Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Im not playing any games. Im just calling bullshit on you.Damn, kid. You’re dull.
Im not playing any games. Im just calling bullshit on you.
Once again, for your retarded brain:
You, as the proponent of an assertion, have the burden of proof.
Of course, you’re free to just make assertions without offering any support in facts or logic. Nobody expects better from a dimwit such as you. But, when you wish to someday be taken seriously, the rule isn’t subject to your whim: The proponent carries the burden.
The facts I stated are that they were calling for trumps impeachment early in his presidency, and they did just that, which shows that they had impeachment on their minds the whole time.Are these the "facts" to which you are now referring?
I don’t take directions from scumbag retards like you.Im not playing any games. Im just calling bullshit on you.
If you're done, shut the fuk up.
Never said I was. I enjoy calling bullshit on frauds like you.But we both know you aren't.
All who read it. But that doesn’t matter when, as here, you don’t support your claims in any fashion whatsofuckingever.now explain to me who will judge what I provide you.
At the time US Intelligence services had concluded that he was a problem.The facts I stated are that they were calling for trumps impeachment early in his presidency, and they did just that, which shows that they had impeachment on their minds the whole time.
I don’t take directions from scumbag retards like you.
Never said I was. I enjoy calling bullshit on frauds like you.
All who read it. But that doesn’t matter when, as here, you don’t support your claims in any fashion whatsofuckingever.
Man. You’re a simple little retard.
Ass sucker. The rules pre-existed us.I have no intention of throwing pearls before dim pigs. There has to be something in it for me.
In this instance, you codifying the rules by which we will BOTH proceed.
The rules pre-existed us.Ass sucker. The rules pre-existed us.
You’re a coward. I fully get it. Actually supporting what you say is way too hard and scary for a pussy like you.
Run away. But feel free to come back and try to be an adult if your little balls ever drop.
You’re still being a very slow student.The rules pre-existed us.
You’re a coward
You haven't set much of an example.
Now would be a good time.
What or whose standard must I meet?
What are the arbiter's qualifications to determine facts?
4 months into his presidency? Also, there are articles that suggest the impeachment talk was going around before he was even nominated.At the time US Intelligence services had concluded that he was a problem.
Also, please link to that. I want to see where intelligence services deemed a problem before and within 4 months of his presidency.At the time US Intelligence services had concluded that he was a problem.
Post your alleged facts. Post your logic. Then, you don’t need to fret who the judge is. It’s everybody and nobody. It’s just the start of the discussionYou’re still being a very slow student.
The rules already exist and I’ve repeated them for you several times. If you make the assertion, you bear the burden of proof.
Post your alleged facts. Post your logic. Then, you don’t need to fret who the judge is. It’s everybody and nobody. It’s just the start of the discussion. For example, I might dispute your alleged facts. Or I might question your purported “logic.” Or, both. That’s the nature of the give and take of a discussion or argument
You aren’t required to sack up. Lots of people here make silly pronouncements and decline to even try to substantiate what they say. Gutless useless shitstains like you.
I'm sure you would...Also, please link to that. I want to see where intelligence services deemed a problem before and within 4 months of his presidency.
And, even if they thought so, that's not any reason for dems to start talking impeachment.
Face it, your dem leaders had intentions of impeachment from the get go.
PRIOR to his presidency.4 months into his presidency? Also, there are articles that suggest the impeachment talk was going around before he was even nominated.
You asked, you sub moron douche bag.Post your alleged facts. Post your logic. Then, you don’t need to fret who the judge is. It’s everybody and nobody. It’s just the start of the discussion
Who are you to presume to lecture me on Rhetoric?
As I noted. You retain the right to be a. Complete cowardly kissy and quite laughable. Good news. It’s working!I have no obligation to explain anything to braying jackasses who have chosen willful ignorance.
Meaningless.None of your peers watched the hearings.
Irrelevant. (Did you not realize that people can read?)Did you?
Sure...You asked, you sub moron douche bag.
As I noted. You retain the right to be a. Complete cowardly kissy and quite laughable. Good news. It’s working!
Meaningless.
Irrelevant. (Did you not realize that people can read?)
Also, did you know that your transparent effort to deflect doesn’t work?
You’re just a pussy. No big deal. It isn’t possible to take you seriously.
You have yet to offer proof insupport of a single assertion.Also, please link to that. I want to see where intelligence services deemed a problem before and within 4 months of his presidency.
And, even if they thought so, that's not any reason for dems to start talking impeachment.
Face it, your dem leaders had intentions of impeachment from the get go.
British spies were first to spot Trump team's links with RussiaAlso, please link to that. I want to see where intelligence services deemed a problem before and within 4 months of his presidency.
And, even if they thought so, that's not any reason for dems to start talking impeachment.
Face it, your dem leaders had intentions of impeachment from the get go.
So after all your huffing puffing and posturing and evasions the bottom line remains the same. You still can’t find your balls. Check.Sure...
You have failed to answer simple questions...
So what's the source of all of your cred
When you're done posing and bluffing, and are ready to engage, let me know.
But I don't play the "prove it to me" game with people who couldn't bother to inform themselves of the facts.
Meaningless.
I disagree
Irrelevant. (Did you not realize that people can read?)
Where did you read it?
Also, did you know that your transparent effort to deflect doesn’t work?
If you were a lawyer, you must have sucked at it....
No, it's still you making demands while declining to answer simple questions.So after all your huffing puffing and posturing and evasions the bottom line remains the same. You still can’t find your balls. Check.
