harmonica
Diamond Member
- Sep 1, 2017
- 43,841
- 20,018
- 2,300
....so if they were WRONG about the Inquisition and WRONG about Galileo, you think they will be right about everything else????Of course the Bibble condones slavery! Seeing people beaten, whipped and forced to toil in the fields gave Him a hard on from here to Uranus.Jefferson + Genesis still resulted in slavery
But then again, the Bible condones slavery
1. Every day we find another dunce like this, a grad of indoctrination school, sent out in the world to spread the propagnda.
He has never read the Bible.
Let's prove it.
"Of course the Bibble (sic) condones slavery! Seeing people beaten, whipped and forced to toil in the fields."
That, of course, is the Democrat version of slavery, and proof that the Democrats server a very different master.
2. Not only is the above not endorsed by the Bible…..but it is expressly forbidden.
The aspects that identify what we call 'slavery' today, the colloquial meaning, are the following:
a. permanence of bondage
b. treatment as material assets
c. control of the life and death of the slave: the slave could be beaten to death
d. an escaped slave had to be returned to his master….as decreed in the Dred Scott Democrat Supreme Court decision.
This is Democrat slavery.
3. None of the above are allowed to the 'slave owner' by the Bible.
"The Bible uses the Hebrew term eved (עבד) and Greek doulos (δοῦλος) to refer to slaves. Eved has a much wider meaning than the English term slave, and in many circumstances it is more accurately translated into English as servant or hired worker."
Christian views on slavery - Wikipedia
e,g, "God spoke face-to-face with Moses but Joshua will be instructed by Eleazar; Moses was the servant of God but Joshua is Moses’s minister (Joshua 1.1)." https://uwaterloo.ca/grebel/sites/ca.grebel/files/uploads/files/CGR-22-1-W2004-1_1.pdf
"If you buy a Hebrew servant, he is to serve you for six years. But in the seventh year, he shall go free, without paying anything."
Exodus 21:2
So….if the Bible is your excuse for the imposition of slavery….the argument fails at the briefest perusal of the text.
4. But….how about simply defining black slaves as 'foreign'?
"While foreign slaves could be made slaves for life,…"
The treatment of blacks in the South doesn't seem to have conformed to this:
"….the laws regarding the general treatment of slaves applied to them as well (Lev 24:22, Num 15:15-16). The law made it clear that foreigners were not inferiors who could be mistreated (Ex 23:9); instead they were to be loved just as fellow Israelites were (Lev 19:33-34). " Slavery in the OT
If the Bible is used as the excuse used for slavery, then all of the restrictions need be followed.
They weren't.
It isn't.
It is the lack of humanity by Democrats that produced the inhuman version of slavery.
And it is ignorance that produced the above poster.
..stupid people following stupid people are even more stupid