Ray From Cleveland
Diamond Member
- Aug 16, 2015
- 97,215
- 37,439
- 2,290
What I believe is that if you are going to credit somebody (or discredit them) for something, you have to provide evidence they are responsible.
DumBama was the most anti-business President of our lifetime. He regulated businesses, he taxed businesses, he's closed down businesses, and then people want to give him credit for the economy?
I don't have to repeat what ACTIONS Trump took to give us the economy we have today, but he and Hussein are the polar opposites when it comes to the economy and job creation. So nobody can BS me and say that this is still Ears economy that Trump only maintained.
Wrong again.
You also avoided my questions. The economy in 2015 and 2016 tells me that you are very dishonest.
Obama anti business? That’s a load of crap. If Obama is that bad and the lies that you keep blabbering about regulations..... the economy should not be this good in 2015, 2016, 2017, 2018.
These are real facts.
Trump economy? The Americans should give him the credits but his popularity tells you the other way. So it’s not trump economy.
It absolutely is his economy. If Hillary were in charge, we would have been going the other way now for the last couple of years.
Why is Trump's popularity down? Gee, I don't know. Maybe this perhaps?
Anti-Trump Media? 92% Of Coverage Of His Presidency Is Negative: Study | Investor's Business Daily
Nah, that can't be it. Perhaps this?
CNN, MSNBC said 'racist' more than 4,100 times from July 14-21
You see, brainwashing has worked for the Democrats and they know it. They have nothing else to offer the public. While they do plenty, it's their media and Hollywood that does most of the work; both extensions of the Democrat party.
True, it doesn't work on everybody. Not everybody is weak minded enough to follow marching orders. But it works enough to get them elected from time to time.
DumBama's economy was mostly due to feds who pumped trillions of dollars into the market, also known as Quantitive Easing. While DumBama served during the worst recovery since WWII, the biggest boost for him was the drastic reduction in fuel costs, which of course, is another thing he had nothing to do with. In fact he and the Democrats are strongly against fracking.
Wrong again Ray very wrong. You can lie however you want but facts are proving you wrongly.
It doesn’t matter who was elected president in 2016. Ron Paul, Ted Cruz, Bush, Sanders or Hillary. The economy still be this good. It is NOT because of that orange clown.
It matters greatly, because businesses don't like to invest or expand under uncertain environments. Trump is extremely pro-business, so that gives business confidence that things will go their way, unlike with DumBama where they didn't know WTF to expect next.
But I expected and even predicted this. It's like Rush Limbaugh always says. I know liberals like I know every square inch of my glorious naked body.
You people are just too easy to predict.
Wrong again. Economy was already booming in 2015 and 2016.
Oh I’m going to stop investing because Hillary or Bush is the president. That’s dumb.
It wasn't Booming, it was getting better, again, because most Americans found new money in their pockets thanks to the decrease in fuel prices.
One of my former coworkers stated he was saving over $125.00 a month, plus what he saved on his heating home bill. Another one who also lived far away from work was saving $80.00 a month, but all his kids were grown and he didn't have to drive them everywhere.
That drop in price was real money to middle-class people. They were able to payoff credit cards faster, able to buy new vehicles sooner, able to put that new money into circulation since it was all disposable income.
The problem with the DumBama legacy is you on the left give him credit simply for being in the right place at the right time. You can't name anything positive he did, so you sit there and say Obama was President, so he was the one that did something. The fact of the matter is he didn't do squat.