Judge sets absurd trial date for Trump case

[StoneCold]

I used to work for a firm that digitized evidence and hosted the review tools. Yiu are not talking about 1 guy reading 12 million pages. You are talking about a number of clerks doing keyword searches for documents that may be relevant. Those can be further checked and classified as relevant, not relevant or privileged. And redacted. It can easily be done in the amount of time allotted by the judge.

But he can't because He's not a law clerk. He's just a hack.

 

[meaner gene]

March 4th is a fair starting date. They don't have to review every page.

Most of the discovery involves Trumps own words or actions being held against him. They even cataloged much of the discovery so they only have to review the sections that apply to Trump.

 

[Billo_Really]

Wrong Dildo_really.

What they need to review is not your call. You’re not the one facing felony charges.

They will have to make it work, you big mouth little bitch!

 

[meaner gene]

March 4th is a fair starting date. They don't have to review every page.

No. None of them should. I realize that you get wet hoping for a constant flood of trial shit on each news cycle to disrupt the electioneering. But that’s perhaps the most compelling reason not to have any trial before Election Day.

Now who's playing politics. Billo says get all the trials over with BEFORE the political season starts. And you're against doing that.

 

[meaner gene]

They will have to make it work, you big mouth little bitch!

Trump claims he's worth $10 billion. He's raised over $200 million he can use for his legal defense, with more and more legal fundraising going on, like Trump mug shot merchandise.

Trump has more than enough money and resources to hire all the necessary legal expertise to go through every page in weeks. The irony is that Trump has spent more so far on his legal defense, than Jack Smith has spent to develop the case against Trump.

 

[Richard-H]

No. None of them should. I realize that you get wet hoping for a constant flood of trial shit on each news cycle to disrupt the electioneering. But that’s perhaps the most compelling reason not to have any trial before Election Day.


Nonsense.

Two months is plenty of time to review the evidence. Most of it has been public for a very long time.

And yes, once Trump is convicted the GOP should have a chance to adjust and allow their members to choose a viable candidate.

We all realize that Putin's stooges are just trying to cause as much chaos in the American political system as they can, but it will fail - and all your posts will be for naught.

But don't worry - Putin will still love you - like he loved Prigozhin.

 

[Rawley]

I used to work for a firm that digitized evidence and hosted the review tools. Yiu are not talking about 1 guy reading 12 million pages. You are talking about a number of clerks doing keyword searches for documents that may be relevant. Those can be further checked and classified as relevant, not relevant or privileged. And redacted. It can easily be done in the amount of time allotted by the judge.

For criminal trials? Where someone's literal freedom is at stake?

 

[kaz]

WTF are you talking about? You are spewing nonsense!

It was intended for someone more intelligent than you

 

[Rawley]

Two months is plenty of time to review the evidence. Most of it has been public for a very long time.

How about the January 6th evidence that Cheney and Thompson destroyed, illegally? How long with it take recover, recreate that evidence?

 

[meaner gene]

How long should the next "trial of the century" take to go to trial?

Let's look at the previous trial of the century, involving all kinds of evidence, and legal arguments.

Simpson was formally arraigned on July 22, 1994, entering a plea of not guilty. The trial began on January 24, 1995, with Lance Ito as the presiding judge.

And this was a murder trial where the accused faced the death penalty, and the defense only had 6 months to prepare.

Now make the argument that Trump should have more time then someone facing the death penalty.

 

[Frankenstein]

Told you. You know, that the judge would laugh at the "BUT THE DEFENSE IS INCOMPETENT, SO YOU MUST DELAY FOREVER!" argument.

This is actually good news for Republicans. Trump's conviction will be in before the Republican convention in July, so Trump's delegates will have the opportunity to choose someone else.

Oh wait. They won't choose someone else. Well, that's just too bad.

You are a disgusting traitor who cares only about the democrats power, not about justice or this country.

 

[meaner gene]

Two months is plenty of time to review the evidence. Most of it has been public for a very long time.

Correction, 6 months. His trial is March 4th 2024, six months from now.

 

[kaz]

How long should the next "trial of the century" take to go to trial?

Well, clearly four trials should all take the exact same number of years and all start in the middle of the elections, just like OJ, he had four trials in the middle of an election, that's what you're saying, right Goober?

 

[Richard-H]

How about the January 6th evidence that Cheney and Thompson destroyed, illegally? How long with it take recover, recreate that evidence?

Nice try...no dice.

 

[meaner gene]

How about the January 6th evidence that Cheney and Thompson destroyed, illegally? How long with it take recover, recreate that evidence?

How can congress illegally destroy evidence that Trump doesn't have the ability under the constitution to independently subpoena.

 

[Richard-H]

Correction, 6 months. His trial is March 4th 2024, six months from now.

No 2 months. The trial should be finished by Jan. 1 2024, so that the GOP can adjust to the verdict.

 

[meaner gene]

For criminal trials? Where someone's literal freedom is at stake?

Trump will have as much time to go to trial for his freedom, as O.J. had to go to trial for his LIFE.

 

[meaner gene]

Well, clearly four trials should all take the exact same number of years and all start in the middle of the elections, just like OJ, he had four trials in the middle of an election, that's what you're saying, right Goober?

Trump has nearly unlimited resources to defend himself. After all he already raised $200 million, and is still legal fundraising. And that's on top of the $10 billion, he claims he's worth.

Trump has more money than all the US Attorneys combined.

 

[kaz]

Nice try...no dice.

Well, there you go then. You said it so it's obviously true. LOL, you do lie, Dick

 

[kaz]

Trump has nearly unlimited resources to defend himself. After all he already raised $200 million, and is still legal fundraising. And that's on top of the $10 billion, he claims he's worth.

Trump has more money than all the US Attorneys combined.

So that makes election interference by the Democrats reasonable, gotcha, thanks for clarifying that. We just need to start impeaching Old Joe and start filing charges in Red States when he leaves office