Aldo Raine
Gold Member
- Aug 8, 2017
- 12,573
- 3,868
Goor people believe the election was stolen. The one who deny it are the scum sucking assholes.
Says a scum sucking asshole that knows there is NO evidence of "stolen election. "
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Goor people believe the election was stolen. The one who deny it are the scum sucking assholes.
We saw the election being stolen with our own eyes.
That's circular, because then you are saying Bragg can't charge on Federal campaign laws,-Doh!Bragg has already warned Jordan not to interfere in his prosecution
Congress does not have oversight on state prosecutions
Will Jordan be next?
The American people are sick and tired of political prosecutions.
It doesn't matter where a campaign is held, it's still federal jurisdiction which already investigated this. Two is the fact that the statue of limitations expired several years ago.
That sounds good. But is it true? If it is universally true, then good. But if it is only relied upon sporadically, then not so good.
Congress has investigated local police departments, before. Why shouldn’t they have the same power to investigate the prosecutors’ offices?
They are not as low as any of the Democrats in this forum.
Goor people believe the election was stolen. The one who deny it are the scum sucking assholes.
Actually Bragg is overstepping into federal jurisdiction
Actually Bragg is overstepping into federal jurisdiction
When in reality… NOTHING is on the table.As he and many others in Congress should.
---Jim Jordan: ‘Everything’s on the Table’ Regarding Manhattan DA Alvin Bragg---
![]()
Jim Jordan: 'Everything's on the Table' Regarding Manhattan DA Alvin Bragg
Representative Jim Jordan (R-OH) said that everything was "on the table" pertaining to Congress' oversight role into the grand jury indictment of former President Trump. | Clipswww.breitbart.com
Threatening him how, by wanting some questions answered???
I don’t necessarily disagree. On the other hand, if the state is violating equal protection rights on some dumb-ass partisan political basis, that warrants investigation by the federal government.They do not have the power to interfere with state investigations.
Congress has no right to interfere in state prosecutions.
The reports were filed with the state. It is a state affair.
Yes, of course it can. And does. Regularly.When in reality… NOTHING is on the table.
The Congress can not legally insert itself into state matters
Actually when did state have precedence over federal laws?Not at all
Jordan is overstepping
"Threatening him" with what, the truth?He is threatening Bragg.
Bragg needs to stop doing the work controlled by the fedsBragg needs to arrest Jordan for obstruction of a criminal investigation
The Manhattan District Attorney's office is part of the state-level law enforcement apparatus, and Congress does not have direct legislative oversight over state-level law enforcement. Congress's legislative authority is limited to federal law and federal agencies, while state-level law enforcement agencies are primarily subject to state law and the oversight of state officials.