Kari Lake Smoking Gun: Maricopa Official Says Machine Settings Were Changed THAT DAY

They stole votes in NY in 2020 (the group that discovered the method has taken it to court), and they no doubt doubled down to elect Hochul.

They did it in NJ in 2021 when after leading for nearly a week after election day the Republican Gubernatorial candidate suddenly lost as they kept finding votes for a week plus after election day.
 
Of course they were changed....Only a total fucking fool could pretend that they weren't.
That judge is using this as another "show trial" just like the handful that served that purpose after 2020. He set a bar that is literally impossible to meet. She has to prove ill intent/malice even if the irregularities rose to a level to change the election results. HTF is it possible to prove a STATE OF MIND?
 
No, they said literally the opposite in the trial.
When a ballot can’t be read by a vote center tabulator, he acknowledged it’s sent to a bipartisan board of workers that transfers the voter’s choices onto a fresh ballot so it can be tabulated.

 
That judge is using this as another "show trial" just like the handful that served that purpose after 2020. He set a bar that is literally impossible to meet. She has to prove ill intent/malice even if the irregularities rose to a level to change the election results. HTF is it possible to prove a STATE OF MIND?
Actually, according to Maricopa County Superior Court Judge Peter Thompson’s order, it was about bringing evidence that shows someone intentionally caused the county’s ballot-on-demand printers to malfunction -- and that, as a result of that, enough “identifiable” votes were lost to change the outcome of the election.

And it was about whether the Republican-run county intentionally played fast and loose with the rules that require them to keep track of early ballots, allowing Democrat Katie Hobbs to come away with the win.

Team Lake didn’t even come close on either count.

 
That judge is using this as another "show trial" just like the handful that served that purpose after 2020. He set a bar that is literally impossible to meet. She has to prove ill intent/malice even if the irregularities rose to a level to change the election results. HTF is it possible to prove a STATE OF MIND?
...and yet prosecuters do it all the time in criminal trials~
 
That judge is using this as another "show trial" just like the handful that served that purpose after 2020. He set a bar that is literally impossible to meet. She has to prove ill intent/malice even if the irregularities rose to a level to change the election results. HTF is it possible to prove a STATE OF MIND?

Kari Lake's own expert had to admit that not a single vote was not counted.
 


Ho chit. Bannon talking live, eviscerating the defense. "So there is clear disenfranchisement, if you understand by that frustration of the ability to vote on election day itself, which disproportionately affected Republican votes."


If you watched the trial, imo you and others would know, she's going to lose her case, because she did not prove intentional fraud, nor that she would or could have won if printers hadn't malfunctioned...

 

Forum List

Back
Top