It's Official: Clinton's Popular Vote Win Came Entirely From California

[BuckToothMoron]

In Denial

&w=480

Read more: A new poll shows an astonishing 52% of Republicans incorrectly think Trump won the popular vote

Only for the clueless and the Causeless.

It took California three weeks to figure it out. The South is still looking for their lost clue and their lost Cause.

The economy of California is the largest in the United States. As of 2015, California's gross state product (GSP) is about $2.496 trillion. The state's GSP grew 4.1% in 2015.--https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Economy_of_California

Let's evaluate CA according to Prog values: terrible income equality and white privilege in gated suburbs along the coast while poor brown people live in areas of high unemployment in the Federal induced water starved Central Valley. It's the Apartheid the Dems prefer.

That's your argument against 1 person 1 vote?

Amazing.

Reading comprehension challenged much? I was commenting on the Faux Miralcle CA Economy. Try keeping up.

there is no faux miracle in the Golden State; we really are like that.

California, the land of fruits and nuts.

And one of the biggest drivers to our nations economy

With a population of 33 million people that would seem logical. It takes a long time to murder a golden goose that large. But the progressives are working real hard at it...

Let's evaluate CA according to Prog values: terrible income equality and white privilege in gated suburbs along the coast while poor brown people live in areas of high unemployment in the Federal induced water starved Central Valley. It's the Apartheid the Dems prefer.

That's your argument against 1 person 1 vote?

Amazing.

Reading comprehension challenged much? I was commenting on the Faux Miralcle CA Economy. Try keeping up.

there is no faux miracle in the Golden State; we really are like that.

I've lived in CA since I was 2 years old. The state is technically insolvent if one uses proper accounting standards. The Dems and their public employee hench thugs have led a coup against working citizens. The Pension Tsunami of bloated benefits for votes will bankrupt the state and a lot of cities. It's going to be very ugly. I plan to be out of here before that happens.

And I ask for the 20th time.......what game was Hillary and Trump playing, and what constituted victory?

Was it, he/she who gets 270 electoral votes is the next President, or rather........he/she who gets the most popular vote wins the Presidency?

And if it was all about what the leftists say, why was Hillary in Michigan and Penn, the few days before the election, and NOT in California and New York?!?!?!

Next time your FAVORITE FOOTBALL team plays, I want to hear the other team say that the score doesn't count because we gained more yards, so you lost, lol! Nothing like trying to change the rules for victory to what you succeeded in to pretend you won. Must be because all of you younger leftists never had to lose since you all got participation trophies, hehehehehe.

A great sports analogy for the electoral system is a tennis match.

Player A Player B
Set 1. 0. 6
Set 2. 0. 6
Set 3 6. 4
Set 4. 6. 4
Set. 6. 4

Games
Won. 18. 24

Sets
Won. 3. 2

Winner of the match is PLAYER A, 3 sets to 2.

 

[NYcarbineer]

It doesn't. Under the electoral college, the North Dakota vote counts more.

Liberal math: 3>55.

See? Here's the truth. These idiots want North Dakota to have the same number of electoral votes as California.

wow you are stupid.

If N. Dakota had 55 EC votes and California had 55 EC votes, then the votes in N. Dakota would be greater.

However, the apportionment based upon population provides an even playing field and requires that the Candidates must be a candidate for all the people, not just the most populous centers. It also prevents the values of a single city from dictating to the entire country.

I don't understand you clowns. You demand that all the states adhere to one homogeneous central government, then demand that the rest of the country bow down to the will of just a few cities.

California has 50 times the population of North Dakota,

but only 18 times the number of electoral votes.

If electoral votes were doled out PROPORTIONATELY, North Dakota would have 3 and California would have about 150.

 

[Vigilante]

Democrats who are having trouble getting out of the first stage of grief — denial — aren't being helped by the fact that, now that all the votes are counted, Hillary Clinton's lead in the popular vote has topped 2.8 million, giving her a 48% share of the vote compared with Trumps 46%.

To those unschooled in how the United States selects presidents, this seems totally unfair. But look more closely at the numbers and you see that Clinton's advantage all but disappears.

As we noted in this space earlier, while Clinton's overall margin looks large and impressive, it is due to Clinton's huge margin of victory in one state — California — where she got a whopping 4.3 million more votes than Trump.

California is the only state, in fact, where Clinton's margin of victory was bigger than President Obama's in 2012 — 61.5% vs. Obama's 60%.

But California is the exception that proves the true genius of the Electoral College — which was designed to prevent regional candidates from dominating national elections.

(Excerpt) Read more at investors.com ...

Meanwhile, if you look at every other measure, Trump was the clear and decisive winner in this election.

Only if we consider our red States and their non, democrat voting habits.

Thank GOD, they understand democracy

^ THIS from the moron who wants Drumplethinskin to be a dictator.......

And BoDYKEa is the POS that wants to see America destroyed, both economically as well as morally!

 

[danielpalos]

That's your argument against 1 person 1 vote?

Amazing.

Reading comprehension challenged much? I was commenting on the Faux Miralcle CA Economy. Try keeping up.

there is no faux miracle in the Golden State; we really are like that.

I've lived in CA since I was 2 years old. The state is technically insolvent if one uses proper accounting standards. The Dems and their public employee hench thugs have led a coup against working citizens. The Pension Tsunami of bloated benefits for votes will bankrupt the state and a lot of cities. It's going to be very ugly. I plan to be out of here before that happens.

Pot got decriminalized. Tax receipts will solve our fiscal problems. All we really needed, was Commerce, well regulated.

If you seriously think that legalizing pot will generate enough tax income to save the CA economy, you must drink your bong water.

it may be more accurate than right wing fantasy. we will also be reducing our tax burden by not incarcerating Persons for practicing their natural rights.

 

[imawhosure]

It doesn't. Under the electoral college, the North Dakota vote counts more.

Liberal math: 3>55.

See? Here's the truth. These idiots want North Dakota to have the same number of electoral votes as California.

wow you are stupid.

If N. Dakota had 55 EC votes and California had 55 EC votes, then the votes in N. Dakota would be greater.

However, the apportionment based upon population provides an even playing field and requires that the Candidates must be a candidate for all the people, not just the most populous centers. It also prevents the values of a single city from dictating to the entire country.

I don't understand you clowns. You demand that all the states adhere to one homogeneous central government, then demand that the rest of the country bow down to the will of just a few cities.

California has 50 times the population of North Dakota,

but only 18 times the number of electoral votes.

If electoral votes were doled out PROPORTIONATELY, North Dakota would have 3 and California would have about 150.

Hey, who/whom decided how the electoral college works? Tell us, who!

 

[danielpalos]

Democrats who are having trouble getting out of the first stage of grief — denial — aren't being helped by the fact that, now that all the votes are counted, Hillary Clinton's lead in the popular vote has topped 2.8 million, giving her a 48% share of the vote compared with Trumps 46%.

To those unschooled in how the United States selects presidents, this seems totally unfair. But look more closely at the numbers and you see that Clinton's advantage all but disappears.

As we noted in this space earlier, while Clinton's overall margin looks large and impressive, it is due to Clinton's huge margin of victory in one state — California — where she got a whopping 4.3 million more votes than Trump.

California is the only state, in fact, where Clinton's margin of victory was bigger than President Obama's in 2012 — 61.5% vs. Obama's 60%.

But California is the exception that proves the true genius of the Electoral College — which was designed to prevent regional candidates from dominating national elections.

(Excerpt) Read more at investors.com ...

This country fucks California. Republicans living in Red States who depend on California constantly mock the state. Republicans are the permanent dependent class. They work for minimum wage, the few that do work. They get the bulk of welfare, medicare and Social Security. Obamacare helps them the most.

And yet, Wyoming has two senators representing a half million people, California also has two representing over 33 million.

California gives twice what Texas gives to the federal government and not just from oil and gas.

Republicans give California the finger with one hand and the other hand they hold out for "free stuff".

just the cognitive dissonance of the fantastical, right wing.

 

[Vigilante]

Democrats who are having trouble getting out of the first stage of grief — denial — aren't being helped by the fact that, now that all the votes are counted, Hillary Clinton's lead in the popular vote has topped 2.8 million, giving her a 48% share of the vote compared with Trumps 46%.

To those unschooled in how the United States selects presidents, this seems totally unfair. But look more closely at the numbers and you see that Clinton's advantage all but disappears.

As we noted in this space earlier, while Clinton's overall margin looks large and impressive, it is due to Clinton's huge margin of victory in one state — California — where she got a whopping 4.3 million more votes than Trump.

California is the only state, in fact, where Clinton's margin of victory was bigger than President Obama's in 2012 — 61.5% vs. Obama's 60%.

But California is the exception that proves the true genius of the Electoral College — which was designed to prevent regional candidates from dominating national elections.

(Excerpt) Read more at investors.com ...

This country fucks California. Republicans living in Red States who depend on California constantly mock the state. Republicans are the permanent dependent class. They work for minimum wage, the few that do work. They get the bulk of welfare, medicare and Social Security. Obamacare helps them the most.

And yet, Wyoming has two senators representing a half million people, California also has two representing over 33 million.

California gives twice what Texas gives to the federal government and not just from oil and gas.

Republicans give California the finger with one hand and the other hand they hold out for "free stuff".

You mean they act like DemocRATS!!!!...Self ownage, ...the best!

Hello, knock knock, it's the Democrats providing the "free stuff" nitwit.

Thank you for reenforcing just how fucked up you and the DemocRATS are....Build a permanent underclass and feed, clothes, and let them have drugs, and they will vote DemocRATic forever!!!

 

[NYcarbineer]

It doesn't. Under the electoral college, the North Dakota vote counts more.

Liberal math: 3>55.

See? Here's the truth. These idiots want North Dakota to have the same number of electoral votes as California.

wow you are stupid.

If N. Dakota had 55 EC votes and California had 55 EC votes, then the votes in N. Dakota would be greater.

However, the apportionment based upon population provides an even playing field and requires that the Candidates must be a candidate for all the people, not just the most populous centers. It also prevents the values of a single city from dictating to the entire country.

I don't understand you clowns. You demand that all the states adhere to one homogeneous central government, then demand that the rest of the country bow down to the will of just a few cities.

California has 50 times the population of North Dakota,

but only 18 times the number of electoral votes.

If electoral votes were doled out PROPORTIONATELY, North Dakota would have 3 and California would have about 150.

Hey, who/whom decided how the electoral college works? Tell us, who!

The same guys who thought women shouldn't vote and slavery was constitutional.

 

[Darkwind]

It doesn't. Under the electoral college, the North Dakota vote counts more.

Liberal math: 3>55.

See? Here's the truth. These idiots want North Dakota to have the same number of electoral votes as California.

wow you are stupid.

If N. Dakota had 55 EC votes and California had 55 EC votes, then the votes in N. Dakota would be greater.

However, the apportionment based upon population provides an even playing field and requires that the Candidates must be a candidate for all the people, not just the most populous centers. It also prevents the values of a single city from dictating to the entire country.

I don't understand you clowns. You demand that all the states adhere to one homogeneous central government, then demand that the rest of the country bow down to the will of just a few cities.

California has 50 times the population of North Dakota,

but only 18 times the number of electoral votes.

If electoral votes were doled out PROPORTIONATELY, North Dakota would have 3 and California would have about 150.

so tell Me then, how exactly are the EC votes apportioned? Maybe you'll find the answer there....

 

[imawhosure]

Liberal math: 3>55.

See? Here's the truth. These idiots want North Dakota to have the same number of electoral votes as California.

wow you are stupid.

If N. Dakota had 55 EC votes and California had 55 EC votes, then the votes in N. Dakota would be greater.

However, the apportionment based upon population provides an even playing field and requires that the Candidates must be a candidate for all the people, not just the most populous centers. It also prevents the values of a single city from dictating to the entire country.

I don't understand you clowns. You demand that all the states adhere to one homogeneous central government, then demand that the rest of the country bow down to the will of just a few cities.

California has 50 times the population of North Dakota,

but only 18 times the number of electoral votes.

If electoral votes were doled out PROPORTIONATELY, North Dakota would have 3 and California would have about 150.

Hey, who/whom decided how the electoral college works? Tell us, who!

The same guys who thought women shouldn't vote and slavery was constitutional.

So you are against our founding then. OK, good, why do you want to stay here then? We are racist, and homophobic, etc. Why is everyone trying to get into such a rotten country illegally?

Listen to this Carbear folks...........he hates how our country works. It isn't FAIR, and yet if it wasn't set up this way, the country would never have been here. Leftists LOSE EVERYWHERE but a few states, and he doesn't have a clue that it is he/she who is out of touch.

 

[BuckToothMoron]

Democrats who are having trouble getting out of the first stage of grief — denial — aren't being helped by the fact that, now that all the votes are counted, Hillary Clinton's lead in the popular vote has topped 2.8 million, giving her a 48% share of the vote compared with Trumps 46%.

To those unschooled in how the United States selects presidents, this seems totally unfair. But look more closely at the numbers and you see that Clinton's advantage all but disappears.

As we noted in this space earlier, while Clinton's overall margin looks large and impressive, it is due to Clinton's huge margin of victory in one state — California — where she got a whopping 4.3 million more votes than Trump.

California is the only state, in fact, where Clinton's margin of victory was bigger than President Obama's in 2012 — 61.5% vs. Obama's 60%.

But California is the exception that proves the true genius of the Electoral College — which was designed to prevent regional candidates from dominating national elections.

(Excerpt) Read more at investors.com ...

Bullshit all the votes in California were counted on election night. The 2.8 million vote lead she has now is from overseas military ballots. She started out on election night with a 500K popular vote lead and it's grown since then because of the all the overseas military ballots that have come in. Sometimes these can take weeks to get back. She is now up around a 3 million popular vote lead.

Tell CBS bitch boi. Why do idiots like you not do a simple search before posting?. It's an easy way to avoid looking like a complete defus.

Final Tally: Clinton Defeats Trump In California By 4.2 Million Votes
Final Tally: Clinton Defeats Trump In California By 4.2 Million Votes

 

[LeftofLeft]

Even when Democrats win, Conservstives don't complain about the Electoral College. Linear popular vote total determining the election is third world mentality. If Liberals are ready to toss the EC out, they are going to have to explain to small states how their votes will be equal to the large states. The EC already rewards popular vote to larger states with more EC votes (eg California).

Liberals, you lost. You ignored what was equally important in PA, OH, WI and now you are paying for it.

 

[BuckToothMoron]

It doesn't. Under the electoral college, the North Dakota vote counts more.

Liberal math: 3>55.

See? Here's the truth. These idiots want North Dakota to have the same number of electoral votes as California.

wow you are stupid.

If N. Dakota had 55 EC votes and California had 55 EC votes, then the votes in N. Dakota would be greater.

However, the apportionment based upon population provides an even playing field and requires that the Candidates must be a candidate for all the people, not just the most populous centers. It also prevents the values of a single city from dictating to the entire country.

I don't understand you clowns. You demand that all the states adhere to one homogeneous central government, then demand that the rest of the country bow down to the will of just a few cities.

California has 50 times the population of North Dakota,

but only 18 times the number of electoral votes.

If electoral votes were doled out PROPORTIONATELY, North Dakota would have 3 and California would have about 150.

The founders knew that smaller states would not agree to a proportional distribution, because the smaller states were concerned about larger states having too much control and power over the executive branch. And guess what, that is exactly why it will never be changed. Why would smaller states vote for it? 75% of the states need to approve the amendment. Perhaps you whinny Libs should start focusing on winning more states instead of more votes.

 

[HenryBHough]

The last time I checked California was part of the United states.

Keep checking.

Obama is still in office and Mexico may yet make a tempting offer........

 

[boedicca]

In Denial

&w=480

Read more: A new poll shows an astonishing 52% of Republicans incorrectly think Trump won the popular vote

Only for the clueless and the Causeless.

It took California three weeks to figure it out. The South is still looking for their lost clue and their lost Cause.

The economy of California is the largest in the United States. As of 2015, California's gross state product (GSP) is about $2.496 trillion. The state's GSP grew 4.1% in 2015.--https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Economy_of_California

Let's evaluate CA according to Prog values: terrible income equality and white privilege in gated suburbs along the coast while poor brown people live in areas of high unemployment in the Federal induced water starved Central Valley. It's the Apartheid the Dems prefer.

That's your argument against 1 person 1 vote?

Amazing.

Reading comprehension challenged much? I was commenting on the Faux Miralcle CA Economy. Try keeping up.

there is no faux miracle in the Golden State; we really are like that.

California, the land of fruits and nuts.

And one of the biggest drivers to our nations economy

With a population of 33 million people that would seem logical. It takes a long time to murder a golden goose that large. But the progressives are working real hard at it...

Let's evaluate CA according to Prog values: terrible income equality and white privilege in gated suburbs along the coast while poor brown people live in areas of high unemployment in the Federal induced water starved Central Valley. It's the Apartheid the Dems prefer.

That's your argument against 1 person 1 vote?

Amazing.

Reading comprehension challenged much? I was commenting on the Faux Miralcle CA Economy. Try keeping up.

there is no faux miracle in the Golden State; we really are like that.

I've lived in CA since I was 2 years old. The state is technically insolvent if one uses proper accounting standards. The Dems and their public employee hench thugs have led a coup against working citizens. The Pension Tsunami of bloated benefits for votes will bankrupt the state and a lot of cities. It's going to be very ugly. I plan to be out of here before that happens.

And I ask for the 20th time.......what game was Hillary and Trump playing, and what constituted victory?

Was it, he/she who gets 270 electoral votes is the next President, or rather........he/she who gets the most popular vote wins the Presidency?

And if it was all about what the leftists say, why was Hillary in Michigan and Penn, the few days before the election, and NOT in California and New York?!?!?!

Next time your FAVORITE FOOTBALL team plays, I want to hear the other team say that the score doesn't count because we gained more yards, so you lost, lol! Nothing like trying to change the rules for victory to what you succeeded in to pretend you won. Must be because all of you younger leftists never had to lose since you all got participation trophies, hehehehehe.

The Constitution is quite clear regarding the role of the Electoral College.

hiLIARy assumed she had already won that, so focused on beefing up the popular vote. She misjudged and lost.

 

[Meathead]

It doesn't. Under the electoral college, the North Dakota vote counts more.

Liberal math: 3>55.

In North Dakota, Trump got 1 electoral vote for every 73,000 votes he received.

In California, Clinton got 1 electoral vote for every 159,160 votes she received.

IOW, a N Dakota electoral vote is worth more than double a California electoral vote.

A minuscule difference in the state's popular vote can deliver 55 EC votes in California but only 3 in ND.

North Dakota has less than 800,000 PEOPLE you retard.

Stop whining. You got the electoral votes from Rhode Island. Delaware, Vermont and DC, which isn't even a state.

Put your big girl pantsuit on.

 

[12icer]

The REAL FACT is If they NEGATED CALIFORNIA she WOULD LOOSE the POPULAR VOTE BY AS MUCH AS SHE IS LEADING by, SO CALIFORNIA IS RESPONSIBLE FOR HER LEAD, and SHE ACTUALLY LOOSES By a margin that would be unprecedented. It is easy to track reality if you want, but SHE LOST THE ELECTION, and all of your crying trying to change the rules and the outcome will fail. It should be a wakeup call to let you liberals know to stop pushing, attacking, name calling and harassing everyone else before we REALLY get tired of it, but you are too egotistical, vain and stupid to realize when you got slapped lightly, and are about to get bitch slapped.

 

[Art__Allm]

The last time I checked California was part of the United states.

Mexicans believe that they have already "reconquered" this territory, they burn American flags, they wave Mexican flags... and they illegally vote for cucks, like Killary.

 

[bodecea]

California: Land Of The Stupid. All votes for Hillary should be deducted!!!

In a fascist dictatorship....you'd like that. But then again, you aren't an American.

 

[Toro]

The REAL FACT is If they NEGATED CALIFORNIA she WOULD LOOSE the POPULAR VOTE BY AS MUCH AS SHE IS LEADING by, SO CALIFORNIA IS RESPONSIBLE FOR HER LEAD, and SHE ACTUALLY LOOSES By a margin that would be unprecedented. It is easy to track reality if you want, but SHE LOST THE ELECTION, and all of your crying trying to change the rules and the outcome will fail. It should be a wakeup call to let you liberals know to stop pushing, attacking, name calling and harassing everyone else before we REALLY get tired of it, but you are too egotistical, vain and stupid to realize when you got slapped lightly, and are about to get bitch slapped.

You sound like an Internet tough guy.

I guess everyone should be very scared!