reconmark
Gold Member
- May 13, 2014
- 6,508
- 1,227
The literacy level of conservatives...
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Unlock unbeatable offers today. Shop here: https://amzn.to/4cEkqYs 🎁
The literacy level of conservatives...
The left is shocked to learn that Hawaii is an island in the Pacific.
See the video above. Dan Quayle broke the news that Hawaìi is "right here".
Apparently Sessions Gump wants judicial decisions to emanate not from "right here" but from "out there".
Isn't it interesting that when the Birfers --- like Rump --- were trying to move O'bama's birthplace OUT OF Hawaìi, it was because Hawaìi was definitely part of the country. Now it becomes "an island in the Pacific".
Having it both ways ---- Priceless.
The left is shocked to learn that Hawaii is an island in the Pacific.
See the video above. Dan Quayle broke the news that Hawaìi is "right here".
Apparently Sessions Gump wants judicial decisions to emanate not from "right here" but from "out there".
Isn't it interesting that when the Birfers --- like Rump --- were trying to move O'bama's birthplace OUT OF Hawaìi, it was because Hawaìi was definitely part of the country. Now it becomes "an island in the Pacific".
Having it both ways ---- Priceless.
My wife is from Hawaii. I just asked her if it's an island in the Pacific and she said, "Well, yeah..."
"I really am amazed that a judge sitting on an island in the Pacific can issue an order that stops the President of the United States from what appears to be clearly his statutory and Constitutional power."The left is shocked to learn that Hawaii is an island in the Pacific.
See the video above. Dan Quayle broke the news that Hawaìi is "right here".
Apparently Sessions Gump wants judicial decisions to emanate not from "right here" but from "out there".
Isn't it interesting that when the Birfers --- like Rump --- were trying to move O'bama's birthplace OUT OF Hawaìi, it was because Hawaìi was definitely part of the country. Now it becomes "an island in the Pacific".
Having it both ways ---- Priceless.
My wife is from Hawaii. I just asked her if it's an island in the Pacific and she said, "Well, yeah..."
Why not? It is both."I really am amazed that a judge sitting on an island in the Pacific can issue an order that stops the President of the United States from what appears to be clearly his statutory and Constitutional power."
I wonder if he calls Florida a peninsula instead of state.
Aren't Basque terrorist?
Sessions is a nasty man.
Sessions is a nasty man.
And you are a very stupid person.
No, Sessions is a very good and decent man.
Sessions is a nasty man.
And you are a very stupid person.
That's quite a step up from the deeply stupid like yourself.
And sessions remains a nasty man
No, Sessions is a very good and decent man.
Sessions is a nasty man.
And you are a very stupid person.
That's quite a step up from the deeply stupid like yourself.
And sessions remains a nasty man
You perceive him as 'nasty' because you are an ideologue and Sessions violates your ideology.
That is the problem with you ideologues; you see EVERYTHING through your ideological prism.
Which is what in fact makes you stupid as a busted rock.
/---- It's always a challenge educating Libtard Moonbats and you are no exception. I'll dumb it down. The AG meant that the Judge isolated on a tiny island in the middle of the Pacific thousands of miles away is not attuned to the immigration issues on the mainland. Maybe your Special Ed teacher can explain it better for you./---- Gee where was your fake outrage when Obozo attacked judges? President Obama had a couple of notable run-ins with the Supreme Court. In his 2010 State of the Union, he chided the court for a recent decision holding unconstitutional certain campaign finance restrictions. Obama asserted that the court, in reaching its decision, had "reversed a century of law."/---- No you retard. He means the judge is sitting on a remote Island far removed for the issues of the main land. And the Ag is 100% correct.Great An AG who doesn't know his country outside of Alafrickinbama.
>> “I really am amazed that a judge sitting on an island in the Pacific can issue an order that stops the president of the United States from what appears to be clearly his statutory and constitutional power,” Sessions told radio host Mark Levin on Wednesday, as reported by CNN. <<
Really Sessions Gump? You think judicial decisions are made on the basis of fucking geography??
Yuh huh. This is a federal judge, not an "island in the Pacific" judge. Sooooooo maybe you can essplain to the class how geography is in any way pertinent. Is Hawaìi not a state? Does it not have a star on the flag?
If some geographical distance is to be a measure of judicial competence, doesn't that mean a judge closer to the national capitol --- say, a judge from Maryland --- carries more weight than a judge from, say, Alabama?
Looks to me like that alone makes Sessions Gump unqualified. The AG shouldn't be from any further away than Virginia, and northern Virginia at that. Hey ---- your logic. And that's all I have to say about that.
Gee Wally, did he invoke geography as a basis for objection? Hm? Did he say “I really am amazed that a panel of judges sitting 'in a building in the District which is dozens of steps from here' can issue an orders just because the Constitution says they can”? Hm?
Wassamatta, can't handle the point, gotta change the subject?
Sooooooooooo you're saying distance from DC renders a state irrelevant. Alaska and Hawaìi should have no federal judges at all. Presumably no electoral votes either. Give all the EVs to the Marylands and Virginias.
Again --- your logic, Bubbles.
No, Sessions is a very good and decent man.
Sessions is a nasty man.
And you are a very stupid person.
That's quite a step up from the deeply stupid like yourself.
And sessions remains a nasty man
You perceive him as 'nasty' because you are an ideologue and Sessions violates your ideology.
That is the problem with you ideologues; you see EVERYTHING through your ideological prism.
Which is what in fact makes you stupid as a busted rock.
Sessions is not a good and decent man. He's a nasty little man.
/---- It's always a challenge educating Libtard Moonbats and you are no exception. I'll dumb it down. The AG meant that the Judge isolated on a tiny island in the middle of the Pacific thousands of miles away is not attuned to the immigration issues on the mainland. Maybe your Special Ed teacher can explain it better for you./---- Gee where was your fake outrage when Obozo attacked judges? President Obama had a couple of notable run-ins with the Supreme Court. In his 2010 State of the Union, he chided the court for a recent decision holding unconstitutional certain campaign finance restrictions. Obama asserted that the court, in reaching its decision, had "reversed a century of law."/---- No you retard. He means the judge is sitting on a remote Island far removed for the issues of the main land. And the Ag is 100% correct.Great An AG who doesn't know his country outside of Alafrickinbama.
>> “I really am amazed that a judge sitting on an island in the Pacific can issue an order that stops the president of the United States from what appears to be clearly his statutory and constitutional power,” Sessions told radio host Mark Levin on Wednesday, as reported by CNN. <<
Really Sessions Gump? You think judicial decisions are made on the basis of fucking geography??
Yuh huh. This is a federal judge, not an "island in the Pacific" judge. Sooooooo maybe you can essplain to the class how geography is in any way pertinent. Is Hawaìi not a state? Does it not have a star on the flag?
If some geographical distance is to be a measure of judicial competence, doesn't that mean a judge closer to the national capitol --- say, a judge from Maryland --- carries more weight than a judge from, say, Alabama?
Looks to me like that alone makes Sessions Gump unqualified. The AG shouldn't be from any further away than Virginia, and northern Virginia at that. Hey ---- your logic. And that's all I have to say about that.
Gee Wally, did he invoke geography as a basis for objection? Hm? Did he say “I really am amazed that a panel of judges sitting 'in a building in the District which is dozens of steps from here' can issue an orders just because the Constitution says they can”? Hm?
Wassamatta, can't handle the point, gotta change the subject?
Sooooooooooo you're saying distance from DC renders a state irrelevant. Alaska and Hawaìi should have no federal judges at all. Presumably no electoral votes either. Give all the EVs to the Marylands and Virginias.
Again --- your logic, Bubbles.
/---- It's always a challenge educating Libtard Moonbats and you are no exception. I'll dumb it down. The AG meant that the Judge isolated on a tiny island in the middle of the Pacific thousands of miles away is not attuned to the immigration issues on the mainland. Maybe your Special Ed teacher can explain it better for you./---- Gee where was your fake outrage when Obozo attacked judges? President Obama had a couple of notable run-ins with the Supreme Court. In his 2010 State of the Union, he chided the court for a recent decision holding unconstitutional certain campaign finance restrictions. Obama asserted that the court, in reaching its decision, had "reversed a century of law."/---- No you retard. He means the judge is sitting on a remote Island far removed for the issues of the main land. And the Ag is 100% correct.
Yuh huh. This is a federal judge, not an "island in the Pacific" judge. Sooooooo maybe you can essplain to the class how geography is in any way pertinent. Is Hawaìi not a state? Does it not have a star on the flag?
If some geographical distance is to be a measure of judicial competence, doesn't that mean a judge closer to the national capitol --- say, a judge from Maryland --- carries more weight than a judge from, say, Alabama?
Looks to me like that alone makes Sessions Gump unqualified. The AG shouldn't be from any further away than Virginia, and northern Virginia at that. Hey ---- your logic. And that's all I have to say about that.
Gee Wally, did he invoke geography as a basis for objection? Hm? Did he say “I really am amazed that a panel of judges sitting 'in a building in the District which is dozens of steps from here' can issue an orders just because the Constitution says they can”? Hm?
Wassamatta, can't handle the point, gotta change the subject?
Sooooooooooo you're saying distance from DC renders a state irrelevant. Alaska and Hawaìi should have no federal judges at all. Presumably no electoral votes either. Give all the EVs to the Marylands and Virginias.
Again --- your logic, Bubbles.
Who cares what he meant, he is still a slimy snake and a nasty man.
/---- It's always a challenge educating Libtard Moonbats and you are no exception. I'll dumb it down. The AG meant that the Judge isolated on a tiny island in the middle of the Pacific thousands of miles away is not attuned to the immigration issues on the mainland. Maybe your Special Ed teacher can explain it better for you./---- Gee where was your fake outrage when Obozo attacked judges? President Obama had a couple of notable run-ins with the Supreme Court. In his 2010 State of the Union, he chided the court for a recent decision holding unconstitutional certain campaign finance restrictions. Obama asserted that the court, in reaching its decision, had "reversed a century of law."/---- No you retard. He means the judge is sitting on a remote Island far removed for the issues of the main land. And the Ag is 100% correct.Great An AG who doesn't know his country outside of Alafrickinbama.
>> “I really am amazed that a judge sitting on an island in the Pacific can issue an order that stops the president of the United States from what appears to be clearly his statutory and constitutional power,” Sessions told radio host Mark Levin on Wednesday, as reported by CNN. <<
Really Sessions Gump? You think judicial decisions are made on the basis of fucking geography??
Yuh huh. This is a federal judge, not an "island in the Pacific" judge. Sooooooo maybe you can essplain to the class how geography is in any way pertinent. Is Hawaìi not a state? Does it not have a star on the flag?
If some geographical distance is to be a measure of judicial competence, doesn't that mean a judge closer to the national capitol --- say, a judge from Maryland --- carries more weight than a judge from, say, Alabama?
Looks to me like that alone makes Sessions Gump unqualified. The AG shouldn't be from any further away than Virginia, and northern Virginia at that. Hey ---- your logic. And that's all I have to say about that.
Gee Wally, did he invoke geography as a basis for objection? Hm? Did he say “I really am amazed that a panel of judges sitting 'in a building in the District which is dozens of steps from here' can issue an orders just because the Constitution says they can”? Hm?
Wassamatta, can't handle the point, gotta change the subject?
Sooooooooooo you're saying distance from DC renders a state irrelevant. Alaska and Hawaìi should have no federal judges at all. Presumably no electoral votes either. Give all the EVs to the Marylands and Virginias.
Again --- your logic, Bubbles.
The whole point of the appointment is so they are not constantly running for judicial elections.Unless they get IMPEACHED which is damned sure what should happen to this fucking moron of a judge.Federal appointments are lifetime appointments.
Whats next, he is going to rule that he gets a winning lottery ticket? That the 2016 election was not to his liking so put Hillary in?
I would like to see warring judges making ruling that neutralize each other, that would be hilarious!
"Today Judge Ipshitz of Cleveland district Hugivesafuck over ruled judge Fartlow of California on his ruling that Judge Coxuker of Detroit was out of his scope of authority to rule that Goldman Sachs had to give him a $2 million account or he would confiscate their property." That would be hilarious as all hell.
Where is the limit of scope and authority of federal judges?
No one has yet told me what that limit is as of yet. They are all little Imperial tyrants that can make up any fucking ruling that they want and get away with it.
These ass hats are just people, nothing more and they need to be held accountable.
Of COURSE there are OUTS for behavior unbecoming the oath of the robe, but it's a process.......
I'm thinking that process needs set into motion.