Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Ho chit. Bannon talking live, eviscerating the defense. "So there is clear disenfranchisement, if you understand by that frustration of the ability to vote on election day itself, which disproportionately affected Republican votes."
Yes, the Maricopa county officials are. That has been proven in this trial.Lunatics
That judge is using this as another "show trial" just like the handful that served that purpose after 2020. He set a bar that is literally impossible to meet. She has to prove ill intent/malice even if the irregularities rose to a level to change the election results. HTF is it possible to prove a STATE OF MIND?Of course they were changed....Only a total fucking fool could pretend that they weren't.
When a ballot can’t be read by a vote center tabulator, he acknowledged it’s sent to a bipartisan board of workers that transfers the voter’s choices onto a fresh ballot so it can be tabulated.No, they said literally the opposite in the trial.
Actually, according to Maricopa County Superior Court Judge Peter Thompson’s order, it was about bringing evidence that shows someone intentionally caused the county’s ballot-on-demand printers to malfunction -- and that, as a result of that, enough “identifiable” votes were lost to change the outcome of the election.That judge is using this as another "show trial" just like the handful that served that purpose after 2020. He set a bar that is literally impossible to meet. She has to prove ill intent/malice even if the irregularities rose to a level to change the election results. HTF is it possible to prove a STATE OF MIND?
...and yet prosecuters do it all the time in criminal trials~That judge is using this as another "show trial" just like the handful that served that purpose after 2020. He set a bar that is literally impossible to meet. She has to prove ill intent/malice even if the irregularities rose to a level to change the election results. HTF is it possible to prove a STATE OF MIND?
You sure are!Lunatics
That judge is using this as another "show trial" just like the handful that served that purpose after 2020. He set a bar that is literally impossible to meet. She has to prove ill intent/malice even if the irregularities rose to a level to change the election results. HTF is it possible to prove a STATE OF MIND?
lolKari Lake Smoking Gun
Lunatics..
You sound scared.
.
It’s more like Kari Lake supporters smoking crack..
Okay, Saul.
.
.It’s more like Kari Lake supporters smoking crack.
Ho chit. Bannon talking live, eviscerating the defense. "So there is clear disenfranchisement, if you understand by that frustration of the ability to vote on election day itself, which disproportionately affected Republican votes."