Jilted boyfried shoots two and himself at mall

Yea, he looks like a typical NRA/GOP type:

Aguilar-Darion-junior1390762572.jpg


He is yet another black thug who most likely has a criminal history but was given a second chance by Democrap types who think thugs deserve a second chance.

He was enabled by the GOP/NRA. I never said he was a member of either. Their insistence on loose and sloppy gun laws made it easy for him to get a gun. Who was he protecting himself against? What well-regulated militia was he in?

And your obsession with race is noted.

it was a shot gun and if you actually lived in Maryland, you would know we have some of the strictest gun laws in the country.....:cuckoo:

This mass shooting is proof that they aren't strict enough, not that MD's gun laws are failures and should be scrapped altogether.
 
He was enabled by the GOP/NRA. I never said he was a member of either. Their insistence on loose and sloppy gun laws made it easy for him to get a gun. Who was he protecting himself against? What well-regulated militia was he in?

And your obsession with race is noted.

it was a shot gun and if you actually lived in Maryland, you would know we have some of the strictest gun laws in the country.....:cuckoo:

This mass shooting is proof that they aren't strict enough, not that MD's gun laws are failures and should be scrapped altogether.
What law wouild have stopped this kid from buying this shotgun?
 
it was a shot gun and if you actually lived in Maryland, you would know we have some of the strictest gun laws in the country.....:cuckoo:

This mass shooting is proof that they aren't strict enough, not that MD's gun laws are failures and should be scrapped altogether.
What law wouild have stopped this kid from buying this shotgun?

Irrelevant. Laws don't cause shootings, and obviously don't stop them.

What culture would have deterred this kid from taking this action?
Aye, there's the rub.
 
... overall firearm related crimes are down ...

Tell that to the families of the dead. Every day, more dead kids but the nutters say 'gun crime is down'.

That's not enough.

This has dick to do with guns.

It's a personal problem that went south.

He used a gun. So what?

Would you be happier, or the dead less dead, if he used a machete?

Stop and THINK before you post such feckless nonsense.
 
... overall firearm related crimes are down ...

Tell that to the families of the dead. Every day, more dead kids but the nutters say 'gun crime is down'.

That's not enough.

This has dick to do with guns.

It's a personal problem that went south.

He used a gun. So what?

Would you be happier, or the dead less dead, if he used a machete?

Stop and THINK before you post such feckless nonsense.

Yeah they would be less dead. You can see a guy with a machete coming WAY before he's close enough.

Think it through. Take your time.
 
If the store owners were armed maybe the idiot wouldn't have killed both of them

Being defenseless is the problem

Obviously, because the answer to guns is... more guns! Just as the answer to any violence is more violence. That's why when there's a fire the FD shows up to pour gasoline on it. After all, 'an armed society is a polite society', right?



Life on Planet Bizzaro... :cuckoo:

And if you buy that line I've got a tractor trailer full of sham-wows and Kevin Trudeau books for sale.

It's a poignant comment on our gun-obsessed culture that the store employee had only to say "Shooter- call police!" and everyone in earshot knew what was going on.

YEah he yelled call the police and then got fucking shot.

Why do you want honest hard working law abiding people to be defenseless?
 
Guns are the crack of the partisan hacks. Courage is an imaginary passion for them and thus the gun huggers cling to the source of their only strength, an empty bravado. They are like a child with its blankee who cries when separated. Drugs, even when they are hard metal talismans of courage are not something the frightened can part with. They have come to represent freedom for the unfree, teetered as they are to the gun lobby and the NRA, and a misrepresentation of the 2nd. They need their fix and their fix is an object of imaginary security, an object that gives meaning to a senselessness that only programmed Americans can believe is real.

"In 1991, Warren E. Burger, the conservative chief justice of the Supreme Court, was interviewed on the MacNeil/Lehrer NewsHour about the meaning of the Second Amendment's "right to keep and bear arms." Burger answered that the Second Amendment "has been the subject of one of the greatest pieces of fraud--I repeat the word 'fraud'--on the American public by special interest groups that I have ever seen in my lifetime." In a speech in 1992, Burger declared that "the Second Amendment doesn't guarantee the right to have firearms at all. "In his view, the purpose of the Second Amendment was "to ensure that the 'state armies'--'the militia'--would be maintained for the defense of the state."
 
Guns are the crack of the partisan hacks. Courage is an imaginary passion for them and thus the gun huggers cling to the source of their only strength, an empty bravado. They are like a child with its blankee who cries when separated. Drugs, even when they are hard metal talismans of courage are not something the frightened can part with. They have come to represent freedom for the unfree, teetered as they are to the gun lobby and the NRA, and a misrepresentation of the 2nd. They need their fix and their fix is an object of imaginary security, an object that gives meaning to a senselessness that only programmed Americans can believe is real.

It's only imaginary security if you have never been the victim of violent crime.

I have been have you?

What's imaginary is the protection promised by government police.
 
Unless you have an armed guard at your side 24/7 you need to be able to protect yourself.

according to the news the mall is going to do exactly that

increase the number of good guys with guns on duty
Until there is an armed guard in every single store every hour the store is open?

well perhaps they would carry it out that far

however they have conceded that

it does in fact make sense to have more good guys with guns

then less good guys guns

now if they would work on ones right to self defense
 
Guns are the crack of the partisan hacks. Courage is an imaginary passion for them and thus the gun huggers cling to the source of their only strength, an empty bravado. They are like a child with its blankee who cries when separated. Drugs, even when they are hard metal talismans of courage are not something the frightened can part with. They have come to represent freedom for the unfree, teetered as they are to the gun lobby and the NRA, and a misrepresentation of the 2nd. They need their fix and their fix is an object of imaginary security, an object that gives meaning to a senselessness that only programmed Americans can believe is real.

"In 1991, Warren E. Burger, the conservative chief justice of the Supreme Court, was interviewed on the MacNeil/Lehrer NewsHour about the meaning of the Second Amendment's "right to keep and bear arms." Burger answered that the Second Amendment "has been the subject of one of the greatest pieces of fraud--I repeat the word 'fraud'--on the American public by special interest groups that I have ever seen in my lifetime." In a speech in 1992, Burger declared that "the Second Amendment doesn't guarantee the right to have firearms at all. "In his view, the purpose of the Second Amendment was "to ensure that the 'state armies'--'the militia'--would be maintained for the defense of the state."

I have about a dozen guns, and not one of them do I own for personal protection.
 
So now they're saying there was no connection between the shooter and the victims ?

What happened to the love triangle theory ?
 

Forum List

Back
Top