Jerome Corsi negotiating plea with Mueller

Aiding a foreign adversary in desiminating information from stolen e mails to help elected an idiot....we have an illegitimate so called POS president.
1. Mueller has no evidence that President Trump ever colluded with the Russians...or that any illegal collusion ever occurred.

2. Using foreign-provided information that was paid for in a US election is a crime. Evidence exists that Hillary Clinton colluded with and paid foreign spies working for Obama's FBI and Russians.

The harder you try to manufacture a case / evidence against the President the dumber you look.....

Ha Ha! You have no idea what Mueller has....and the Hillary excuse is worn and old.

Collusion will be found. trumpo will be seen as an illegitimate president...installed with the aid of a foreign adversary...

Are you claiming that Russia changed votes?

So he is illegitimate because he beat a woman who lost 3 primaries and didn't campaign in the general?
 
Now wait a minute. I thought that when Rosenstein announced the last set of ghost indictments of "Russians", he clearly stated that NO Americans were involved. Yet now, Mueller is going after Americans. More proof he needs to be shut down as he can't even keep his stories straight anymore.

More like, proof that you're a dope.

No Americans involved in what the indictment covered, dope.

Nothing like you showing your utter stupidity. Again. Need I remind you of another statement in that release. NO election results were affected. Not ONE vote was changed. meaning tis investigation has NO legal basis. Resume your whinng.
 
LOL

You’re unhinged, rightie. That has nothing to do with anything I said.

They said, as part of his punishment, he wouldn't be able to practice in front of the Supreme Court.
Can he practice in front of the Supreme Court?
Now wtf does that have to do with, ”He wasn't convicted.....he plead guilty?”

He wasn't disbarred, he quit before the disbarment took effect.
Kind of like pleading guilty before you're convicted.
End result, he can't practice in front of the Supreme Court.
No, it’s not like pleading guilty since he didn’t plead guilty in their court. He had the opportunity to challenge it and given he had stopped practicing law nearly 2 decades earlier and had never taken a case to the U.S. Supreme Court, he opted to to resign from the Supreme Court bar instead.

No matter how desperate you are to try and spin it, Clinton wasn’t disbarred, as you (and trump), idiotically claimed.

You merely lack the intelligence to know any better and you lack the character needed to simply admit you’re wrong. Like I said earlier, I can live with that. :mm:

No, it’s not like pleading guilty since he didn’t plead guilty in their court.

What's the difference between 5 years in jail from a conviction and 5 years in jail from a plea?
The difference is Clinton was neither convicted by the Supreme Court nor did he work out a plea agreement with that court. You really suck at this analogy thing.

And still, he was not disbarred. A reality you should come to terms with.
 
Now wait a minute. I thought that when Rosenstein announced the last set of ghost indictments of "Russians", he clearly stated that NO Americans were involved. Yet now, Mueller is going after Americans. More proof he needs to be shut down as he can't even keep his stories straight anymore.

More like, proof that you're a dope.

No Americans involved in what the indictment covered, dope.

Nothing like you showing your utter stupidity. Again. Need I remind you of another statement in that release. NO election results were affected. Not ONE vote was changed. meaning tis investigation has NO legal basis. Resume your whinng.

Now wait a minute. I thought that when Rosenstein announced the last set of ghost indictments of "Russians", he clearly stated that NO Americans were involved. Yet now, Mueller is going after Americans. More proof he needs to be shut down as he can't even keep his stories straight anymore.

More like, proof that you're a dope.

No Americans involved in what the indictment covered, dope.

Nothing like you showing your utter stupidity. Again. Need I remind you of another statement in that release. NO election results were affected. Not ONE vote was changed. meaning tis investigation has NO legal basis. Resume your whinng.
Nothing like you showing your utter stupidity. Again. Need I remind you of another statement in that release. NO election results were affected. Not ONE vote was changed. meaning tis investigation has NO legal basis. Resume your whinng.

It doesn't mean that at all, dope. Obviously no one with oversight agrees with you.
Try again, loser.
 
Yes it does mean that you illiterate. Learn to read. Words are your friend. If no votes were changed and no elections affected, you have NO crime moron. By all means keep holding your breath and screaming while Mueller keeps coming up empty.
 
They said, as part of his punishment, he wouldn't be able to practice in front of the Supreme Court.
Can he practice in front of the Supreme Court?
Now wtf does that have to do with, ”He wasn't convicted.....he plead guilty?”

He wasn't disbarred, he quit before the disbarment took effect.
Kind of like pleading guilty before you're convicted.
End result, he can't practice in front of the Supreme Court.
No, it’s not like pleading guilty since he didn’t plead guilty in their court. He had the opportunity to challenge it and given he had stopped practicing law nearly 2 decades earlier and had never taken a case to the U.S. Supreme Court, he opted to to resign from the Supreme Court bar instead.

No matter how desperate you are to try and spin it, Clinton wasn’t disbarred, as you (and trump), idiotically claimed.

You merely lack the intelligence to know any better and you lack the character needed to simply admit you’re wrong. Like I said earlier, I can live with that. :mm:

No, it’s not like pleading guilty since he didn’t plead guilty in their court.

What's the difference between 5 years in jail from a conviction and 5 years in jail from a plea?
The difference is Clinton was neither convicted by the Supreme Court nor did he work out a plea agreement with that court. You really suck at this analogy thing.

And still, he was not disbarred. A reality you should come to terms with.

One punishment for his perjury was he couldn't practice in front of the Supreme Court.

Can he practice in front of the Supreme Court or not?
 
An Associate of Roger Stone (former Trump adviser) is talking to Robert Mueller about a plea deal. The central issue appears to revolve about what Roger Stone knew about the dissemination of hacked DNC emails from Wikileaks.

Stone associate Jerome Corsi is in plea negotiations with special counsel, according to a person with knowledge of the talks - The Washington Post
What possible crime related to Wiki leaks or the Russia collusion conspiracy theory could Corsi have committed?


Obviously something or else he wouldn't be ironing out a plea deal with Mueller.
Jesus what does it take to get you fuck ups to rub to brain cells together?

Sounds to me like Corsi is going to turn Roger Stone in to save his own ass.


.
.
.

What are friends for?
 
Yes it does mean that you illiterate. Learn to read. Words are your friend. If no votes were changed and no elections affected, you have NO crime moron. By all means keep holding your breath and screaming while Mueller keeps coming up empty.
Yesssssssss.....
200.gif
 
Now wtf does that have to do with, ”He wasn't convicted.....he plead guilty?”

He wasn't disbarred, he quit before the disbarment took effect.
Kind of like pleading guilty before you're convicted.
End result, he can't practice in front of the Supreme Court.
No, it’s not like pleading guilty since he didn’t plead guilty in their court. He had the opportunity to challenge it and given he had stopped practicing law nearly 2 decades earlier and had never taken a case to the U.S. Supreme Court, he opted to to resign from the Supreme Court bar instead.

No matter how desperate you are to try and spin it, Clinton wasn’t disbarred, as you (and trump), idiotically claimed.

You merely lack the intelligence to know any better and you lack the character needed to simply admit you’re wrong. Like I said earlier, I can live with that. :mm:

No, it’s not like pleading guilty since he didn’t plead guilty in their court.

What's the difference between 5 years in jail from a conviction and 5 years in jail from a plea?
The difference is Clinton was neither convicted by the Supreme Court nor did he work out a plea agreement with that court. You really suck at this analogy thing.

And still, he was not disbarred. A reality you should come to terms with.

One punishment for his perjury was he couldn't practice in front of the Supreme Court.

Can he practice in front of the Supreme Court or not?
It’s not really a punishment since he had given up his legal practice. Regardless, even if he hadn’t and even if he bothered to get his license to practice law in Arkansas reinstated, he still wasn’t disbarred. Not from the Arkansas bar; and not from the Supreme Court bar. He can’t practice in on front of of Supreme Court because he resigned from the Supreme Court bar.

A rational person in your shoes right now would simply admit they fucked up and move on. But alas, you’re a conservative.
 
Jerome Corsi trolled Witch Hunter Mueller. Corsi is now suing that Swamp Rat Mueller for his Nazi tactics! :p
 
Jerome Corsi trolled Witch Hunter Mueller. Corsi is now suing that Swamp Rat Mueller for his Nazi tactics! :p
LOLOL

I like how Corsi denied any communication with Julian Assange .... until Mueller showed him his own emails with Julian Assange.

:lmao:
 
No Idiot, I'm talking about taxes paid in a single year as not being anywhere near complete records running for Presi
Taxes for a decade you dipshit.
Do you work for the IRS? If not you really just sound like some sort of resentful whiny little snot who believes other peoples labors should be in your pocket too.

You don’t need to work for IRS to know that there is no audit that would prevent Trump from releasing his old tax-returns. Trump is simply full of shit and you are a dupe for believing his rediculous lies.
If the law didn't require it I wouldn't show mine either as I don't think my business enterprise is any vipers business either.

Would you lie your ass off about it too?
Nah, unlike you I do not have to try to make up false crap to push an agenda.

...? Trump said he can't show his tax-returns because he is under audit and wil release them as soon as it's over.

That was just another lie.
 
It says nothing of the sort, dingbat:

... and [the President] shall nominate, and by and with the Advice and Consent of the Senate, shall appoint Ambassadors, other public Ministers and Consuls, Judges of the supreme Court, and all other Officers of the United States, whose Appointments are not herein otherwise provided for, and which shall be established by Law: but the Congress may by Law vest the Appointment of such inferior Officers, as they think proper, in the President alone, in the Courts of Law, or in the Heads of Departments.

"all other Officers of the United States"...of which the Attorney General is one.

Congress CAN "by Law vest the Appointment of such inferior Officers, as they think proper, in the President alone, in the Courts of Law, or in the Heads of Departments"...which is where the interim appointments come from...but that statute is temporary and is NOT meant as a way around confirmation by the Senate
So if the AG quits, dies or gets fired, who runs the department until the Senate gives it's "advice and consent" to a new AG?

The confirmed deputy, dope.
Rosenstein? You must be joking. He would rather appoint Nazi Pelosi.

The law allows him to choose any person who fits the requirements. Being confirmed isn't one of the requirement.s
 
It says nothing of the sort, dingbat:

... and [the President] shall nominate, and by and with the Advice and Consent of the Senate, shall appoint Ambassadors, other public Ministers and Consuls, Judges of the supreme Court, and all other Officers of the United States, whose Appointments are not herein otherwise provided for, and which shall be established by Law: but the Congress may by Law vest the Appointment of such inferior Officers, as they think proper, in the President alone, in the Courts of Law, or in the Heads of Departments.

"all other Officers of the United States"...of which the Attorney General is one.

Congress CAN "by Law vest the Appointment of such inferior Officers, as they think proper, in the President alone, in the Courts of Law, or in the Heads of Departments"...which is where the interim appointments come from...but that statute is temporary and is NOT meant as a way around confirmation by the Senate
So if the AG quits, dies or gets fired, who runs the department until the Senate gives it's "advice and consent" to a new AG?

The confirmed deputy, dope.
Rosenstein? You must be joking. He would rather appoint Nazi Pelosi.

The law allows him to choose any person who fits the requirements. Being confirmed isn't one of the requirement.s

That's why the deputy is confirmed as well.
 
An Associate of Roger Stone (former Trump adviser) is talking to Robert Mueller about a plea deal. The central issue appears to revolve about what Roger Stone knew about the dissemination of hacked DNC emails from Wikileaks.

Stone associate Jerome Corsi is in plea negotiations with special counsel, according to a person with knowledge of the talks - The Washington Post
What possible crime related to Wiki leaks or the Russia collusion conspiracy theory could Corsi have committed?

Aiding a foreign adversary in desiminating information from stolen e mails to help elected an idiot....we have an illegitimate so called POS president.
Publishing information is not a crime, moron, even if you have proof he did that. You don't, of course.
 
It says nothing of the sort, dingbat:

... and [the President] shall nominate, and by and with the Advice and Consent of the Senate, shall appoint Ambassadors, other public Ministers and Consuls, Judges of the supreme Court, and all other Officers of the United States, whose Appointments are not herein otherwise provided for, and which shall be established by Law: but the Congress may by Law vest the Appointment of such inferior Officers, as they think proper, in the President alone, in the Courts of Law, or in the Heads of Departments.

"all other Officers of the United States"...of which the Attorney General is one.

Congress CAN "by Law vest the Appointment of such inferior Officers, as they think proper, in the President alone, in the Courts of Law, or in the Heads of Departments"...which is where the interim appointments come from...but that statute is temporary and is NOT meant as a way around confirmation by the Senate
So if the AG quits, dies or gets fired, who runs the department until the Senate gives it's "advice and consent" to a new AG?

The confirmed deputy, dope.
Rosenstein? You must be joking. He would rather appoint Nazi Pelosi.

The law allows him to choose any person who fits the requirements. Being confirmed isn't one of the requirement.s

That's why the deputy is confirmed as well.
The law says he isn't required to put the douchebag Rosenstein into the position.

End of story.
 

Forum List

Back
Top