It's Official: Clinton's Popular Vote Win Came Entirely From California

It doesn't. Under the electoral college, the North Dakota vote counts more.
Liberal math: 3>55.

See? Here's the truth. These idiots want North Dakota to have the same number of electoral votes as California.
wow you are stupid.

If N. Dakota had 55 EC votes and California had 55 EC votes, then the votes in N. Dakota would be greater.

However, the apportionment based upon population provides an even playing field and requires that the Candidates must be a candidate for all the people, not just the most populous centers. It also prevents the values of a single city from dictating to the entire country.

I don't understand you clowns. You demand that all the states adhere to one homogeneous central government, then demand that the rest of the country bow down to the will of just a few cities.
 
California: Land Of The Stupid. All votes for Hillary should be deducted!!!
Only for the clueless and the Causeless.

It took California three weeks to figure it out. The South is still looking for their lost clue and their lost Cause.

The economy of California is the largest in the United States. As of 2015, California's gross state product (GSP) is about $2.496 trillion. The state's GSP grew 4.1% in 2015.--https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Economy_of_California


Let's evaluate CA according to Prog values: terrible income equality and white privilege in gated suburbs along the coast while poor brown people live in areas of high unemployment in the Federal induced water starved Central Valley. It's the Apartheid the Dems prefer.
even a Golden State may have problems. we also have solutions; unlike the right.


Oh Puh-leeeze. Here are some of the "solutions" being pushed by One Party Control in CA:

- Cancelling the water project in the 1970s so that virtually no additional water storage was built while the population increased by tens of millions.
- Dumping stored water (during a drought no less) in the futile attempt to revive salmon runs that dried up a century ago.
- Bullet train to nowhere.
- Road Diets in congested areas which consist of eliminating lanes for cars and adding bicycle paths in their place.
- Severe zoning restrictions which drive housing costs out of reach of average workers and lead to things like the Ghost Ship fire.
- Inflated minimum wage laws that drive small businesses out of business.

For starters.
 
In Denial
wood.png
&w=480

Read more: A new poll shows an astonishing 52% of Republicans incorrectly think Trump won the popular vote
 
California: Land Of The Stupid. All votes for Hillary should be deducted!!!
Only for the clueless and the Causeless.

It took California three weeks to figure it out. The South is still looking for their lost clue and their lost Cause.

The economy of California is the largest in the United States. As of 2015, California's gross state product (GSP) is about $2.496 trillion. The state's GSP grew 4.1% in 2015.--https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Economy_of_California


Let's evaluate CA according to Prog values: terrible income equality and white privilege in gated suburbs along the coast while poor brown people live in areas of high unemployment in the Federal induced water starved Central Valley. It's the Apartheid the Dems prefer.

That's your argument against 1 person 1 vote?

Amazing.

Reading comprehension challenged much? I was commenting on the Faux Miralcle CA Economy. Try keeping up.
there is no faux miracle in the Golden State; we really are like that.
 
California: Land Of The Stupid. All votes for Hillary should be deducted!!!
Only for the clueless and the Causeless.

It took California three weeks to figure it out. The South is still looking for their lost clue and their lost Cause.

The economy of California is the largest in the United States. As of 2015, California's gross state product (GSP) is about $2.496 trillion. The state's GSP grew 4.1% in 2015.--https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Economy_of_California


Let's evaluate CA according to Prog values: terrible income equality and white privilege in gated suburbs along the coast while poor brown people live in areas of high unemployment in the Federal induced water starved Central Valley. It's the Apartheid the Dems prefer.
even a Golden State may have problems. we also have solutions; unlike the right.


Oh Puh-leeeze. Here are some of the "solutions" being pushed by One Party Control in CA:

- Cancelling the water project in the 1970s so that virtually no additional water storage was built while the population increased by tens of millions.
- Dumping stored water (during a drought no less) in the futile attempt to revive salmon runs that dried up a century ago.
- Bullet train to nowhere.
- Road Diets in congested areas which consist of eliminating lanes for cars and adding bicycle paths in their place.
- Severe zoning restrictions which drive housing costs out of reach of average workers and lead to things like the Ghost Ship fire.
- Inflated minimum wage laws that drive small businesses out of business.

For starters.
the right didn't even want to consider, any of it. that was the starter.

improvements are being made everyday. we simply need to encourage technology and beavers.
 
California, the land of fruits and nuts.
And one of the biggest drivers to our nations economy





With a population of 33 million people that would seem logical. It takes a long time to murder a golden goose that large. But the progressives are working real hard at it...
Doesn't seem that way to me. All I seem to hear, is how the right can't handle it and has to whine about taxes and regulations, instead of making like Henry Ford and doubling wages.
 
California: Land Of The Stupid. All votes for Hillary should be deducted!!!
Only for the clueless and the Causeless.

It took California three weeks to figure it out. The South is still looking for their lost clue and their lost Cause.

The economy of California is the largest in the United States. As of 2015, California's gross state product (GSP) is about $2.496 trillion. The state's GSP grew 4.1% in 2015.--https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Economy_of_California


Let's evaluate CA according to Prog values: terrible income equality and white privilege in gated suburbs along the coast while poor brown people live in areas of high unemployment in the Federal induced water starved Central Valley. It's the Apartheid the Dems prefer.

That's your argument against 1 person 1 vote?

Amazing.

Reading comprehension challenged much? I was commenting on the Faux Miralcle CA Economy. Try keeping up.
there is no faux miracle in the Golden State; we really are like that.


I've lived in CA since I was 2 years old. The state is technically insolvent if one uses proper accounting standards. The Dems and their public employee hench thugs have led a coup against working citizens. The Pension Tsunami of bloated benefits for votes will bankrupt the state and a lot of cities. It's going to be very ugly. I plan to be out of here before that happens.
 
Democrats who are having trouble getting out of the first stage of grief — denial — aren't being helped by the fact that, now that all the votes are counted, Hillary Clinton's lead in the popular vote has topped 2.8 million, giving her a 48% share of the vote compared with Trumps 46%.

To those unschooled in how the United States selects presidents, this seems totally unfair. But look more closely at the numbers and you see that Clinton's advantage all but disappears.

As we noted in this space earlier, while Clinton's overall margin looks large and impressive, it is due to Clinton's huge margin of victory in one state — California — where she got a whopping 4.3 million more votes than Trump.

California is the only state, in fact, where Clinton's margin of victory was bigger than President Obama's in 2012 — 61.5% vs. Obama's 60%.

But California is the exception that proves the true genius of the Electoral College — which was designed to prevent regional candidates from dominating national elections.

(Excerpt) Read more at investors.com ...


Bullshit all the votes in California were counted on election night. The 2.8 million vote lead she has now is from overseas military ballots. She started out on election night with a 500K popular vote lead and it's grown since then because of the all the overseas military ballots that have come in. Sometimes these can take weeks to get back. She is now up around a 3 million popular vote lead.

:bsflag:
There are 2 million active duty and reserve military in total. If you think they are all over seas and all voted for hildabeast you've lost your damn mind.
 
Only for the clueless and the Causeless.

It took California three weeks to figure it out. The South is still looking for their lost clue and their lost Cause.

The economy of California is the largest in the United States. As of 2015, California's gross state product (GSP) is about $2.496 trillion. The state's GSP grew 4.1% in 2015.--https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Economy_of_California


Let's evaluate CA according to Prog values: terrible income equality and white privilege in gated suburbs along the coast while poor brown people live in areas of high unemployment in the Federal induced water starved Central Valley. It's the Apartheid the Dems prefer.

That's your argument against 1 person 1 vote?

Amazing.

Reading comprehension challenged much? I was commenting on the Faux Miralcle CA Economy. Try keeping up.
there is no faux miracle in the Golden State; we really are like that.


I've lived in CA since I was 2 years old. The state is technically insolvent if one uses proper accounting standards. The Dems and their public employee hench thugs have led a coup against working citizens. The Pension Tsunami of bloated benefits for votes will bankrupt the state and a lot of cities. It's going to be very ugly. I plan to be out of here before that happens.
Pot got decriminalized. Tax receipts will solve our fiscal problems. All we really needed, was Commerce, well regulated.
 
Let's evaluate CA according to Prog values: terrible income equality and white privilege in gated suburbs along the coast while poor brown people live in areas of high unemployment in the Federal induced water starved Central Valley. It's the Apartheid the Dems prefer.

That's your argument against 1 person 1 vote?

Amazing.

Reading comprehension challenged much? I was commenting on the Faux Miralcle CA Economy. Try keeping up.
there is no faux miracle in the Golden State; we really are like that.


I've lived in CA since I was 2 years old. The state is technically insolvent if one uses proper accounting standards. The Dems and their public employee hench thugs have led a coup against working citizens. The Pension Tsunami of bloated benefits for votes will bankrupt the state and a lot of cities. It's going to be very ugly. I plan to be out of here before that happens.
Pot got decriminalized. Tax receipts will solve our fiscal problems. All we really needed, was Commerce, well regulated.


If you seriously think that legalizing pot will generate enough tax income to save the CA economy, you must drink your bong water.
 
Democrats who are having trouble getting out of the first stage of grief — denial — aren't being helped by the fact that, now that all the votes are counted, Hillary Clinton's lead in the popular vote has topped 2.8 million, giving her a 48% share of the vote compared with Trumps 46%.

To those unschooled in how the United States selects presidents, this seems totally unfair. But look more closely at the numbers and you see that Clinton's advantage all but disappears.

As we noted in this space earlier, while Clinton's overall margin looks large and impressive, it is due to Clinton's huge margin of victory in one state — California — where she got a whopping 4.3 million more votes than Trump.

California is the only state, in fact, where Clinton's margin of victory was bigger than President Obama's in 2012 — 61.5% vs. Obama's 60%.

But California is the exception that proves the true genius of the Electoral College — which was designed to prevent regional candidates from dominating national elections.

(Excerpt) Read more at investors.com ...
This country fucks California. Republicans living in Red States who depend on California constantly mock the state. Republicans are the permanent dependent class. They work for minimum wage, the few that do work. They get the bulk of welfare, medicare and Social Security. Obamacare helps them the most.

And yet, Wyoming has two senators representing a half million people, California also has two representing over 33 million.

California gives twice what Texas gives to the federal government and not just from oil and gas.

Republicans give California the finger with one hand and the other hand they hold out for "free stuff".
 
It doesn't. Under the electoral college, the North Dakota vote counts more.
Liberal math: 3>55.

See? Here's the truth. These idiots want North Dakota to have the same number of electoral votes as California.
wow you are stupid.

If N. Dakota had 55 EC votes and California had 55 EC votes, then the votes in N. Dakota would be greater.

However, the apportionment based upon population provides an even playing field and requires that the Candidates must be a candidate for all the people, not just the most populous centers. It also prevents the values of a single city from dictating to the entire country.

I don't understand you clowns. You demand that all the states adhere to one homogeneous central government, then demand that the rest of the country bow down to the will of just a few cities.

ironically north dakota gets just tad better deal then most states with the EC
 
Democrats who are having trouble getting out of the first stage of grief — denial — aren't being helped by the fact that, now that all the votes are counted, Hillary Clinton's lead in the popular vote has topped 2.8 million, giving her a 48% share of the vote compared with Trumps 46%.

To those unschooled in how the United States selects presidents, this seems totally unfair. But look more closely at the numbers and you see that Clinton's advantage all but disappears.

As we noted in this space earlier, while Clinton's overall margin looks large and impressive, it is due to Clinton's huge margin of victory in one state — California — where she got a whopping 4.3 million more votes than Trump.

California is the only state, in fact, where Clinton's margin of victory was bigger than President Obama's in 2012 — 61.5% vs. Obama's 60%.

But California is the exception that proves the true genius of the Electoral College — which was designed to prevent regional candidates from dominating national elections.

(Excerpt) Read more at investors.com ...
This country fucks California. Republicans living in Red States who depend on California constantly mock the state. Republicans are the permanent dependent class. They work for minimum wage, the few that do work. They get the bulk of welfare, medicare and Social Security. Obamacare helps them the most.

And yet, Wyoming has two senators representing a half million people, California also has two representing over 33 million.

California gives twice what Texas gives to the federal government and not just from oil and gas.

Republicans give California the finger with one hand and the other hand they hold out for "free stuff".



You mean they act like DemocRATS!!!!...Self ownage, ...the best!
 


California: Land Of The Stupid. All votes for Hillary should be deducted!!!
Only for the clueless and the Causeless.

It took California three weeks to figure it out. The South is still looking for their lost clue and their lost Cause.

The economy of California is the largest in the United States. As of 2015, California's gross state product (GSP) is about $2.496 trillion. The state's GSP grew 4.1% in 2015.--https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Economy_of_California


Let's evaluate CA according to Prog values: terrible income equality and white privilege in gated suburbs along the coast while poor brown people live in areas of high unemployment in the Federal induced water starved Central Valley. It's the Apartheid the Dems prefer.

That's your argument against 1 person 1 vote?

Amazing.

Reading comprehension challenged much? I was commenting on the Faux Miralcle CA Economy. Try keeping up.
there is no faux miracle in the Golden State; we really are like that.

California, the land of fruits and nuts.
And one of the biggest drivers to our nations economy





With a population of 33 million people that would seem logical. It takes a long time to murder a golden goose that large. But the progressives are working real hard at it...

Only for the clueless and the Causeless.

It took California three weeks to figure it out. The South is still looking for their lost clue and their lost Cause.

The economy of California is the largest in the United States. As of 2015, California's gross state product (GSP) is about $2.496 trillion. The state's GSP grew 4.1% in 2015.--https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Economy_of_California


Let's evaluate CA according to Prog values: terrible income equality and white privilege in gated suburbs along the coast while poor brown people live in areas of high unemployment in the Federal induced water starved Central Valley. It's the Apartheid the Dems prefer.

That's your argument against 1 person 1 vote?

Amazing.

Reading comprehension challenged much? I was commenting on the Faux Miralcle CA Economy. Try keeping up.
there is no faux miracle in the Golden State; we really are like that.


I've lived in CA since I was 2 years old. The state is technically insolvent if one uses proper accounting standards. The Dems and their public employee hench thugs have led a coup against working citizens. The Pension Tsunami of bloated benefits for votes will bankrupt the state and a lot of cities. It's going to be very ugly. I plan to be out of here before that happens.

And I ask for the 20th time.......what game was Hillary and Trump playing, and what constituted victory?

Was it, he/she who gets 270 electoral votes is the next President, or rather........he/she who gets the most popular vote wins the Presidency?

And if it was all about what the leftists say, why was Hillary in Michigan and Penn, the few days before the election, and NOT in California and New York?!?!?!

Next time your FAVORITE FOOTBALL team plays, I want to hear the other team say that the score doesn't count because we gained more yards, so you lost, lol! Nothing like trying to change the rules for victory to what you succeeded in to pretend you won. Must be because all of you younger leftists never had to lose since you all got participation trophies, hehehehehe.
 
Democrats who are having trouble getting out of the first stage of grief — denial — aren't being helped by the fact that, now that all the votes are counted, Hillary Clinton's lead in the popular vote has topped 2.8 million, giving her a 48% share of the vote compared with Trumps 46%.

To those unschooled in how the United States selects presidents, this seems totally unfair. But look more closely at the numbers and you see that Clinton's advantage all but disappears.

As we noted in this space earlier, while Clinton's overall margin looks large and impressive, it is due to Clinton's huge margin of victory in one state — California — where she got a whopping 4.3 million more votes than Trump.

California is the only state, in fact, where Clinton's margin of victory was bigger than President Obama's in 2012 — 61.5% vs. Obama's 60%.

But California is the exception that proves the true genius of the Electoral College — which was designed to prevent regional candidates from dominating national elections.

(Excerpt) Read more at investors.com ...


Meanwhile, if you look at every other measure, Trump was the clear and decisive winner in this election.

Only if we consider our red States and their non, democrat voting habits.

Thank GOD, they understand democracy
^ THIS from the moron who wants Drumplethinskin to be a dictator.......:rofl: :rofl: :rofl:
 
Democrats who are having trouble getting out of the first stage of grief — denial — aren't being helped by the fact that, now that all the votes are counted, Hillary Clinton's lead in the popular vote has topped 2.8 million, giving her a 48% share of the vote compared with Trumps 46%.

To those unschooled in how the United States selects presidents, this seems totally unfair. But look more closely at the numbers and you see that Clinton's advantage all but disappears.

As we noted in this space earlier, while Clinton's overall margin looks large and impressive, it is due to Clinton's huge margin of victory in one state — California — where she got a whopping 4.3 million more votes than Trump.

California is the only state, in fact, where Clinton's margin of victory was bigger than President Obama's in 2012 — 61.5% vs. Obama's 60%.

But California is the exception that proves the true genius of the Electoral College — which was designed to prevent regional candidates from dominating national elections.

(Excerpt) Read more at investors.com ...

The truly disturbing part of the Liberal angst is that even those who should be the most educated and informed among the left are retarded in their understanding of the brilliance of the electoral system. Former Attorney General Eric Holder, with a law degree from Columbia, demonstrates the depth of whinny butthurt, and ignorance that exist even at the highest level among the left-
 
Democrats who are having trouble getting out of the first stage of grief — denial — aren't being helped by the fact that, now that all the votes are counted, Hillary Clinton's lead in the popular vote has topped 2.8 million, giving her a 48% share of the vote compared with Trumps 46%.

To those unschooled in how the United States selects presidents, this seems totally unfair. But look more closely at the numbers and you see that Clinton's advantage all but disappears.

As we noted in this space earlier, while Clinton's overall margin looks large and impressive, it is due to Clinton's huge margin of victory in one state — California — where she got a whopping 4.3 million more votes than Trump.

California is the only state, in fact, where Clinton's margin of victory was bigger than President Obama's in 2012 — 61.5% vs. Obama's 60%.

But California is the exception that proves the true genius of the Electoral College — which was designed to prevent regional candidates from dominating national elections.

(Excerpt) Read more at investors.com ...
This country fucks California. Republicans living in Red States who depend on California constantly mock the state. Republicans are the permanent dependent class. They work for minimum wage, the few that do work. They get the bulk of welfare, medicare and Social Security. Obamacare helps them the most.

And yet, Wyoming has two senators representing a half million people, California also has two representing over 33 million.

California gives twice what Texas gives to the federal government and not just from oil and gas.

Republicans give California the finger with one hand and the other hand they hold out for "free stuff".



You mean they act like DemocRATS!!!!...Self ownage, ...the best!
Hello, knock knock, it's the Democrats providing the "free stuff" nitwit.
 
Democrats who are having trouble getting out of the first stage of grief — denial — aren't being helped by the fact that, now that all the votes are counted, Hillary Clinton's lead in the popular vote has topped 2.8 million, giving her a 48% share of the vote compared with Trumps 46%.

To those unschooled in how the United States selects presidents, this seems totally unfair. But look more closely at the numbers and you see that Clinton's advantage all but disappears.

As we noted in this space earlier, while Clinton's overall margin looks large and impressive, it is due to Clinton's huge margin of victory in one state — California — where she got a whopping 4.3 million more votes than Trump.

California is the only state, in fact, where Clinton's margin of victory was bigger than President Obama's in 2012 — 61.5% vs. Obama's 60%.

But California is the exception that proves the true genius of the Electoral College — which was designed to prevent regional candidates from dominating national elections.

(Excerpt) Read more at investors.com ...

The truly disturbing part of the Liberal angst is that even those who should be the most educated and informed among the left are retarded in their understanding of the brilliance of the electoral system. Former Attorney General Eric Holder, with a law degree from Columbia, demonstrates the depth of whinny butthurt, and ignorance that exist even at the highest level among the left-

And what brilliance is that?
 

Forum List

Back
Top