Lovebears65
Gold Member
You can not blame this on the house. They have passed many budgets but not even a look though by Harry Reid. He should be fired!!
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature currently requires accessing the site using the built-in Safari browser.
Why has there not been a budget in 1000 days?....see my Avatar.
You can save the picture and re-use it to explain the failures of our government for the last 30 years.
The Senate cannot fulfill it's role in the budget process without the house being cooperative in some measure. If the house is unwilling to compromise during the reconciliation phase then there will be no budget.
The Senate cannot fulfill it's role in the budget process without the house being cooperative in some measure. If the house is unwilling to compromise during the reconciliation phase then there will be no budget.
So whats new, the country is freaking broke, people live in a delusional state of denial with the thought that it will all pass to the next generation and not effect them in the here and now. Some think that there is no end and that we can just tax our way back to prosperity without understanding basic economics and the numbers, and others understand that cuts are coming and lack the guts to tell the truth. I would not suggest holding ones breath it's going to get ugly.
The Senate cannot fulfill it's role in the budget process without the house being cooperative in some measure. If the house is unwilling to compromise during the reconciliation phase then there will be no budget.
Why only the house needs to comprimise? Why not the senate?
And do you have a link showing that the senate actually voted on a budget from the house?
House Republicans are too busy reading the Constitution out loud and passing anti abortion measures to do anything useful.
They will lose seats in November.
The Senate cannot fulfill it's role in the budget process without the house being cooperative in some measure. If the house is unwilling to compromise during the reconciliation phase then there will be no budget.
The Senate cannot fulfill it's role in the budget process without the house being cooperative in some measure. If the house is unwilling to compromise during the reconciliation phase then there will be no budget.
Why only the house needs to comprimise? Why not the senate?
And do you have a link showing that the senate actually voted on a budget from the house?
Reading his posts..
The only "link" he has is "missing"...if you get my drift.
The Senate cannot fulfill it's role in the budget process without the house being cooperative in some measure. If the house is unwilling to compromise during the reconciliation phase then there will be no budget.
In your previous post you stated that the Senate voted on the House budget.
The entire Senate or just a budget committee?
If it was voted on by the entire Senate and killed, the House would then have to re-submit a budget wouldn't they? Or would it fall on the Senate to take up the task?
Because, right now, the House can pass just about any Budget they want to with a (R) majority.
With whom would they 'compromise'?
The Dems proposed a Budget and it was literally death-by-suicide. Their own party voted against it.
Isn't the President supposed to come up with some sort of a recommendation? Where is that at?
If no one holds them accountable, is it even a law anymore?You can not blame this on the house. They have passed many budgets but not even a look though by Harry Reid. He should be fired!!
If the president proposed a budget giving 2 trillion to Disney to make new rides and the senate went 97-0 against would this be a bad thing?The Senate cannot fulfill it's role in the budget process without the house being cooperative in some measure. If the house is unwilling to compromise during the reconciliation phase then there will be no budget.
In your previous post you stated that the Senate voted on the House budget.
The entire Senate or just a budget committee?
If it was voted on by the entire Senate and killed, the House would then have to re-submit a budget wouldn't they? Or would it fall on the Senate to take up the task?
Because, right now, the House can pass just about any Budget they want to with a (R) majority.
With whom would they 'compromise'?
The Dems proposed a Budget and it was literally death-by-suicide. Their own party voted against it.
Isn't the President supposed to come up with some sort of a recommendation? Where is that at?
Wasn't the presidents plan rejected 97-0?
The Senate cannot fulfill it's role in the budget process without the house being cooperative in some measure. If the house is unwilling to compromise during the reconciliation phase then there will be no budget.
In your previous post you stated that the Senate voted on the House budget.
The entire Senate or just a budget committee?
If it was voted on by the entire Senate and killed, the House would then have to re-submit a budget wouldn't they? Or would it fall on the Senate to take up the task?
Because, right now, the House can pass just about any Budget they want to with a (R) majority.
With whom would they 'compromise'?
The Dems proposed a Budget and it was literally death-by-suicide. Their own party voted against it.
Isn't the President supposed to come up with some sort of a recommendation? Where is that at?
Wasn't the presidents plan rejected 97-0?