Jack Smith wants to indict Trump for Jan 6

jacksmithisdirtydirtydirty.jpg
 
Um, yeah, his rhetoric was alienating the groups over there that were willing to work with us.

If you see the war on terror for what it is, a few radicals using terror as a tactic, that's probably a winnable fight.

If you see the war as an clash of religions and cultures... we aren't going to win that one, but that's what old Crazy Mike ran around saying before Obama sacked his sorry ass.
He was right.
 
"Make him an offer he can't refuse".....wasn't referencing cannolis.

Meaning, "March Peacefully" was one thing Trump said.
He said other things.
So did the others on the podium that day.
Context matters.
So where's the indictments for:

Inciting to riot
Sedition
Insurrection

???????

LOL
 
"So where's the indictments for:
Inciting to riot....

LOL"
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

Well, poster Delldude, my avatar is sympathetic to your disappointment that those charges weren't include yet.
But, we would advise that you be satisfied that there is some real bad juju in yesterday's indictment, and bad juju in the other indictments. A conviction on those charges would seem to have consequesnces. IMHO

So, don't be greedy. Or too retributive. Don't be vengeful.
If our disgraced ex-President gets convicted of just yesterday's charges alone....well, you should be satisfied that a measure of long overdue accountability has finally been levied.
 
But, we would advise that you be satisfied that there is some real bad juju in yesterday's indictment, and bad juju in the other indictments. A conviction on those charges would seem to have consequesnces.
Disseminating falsehoods over election fraud is a criminal offense?
 

Forum List

Back
Top