Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Actually? What Shrillary did without getting prosecuted is extremely relevant to what’s happening to Trump.It has become a Republican mantra that Hillary got away with something so therefore, it is unfair to charge Trump for what he did. I personally disagree that she got away with anything, but either way, trump's case is based on his actions, and anything Hillary did or didn't do does not matter. What Biden did or didn't do with documants doesn't matter. What Mike Pence, Obama, GW Bush, or anybody else did doesn't matter. Trump is charged with breaking laws, and his case will be determined on his actions alone. The Artificial Intellegence site ChatGPT seems to agree with me,
Introducing ChatGPT
As an AI language model, I can provide information on the topic, but it's important to note that I cannot provide real-time legal analysis or information. However, I can give you a general perspective on the matter.
The legal case against former President Donald Trump would typically be based on specific charges or allegations brought against him, and it would be determined by the relevant laws, evidence, and legal procedures. The legal process is typically focused on the specific case at hand and is not directly influenced by unrelated matters or individuals who may or may not have faced legal issues in the past.
Whether Hillary Clinton "got away with something" or not is a separate matter from any legal case involving Donald Trump. Each case is evaluated based on its own merits, evidence, and applicable laws. Previous legal matters or perceptions about other individuals do not automatically impact the outcome of a different case.
In the United States, the legal system operates on the principle of due process, which means that each person is entitled to a fair and impartial legal proceeding that considers the specific facts and circumstances of their case. Legal cases are typically judged on their individual merits and are not influenced by unrelated matters.
It's important to consult legal experts or stay updated on current news from reputable sources for accurate and timely information regarding specific legal cases or ongoing proceedings involving Donald Trump or any other individuals.
Donald Trump is not on trial for J6, you fucking idiot.Your commentary.
You can claim irrelevance all you want, but it doesn't change reality.
Reality is, it matters VERY MUCH how the law is treating all the other people who've done the exact same thing.
It matters to HUNDREDS of MILLIONS of people.
And if you're not one of them, it speaks volumes about YOU.
NOT even close to reality, nor similarity.
Just like the summer of 2020 riots and the January 6th attempted insurrection, teabaggers tried to compare/conflate.
Yet you can't start a thread on here about Quid Pro Joe without somebody swooping in on the first page to screech, "But TRUMP!, but TRUMP!".It has become a Republican mantra that Hillary got away with something so therefore, it is unfair to charge Trump for what he did. I personally disagree that she got away with anything, but either way, trump's case is based on his actions, and anything Hillary did or didn't do does not matter. What Biden did or didn't do with documants doesn't matter. What Mike Pence, Obama, GW Bush, or anybody else did doesn't matter. Trump is charged with breaking laws, and his case will be determined on his actions alone. The Artificial Intellegence site ChatGPT seems to agree with me,
Introducing ChatGPT
As an AI language model, I can provide information on the topic, but it's important to note that I cannot provide real-time legal analysis or information. However, I can give you a general perspective on the matter.
The legal case against former President Donald Trump would typically be based on specific charges or allegations brought against him, and it would be determined by the relevant laws, evidence, and legal procedures. The legal process is typically focused on the specific case at hand and is not directly influenced by unrelated matters or individuals who may or may not have faced legal issues in the past.
Whether Hillary Clinton "got away with something" or not is a separate matter from any legal case involving Donald Trump. Each case is evaluated based on its own merits, evidence, and applicable laws. Previous legal matters or perceptions about other individuals do not automatically impact the outcome of a different case.
In the United States, the legal system operates on the principle of due process, which means that each person is entitled to a fair and impartial legal proceeding that considers the specific facts and circumstances of their case. Legal cases are typically judged on their individual merits and are not influenced by unrelated matters.
It's important to consult legal experts or stay updated on current news from reputable sources for accurate and timely information regarding specific legal cases or ongoing proceedings involving Donald Trump or any other individuals.
We'll see, won't we?
You Stalinist assholes can depose Trump, but what are you going to do about the rest of us?
Clearly Bush vs. Armstrong I & II and Judicial Watch vs. NARA apply to Trump's case.If there are court settled cases that the attorneys deem relevant they will be introduced. Then it will be up to the judge to allow or disallow as evidence.
Actually? What Shrillary did without getting prosecuted is extremely relevant to what’s happening to Trump.
I note that obvious truth just to highlight the incredible dishonesty of the app and so many degenerate libturd liars like the OP.
More like fizzling, but don't let that stop your warped fantasies.Of course we will. Still, as of now, the trial is forging ahead.
That is one ton of bullshit in a very short post.Well no, it's not. She didn't hold onto classified documents after leaving office. She didn't resist returning them. She didn't hide them from the NARA. She didn't share them with others who didn't have a security clearance.
As always, your whataboutisms fail you.
Donald Trump is not on trial for J6, you fucking idiot.
That is one ton of bullshit in a very short post.
Yet you can't start a thread on here about Quid Pro Joe without somebody swooping in on the first page to screech, "But TRUMP!, but TRUMP!".
More like fizzling, but don't let that stop your warped fantasies.
That is one ton of bullshit in a very short post.
Re: Why were Hillary's classified emails on Carlos Danger's laptop?
You know what? You're not that stupid, therefore you knew all that was a lie when you posted it.
LIAR!
Clearly Bush vs. Armstrong I & II and Judicial Watch vs. NARA apply to Trump's case.
Yea sure. So how do you apply precedent to a first?
Imbecile...
Because Huma Abedin had a security clearance.
wrong,,Everything should have a basis in precedent.
my guess is youre not sure if you have jock itch or clamitia,,I'm sure there has been a wide range of verdicts in posession trials. Some got off light, others not so much. It's all based on the facts of the case.
It doesn't matter what anyone did now, just wait though, since you loons opened the door expect Obama, Hillary, and others to find their way to trial. Thanks.It has become a Republican mantra that Hillary got away with something so therefore, it is unfair to charge Trump for what he did. I personally disagree that she got away with anything, but either way, trump's case is based on his actions, and anything Hillary did or didn't do does not matter. What Biden did or didn't do with documants doesn't matter. What Mike Pence, Obama, GW Bush, or anybody else did doesn't matter. Trump is charged with breaking laws, and his case will be determined on his actions alone. The Artificial Intellegence site ChatGPT seems to agree with me,
Introducing ChatGPT
As an AI language model, I can provide information on the topic, but it's important to note that I cannot provide real-time legal analysis or information. However, I can give you a general perspective on the matter.
The legal case against former President Donald Trump would typically be based on specific charges or allegations brought against him, and it would be determined by the relevant laws, evidence, and legal procedures. The legal process is typically focused on the specific case at hand and is not directly influenced by unrelated matters or individuals who may or may not have faced legal issues in the past.
Whether Hillary Clinton "got away with something" or not is a separate matter from any legal case involving Donald Trump. Each case is evaluated based on its own merits, evidence, and applicable laws. Previous legal matters or perceptions about other individuals do not automatically impact the outcome of a different case.
In the United States, the legal system operates on the principle of due process, which means that each person is entitled to a fair and impartial legal proceeding that considers the specific facts and circumstances of their case. Legal cases are typically judged on their individual merits and are not influenced by unrelated matters.
It's important to consult legal experts or stay updated on current news from reputable sources for accurate and timely information regarding specific legal cases or ongoing proceedings involving Donald Trump or any other individuals.
wrong,,
everything should have a basis in reality and the constitution,,
precedence and case law are how progs sidestep and take more control,,
