Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
No no. I’m still waiting for you to support your initial claim.No, it's still you making demands while declining to answer simple questions.
Here's a simple test..
Did the Oath Keepers engage in a seditious conspiracy?
No...I already have.No no. I’m still waiting for you to support your initial claim.
So let’s remind you. You claimed (without any effort to support your moronic contention) that it was “indisputable” that Trump had somehow orchestrated the 1/6 incident.
Back that shit up, ya cowardly schmuck.
But you never will. You stand fully exposed as a waffling pussy.
You’re babbling.No...I already have.
You didn't like it.....because it's inconvenient.
He is the symbol of the delusion at the heart of your effort....
But even in his absence, you would be obliged to acknowledge facts presented. I'm satisfied, based on the available sample, that you won't.
Could be. I made the mistake that he is smarter than that and just made a typo.he might actually want to persecute people.
I made an unambiguous offer to support it.
With informed opinion.
I don't think I could be more clear.
They lied.At the time US Intelligence services had concluded that he was a problem.
Your liberal media failed to report this evidence as found by the 1/6 committee. Whose fault is that?Post your alleged facts. Post your logic. Then, you don’t need to fret who the judge is. It’s everybody and nobody. It’s just the start of the discussion
Who are you to presume to lecture me on Rhetoric?
I have no obligation to explain anything to braying jackasses who have chosen willful ignorance.
None of your peers watched the hearings.
Did you?
Have they been charged with that crime and when were they convicted?No, it's still you making demands while declining to answer simple questions.
Here's a simple test..
Did the Oath Keepers engage in a seditious conspiracy?
You’re babbling.
You’ve never yet even tried to support your claim. Not with facts and not with logic.
And we all know it — which is clear because you can’t point to your effort. And you never will.
What part ofYou know the saying about opinions don't you? Opinions are like assholes. Everyone has one and they all stink!
Your liberal media failed to report this evidence as found by the 1/6 committee. Whose fault is that?
Q fuckin' E. D.Have they been charged with that crime and when were they convicted?
You’re just a coward. Man up or shut up. Either way, you’ll be less laughable.I'm not interested in a "I said/she said" contest with a coward who won't leave the satellite parking lot, never mind enter the ring.
Don't claim to speak for some posse...you speak only for yourself. And before I start typing, I wanna know what the fuck you are.
So far all I know for sure is that you're a yapping quim.
Goading from the fetal position won't get you what you want...
Stand up, bitch.
You’re still babblingI'm not interested in a "I said/she said" contest with a coward who won't leave the satellite parking lot, never mind enter the ring.
Don't claim to speak for some posse...you speak only for yourself. And before I start typing, I wanna know what the fuck you are.
So far all I know for sure is that you're a yapping quim.
Goading from the fetal position won't get you what you want...
Stand up, bitch.
Like?They found loads of evidence of criminal activity. They would be derelict not to make criminal referrals.
Oops, not watching the hearings bites you in the ass again.Like?
No...we're well past this point.A quick tutorial for The5thHorseman also known as “TheHorseshit:”
The proponent of an assertion has the burden of proof. It doesn’t matter to whom the proof is offered.
Assertion: The5thHorseman is either a pussy who evades even trying to support his own assertions OR he doesn’t grasp the concept and doesn’t know how to do it.
Support: when Horseshit made an assertion specifically about Trump’s alleged responsibility for “inciting” the 1/6 incident, he failed to even try to support it. When pressed, he tries to change the subject. His faux “answer” is to try to convert the conversation into one about the Oath Keepers.
Therefore: being charitable, Horseshit is too stupid to grasp the notion of this burden of proof. Alternatively, Horseshit is simply too much of a pussy to even try to support his assertion.
