Nostra
Diamond Member
- Oct 7, 2019
- 66,035
- 56,848
- 3,615
Yes, I do. That has nothing to do with the blatant lie you posted, liar.You post opposition to stronger gun laws all the time.
Seriously, fuck off.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Yes, I do. That has nothing to do with the blatant lie you posted, liar.You post opposition to stronger gun laws all the time.
Wow! The First Crackhead's laptop continues to spill interesting secrets.
This is a text message exchange between Hunter and his dead brother's wife, who he was banging at the time. She's the one who disposed of Hunter's illegal handgun in a public trash can near an elementary school, from which it disappeared and has never been found.
This is the white-trashiest family in America.
LOL
Mass shootings went down 70%. NOT coincidence duh....Once again you are giving all the credit for any drop in crime to one aspect of the law. That is complete bullshit.
The Complex History of the Controversial 1994 Crime Bill
A political compromise, the crime bill contributed to both the crime decline and mass incarceration. But not in the way that people might think.
Like most political compromises, the crime bill did some good and some bad. It contributed to both the crime decline and mass incarceration. But not in the way that people might think.
First, the good: Though the crime bill was not responsible for the entire drop in crime, it likely helped — not by locking people up, but by putting more cops on the street, studies show. It provided funding for 100,000 new police officers and $14 billion in grants for community-oriented policing, for example. From 1990 to 1999, the number of police officers rose 28 percent, from 699,000 to 899,000, partly funded by the crime bill.
Research also indicates smarter policing tactics, like the ones funded by the bill, and social and economic factors — like an aging population and decreased alcohol consumption — played a role in the crime decline as well.
Crime had already started declining before the bill passed. From 1991 to 1994, crime dropped 10 percent and violence decreased by 5 percent. From 1994 to 2000, crime fell an additional 23 percent, with violent crime dropping by almost 30 percent. All of the above contributed to the fall.
Then there’s the bad: Although incarceration was already rising steadily before the crime bill, several of its provisions helped increase incarceration even further. Nevertheless, this increase had little impact on America’s subsequent drop in crime.
From 1970 to 1994, the rate of imprisonment exploded 400 percent, to 387 per 100,000 people. From 1994 to 2009, imprisonment continued to rise, doubling.
The crime bill contributed to this increase in incarceration. First, it banned 19 types of semiautomatic assault weapons, authorized the death penalty for dozens of existing and new federal crimes, and instituted a federal “three strikes and you’re out” provision.
But those facets were far less pernicious than how the crime bill influenced states to increase their prison rolls. The bill granted states $12.5 billion to build prisons if they passed “truth-in-sentencing” (TIS) laws, which required inmates to serve at least 85 percent of their sentences.
A 2002 Urban Institute study found that between 1995 and 1999, nine states adopted TIS laws for the first time, and another 21 states changed their TIS laws to comply with the crime bill’s requirements and then apply for funding. By 1999, a total of 42 states had such laws on the books, sustaining an increase in imprisonment.
The crime bill, however, was just the most high-profile legislation to increase the number of people behind bars. On their own, states passed three-strikes laws, enacted mandatory minimums, eliminated parole, and removed judicial discretion in sentencing. By dangling bonus dollars, the crime bill encouraged states to remain on their tough-on-crime course.
It has everything to do with it . Supporters of lax gun laws are promoting all gun violence including mass shooting of children. You side with criminals.Yes, I do. That has nothing to do with the blatant lie you posted, liar.
Seriously, fuck off.
I'm guessing you're a felon lol....Yes, I do. That has nothing to do with the blatant lie you posted, liar.
Seriously, fuck off.
You‘ve been breathing way too much Break Free and Hoppes .. Next time open a windowIt is illegal for Crackhead Biden to be around guns. He is violating Federal law every time he goes to The Big Guy's house full of guns.
bs lol. He was a head back when Beau died, dipshytte, anyway, dupe...It is illegal for Crackhead Biden to be around guns. He is violating Federal law every time he goes to The Big Guy's house full of guns.
Not because of the gun ban, according to your link.Mass shootings went down 70%. NOT coincidence duh....
Still a crackhead, still illegal for the felon to be around guns.bs lol. He was a head back when Beau died, dipshytte, anyway, dupe...
Thank you for, yet again, proving that you cannot demonstrate your claim to be true.just that these measures always work duh....everywhere. You are so brainwashed it's a total waste
You cannot demonstrate your claim to be true.Exceptions that prove the rule zzzzzzz. cuts mass shootings by 70% or so...
He's not a felon duh...unbelievable.Still a crackhead, still illegal for the felon to be around guns.
Only trump knows the truth lol. The dunce.You cannot demonstrate your claim to be true.
Chump.
Sure, makes sense. Gun laws affect mostly people who can’t pass a background check and those who supply them with firearms.I'm guessing you're a felon lol....
And thus, your admission that you cannot demonstrate your claim to be true.Only trump knows the truth lol. The dunce.