness.
Plenty to go around.
NotTooBright has an acute TDS blind-spot. Trump could solve all the world's probs today and she'd be here tomorrow crediting Obama or denying it was so, and/or whining that it took him too long so it doesn't count.President Trump engages in hyperbole, humor that the MSM takes literally, misspeaks, gets facts wrong now and then. But he has kept faith with the American people, and nothing President Trump has ever done so far is even remotely anything like the lies told by Clinton or Obama or Hillary, etc.
I have to vehemently disagree with you on this. Trump does not have a sense of humor at all. NONE.
He is the most thin-skinned precious little flower that has ever held the oval office. He cannot handle even the mildest criticism.
I think most things he has done are pretty horrific. Far worse than any other president of my entire lifetime.
It's all a matter of which side of the fence you sit on. I am a target of his policies.
Since I think he can be funny as the dickens I strongly disagree that he has no sense of humor. I think everything he has done for America and Americans is turning out great. I love his policies. That's exactly why I voted for him actually. So we'll just have to disagree.
But TO WHOM have you been proven to be better ? That's a rhetorical question. I'll answer it. You've been proven and stiil are) to be a better SUCKER for the 13 (or 19 or however many) Hillary supporter lawyers who cleaned up a cool $35 Million, by scamming fools like you, who fell for the ruse of an "investigation", and you still think there actually was one.I have proven to be your better.
You're right to move on.
I've already said. But I don't mind repeating it for those with such limited capacity to retain information. Their powers include impeachment. It's up to them to decide if that's the road they want to go down.It's up to the [current] Attorney General. Should trump lose the next election, the new Attorney General will rise to his/her own determinations, at which time, Trump will no longer be shielded by being a sitting president. Meanwhile, it's up to the current Congress what to do for now within their powers.Nope, not at all....Meaning there was not enough to indict. It is basic English. If there were enough they would and would impeach. That was what happened with Starr and Clinton. Again your fellow Leftists agree. You're an outlier.
He did not make any determination on criminality or the lack of criminality, when it came to the president, because he was not allowed to make an indictment, even if he did find colossal evidence that he committed a crime..... thus, he was not going to make a definitive decision that us in the public would see....
if you had watched the hearing, Mueller made that very clear... and thru the congressional questioning it became clear that the president likely committed obstruction of an official hearing, multiple times.... but Mueller was not going to hand down that determination, express such, out loud...
it is up to Congress to handle it in other constitutional means if they deem such is necessary, so that we do not become a lawless Nation, where the president, is above the law and constitution.
It's Mueller Time!
It’s up to the AG. This is tiresome. You see what you want to see.
And that would be? Step up, Fawn. You pussy.
"If there were enough evidence he would."When you talk like an idiot you get treated like an idiot. Mueller never said there is not enough evidence to indict. Not once. Not in his report and not in his testimony. Those are your words, not his.LOLOLNo, it doesn't mean that. Mueller even explained he couldn't indict trump because trump is the sitting president and a sitting president can't be indicted. Not surprisingly, you're just not bright enough to understand.
Nope. He came back and stated there was not enough evidence. Keep trying.
No worries. Your derangement is noted, laughed at, and summarily discarded.
Talking down to me? LOL you chicken shit.
If there were enough evidence he would. Stating there was not enough to find a crime is the same thing. You pussy. Honestly. You’re a pussy. A wimp. A coward. If there was a smidgeon of wrongdoing he would have been impeached and the Leftists on MSNBC and CNN would not be crying.
"If there were enough evidence he would."When you talk like an idiot you get treated like an idiot. Mueller never said there is not enough evidence to indict. Not once. Not in his report and not in his testimony. Those are your words, not his.LOLOLNope. He came back and stated there was not enough evidence. Keep trying.
No worries. Your derangement is noted, laughed at, and summarily discarded.
Talking down to me? LOL you chicken shit.
If there were enough evidence he would. Stating there was not enough to find a crime is the same thing. You pussy. Honestly. You’re a pussy. A wimp. A coward. If there was a smidgeon of wrongdoing he would have been impeached and the Leftists on MSNBC and CNN would not be crying.
LOLOL
He said he couldn't because a sitting president can't be indicted. You'll never understand that because you lack the ability.
"His"..?.…. "report" ? Pheeeew! (high-pitched whistle;When you talk like an idiot you get treated like an idiot. Mueller never said there is not enough evidence to indict. Not once. Not in his report and not in his testimony. Those are your words, not his.
Our weak-minded Fauns will vote for ABT (Anyone But Trump) regardless of how onerous and anti-American … or perhaps because they are onerous and anti-American.I've already said. But I don't mind repeating it for those with such limited capacity to retain information. Their powers include impeachment. It's up to them to decide if that's the road they want to go down.It's up to the [current] Attorney General. Should trump lose the next election, the new Attorney General will rise to his/her own determinations, at which time, Trump will no longer be shielded by being a sitting president. Meanwhile, it's up to the current Congress what to do for now within their powers.Nope, not at all....
He did not make any determination on criminality or the lack of criminality, when it came to the president, because he was not allowed to make an indictment, even if he did find colossal evidence that he committed a crime..... thus, he was not going to make a definitive decision that us in the public would see....
if you had watched the hearing, Mueller made that very clear... and thru the congressional questioning it became clear that the president likely committed obstruction of an official hearing, multiple times.... but Mueller was not going to hand down that determination, express such, out loud...
it is up to Congress to handle it in other constitutional means if they deem such is necessary, so that we do not become a lawless Nation, where the president, is above the law and constitution.
It's Mueller Time!
It’s up to the AG. This is tiresome. You see what you want to see.
And that would be? Step up, Fawn. You pussy.
Except they don’t have enough to impeach and you know this. The Independent voters would turn on them and they would lose the 2020 election. You’re stupid. Russia interference started in mid 2016. Before Trump was even the fave. Mueller never investigated that, never looked into Glen Simpson, never looked into Christopher Steele. LMAO. Weak!!! Could not even opine on Fusion GPS. I am Not loyal to any party. Run someone better than Trump and I ll vote for them. But when all the candidates raise their hands to provide free healthcare for illegals and Bernie and Liz want to forgive college debt, they don’t leave me much choice. You, like a pussy will likely vote for Biden or Sanders. Weak!
Our weak-minded Fauns will vote for ABT (Anyone But Trump) regardless of how onerous and anti-American … or perhaps because they are onerous and anti-American.I've already said. But I don't mind repeating it for those with such limited capacity to retain information. Their powers include impeachment. It's up to them to decide if that's the road they want to go down.It's up to the [current] Attorney General. Should trump lose the next election, the new Attorney General will rise to his/her own determinations, at which time, Trump will no longer be shielded by being a sitting president. Meanwhile, it's up to the current Congress what to do for now within their powers.
And that would be? Step up, Fawn. You pussy.
Except they don’t have enough to impeach and you know this. The Independent voters would turn on them and they would lose the 2020 election. You’re stupid. Russia interference started in mid 2016. Before Trump was even the fave. Mueller never investigated that, never looked into Glen Simpson, never looked into Christopher Steele. LMAO. Weak!!! Could not even opine on Fusion GPS. I am Not loyal to any party. Run someone better than Trump and I ll vote for them. But when all the candidates raise their hands to provide free healthcare for illegals and Bernie and Liz want to forgive college debt, they don’t leave me much choice. You, like a pussy will likely vote for Biden or Sanders. Weak!
It's how some Cali and NY districts elect "glasses of water" as long as they have a big 'D' on 'em.
Leftarded Traitors … every one of 'em.
They are desperately searching for something that they can attempt to disparage Trump with, to reduce his popularity, as polls (responded to by Democrats) have him at about 50% (real polls with Republicans and minus illegal aliens, would have him at about 75%)He could recommend it. He completely retracted what he said to Lieu about obstruction and the report always stated there was no conspiracy. These are facts. Pussies like you don’t have the mental capacity to understand basic English.
Mueller could have concluded that crimes had been committed in his report if he had the evidence of such. Concluding that crimes have been committed is separate from the ability to indict a setting president. Had the Mueller report exposed Trump of committing high crimes or misdemeanors by laying out the evidence, the democrat led house would most certainly impeach Trump."If there were enough evidence he would."When you talk like an idiot you get treated like an idiot. Mueller never said there is not enough evidence to indict. Not once. Not in his report and not in his testimony. Those are your words, not his.LOLOLNope. He came back and stated there was not enough evidence. Keep trying.
No worries. Your derangement is noted, laughed at, and summarily discarded.
Talking down to me? LOL you chicken shit.
If there were enough evidence he would. Stating there was not enough to find a crime is the same thing. You pussy. Honestly. You’re a pussy. A wimp. A coward. If there was a smidgeon of wrongdoing he would have been impeached and the Leftists on MSNBC and CNN would not be crying.
LOLOL
He said he couldn't because a sitting president can't be indicted. You'll never understand that because you lack the ability.
I'd say she is protecting the Hysterical House Dems from themselves. Amazingly a 79 yr old woman from SAN FRAN is the only adult in their caucus.Pelosi keeps protecting Trump. What are YOU going to do about it?
Because you have no choice in the matter?Let her.
There WAS NO MUELLER REPORT. It was a façade made to look like an investigation, with a report at the end. Mueller was a quarter of a Million $$ ACTOR, who had to do nothing more than pose for cameras, and say nothing.Mueller could have concluded that crimes had been committed in his report if he had the evidence of such. Concluding that crimes have been committed is separate from the ability to indict a setting president. Had the Mueller report exposed Trump of committing high crimes or misdemeanors by laying out the evidence, the democrat led house would most certainly impeach Trump.
Your dream lays in smoldering ruins. Move on.Pelosi keeps protecting Trump. What are YOU going to do about it?LOLOLMueller could not make a case for obstruction.In terms of obstruction, Mueller did not report trump has not been found to have committed a crime. That's where your argument goes off the rails when you have to make up shit that isn't there.
Just how brain-dead are you? Mueller could not make a case because a sitting president can't be indicted, not because he didn't commit a crime.
In fact, Mueller's implication is that trump did commit obstruction of justice. It's now in Congress' hands to take action on it, if they so choose. And as I said earlier, I hope they don't. I hope they leave it up to the American electorate to decide trump's fate next year.
Let her.
"Except they don’t have enough to impeach and you know this. The Independent voters would turn on them and they would lose the 2020 election. You’re stupid."I've already said. But I don't mind repeating it for those with such limited capacity to retain information. Their powers include impeachment. It's up to them to decide if that's the road they want to go down.It's up to the [current] Attorney General. Should trump lose the next election, the new Attorney General will rise to his/her own determinations, at which time, Trump will no longer be shielded by being a sitting president. Meanwhile, it's up to the current Congress what to do for now within their powers.Nope, not at all....
He did not make any determination on criminality or the lack of criminality, when it came to the president, because he was not allowed to make an indictment, even if he did find colossal evidence that he committed a crime..... thus, he was not going to make a definitive decision that us in the public would see....
if you had watched the hearing, Mueller made that very clear... and thru the congressional questioning it became clear that the president likely committed obstruction of an official hearing, multiple times.... but Mueller was not going to hand down that determination, express such, out loud...
it is up to Congress to handle it in other constitutional means if they deem such is necessary, so that we do not become a lawless Nation, where the president, is above the law and constitution.
It's Mueller Time!
It’s up to the AG. This is tiresome. You see what you want to see.
And that would be? Step up, Fawn. You pussy.
Except they don’t have enough to impeach and you know this. The Independent voters would turn on them and they would lose the 2020 election. You’re stupid. Russia interference started in mid 2016. Before Trump was even the fave. Mueller never investigated that, never looked into Glen Simpson, never looked into Christopher Steele. LMAO. Weak!!! Could not even opine on Fusion GPS. I am Not loyal to any party. Run someone better than Trump and I ll vote for them. But when all the candidates raise their hands to provide free healthcare for illegals and Bernie and Liz want to forgive college debt, they don’t leave me much choice. You, like a pussy will likely vote for Biden or Sanders. Weak!
It's now in Congress' hands to take action on it, if they so choose. And as I said earlier, I hope they don't. I hope they leave it up to the American electorate to decide trump's fate next year.
I hope not. Let America decide next year.
Impeach him for what?
Faun: "They shouldn't impeach. There's not enough there to justify an impeachment"
Faun: "I've always said trump has done nothing worthy of impeachment and I hope Dems don't impeach him."
Faun: "Why would I know when I said I don't want him impeached?"
"It was bullshit when the GOP did it to Bill Clinton. It's bullshit now."
I couldn't agree more.
"Either way, I think the Dems in Congress should do it, because..."
That I disagree with. Impeachment is a big fucking deal and is not good for the country. If a House is going to impeach, it should only be for a good fucking reason.
Any day now!!!"Except they don’t have enough to impeach and you know this. The Independent voters would turn on them and they would lose the 2020 election. You’re stupid."I've already said. But I don't mind repeating it for those with such limited capacity to retain information. Their powers include impeachment. It's up to them to decide if that's the road they want to go down.It's up to the [current] Attorney General. Should trump lose the next election, the new Attorney General will rise to his/her own determinations, at which time, Trump will no longer be shielded by being a sitting president. Meanwhile, it's up to the current Congress what to do for now within their powers.
And that would be? Step up, Fawn. You pussy.
Except they don’t have enough to impeach and you know this. The Independent voters would turn on them and they would lose the 2020 election. You’re stupid. Russia interference started in mid 2016. Before Trump was even the fave. Mueller never investigated that, never looked into Glen Simpson, never looked into Christopher Steele. LMAO. Weak!!! Could not even opine on Fusion GPS. I am Not loyal to any party. Run someone better than Trump and I ll vote for them. But when all the candidates raise their hands to provide free healthcare for illegals and Bernie and Liz want to forgive college debt, they don’t leave me much choice. You, like a pussy will likely vote for Biden or Sanders. Weak!
LOL
You never learn.
Ever.
It's now in Congress' hands to take action on it, if they so choose. And as I said earlier, I hope they don't. I hope they leave it up to the American electorate to decide trump's fate next year.I hope not. Let America decide next year.Impeach him for what?Faun: "They shouldn't impeach. There's not enough there to justify an impeachment"
Faun: "I've always said trump has done nothing worthy of impeachment and I hope Dems don't impeach him."
Faun: "Why would I know when I said I don't want him impeached?""It was bullshit when the GOP did it to Bill Clinton. It's bullshit now."
I couldn't agree more.
"Either way, I think the Dems in Congress should do it, because..."
That I disagree with. Impeachment is a big fucking deal and is not good for the country. If a House is going to impeach, it should only be for a good fucking reason.
He could have but he said he chose not to because a sitting president can't be indicted."If there were enough evidence he would."When you talk like an idiot you get treated like an idiot. Mueller never said there is not enough evidence to indict. Not once. Not in his report and not in his testimony. Those are your words, not his.LOLOL
No worries. Your derangement is noted, laughed at, and summarily discarded.
Talking down to me? LOL you chicken shit.
If there were enough evidence he would. Stating there was not enough to find a crime is the same thing. You pussy. Honestly. You’re a pussy. A wimp. A coward. If there was a smidgeon of wrongdoing he would have been impeached and the Leftists on MSNBC and CNN would not be crying.
LOLOL
He said he couldn't because a sitting president can't be indicted. You'll never understand that because you lack the ability.
He could recommend it. He completely retracted what he said to Lieu about obstruction and the report always stated there was no conspiracy. These are facts. Pussies like you don’t have the mental capacity to understand basic English.
