Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Not so fast there skippy....That's right - double-down on fake news like CNN.You lie...the US IG was the one to find I, report it, and document it.Based on documented records and history, this is what we KNOW went on beginning AT LEAST in 2014:
2012:
Obama is caught on a 'hot Mike's telling Putin Puppet Medvedev to pass on to Clad that he (Obama) will 'be more flexible' after his (Obama's) re-election...
2014:
- US AG Eric Holder, FBI Director Robert Mueller, Sect of State Hillary Clinton, and President Barak Obama hid Russian crimes associated with the Russian KGB Bank's effort to buy Uranium One until after the sale went through.
- President Obama reneged on the US promise to the Ukraine that the US would help protect the Ukraine's sovereign borders. While Putin piling Russian troops up on the border, Obama chose to ignore the whole thing, to do nothing but watch as Russia militarily annexed Crimea, sending a message to allies and enemies alike that the US' word means nothing and we can't be counted on when they need us.
- President Obama learned of Russian Interference / 'attacks' on the US: A Counter-Intelligence operation using social media that successfully got democrats to organize and march for them...paid willing liberal groups to spread racial division and violence ... attempted to hack the US power grid ... was attempting to hack senior US politician's servers and e-mails.
*** HE DID NOTHING ABOUT IT
- Knew about Hillary's illegal unauthorized unencrypted unsecured server AND knew about Russia's attempting to hack senior politicians...like Hillary. Obama did not warn her and did not shut her usage of her illegal server down. 6 foreign entities, to include Russia and China, ended up accessing Hillary's server and stealing TOP SECRET data.
Who says that 6 foreign entities, including Russia and China, ended up accessing Hillary's server and stealing Top Secret data?
Not the FBI. Not the IG report.
Who?
There's no evidence that Hillary's evidence was comprimised by....anyone. So says the FBI and the IG report citing the FBI forensic agent that inspected the server.2015:
The FBI - Strzok specifically - was warned about China spying on Hillary's server...and the FBI did nothing...except to protect Hillary.
So Strzok's didn't warn Hillary of something that there's no evidence of?
The rest of your post is your typical hysteric conspiracy batshit. Which gets increasingly shrill and wild as the evidence against Trump and his associates continues to mount.
This is not the 1st time you pulled this...and were proven wrong / that you lied.
Fail...again...go away.
The IG found no political bias in investigative decision making. AND the IG cited the FBI forensic agent who analyzed the server who was 'fairly confident that there was no intrusion'. With the FBI reinterating that there's no evidence Hillay's server was ever comprimised.
SO I ask again, who says that 6 foreign entities, including Russia and China, ended up accessing Hillary's server and stealing Top Secret data?
There's you....citing yourself. And who? Because I've got the FBI and the IG report that both show no evidence of an intrusion.
I kinda figured you'd work this out early, given that its the beating heart of your latest batshit conspiracy theory.
.Bwuhahahaha
Yeah, that's not evidence that Hillary's server was hacked by 6 foreign entities, including Russia and China.
So is that it? You make claims, I ask you to tell us where in the heck your claim came from, and you flee?
Well, so much for another one of your batshit conspiracy theories.
Funny;Youre failing a fact check on that one. No such evidence of this chinese hacking.Chinese company reportedly hacked Clinton's server, got copy of every email in real-time
The code reportedly was discovered in 2015 by the Intelligence Community Inspector General (ICIG), which then warned FBI officials of the intrusion.
A source briefed on the matter confirmed to Fox News the details of the Caller’s reporting, and said that the ICIG was so concerned by the revelation that officials drove over to the FBI to inform agents -- including anti-Trump agent Peter Strzok -- of the development after it was discovered via the emails' metadata.'
Hillary wasn't hacked.
She did not destroy 30,000 official e-mails like the FBI said.
She did not commit crimes, like Comey said.
She did not rig elections and cheat in debates like Brazile said.
Diane Feinstein did not get filthy stinking rich working with the ChiComms and did not have a Chinese spy on her staff for the last 20 years
And Oher didn't just flip and testify before Congress that he and Steele have been working with Mueller and the FBI since 2016!
Bwuhahahahaha!
If there were other news outlets reporting on this, It might be worth looking into. But at this time, fox news is just Trump News Network.
FBI says no evidence of such chinese hacking. There is no way they can confirm such BS.Funny;Youre failing a fact check on that one. No such evidence of this chinese hacking.Chinese company reportedly hacked Clinton's server, got copy of every email in real-time
The code reportedly was discovered in 2015 by the Intelligence Community Inspector General (ICIG), which then warned FBI officials of the intrusion.
A source briefed on the matter confirmed to Fox News the details of the Caller’s reporting, and said that the ICIG was so concerned by the revelation that officials drove over to the FBI to inform agents -- including anti-Trump agent Peter Strzok -- of the development after it was discovered via the emails' metadata.'
Hillary wasn't hacked.
She did not destroy 30,000 official e-mails like the FBI said.
She did not commit crimes, like Comey said.
She did not rig elections and cheat in debates like Brazile said.
Diane Feinstein did not get filthy stinking rich working with the ChiComms and did not have a Chinese spy on her staff for the last 20 years
And Oher didn't just flip and testify before Congress that he and Steele have been working with Mueller and the FBI since 2016!
Bwuhahahahaha!
If there were other news outlets reporting on this, It might be worth looking into. But at this time, fox news is just Trump News Network.
I did fact check this one .... Your fact checkers are liars.. FBI cyber-crimes division confirms source code and direct copy programs were in place on her sever.. I will believe the people doing the investigation long before your Geroge Soros connected POS 'fact checker'.
Steele was working with Russians who opposed Putin and his established regime. Case in point is Oleg Erovinkin.There is no evidence Christopher Steele was ever hired by FBI.You mean to tell me the DOJ kept Mueller informed about a dossier that contains info on Trump? Doing their job? such a travisty.
You really are a dumbfk...
Do you know what happens to agents who use unverified and previously TERMINATED sources? Steel was terminated for cause which means he is NOT credible.... therefore his evidence is worthless.
Now that this is exposed this whole house of cards should collapse..
Christopher Steele was a british intelligence officer.
Much of that dossier has ended up being true, and none of it has been proven false.
In fact, Steele just won a libel case.
1. [Supposed author of the dossier,] Steele was a “confirmed socialist” in college at Oxford when he was hired by MI6, another point of suspicion for someone who would be dispatched to Moscow as a spy and later serve as head of the Russian desk at MI6, all extremely sensitive positions." The Final Truth about the “Trump Dossier”
2.. Christopher Steele, Hillary's employee, got the 'dossier' via
Oleg Deripaska, a Russian oligarch linked to Vladimir Putin, according to a new report.
CHRISTOPHER STEELE REPORTEDLY WORKED FOR SANCTIONED RUSSIAN OLIGARCH
Christopher Steele Reportedly Worked For Sanctioned Russian Oligarch
3. Russia is a dictatorship.
Nothing emanates from Moscow without Putin's imprimatur....
The 'information' in the infamous 'dossier' came from Russia.
Now.....if Putin wanted Trump to win.......would there have ever.......ever.....been a dossier?????
QED......the candidate of Vladimir Putin was Hillary Clinton and the Democrats.
4. If any collusion occurred, it was through Democrats, the only folks for whom we have actual evidence of collusion.
Its like if you said, "somebody worked with Americans". But then the question becomes did he work work with a republican american or a democrat american. Its the same thing when working with russians.
But its all a moot point, because nothing depends on the dossier. FBI investigation wasnt started because of dossier. Mueller doesnt depend on the dossier.. It could be 100% false and it wouldnt make one bit of difference.
case in point: Trump approved of proposed Popadopoulus meeting with Putin.
Evidence shows the FBI / Mueller had worked with/for the Russians in the past...Politicize the intel agenda? Trump refused to back his own intel community over Putin, standing next to the Russian leader on Live TV.
Evidence shows his Intell community was committing treason, led by Brennan and Clapper, by knowingly presenting Russian-authored fake reports as legitimate intel, breaking laws by doing so, to illegally acquire warrants and to get Mueller - who had been working with Steele, Oher, and the Russians already - appointed as Special Counsel.
Once again, it turns out the President was RIGHT!
FBI says no evidence of such chinese hacking. There is no way they can confirm such BS.Funny;Youre failing a fact check on that one. No such evidence of this chinese hacking.Chinese company reportedly hacked Clinton's server, got copy of every email in real-time
The code reportedly was discovered in 2015 by the Intelligence Community Inspector General (ICIG), which then warned FBI officials of the intrusion.
A source briefed on the matter confirmed to Fox News the details of the Caller’s reporting, and said that the ICIG was so concerned by the revelation that officials drove over to the FBI to inform agents -- including anti-Trump agent Peter Strzok -- of the development after it was discovered via the emails' metadata.'
Hillary wasn't hacked.
She did not destroy 30,000 official e-mails like the FBI said.
She did not commit crimes, like Comey said.
She did not rig elections and cheat in debates like Brazile said.
Diane Feinstein did not get filthy stinking rich working with the ChiComms and did not have a Chinese spy on her staff for the last 20 years
And Oher didn't just flip and testify before Congress that he and Steele have been working with Mueller and the FBI since 2016!
Bwuhahahahaha!
If there were other news outlets reporting on this, It might be worth looking into. But at this time, fox news is just Trump News Network.
I did fact check this one .... Your fact checkers are liars.. FBI cyber-crimes division confirms source code and direct copy programs were in place on her sever.. I will believe the people doing the investigation long before your Geroge Soros connected POS 'fact checker'.
And snopes has no connection to soros.
FBI started investigating July 2016, but dossier didnt come until 3 months later:Steele was working with Russians who opposed Putin and his established regime. Case in point is Oleg Erovinkin.There is no evidence Christopher Steele was ever hired by FBI.You mean to tell me the DOJ kept Mueller informed about a dossier that contains info on Trump? Doing their job? such a travisty.
You really are a dumbfk...
Do you know what happens to agents who use unverified and previously TERMINATED sources? Steel was terminated for cause which means he is NOT credible.... therefore his evidence is worthless.
Now that this is exposed this whole house of cards should collapse..
Christopher Steele was a british intelligence officer.
Much of that dossier has ended up being true, and none of it has been proven false.
In fact, Steele just won a libel case.
1. [Supposed author of the dossier,] Steele was a “confirmed socialist” in college at Oxford when he was hired by MI6, another point of suspicion for someone who would be dispatched to Moscow as a spy and later serve as head of the Russian desk at MI6, all extremely sensitive positions." The Final Truth about the “Trump Dossier”
2.. Christopher Steele, Hillary's employee, got the 'dossier' via
Oleg Deripaska, a Russian oligarch linked to Vladimir Putin, according to a new report.
CHRISTOPHER STEELE REPORTEDLY WORKED FOR SANCTIONED RUSSIAN OLIGARCH
Christopher Steele Reportedly Worked For Sanctioned Russian Oligarch
3. Russia is a dictatorship.
Nothing emanates from Moscow without Putin's imprimatur....
The 'information' in the infamous 'dossier' came from Russia.
Now.....if Putin wanted Trump to win.......would there have ever.......ever.....been a dossier?????
QED......the candidate of Vladimir Putin was Hillary Clinton and the Democrats.
4. If any collusion occurred, it was through Democrats, the only folks for whom we have actual evidence of collusion.
Its like if you said, "somebody worked with Americans". But then the question becomes did he work work with a republican american or a democrat american. Its the same thing when working with russians.
But its all a moot point, because nothing depends on the dossier. FBI investigation wasnt started because of dossier. Mueller doesnt depend on the dossier.. It could be 100% false and it wouldnt make one bit of difference.
case in point: Trump approved of proposed Popadopoulus meeting with Putin.
Says Popadopoulus, and no one else. You're such a lying piece of shit. The fact is that without the "dossier," there wouldn't be any Mueller investigation.
Investigation is not reputable...but it’s like a dose of syphilis that won’t go away.We should set our watches....
I'm sure we'll be hearing from you guys about how "its over" a few weeks from now too.
View attachment 213936
View attachment 213937
View attachment 213938
View attachment 213939
Ah yes, another disease Democrats are single-handedly keeping alive in the U.S., thanks to one of their pet demographics of mentally ill fetishists and pedophiles and their fans.
I see someone has a word of the day calendar...either that or you're giving us a glimpse into how you spend your day. I'm guessing the latter.
And we have yet another compulsive fetishist who has to weigh in , with nothing as usual. You don't like it, take it up with the CDC for not being 'Faggot Friendly' enough to suit you, as they keep documenting diseases homosexuals top the list in spreading. This is old news, doesn't take but a minute to check out, and in never varies from year to year, either. I do understand why you really hate being informed on anything, and hate anybody else who is, though; it's bad for Democrats at the polls.
Actually if your read congressional testimony by Comey and others they found that the dossier information from Steel was being used far earlier than the NYSlime reported.. But hey who's Lying? The NYTimes or Comey?FBI started investigating July 2016, but dossier didnt come until 3 months later:Steele was working with Russians who opposed Putin and his established regime. Case in point is Oleg Erovinkin.There is no evidence Christopher Steele was ever hired by FBI.You really are a dumbfk...
Do you know what happens to agents who use unverified and previously TERMINATED sources? Steel was terminated for cause which means he is NOT credible.... therefore his evidence is worthless.
Now that this is exposed this whole house of cards should collapse..
Christopher Steele was a british intelligence officer.
Much of that dossier has ended up being true, and none of it has been proven false.
In fact, Steele just won a libel case.
1. [Supposed author of the dossier,] Steele was a “confirmed socialist” in college at Oxford when he was hired by MI6, another point of suspicion for someone who would be dispatched to Moscow as a spy and later serve as head of the Russian desk at MI6, all extremely sensitive positions." The Final Truth about the “Trump Dossier”
2.. Christopher Steele, Hillary's employee, got the 'dossier' via
Oleg Deripaska, a Russian oligarch linked to Vladimir Putin, according to a new report.
CHRISTOPHER STEELE REPORTEDLY WORKED FOR SANCTIONED RUSSIAN OLIGARCH
Christopher Steele Reportedly Worked For Sanctioned Russian Oligarch
3. Russia is a dictatorship.
Nothing emanates from Moscow without Putin's imprimatur....
The 'information' in the infamous 'dossier' came from Russia.
Now.....if Putin wanted Trump to win.......would there have ever.......ever.....been a dossier?????
QED......the candidate of Vladimir Putin was Hillary Clinton and the Democrats.
4. If any collusion occurred, it was through Democrats, the only folks for whom we have actual evidence of collusion.
Its like if you said, "somebody worked with Americans". But then the question becomes did he work work with a republican american or a democrat american. Its the same thing when working with russians.
But its all a moot point, because nothing depends on the dossier. FBI investigation wasnt started because of dossier. Mueller doesnt depend on the dossier.. It could be 100% false and it wouldnt make one bit of difference.
case in point: Trump approved of proposed Popadopoulus meeting with Putin.
Says Popadopoulus, and no one else. You're such a lying piece of shit. The fact is that without the "dossier," there wouldn't be any Mueller investigation.
As The New York Times reported in December, the investigation began in July 2016 — after George Papadopoulos, a Trump campaign foreign policy adviser, told an Australian diplomat that Russia had political “dirt” on Hillary Clinton. Australian officials then alerted their American counterparts.
The information provided by Mr. Steele did not reach the F.B.I. officials charged with investigating Mr. Trump’s campaign until mid-September.
Comey didnt answer any of the questions about dossier because it couldnt be answered in a public setting. Burr said the media had it before Comey had it.Actually if your read congressional testimony by Comey and others they found that the dossier information from Steel was being used far earlier than the NYSlime reported.. But hey who's Lying? The NYTimes or Comey?FBI started investigating July 2016, but dossier didnt come until 3 months later:Steele was working with Russians who opposed Putin and his established regime. Case in point is Oleg Erovinkin.There is no evidence Christopher Steele was ever hired by FBI.
Christopher Steele was a british intelligence officer.
Much of that dossier has ended up being true, and none of it has been proven false.
In fact, Steele just won a libel case.
1. [Supposed author of the dossier,] Steele was a “confirmed socialist” in college at Oxford when he was hired by MI6, another point of suspicion for someone who would be dispatched to Moscow as a spy and later serve as head of the Russian desk at MI6, all extremely sensitive positions." The Final Truth about the “Trump Dossier”
2.. Christopher Steele, Hillary's employee, got the 'dossier' via
Oleg Deripaska, a Russian oligarch linked to Vladimir Putin, according to a new report.
CHRISTOPHER STEELE REPORTEDLY WORKED FOR SANCTIONED RUSSIAN OLIGARCH
Christopher Steele Reportedly Worked For Sanctioned Russian Oligarch
3. Russia is a dictatorship.
Nothing emanates from Moscow without Putin's imprimatur....
The 'information' in the infamous 'dossier' came from Russia.
Now.....if Putin wanted Trump to win.......would there have ever.......ever.....been a dossier?????
QED......the candidate of Vladimir Putin was Hillary Clinton and the Democrats.
4. If any collusion occurred, it was through Democrats, the only folks for whom we have actual evidence of collusion.
Its like if you said, "somebody worked with Americans". But then the question becomes did he work work with a republican american or a democrat american. Its the same thing when working with russians.
But its all a moot point, because nothing depends on the dossier. FBI investigation wasnt started because of dossier. Mueller doesnt depend on the dossier.. It could be 100% false and it wouldnt make one bit of difference.
case in point: Trump approved of proposed Popadopoulus meeting with Putin.
Says Popadopoulus, and no one else. You're such a lying piece of shit. The fact is that without the "dossier," there wouldn't be any Mueller investigation.
As The New York Times reported in December, the investigation began in July 2016 — after George Papadopoulos, a Trump campaign foreign policy adviser, told an Australian diplomat that Russia had political “dirt” on Hillary Clinton. Australian officials then alerted their American counterparts.
The information provided by Mr. Steele did not reach the F.B.I. officials charged with investigating Mr. Trump’s campaign until mid-September.
He's using the old rope-a-dope play stupid routine. He pretends he doesn't know about the capabilities of NSA surveillance so he can pretend that his bullshit arguments are valid.Your working theory on the Page FISA warrant is that the FBI spied on the Trump campaign by getting wire taps on a guy who DIDN'T WORK for the Trump campaign?
not a working theory. That IS the design of the NSA collection/archiving system. You find a target, you go hunting for associations current and past. That's the way it works. WHEN he was in the campaign has NO bearing on cruising thru the mountains of data that 702 system has been sucking in and storing for many years now.
Whoever fed you that excuse ?? You need to fire them and find better spinners.
Brit, you don't know shit. Making your babble about 'the capability of NSA surveillance' just more meaningless jibber jabber.
Any argument you want to make needs external sources. You citing yourself is worthless.
The Dossier did not turn up until December. Oher testified he, Steele, Mueller, & the FBI were talking earlier than that...FBI started investigating July 2016, but dossier didnt come until 3 months later:Steele was working with Russians who opposed Putin and his established regime. Case in point is Oleg Erovinkin.There is no evidence Christopher Steele was ever hired by FBI.You really are a dumbfk...
Do you know what happens to agents who use unverified and previously TERMINATED sources? Steel was terminated for cause which means he is NOT credible.... therefore his evidence is worthless.
Now that this is exposed this whole house of cards should collapse..
Christopher Steele was a british intelligence officer.
Much of that dossier has ended up being true, and none of it has been proven false.
In fact, Steele just won a libel case.
1. [Supposed author of the dossier,] Steele was a “confirmed socialist” in college at Oxford when he was hired by MI6, another point of suspicion for someone who would be dispatched to Moscow as a spy and later serve as head of the Russian desk at MI6, all extremely sensitive positions." The Final Truth about the “Trump Dossier”
2.. Christopher Steele, Hillary's employee, got the 'dossier' via
Oleg Deripaska, a Russian oligarch linked to Vladimir Putin, according to a new report.
CHRISTOPHER STEELE REPORTEDLY WORKED FOR SANCTIONED RUSSIAN OLIGARCH
Christopher Steele Reportedly Worked For Sanctioned Russian Oligarch
3. Russia is a dictatorship.
Nothing emanates from Moscow without Putin's imprimatur....
The 'information' in the infamous 'dossier' came from Russia.
Now.....if Putin wanted Trump to win.......would there have ever.......ever.....been a dossier?????
QED......the candidate of Vladimir Putin was Hillary Clinton and the Democrats.
4. If any collusion occurred, it was through Democrats, the only folks for whom we have actual evidence of collusion.
Its like if you said, "somebody worked with Americans". But then the question becomes did he work work with a republican american or a democrat american. Its the same thing when working with russians.
But its all a moot point, because nothing depends on the dossier. FBI investigation wasnt started because of dossier. Mueller doesnt depend on the dossier.. It could be 100% false and it wouldnt make one bit of difference.
case in point: Trump approved of proposed Popadopoulus meeting with Putin.
Says Popadopoulus, and no one else. You're such a lying piece of shit. The fact is that without the "dossier," there wouldn't be any Mueller investigation.
As The New York Times reported in December, the investigation began in July 2016 — after George Papadopoulos, a Trump campaign foreign policy adviser, told an Australian diplomat that Russia had political “dirt” on Hillary Clinton. Australian officials then alerted their American counterparts.
The information provided by Mr. Steele did not reach the F.B.I. officials charged with investigating Mr. Trump’s campaign until mid-September.
The Dossier did not turn up until December. Oher testified he, Steele, Mueller, & the FBI were talking earlier than that...FBI started investigating July 2016, but dossier didnt come until 3 months later:Steele was working with Russians who opposed Putin and his established regime. Case in point is Oleg Erovinkin.There is no evidence Christopher Steele was ever hired by FBI.
Christopher Steele was a british intelligence officer.
Much of that dossier has ended up being true, and none of it has been proven false.
In fact, Steele just won a libel case.
1. [Supposed author of the dossier,] Steele was a “confirmed socialist” in college at Oxford when he was hired by MI6, another point of suspicion for someone who would be dispatched to Moscow as a spy and later serve as head of the Russian desk at MI6, all extremely sensitive positions." The Final Truth about the “Trump Dossier”
2.. Christopher Steele, Hillary's employee, got the 'dossier' via
Oleg Deripaska, a Russian oligarch linked to Vladimir Putin, according to a new report.
CHRISTOPHER STEELE REPORTEDLY WORKED FOR SANCTIONED RUSSIAN OLIGARCH
Christopher Steele Reportedly Worked For Sanctioned Russian Oligarch
3. Russia is a dictatorship.
Nothing emanates from Moscow without Putin's imprimatur....
The 'information' in the infamous 'dossier' came from Russia.
Now.....if Putin wanted Trump to win.......would there have ever.......ever.....been a dossier?????
QED......the candidate of Vladimir Putin was Hillary Clinton and the Democrats.
4. If any collusion occurred, it was through Democrats, the only folks for whom we have actual evidence of collusion.
Its like if you said, "somebody worked with Americans". But then the question becomes did he work work with a republican american or a democrat american. Its the same thing when working with russians.
But its all a moot point, because nothing depends on the dossier. FBI investigation wasnt started because of dossier. Mueller doesnt depend on the dossier.. It could be 100% false and it wouldnt make one bit of difference.
case in point: Trump approved of proposed Popadopoulus meeting with Putin.
Says Popadopoulus, and no one else. You're such a lying piece of shit. The fact is that without the "dossier," there wouldn't be any Mueller investigation.
As The New York Times reported in December, the investigation began in July 2016 — after George Papadopoulos, a Trump campaign foreign policy adviser, told an Australian diplomat that Russia had political “dirt” on Hillary Clinton. Australian officials then alerted their American counterparts.
The information provided by Mr. Steele did not reach the F.B.I. officials charged with investigating Mr. Trump’s campaign until mid-September.
Steele was working with Russians who opposed Putin and his established regime. Case in point is Oleg Erovinkin.There is no evidence Christopher Steele was ever hired by FBI.You mean to tell me the DOJ kept Mueller informed about a dossier that contains info on Trump? Doing their job? such a travisty.
You really are a dumbfk...
Do you know what happens to agents who use unverified and previously TERMINATED sources? Steel was terminated for cause which means he is NOT credible.... therefore his evidence is worthless.
Now that this is exposed this whole house of cards should collapse..
Christopher Steele was a british intelligence officer.
Much of that dossier has ended up being true, and none of it has been proven false.
In fact, Steele just won a libel case.
1. [Supposed author of the dossier,] Steele was a “confirmed socialist” in college at Oxford when he was hired by MI6, another point of suspicion for someone who would be dispatched to Moscow as a spy and later serve as head of the Russian desk at MI6, all extremely sensitive positions." The Final Truth about the “Trump Dossier”
2.. Christopher Steele, Hillary's employee, got the 'dossier' via
Oleg Deripaska, a Russian oligarch linked to Vladimir Putin, according to a new report.
CHRISTOPHER STEELE REPORTEDLY WORKED FOR SANCTIONED RUSSIAN OLIGARCH
Christopher Steele Reportedly Worked For Sanctioned Russian Oligarch
3. Russia is a dictatorship.
Nothing emanates from Moscow without Putin's imprimatur....
The 'information' in the infamous 'dossier' came from Russia.
Now.....if Putin wanted Trump to win.......would there have ever.......ever.....been a dossier?????
QED......the candidate of Vladimir Putin was Hillary Clinton and the Democrats.
4. If any collusion occurred, it was through Democrats, the only folks for whom we have actual evidence of collusion.
Its like if you said, "somebody worked with Americans". But then the question becomes did he work work with a republican american or a democrat american. Its the same thing when working with russians.
But its all a moot point, because nothing depends on the dossier. FBI investigation wasnt started because of dossier. Mueller doesnt depend on the dossier.. It could be 100% false and it wouldnt make one bit of difference.
case in point: Trump approved of proposed Popadopoulus meeting with Putin.
...again...Conspiracy / treason exposed from the Left. .The Dossier did not turn up until December. Oher testified he, Steele, Mueller, & the FBI were talking earlier than that...FBI started investigating July 2016, but dossier didnt come until 3 months later:Steele was working with Russians who opposed Putin and his established regime. Case in point is Oleg Erovinkin.1. [Supposed author of the dossier,] Steele was a “confirmed socialist” in college at Oxford when he was hired by MI6, another point of suspicion for someone who would be dispatched to Moscow as a spy and later serve as head of the Russian desk at MI6, all extremely sensitive positions." The Final Truth about the “Trump Dossier”
2.. Christopher Steele, Hillary's employee, got the 'dossier' via
Oleg Deripaska, a Russian oligarch linked to Vladimir Putin, according to a new report.
CHRISTOPHER STEELE REPORTEDLY WORKED FOR SANCTIONED RUSSIAN OLIGARCH
Christopher Steele Reportedly Worked For Sanctioned Russian Oligarch
3. Russia is a dictatorship.
Nothing emanates from Moscow without Putin's imprimatur....
The 'information' in the infamous 'dossier' came from Russia.
Now.....if Putin wanted Trump to win.......would there have ever.......ever.....been a dossier?????
QED......the candidate of Vladimir Putin was Hillary Clinton and the Democrats.
4. If any collusion occurred, it was through Democrats, the only folks for whom we have actual evidence of collusion.
Its like if you said, "somebody worked with Americans". But then the question becomes did he work work with a republican american or a democrat american. Its the same thing when working with russians.
But its all a moot point, because nothing depends on the dossier. FBI investigation wasnt started because of dossier. Mueller doesnt depend on the dossier.. It could be 100% false and it wouldnt make one bit of difference.
case in point: Trump approved of proposed Popadopoulus meeting with Putin.
Says Popadopoulus, and no one else. You're such a lying piece of shit. The fact is that without the "dossier," there wouldn't be any Mueller investigation.
As The New York Times reported in December, the investigation began in July 2016 — after George Papadopoulos, a Trump campaign foreign policy adviser, told an Australian diplomat that Russia had political “dirt” on Hillary Clinton. Australian officials then alerted their American counterparts.
The information provided by Mr. Steele did not reach the F.B.I. officials charged with investigating Mr. Trump’s campaign until mid-September.
There were MANY press stories on the "dossier' prior to the election. SO many in fact, that it had a weighable effect on the election. I have links to DOZENS of stories from the resistance media from Sept to the Nov election. But just read the Wiki entry for Trump-Russia Dossier.
Hints of existence
Jane Mayer has described how, in "late summer, Fusion set up a series of meetings, at the Tabard Inn, in Washington, between Steele and a handful of national-security reporters.... Despite Steele's generally cool manner, he seemed distraught about the Russians' role in the election." Mayer attended one of the meetings. No news organizations ran any stories about the allegations at that time.[10]
Mother Jones story
By the third quarter of 2016, many news organizations knew about the existence of the dossier, which had been described as an "open secret" among journalists. However, they chose not to publish information that could not be confirmed.[2][52]
By October 2016, Steele had compiled 33 pages (16 memos), and he then passed on what he had discovered to David Corn, a reporter from Mother Jones magazine. On October 31, 2016, a week before the election, Mother Jones reported that a former intelligence officer, whom they did not name, had produced a report based on Russian sources and turned it over to the FBI.[44] The article disclosed some of the dossier's allegations:
The first memo, based on the former intelligence officer's conversations with Russian sources, noted, "Russian regime has been cultivating, supporting and assisting TRUMP for at least 5 years. Aim, endorsed by PUTIN, has been to encourage splits and divisions in western alliance". It maintained that Trump "and his inner circle have accepted a regular flow of intelligence from the Kremlin, including on his Democratic and other political rivals". It claimed that Russian intelligence had "compromised" Trump during his visits to Moscow and could "blackmail him". It also reported that Russian intelligence had compiled a dossier on Hillary Clinton based on "bugged conversations she had on various visits to Russia and intercepted phone calls.
— David Corn, "A Veteran Spy Has Given the FBI Information Alleging a Russian Operation to Cultivate Donald Trump", Mother Jones (October 31, 2016)[44]
When the Mother Jones story broke, John Podesta, chairman of the Clinton campaign, said he was "stunned by the news that the FBI had launched a full-blown investigation into Trump, especially one that was informed by research underwritten by the Clinton campaign." Although they knew that Perkins Coie had spent money for opposition research, neither Podesta nor campaign manager Robby Mook knew that Steele was on the Democratic payroll. They both maintain they "didn't read the dossier until BuzzFeed posted it online. Far from a secret campaign weapon, Steele turned out to be a secret kept from the campaign."[10]
Mother jones was the only outlet reporting on the existence of the dossier, just one week prior to vote. Overshadowed by Comey's announcement of re-opening Hillary's email investigation. MotherJones is far left, and certainly not mainstream. People didnt really know about dossier until after Trump assumed office, when buzzfeed published the actual dossier; before then it was just some far left site that no trump support would believe.The Dossier did not turn up until December. Oher testified he, Steele, Mueller, & the FBI were talking earlier than that...FBI started investigating July 2016, but dossier didnt come until 3 months later:Steele was working with Russians who opposed Putin and his established regime. Case in point is Oleg Erovinkin.1. [Supposed author of the dossier,] Steele was a “confirmed socialist” in college at Oxford when he was hired by MI6, another point of suspicion for someone who would be dispatched to Moscow as a spy and later serve as head of the Russian desk at MI6, all extremely sensitive positions." The Final Truth about the “Trump Dossier”
2.. Christopher Steele, Hillary's employee, got the 'dossier' via
Oleg Deripaska, a Russian oligarch linked to Vladimir Putin, according to a new report.
CHRISTOPHER STEELE REPORTEDLY WORKED FOR SANCTIONED RUSSIAN OLIGARCH
Christopher Steele Reportedly Worked For Sanctioned Russian Oligarch
3. Russia is a dictatorship.
Nothing emanates from Moscow without Putin's imprimatur....
The 'information' in the infamous 'dossier' came from Russia.
Now.....if Putin wanted Trump to win.......would there have ever.......ever.....been a dossier?????
QED......the candidate of Vladimir Putin was Hillary Clinton and the Democrats.
4. If any collusion occurred, it was through Democrats, the only folks for whom we have actual evidence of collusion.
Its like if you said, "somebody worked with Americans". But then the question becomes did he work work with a republican american or a democrat american. Its the same thing when working with russians.
But its all a moot point, because nothing depends on the dossier. FBI investigation wasnt started because of dossier. Mueller doesnt depend on the dossier.. It could be 100% false and it wouldnt make one bit of difference.
case in point: Trump approved of proposed Popadopoulus meeting with Putin.
Says Popadopoulus, and no one else. You're such a lying piece of shit. The fact is that without the "dossier," there wouldn't be any Mueller investigation.
As The New York Times reported in December, the investigation began in July 2016 — after George Papadopoulos, a Trump campaign foreign policy adviser, told an Australian diplomat that Russia had political “dirt” on Hillary Clinton. Australian officials then alerted their American counterparts.
The information provided by Mr. Steele did not reach the F.B.I. officials charged with investigating Mr. Trump’s campaign until mid-September.
There were press stories on the "dossier' prior to the election. SO many in fact hinting that Trump had a Russia connection, that it had a weighable effect on the election. I have links to DOZENS of stories from the resistance media from Sept to the Nov election. But just read the Wiki entry for Trump-Russia Dossier.
Hints of existence
Jane Mayer has described how, in "late summer, Fusion set up a series of meetings, at the Tabard Inn, in Washington, between Steele and a handful of national-security reporters.... Despite Steele's generally cool manner, he seemed distraught about the Russians' role in the election." Mayer attended one of the meetings. No news organizations ran any stories about the allegations at that time.[10]
Mother Jones story
By the third quarter of 2016, many news organizations knew about the existence of the dossier, which had been described as an "open secret" among journalists. However, they chose not to publish information that could not be confirmed.[2][52]
By October 2016, Steele had compiled 33 pages (16 memos), and he then passed on what he had discovered to David Corn, a reporter from Mother Jones magazine. On October 31, 2016, a week before the election, Mother Jones reported that a former intelligence officer, whom they did not name, had produced a report based on Russian sources and turned it over to the FBI.[44] The article disclosed some of the dossier's allegations:
The first memo, based on the former intelligence officer's conversations with Russian sources, noted, "Russian regime has been cultivating, supporting and assisting TRUMP for at least 5 years. Aim, endorsed by PUTIN, has been to encourage splits and divisions in western alliance". It maintained that Trump "and his inner circle have accepted a regular flow of intelligence from the Kremlin, including on his Democratic and other political rivals". It claimed that Russian intelligence had "compromised" Trump during his visits to Moscow and could "blackmail him". It also reported that Russian intelligence had compiled a dossier on Hillary Clinton based on "bugged conversations she had on various visits to Russia and intercepted phone calls.
— David Corn, "A Veteran Spy Has Given the FBI Information Alleging a Russian Operation to Cultivate Donald Trump", Mother Jones (October 31, 2016)[44]
When the Mother Jones story broke, John Podesta, chairman of the Clinton campaign, said he was "stunned by the news that the FBI had launched a full-blown investigation into Trump, especially one that was informed by research underwritten by the Clinton campaign." Although they knew that Perkins Coie had spent money for opposition research, neither Podesta nor campaign manager Robby Mook knew that Steele was on the Democratic payroll. They both maintain they "didn't read the dossier until BuzzFeed posted it online. Far from a secret campaign weapon, Steele turned out to be a secret kept from the campaign."[10]
Mother jones was the only outlet reporting on the existence of the dossier, just one week prior to vote. Overshadowed by Comey's announcement of re-opening Hillary's email investigation. MotherJones is far left, and certainly not mainstream. People didnt really know about dossier until after Trump assumed office, when buzzfeed published the actual dossier; before then it was just some far left site that no trump support would believe.The Dossier did not turn up until December. Oher testified he, Steele, Mueller, & the FBI were talking earlier than that...FBI started investigating July 2016, but dossier didnt come until 3 months later:Steele was working with Russians who opposed Putin and his established regime. Case in point is Oleg Erovinkin.
Its like if you said, "somebody worked with Americans". But then the question becomes did he work work with a republican american or a democrat american. Its the same thing when working with russians.
But its all a moot point, because nothing depends on the dossier. FBI investigation wasnt started because of dossier. Mueller doesnt depend on the dossier.. It could be 100% false and it wouldnt make one bit of difference.
case in point: Trump approved of proposed Popadopoulus meeting with Putin.
Says Popadopoulus, and no one else. You're such a lying piece of shit. The fact is that without the "dossier," there wouldn't be any Mueller investigation.
As The New York Times reported in December, the investigation began in July 2016 — after George Papadopoulos, a Trump campaign foreign policy adviser, told an Australian diplomat that Russia had political “dirt” on Hillary Clinton. Australian officials then alerted their American counterparts.
The information provided by Mr. Steele did not reach the F.B.I. officials charged with investigating Mr. Trump’s campaign until mid-September.
There were press stories on the "dossier' prior to the election. SO many in fact hinting that Trump had a Russia connection, that it had a weighable effect on the election. I have links to DOZENS of stories from the resistance media from Sept to the Nov election. But just read the Wiki entry for Trump-Russia Dossier.
Hints of existence
Jane Mayer has described how, in "late summer, Fusion set up a series of meetings, at the Tabard Inn, in Washington, between Steele and a handful of national-security reporters.... Despite Steele's generally cool manner, he seemed distraught about the Russians' role in the election." Mayer attended one of the meetings. No news organizations ran any stories about the allegations at that time.[10]
Mother Jones story
By the third quarter of 2016, many news organizations knew about the existence of the dossier, which had been described as an "open secret" among journalists. However, they chose not to publish information that could not be confirmed.[2][52]
By October 2016, Steele had compiled 33 pages (16 memos), and he then passed on what he had discovered to David Corn, a reporter from Mother Jones magazine. On October 31, 2016, a week before the election, Mother Jones reported that a former intelligence officer, whom they did not name, had produced a report based on Russian sources and turned it over to the FBI.[44] The article disclosed some of the dossier's allegations:
The first memo, based on the former intelligence officer's conversations with Russian sources, noted, "Russian regime has been cultivating, supporting and assisting TRUMP for at least 5 years. Aim, endorsed by PUTIN, has been to encourage splits and divisions in western alliance". It maintained that Trump "and his inner circle have accepted a regular flow of intelligence from the Kremlin, including on his Democratic and other political rivals". It claimed that Russian intelligence had "compromised" Trump during his visits to Moscow and could "blackmail him". It also reported that Russian intelligence had compiled a dossier on Hillary Clinton based on "bugged conversations she had on various visits to Russia and intercepted phone calls.
— David Corn, "A Veteran Spy Has Given the FBI Information Alleging a Russian Operation to Cultivate Donald Trump", Mother Jones (October 31, 2016)[44]
When the Mother Jones story broke, John Podesta, chairman of the Clinton campaign, said he was "stunned by the news that the FBI had launched a full-blown investigation into Trump, especially one that was informed by research underwritten by the Clinton campaign." Although they knew that Perkins Coie had spent money for opposition research, neither Podesta nor campaign manager Robby Mook knew that Steele was on the Democratic payroll. They both maintain they "didn't read the dossier until BuzzFeed posted it online. Far from a secret campaign weapon, Steele turned out to be a secret kept from the campaign."[10]
But ultimately, Hillary's campaign never used the dossier.
Of course, everything Comey testified to proved to be perfectly benign as far as national intelligence is concerned.Comey didnt answer any of the questions about dossier because it couldnt be answered in a public setting. Burr said the media had it before Comey had it.Actually if your read congressional testimony by Comey and others they found that the dossier information from Steel was being used far earlier than the NYSlime reported.. But hey who's Lying? The NYTimes or Comey?FBI started investigating July 2016, but dossier didnt come until 3 months later:Steele was working with Russians who opposed Putin and his established regime. Case in point is Oleg Erovinkin.1. [Supposed author of the dossier,] Steele was a “confirmed socialist” in college at Oxford when he was hired by MI6, another point of suspicion for someone who would be dispatched to Moscow as a spy and later serve as head of the Russian desk at MI6, all extremely sensitive positions." The Final Truth about the “Trump Dossier”
2.. Christopher Steele, Hillary's employee, got the 'dossier' via
Oleg Deripaska, a Russian oligarch linked to Vladimir Putin, according to a new report.
CHRISTOPHER STEELE REPORTEDLY WORKED FOR SANCTIONED RUSSIAN OLIGARCH
Christopher Steele Reportedly Worked For Sanctioned Russian Oligarch
3. Russia is a dictatorship.
Nothing emanates from Moscow without Putin's imprimatur....
The 'information' in the infamous 'dossier' came from Russia.
Now.....if Putin wanted Trump to win.......would there have ever.......ever.....been a dossier?????
QED......the candidate of Vladimir Putin was Hillary Clinton and the Democrats.
4. If any collusion occurred, it was through Democrats, the only folks for whom we have actual evidence of collusion.
Its like if you said, "somebody worked with Americans". But then the question becomes did he work work with a republican american or a democrat american. Its the same thing when working with russians.
But its all a moot point, because nothing depends on the dossier. FBI investigation wasnt started because of dossier. Mueller doesnt depend on the dossier.. It could be 100% false and it wouldnt make one bit of difference.
case in point: Trump approved of proposed Popadopoulus meeting with Putin.
Says Popadopoulus, and no one else. You're such a lying piece of shit. The fact is that without the "dossier," there wouldn't be any Mueller investigation.
As The New York Times reported in December, the investigation began in July 2016 — after George Papadopoulos, a Trump campaign foreign policy adviser, told an Australian diplomat that Russia had political “dirt” on Hillary Clinton. Australian officials then alerted their American counterparts.
The information provided by Mr. Steele did not reach the F.B.I. officials charged with investigating Mr. Trump’s campaign until mid-September.
Information from Bruce Ohr's testimony indicates that he and his wife were sending all of the information he was collecting to Clinton surrogates prior to the start of the special counsel investigation starting in June-July. This is why Comey made reference to many of the stories in the dossier in his letters to Chuck Shummer and other prominent democrats PRIOR TO THE ELECTION and prior to his termination for cause.FBI started investigating July 2016, but dossier didnt come until 3 months later:Steele was working with Russians who opposed Putin and his established regime. Case in point is Oleg Erovinkin.There is no evidence Christopher Steele was ever hired by FBI.You really are a dumbfk...
Do you know what happens to agents who use unverified and previously TERMINATED sources? Steel was terminated for cause which means he is NOT credible.... therefore his evidence is worthless.
Now that this is exposed this whole house of cards should collapse..
Christopher Steele was a british intelligence officer.
Much of that dossier has ended up being true, and none of it has been proven false.
In fact, Steele just won a libel case.
1. [Supposed author of the dossier,] Steele was a “confirmed socialist” in college at Oxford when he was hired by MI6, another point of suspicion for someone who would be dispatched to Moscow as a spy and later serve as head of the Russian desk at MI6, all extremely sensitive positions." The Final Truth about the “Trump Dossier”
2.. Christopher Steele, Hillary's employee, got the 'dossier' via
Oleg Deripaska, a Russian oligarch linked to Vladimir Putin, according to a new report.
CHRISTOPHER STEELE REPORTEDLY WORKED FOR SANCTIONED RUSSIAN OLIGARCH
Christopher Steele Reportedly Worked For Sanctioned Russian Oligarch
3. Russia is a dictatorship.
Nothing emanates from Moscow without Putin's imprimatur....
The 'information' in the infamous 'dossier' came from Russia.
Now.....if Putin wanted Trump to win.......would there have ever.......ever.....been a dossier?????
QED......the candidate of Vladimir Putin was Hillary Clinton and the Democrats.
4. If any collusion occurred, it was through Democrats, the only folks for whom we have actual evidence of collusion.
Its like if you said, "somebody worked with Americans". But then the question becomes did he work work with a republican american or a democrat american. Its the same thing when working with russians.
But its all a moot point, because nothing depends on the dossier. FBI investigation wasnt started because of dossier. Mueller doesnt depend on the dossier.. It could be 100% false and it wouldnt make one bit of difference.
case in point: Trump approved of proposed Popadopoulus meeting with Putin.
Says Popadopoulus, and no one else. You're such a lying piece of shit. The fact is that without the "dossier," there wouldn't be any Mueller investigation.
As The New York Times reported in December, the investigation began in July 2016 — after George Papadopoulos, a Trump campaign foreign policy adviser, told an Australian diplomat that Russia had political “dirt” on Hillary Clinton. Australian officials then alerted their American counterparts.
The information provided by Mr. Steele did not reach the F.B.I. officials charged with investigating Mr. Trump’s campaign until mid-September.
