Jon Ossoff has surged to a 51% - 44% lead in the latest Georgia Special Election Poll

[Pogo]

That is why this election is important for both sides.

Don't begin sour graping it now. We still have 20 days, people.

All elections count and are important. That's how the Republicans have built their advantage, by winning local and state level races. Now they can capitalize on that to win national races.

It's a good thing.

That's why they are 7% behind Ossof in the GA congressional race?

That is why those favoring impeachment have gained 5 points in a week to 43 to 45, and that before the real testimonies of Flynn, Cohen, Comey, and others begin.

They have been winning special elections this whole time, but no one says they're going to win every single one.

Now, if you want to attach special importance to just this one race because it looks like a democrat might finally win, fine, but you can't ignore the rest of them and act like THIS one is the only one that matters. The reality is, the Republican brand is a lot stronger than many wish it was.

"Brand" huh.

Doesn't that speak volumes.

The democrats need a new brand. Hillary trashed the last one.

Again --- here comes another one, just like the other one---- "brand".



This is completely flying over your head, isn't it?

 

[hadit]

All elections count and are important. That's how the Republicans have built their advantage, by winning local and state level races. Now they can capitalize on that to win national races.

It's a good thing.

That's why they are 7% behind Ossof in the GA congressional race?

That is why those favoring impeachment have gained 5 points in a week to 43 to 45, and that before the real testimonies of Flynn, Cohen, Comey, and others begin.

They have been winning special elections this whole time, but no one says they're going to win every single one.

Now, if you want to attach special importance to just this one race because it looks like a democrat might finally win, fine, but you can't ignore the rest of them and act like THIS one is the only one that matters. The reality is, the Republican brand is a lot stronger than many wish it was.

"Brand" huh.

Doesn't that speak volumes.

The democrats need a new brand. Hillary trashed the last one.

Again --- here comes another one, just like the other one---- "brand".



This is completely flying over your head, isn't it?

You're choosing to ignore the reality that political parties have to develop a name brand?

 

[jc456]

Right, and Trump putting his hand on the arm of a Prime Minister so he can get by him is "shoving" him. Another epic overdramatization by the snowflakes.

I guess the snowflakes are just use to a wall flower shrinking violet like lead from behind Obama. I want Trump to shove lesser men out of his path. He is the leader of the free world.

"Lesser men" speaks volumes.

The rest of us by contrast hold this truth to be self-evident: that all men are created equal.

"Lesser men" holy shit what a dead giveaway. Stay tuned for "master race", right after this word for this great new line of brown shirts, proudly made in China. By lesser men.

except if you have a million dollars, not all men are equal after they grow up. That statement is only for creation. so at conception men are equal bubba. What you choose to do with what you got when you can move is solely up to the individual and power outranks anything. you show me otherwise. Don't you jamokes ever get tired of getting bitch slapped?

Dafuk's any of this got to do with the previous poster's elitist "lesser men"?

Can't you read?

maybe you can't.

 

[jc456]

Right, and Trump putting his hand on the arm of a Prime Minister so he can get by him is "shoving" him. Another epic overdramatization by the snowflakes.

I guess the snowflakes are just use to a wall flower shrinking violet like lead from behind Obama. I want Trump to shove lesser men out of his path. He is the leader of the free world.

"Lesser men" speaks volumes.

The rest of us by contrast hold this truth to be self-evident: that all men are created equal.

"Lesser men" holy shit what a dead giveaway. Stay tuned for "master race", right after this word for this great new line of brown shirts, proudly made in China. By lesser men.

except if you have a million dollars, not all men are equal after they grow up. That statement is only for creation. so at conception men are equal bubba. What you choose to do with what you got when you can move is solely up to the individual and power outranks anything. you show me otherwise. Don't you jamokes ever get tired of getting bitch slapped?

You are not making any sense, jc.

what part of this don't you understand?

The rest of us by contrast hold this truth to be self-evident: that all men are created equal.

men are only equal during conception. After they are born, all things change. Many men and women will be 'lesser people'. kapeesh?

Derp!!!

 

[JakeStarkey]

Right, and Trump putting his hand on the arm of a Prime Minister so he can get by him is "shoving" him. Another epic overdramatization by the snowflakes.

I guess the snowflakes are just use to a wall flower shrinking violet like lead from behind Obama. I want Trump to shove lesser men out of his path. He is the leader of the free world.

"Lesser men" speaks volumes.

The rest of us by contrast hold this truth to be self-evident: that all men are created equal.

"Lesser men" holy shit what a dead giveaway. Stay tuned for "master race", right after this word for this great new line of brown shirts, proudly made in China. By lesser men.

except if you have a million dollars, not all men are equal after they grow up. That statement is only for creation. so at conception men are equal bubba. What you choose to do with what you got when you can move is solely up to the individual and power outranks anything. you show me otherwise. Don't you jamokes ever get tired of getting bitch slapped?

You are not making any sense, jc.

what part of this don't you understand? The rest of us by contrast hold this truth to be self-evident: that all men are created equal. men are only equal during conception. After they are born, all things change. Many men and women will be 'lesser people'. kapeesh? Derp!!!

You can believe that silliness if you want. The Constitution does not, the US Code does not, the state laws do not.

 

[jc456]

I guess the snowflakes are just use to a wall flower shrinking violet like lead from behind Obama. I want Trump to shove lesser men out of his path. He is the leader of the free world.

"Lesser men" speaks volumes.

The rest of us by contrast hold this truth to be self-evident: that all men are created equal.

"Lesser men" holy shit what a dead giveaway. Stay tuned for "master race", right after this word for this great new line of brown shirts, proudly made in China. By lesser men.

except if you have a million dollars, not all men are equal after they grow up. That statement is only for creation. so at conception men are equal bubba. What you choose to do with what you got when you can move is solely up to the individual and power outranks anything. you show me otherwise. Don't you jamokes ever get tired of getting bitch slapped?

You are not making any sense, jc.

what part of this don't you understand? The rest of us by contrast hold this truth to be self-evident: that all men are created equal. men are only equal during conception. After they are born, all things change. Many men and women will be 'lesser people'. kapeesh? Derp!!!

You can believe that silliness if you want. The Constitution does not, the US Code does not, the state laws do not.

well stupid fk, the big word there is 'CREATED' Do you know what that word even fking means? hly fk are you stupid.

What is the lesson you'd like now?

 

[Pogo]

That's why they are 7% behind Ossof in the GA congressional race?

That is why those favoring impeachment have gained 5 points in a week to 43 to 45, and that before the real testimonies of Flynn, Cohen, Comey, and others begin.

They have been winning special elections this whole time, but no one says they're going to win every single one.

Now, if you want to attach special importance to just this one race because it looks like a democrat might finally win, fine, but you can't ignore the rest of them and act like THIS one is the only one that matters. The reality is, the Republican brand is a lot stronger than many wish it was.

"Brand" huh.

Doesn't that speak volumes.

The democrats need a new brand. Hillary trashed the last one.

Again --- here comes another one, just like the other one---- "brand".



This is completely flying over your head, isn't it?

You're choosing to ignore the reality that political parties have to develop a name brand?

Strike three.


A "brand" is an advertising tool. Advertising is defined as the act of persuading the public to buy something that it doesn't need.

Elections are not something we "don't need". Without them the government would be appointed by whoever had that power.

 

[NYcarbineer]

"Lesser men" speaks volumes.

The rest of us by contrast hold this truth to be self-evident: that all men are created equal.

"Lesser men" holy shit what a dead giveaway. Stay tuned for "master race", right after this word for this great new line of brown shirts, proudly made in China. By lesser men.

except if you have a million dollars, not all men are equal after they grow up. That statement is only for creation. so at conception men are equal bubba. What you choose to do with what you got when you can move is solely up to the individual and power outranks anything. you show me otherwise. Don't you jamokes ever get tired of getting bitch slapped?

You are not making any sense, jc.

what part of this don't you understand? The rest of us by contrast hold this truth to be self-evident: that all men are created equal. men are only equal during conception. After they are born, all things change. Many men and women will be 'lesser people'. kapeesh? Derp!!!

You can believe that silliness if you want. The Constitution does not, the US Code does not, the state laws do not.

well stupid fk, the big word there is 'CREATED' Do you know what that word even fking means? hly fk are you stupid.

What is the lesson you'd like now?

and endowed with certain inalienable rights. Equal rights extend beyond the moment of creation.

 

[jc456]

except if you have a million dollars, not all men are equal after they grow up. That statement is only for creation. so at conception men are equal bubba. What you choose to do with what you got when you can move is solely up to the individual and power outranks anything. you show me otherwise. Don't you jamokes ever get tired of getting bitch slapped?

You are not making any sense, jc.

what part of this don't you understand? The rest of us by contrast hold this truth to be self-evident: that all men are created equal. men are only equal during conception. After they are born, all things change. Many men and women will be 'lesser people'. kapeesh? Derp!!!

You can believe that silliness if you want. The Constitution does not, the US Code does not, the state laws do not.

well stupid fk, the big word there is 'CREATED' Do you know what that word even fking means? hly fk are you stupid.

What is the lesson you'd like now?

and endowed with certain inalienable rights. Equal rights extend beyond the moment of creation.

well you tell me who doesn't get the same rights?

 

[JakeStarkey]

You are not making any sense, jc.

what part of this don't you understand? The rest of us by contrast hold this truth to be self-evident: that all men are created equal. men are only equal during conception. After they are born, all things change. Many men and women will be 'lesser people'. kapeesh? Derp!!!

You can believe that silliness if you want. The Constitution does not, the US Code does not, the state laws do not.

well stupid fk, the big word there is 'CREATED' Do you know what that word even fking means? hly fk are you stupid.

What is the lesson you'd like now?

and endowed with certain inalienable rights. Equal rights extend beyond the moment of creation.

well you tell me who doesn't get the same rights?

jc thinks his opinion is right. Good on hime.

 

[IResist]

Uh oh. It looks like the conservatives on this forum are offended. Only they are allowed to post polls to fit their narrative. Don't you know that, OP?

 

[jc456]

what part of this don't you understand? The rest of us by contrast hold this truth to be self-evident: that all men are created equal. men are only equal during conception. After they are born, all things change. Many men and women will be 'lesser people'. kapeesh? Derp!!!

You can believe that silliness if you want. The Constitution does not, the US Code does not, the state laws do not.

well stupid fk, the big word there is 'CREATED' Do you know what that word even fking means? hly fk are you stupid.

What is the lesson you'd like now?

and endowed with certain inalienable rights. Equal rights extend beyond the moment of creation.

well you tell me who doesn't get the same rights?

jc thinks his opinion is right. Good on hime.

what opinion? quote it.

 

[jc456]

Uh oh. It looks like the conservatives on this forum are offended. Only they are allowed to post polls to fit their narrative. Don't you know that, OP?

we don't usually post polls, those are libturds dreams.

 

[JakeStarkey]

You can believe that silliness if you want. The Constitution does not, the US Code does not, the state laws do not.

well stupid fk, the big word there is 'CREATED' Do you know what that word even fking means? hly fk are you stupid.

What is the lesson you'd like now?

and endowed with certain inalienable rights. Equal rights extend beyond the moment of creation.

well you tell me who doesn't get the same rights?

jc thinks his opinion is right. Good on hime.

what opinion? quote it.

You posted your silly opinions above, so we will leave it at that, kid.

 

[JakeStarkey]

Uh oh. It looks like the conservatives on this forum are offended. Only they are allowed to post polls to fit their narrative. Don't you know that, OP?

we don't usually post polls, those are libturds dreams.

Prove that lie contards don't post polls.

 

[JakeStarkey]

Contards certainly don't like polls released when it shows their weakness.

 

[NYcarbineer]

You are not making any sense, jc.

what part of this don't you understand? The rest of us by contrast hold this truth to be self-evident: that all men are created equal. men are only equal during conception. After they are born, all things change. Many men and women will be 'lesser people'. kapeesh? Derp!!!

You can believe that silliness if you want. The Constitution does not, the US Code does not, the state laws do not.

well stupid fk, the big word there is 'CREATED' Do you know what that word even fking means? hly fk are you stupid.

What is the lesson you'd like now?

and endowed with certain inalienable rights. Equal rights extend beyond the moment of creation.

well you tell me who doesn't get the same rights?

It's not so much who doesn't get the same rights as it is who gets to decide what is or isn't a right.

 

[jc456]

Uh oh. It looks like the conservatives on this forum are offended. Only they are allowed to post polls to fit their narrative. Don't you know that, OP?

we don't usually post polls, those are libturds dreams.

Prove that lie contards don't post polls.

I didn't say that. wow, your comprehension skills suck you fk.

 

[hadit]

They have been winning special elections this whole time, but no one says they're going to win every single one.

Now, if you want to attach special importance to just this one race because it looks like a democrat might finally win, fine, but you can't ignore the rest of them and act like THIS one is the only one that matters. The reality is, the Republican brand is a lot stronger than many wish it was.

"Brand" huh.

Doesn't that speak volumes.

The democrats need a new brand. Hillary trashed the last one.

Again --- here comes another one, just like the other one---- "brand".



This is completely flying over your head, isn't it?

You're choosing to ignore the reality that political parties have to develop a name brand?

Strike three.


A "brand" is an advertising tool. Advertising is defined as the act of persuading the public to buy something that it doesn't need.

Elections are not something we "don't need". Without them the government would be appointed by whoever had that power.

You're not even in the ballpark.

1. Manufacturers advertise products that we need as well as products we don't need. Pay attention the next time you see an ad for canned vegetables or produce. This is done to convince us to buy a product from one manufacturer instead of from another, even though the products both serve the same purpose. You really should understand that to function in today's society.

2. Political parties also advertise to convince us to vote for their candidate instead of for one from a different party, even though the candidates ultimately serve the same purpose, in this case to hold office. Hillary and her party famously spent untold millions doing just that this last cycle (and lost. LOL). Again, you really should understand that. This is not rocket surgery.

3. Political parties carefully craft a brand so the voter doesn't have to pay careful attention to the candidate. The uninformed voter would likely assume that Hillary, for example, was a champion for women's rights, while the informed voter who looked past the democrat brand, would note that her actual history demonstrated a markedly different story.

In short, a political party's brand is extremely important to it.

 

[Pogo]

1. Manufacturers advertise products that we need as well as products we don't need. Pay attention the next time you see an ad for canned vegetables or produce. This is done to convince us to buy a product from one manufacturer instead of from another, even though the products both serve the same purpose. You really should understand that to function in today's society.

Wrong.
When Green Giant advertises its can of beans it's advertising ITS SPECIFIC can of beans. Nobody "needs" Green Giant beans. We do need to EAT. Nobody needs to advertise the idea of "eating". It's biological. What they need to advertise is the idea of buying THAT PRODUCT from THAT COMPANY.. Even while the same company is also selling the same product to the grocery chain so it can slap its own name on it.

What they sell is the IDEA that you "need" to buy Green Giant. And that you "need" to buy a known brand name. Clearly -- you don't.

Nobody "needs" to be convinced to drink water. Again, it's biological. What advertising does is try to convince you that you "need" to buy Evian (naive spelled backward). Clearly --- you don't.

Nobody "needed" inverted bathtubs with wheels on them. Nobody "needed" IPhones. Nobody "needed" deodorant. ALL of those artificial "desires" had to be created. That's what advertising does.

And every time Coke advertises the idea that you "need" to drink Coke, it's also advertising Pepsi, by virtue of its propaganda that you "need" to be drinking brown carbonated sugar water. Clearly -- you don't.

2. Political parties also advertise to convince us to vote for their candidate instead of for one from a different party, even though the candidates ultimately serve the same purpose, in this case to hold office. Hillary and her party famously spent untold millions doing just that this last cycle (and lost. LOL). Again, you really should understand that. This is not rocket surgery.

It's also not advertising a product. There's no difference between my buying the Green Giant BRAND and my buying the Bird's Eye BRAND. The only difference is who gets the money.

If you're suggesting that Hillary Clinton and Donald Rump have no more difference between them than Green Giant and Bird's Eye, pass those mushrooms you're smoking.

3. Political parties carefully craft a brand so the voter doesn't have to pay careful attention to the candidate. The uninformed voter would likely assume that Hillary, for example, was a champion for women's rights, while the informed voter who looked past the democrat brand, would note that her actual history demonstrated a markedly different story.

In short, a political party's brand is extremely important to it.

There is no "political party's brand". The fact that you enslave yourself to such a concept belies the fact that you've enslaved yourself to an advertising mass media. Bullshit.