Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
The courts ruled. Trump lost. So why is the left determined to charge him with a crime because he challenged an election that many American's (rightly or wrongly) feel was tainted?The grand jury found it wasn't legal at all.
The courts did rule: every Big Lie case that ever hit the courts was laughed out of it. The electoral college had already met. The electors had already voted.
Trump and his co-conspirators conspired to stop the official proceeding (with Trump's attorney admitting to it), forge fradulent election documents and compel the VP to violate the law to overturn a lawful election.
They failed.
And there are consequences for the conspiracy.
The courts ruled. Trump lost. So why is the left determined to charge him with a crime because he challenged an election that many American's (rightly or wrongly) feel was tainted?
No there is not. The indictments are based on charges that are reaches at best brought by far left prosecutors in liberal locales. For what? They'll be thrown out on appeal even if the judges the left has shopped for gives them the verdict they're looking for in DC, New York and Atlanta.Because there's strong evidence he committed very real crimes in trying to overthrow a lawful election.
December 14, 2020 is the pivotal date.The courts ruled. Trump lost. So why is the left determined to charge him with a crime because he challenged an election that many American's (rightly or wrongly) feel was tainted?
You’re very resistant to actual facts, logic and the law.
Key words are "as the legislature of each state shall direct". And Trump had just that.vldstyl.23.08.31
#1,023
December 14, 2020 is the pivotal date.
Electors Meet to Cast Their Votes
The Twelfth Amendment requires the electors to meet to cast their votes “by ballot” for President and Vice President “in their respective states.” Federal law specifies that the electors meet and cast their votes “on the first Monday after the second Wednesday in December” following election day at a location “in each State as the legislature of such State shall direct.”
December 14, 2020 All fifty states certified their election
December 14, 2020 The election was over according to the Constitution and Federal Law.
December 14, 2020 Was the day Donald J Trump began packing his shit and prepare to get out of the WhiteHouse.
December 14, 2020 meant when Trump told his assembled mob on January 6th if Pence did the right thing (cite fake electors as cause to declare Trump the winner.) . . . . . WE WIN!!!!!!!!
When tied to the fake elector documents conspiracy to commit fraud against the Congress on January 6th Trump committed a crime.
There was zero way legally that Trump/ Pence could win.
There is evidence that Trump was involved in the fake electors plot which went beyond saying he won. Trump was involved in actions that enacted a plot to defraud the people of the United States fur the purpose of overturning the election he lost.
Mike Pence foiled the plot. The plot is still a crime even though the plot was foiled,
bckvgn.23.08.31
#922
All facts above your quote Saint BackAgain and an explanation that LEGAL challenges ended on December 14fh for reasons expressed
nf.23.09.01 #1,026
You misguided idiotI’m not sure you know this but laws becomes USC. They’re the same thing.
Good grief. You’re really clueless.
Here's the truth. You were told something and you believed it because you wanted to believe it. You have no idea if it's true or not but you were told to believe it so you do.You misguided idiot
Historically not that quick, and knowing context that Trump is a presidential candidate, not the day before Super Tuesday.Again, when was Jack Smith supposed to convene a grand jury?
You're avoiding the question for a reason.
December 14, 2020 is the pivotal date.
Electors Meet to Cast Their Votes
The Twelfth Amendment requires the electors to meet to cast their votes “by ballot” for President and Vice President “in their respective states.” Federal law specifies that the electors meet and cast their votes “on the first Monday after the second Wednesday in December” following election day at a location “in each State as the legislature of such State shall direct.”
Key words are "as the legislature of each state shall direct". And Trump had just that.
And Biden ? He had "electors" selected by rogue Democrat election officials (same ones who implemented all the fraud.
Pence made a huge mistake by allowing the
Democrat plot to go foward and succeed.
There's no section of the ECA that allows the vice president to "send it back to the states". It's not in there. It never was in there. It makes no sense. It's stupid.
As late as Jan. 2, Trump convened a conference call for 300 state legislators in which he, Giuliani and lawyer John Eastman encouraged them to convene special sessions and appoint new electors. Despite the pressure and an alliance with numerous GOP legislators, no legislative body voted to endorse alternate electors. The alternate electors had no legal standing, but some Trump supporters, notably Eastman and attorney Jenna Ellis, argued that Vice President Mike Pence could simply choose to recognize these alternate electors instead of the official ones on Jan. 6.
According to the constitution, each state is required to have their state legislature pass laws regarding the roles of electors in a presidential election. Those laws must be in place prior to when the voting begins on election day. A date that is set by each state legislature as well.” Federal law specifies that the electors meet and cast their votes “on the first Monday after the second Wednesday in December” following election day at a location “in each State as the legislature of such State shall direct.”
Historically not that quick, and knowing context that Trump is a presidential candidate, not the day before Super Tuesday.
Key words are "as the legislature of each state shall direct". And Trump had just that.
And Biden ? He had "electors" selected by rogue Democrat election officials (same ones who implemented all the fraud.
He challenged the election. That isn't a crime. Or at least it's never been a crime before when Stacy Abrams did it...when Hillary Clinton did it...or when Al Gore did it.
Let's be quite clear here! If there ever was the possibility of Trump "stealing" the election? That possibility was dealt with by the courts. Our system worked. So why have you on the left suddenly decided that we need to set the very dangerous precedent of a sitting President using the DOJ that he controls to try and put his biggest political rival in jail! Do you all not grasp how this can be used against liberals somewhere down the line? It's wrong and it's disgusting that leaders in the Democratic Party didn't have enough spine to resist doing it!
Turns out your arguments are less than nothing.Did I say they had?![]()
Trying to send fake electors from 7 states to Congress to flip the election is NOT challenging it. It's trying to steal it.
Meantime, Trump's trial dates are unchanged.Turns out your comments make nonsensical seem clever.
I know if I had irrefutable proof that would totally exonerate me, so much so that I was willing to stage an event to show it just a few weeks ago -- it makes sense to delay delay delay delay as long as possible.....because of how sure I am of all of that irrefutable proof I have that will totally exonerate me.In the unlikely event proceedings start this soon, they MIGHT have a jury picked by 2025 or so...