He didn't set the bar too high, it's the LAW, not the judge..... Fraud has a specific meaning under the law....criminality has to be involved.... An irregularity or printer mishap is not fraud under the law, and can not be called fraud, under it he law...He set a bar that is literally impossible to meet. She has to prove ill intent/malice even if the irregularities rose to a level to change the election results. HTF is it possible to prove a STATE OF MIND?