Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Nonsense. This case will be continued with new investigators. Watch. You can't be pushed to the ground and then have no threat to great bodily harm or death, yet shoot the pusher. Does not work that way.I said you want to shoot people because your story is that you can scream at someone's family then kill them if they touch you.
You cant assault someone because they scream at you. Or your wife, Your kids, Law in all 50 states
I said you want to shoot people because your story is that you can scream at someone's family then kill them if they touch you.
You cant assault someone because they scream at you. Or your wife, Your kids, Law in all 50 states
That didn't contradict what I said, brainiac
So you learned a lesson. Good.
Going playground. I'd say good move given the stupid crap you've come up with so far
This is the full statement in the next paragraph. You cut it to snark a reply, a violation of the rules to slice and dice. Do it again, and I will report it. Nuts, I reported it anyway. .Nonsense.
Not at all. No state has verbal assault as grounds for physical assault.
Show me, Dont tell me.
Nonsense. This case will be continued with new investigators. Watch. You can't be pushed to the ground and then have no threat to great bodily harm or death, yet shoot the pusher. Does not work that way.
You ARE the one who said the 50 states don't have laws that make verbal assault as grounds for physical assault, yet you post no evidence, then demand I rebut your assertion. Nonsense. That is not how it works. Must have hit a nerve on you.
This is the full statement in the next paragraph. You cut it to snark a reply, a violation of the rules to slice and dice. Do it again, and I will report it. Nuts, I reported it anyway. .
So you don't have anything on the 50 states, do you?
.
That is your assertion only, so that does not count.
.
This is the full statement in the next paragraph. You cut it to snark a reply, a violation of the rules to slice and dice. Do it again, and I will report it. Nuts, I reported it anyway. .
That is your assertion only, so that does not count.
Post a reputable secondary source that supports your assertion.
You certainly can post a reputable secondary source, but you won't
do it, so your assertion fails on the face of it.
You certainly can post a reputable secondary source, but you won't
do it, so your assertion fails on the face of it.
Thank you, Oodles.
^^^^ :roflmao:
If someone got into your face and started screaming at you, you could argue you were in fear of imminent and serious bodily injury.
If verbal abuse was such as for the individual to believe they were the precursor to an attack. It is not necessary to wait till you are actually struck to defend yourself. Such as if a man with a gun screams abuse, its not necessary to wait till he shoots you. If unarmed he abuses you and then advances on you can strike first. Particularly if it is very clear running would place you at a disadvantage in defending yourself.
https://www.quora.com/Legally-speaking-does-verbal-antagonization-ever-justify-physical-assault
