- Banned
- #141
To hell it don't with abortion on demand. What the hell do you think "on demand" means?It doesn't go down like that. Of course you wouldn't know. Your foul language just not you in the ass.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
To hell it don't with abortion on demand. What the hell do you think "on demand" means?It doesn't go down like that. Of course you wouldn't know. Your foul language just not you in the ass.
Is it ok with you to bring into this world a badly genetically flawed child who had very little chance of surviving in the first place ? I believe that should be a crime. Some women who actually wanted to have more children discover this fact on their 30 week checkup is that murder or mercy I believe that is being merciful. So not all abortions are equal and none are exactly the same but NOME are murder, and definitely all should be determined by a woman and her doctor, not the state or the courts.I thought the ending of a life by a human hand, is the taking of that life by a human hand, otherwise in this case however it's through abortion being used for such to take place by a human hand or intervention so to speak ? The woman may actually not feel guilty, because she thinks to herself that "hey I didn't do it, the doctor who thinks that it's ok did it". So if he or she (Doctor) thinks it's ok, and he or she is supposed to be the smart one, then it must be ok.
Abortion on demand, boy you really bought into the anti-abortion campaigns. I bet you know them all by heart. It's murder, it's a baby etc. Etc.To hell it don't with abortion on demand. What the hell do you think "on demand" means?
Right, she had control, and then got pregnant and is killing a separate life thanks for proving my point.Doesn't matter.
And no women are not given "special" rights they have the same rights as a man to control their own body.
No one ever said life was "fair" this is the nature of the human reproductive cycle and it's the best we have until a fertilized ovum can be grown in a lab or until men can carry a pregnancy.
So really the best advice for men is to not demand the woman be responsible for birth control and take responsibility for themselves because once he deposits his sperm into a woman's body he doesn't own it anymore.
wrong it is a separate human beingIt's not separate until it is no longer attached to the mother.
No matter how hard you try to diminish it, it is human life, you have bought into all of the leftist propaganda trying to make it not life.Attached to the woman and not viable outside the womb when most abortions occur. I'm facts when 50% of all abortions occur the creature is only about 1 " long and that's counting the tail which accounts for nearly half of the body length. It has a primitive heart, gills, no legs, bids for arms and weighs less than an ounce. Basically a deformed tadpole.
Objectively false and insane.Fetuses do not meet the requirements of being a human being.
Fuck yourself, hatemongering pro-abort trash.You're an idiot. Not worthy of serious discussion. Try to have a nice day of that's possible. I plan on it.
Decent human beings don’t want children beaten or killed by their own parents. That excludes you, trash.It's the other way around. Far-right wing nuts believe they have the right to force women to beat children they don't want
ABSOLUTE whaleshit.LOL, abortion is a last resort.
Utterly frivolous and futile; anyone can file a lawsuit about anything. They should be forced to pay court costs from any money wasted on their bullshit.Enter the state of Texas they' be got a lawsuit
The federal government can ban murder in federal jurisdiction.Where in the Constitution is the government given this power over a woman to make her personal and medical decisions for her?
I'm certain he does know them all...Abortion on demand, boy you really bought into the anti-abortion campaigns. I bet you know them all by heart. It's murder, it's a baby etc. Etc.
Whaleshit.Women do not have to justify their decisions to you or anyone else
It’s very much our business, so we’re going to mind it.It's none of your business
Is it ok with you to bring into this world a badly genetically flawed child who had very little chance of surviving in the first place ?
SEE ABOVE.I believe that should be a crime.
The government should NOT be the one to make that medical decision or personal decision for the individual woman. The govt has no power or right to even know the woman is pregnant, until she shows.
The woman in turn, has a right to privacy...for her own personal doings and for her own medical decisions....as she should and any he should....
Where in the Constitution is the government given this power over a woman to make her personal and medical decisions for her?
That is untrue, and it is not a matter of opinion, human life begins at fertilization; this is textbook Biology, but not even BIO 101 level. Should have been learned well before.But, imo it is a baby in the making Stann, being formed.... it does not have "life" yet
Genesis Chapter 2, Yahweh sculpts a figure of a man in his own image out of the earth, then breathes life into it, magically making the clay figure into Adam. There is no indication that he does any such thing for Eve, by the way, she’s made from his rib with unspecified methods.but it could be a born human with life, in time.... That is simply the science of it.... And Biblically it sorta fits in to Genesis.... God formed Adam (man), and THEN He breathed "life" in him... There were 2 distinct situations, the being formed phase, and then the life, with first breath.
You are starting with a false assumption There is human tissue involved but there is no separate individual, only that potential outcome as well as many others. The organism is not even self aware. It would be like pulling the plug on a person who's been on life support with no brain function at all.Right, she had control, and then got pregnant and is killing a separate life thanks for proving my point.
Both are responsible, or should be, but if she agrees to have sex she should not have the right to kill that wholly separate human being, that is equally part of the father, you are basing everything in emotion.
Noxiously stupid.You are starting with a false assumption There is human tissue involved but there is no separate individual, only that potential outcome as well as many others. The organism is not even self aware. It would be like pulling the plug on a person who's been on life support with no brain function at all.
You are using every liberal talking point available, it is a separate sentient beingYou are starting with a false assumption There is human tissue involved but there is no separate individual, only that potential outcome as well as many others. The organism is not even self aware. It would be like pulling the plug on a person who's been on life support with no brain function at all.
That is untrue, and it is not a matter of opinion, human life begins at fertilization; this is textbook Biology, but not even BIO 101 level. Should have been learned well before.
Genesis Chapter 2, Yahweh sculpts a figure of a man in his own image out of the earth, then breathes life into it, magically making the clay figure into Adam. There is no indication that he does any such thing for Eve, by the way, she’s made from his rib with unspecified methods.
This is not how embryology works for everyone else. Earth is clearly not Eden. Adam would be divine magic abiogenesis if the story is true. I very much doubt it is true.
We humans today do not need abiogenesis, divine or otherwise, we are created through sexual reproduction, just like the progeny of the first Homo sapiens sapiens, be that Adam and Eve or advantageously mutated primates.