Kari Lake Wraps Up Trial With No Clear Evidence to Overturn Election

[Skylar]

Kari Lake Opens Pandora’s Box: No Signature Match on 20% of AZ Mail-in Ballots in 2020, Trump Likely Won. Election Workers Testify to People Who Say They Did Not Vote but Had Ballots Mailed In

AZ Senate Must Commission Full 2022 Signature Audit Above: One of mail-in ballot signature matches accepted in 2020 presidential election An examination conducted by a citizens’ election inte…

coronanews123.wordpress.com

"The AZ Senate presentation was accompanied by sworn affidavits, under penalty of perjury, of signature verifiers in that election, such as Andrew Myers, who say they witnessed higher-level managers “reversing and approving” signatures that “level 1 workers” had rejected. Myers stated that he believed that “level 2 managers were changing about 90% of the rejected signatures to accepted.”

Another affidavit submitted by election worker Jacqueline Onegkeit attests that, during the process of “curing” when voters are called to confirm it was they who signed, some voters said that they had never voted.

Onegkeit wrote:

“There were times when the curing workers called voters with rejected signatures and those alleged voters they told them that they never voted. For example, we had some college students who said they never voted and did not sign the ballot submitted in their names.”

Below: Exhibit 2, Screenshot from Affidavit of Election Worker Jaqueline Onegkeit (CLICK FOR LARGER IMAGE)

There are 3 levels of signature verification. Ballots that aren't immediately approved are set aside at the first level that for review at level 2 and then again at a 3rd.

You're insisting that any level 2 or 3 review (reviews that are completely legal, and in fact built into the system).....is somehow fraud.

Laughing.....prove it.

 

[leftwinger]

Court case after court case after audit after audit has told you why. Lol

there were no Court cases that were not "fixed" before it started (excluding 8 of 10 filings"). Leaving only the almost impossible to prove w/o the other 8.

2020 AZ Audit ended up a joke (stall job) by FANN GANG. They excluded envelope evidence. The did not force MCBOS to hand over all requested items.
to simply re-count 1.9million (300K illegitimate) ballots....over ten months? was exactly that...a re-count. Garbage in, Garbage out.
FANN BLOWS. Like Romney, cheney, mccain etc.

 

[OhPleaseJustQuit]

Maricopa has been caught lying many times. Why does that count as nothing?

.

Nothing matters to them as long as they think they're getting what they want.

Remember, none of them EVER grew up.

.

 

[leftwinger]

They didn't mysteriously 'change sizes'. Some sites used the wrong settings. And counted every single ballot that the machines couldn't read by backup means.

How can election be thrown when every ballot cast was COUNTED?

Your conspiracy doesn't make the slightest sense. Which explains why it was laughed out of court.

Try again, tinfoil.

Some sites used the wrong settings. And counted every single ballot that the machines couldn't read by backup means.

Funny that. WHY did they setup some machines for 19" ballots? They had two years to prepare. That dog don't hunt. you're a fraud as always.

How can election be thrown when every ballot cast was COUNTED?

LOL! so they say. The same ones that DELETED 2020 files....refused to hand over evidence....on and on. What were they hiding? what are they hiding now?
Get outa her you dumb OX. you bother people.

 

[Lastamender]

Again, every single ballot that the machines couldn't read were tallied using backup means.

What about that is 'fraud'? You're so emotionally committed to your silly little conspiracy, that even when it doesn't make the slightest sense......you cling to irrationally.

The courts didn't.

That still does not fix the fact the machines caused ridiculously long lines. Affidavits ignored by the court prove that. People went home and did not vote. That number is huge. Maricopa cannot estimate that correctly.

 

[EvilEyeFleegle]

Funny that. WHY did they setup some machines for 19" ballots? They had two years to prepare. That dog don't hunt. you're a fraud as always.

LOL! so they say. The same ones that DELETED 2020 files....refused to hand over evidence....on and on. What were they hiding? what are they hiding now?
Get outa her you dumb OX. you bother people.

Damn you're stupid....but do continue..you amuse~

 

[sartre play]

The witness literally said that someone illegally went into the settings and made changes... illegally. Do you think we should ... i dont know... maybe see if thats true?

SOME ONE SAID, Is not a point of law.

 

[Lastamender]

I quit reading and started laughing after you said this ^^^^^^^^

The article said that, you dumb bag of shit.

 

[Skylar]

there were no Court cases that were not "fixed" before it started (excluding 8 of 10 filings"). Leaving only the almost impossible to prove w/o the other 8.

Fixed....according to who?

This is what I'm saying. Anything that contradicts the Big Liars just gets folded into the conspiracy. Making it even MORE elaborate and MORE fantastically complicated.

The republican lead election board in Maracopa County reports more votes for a democrat than a republican? They're in on the fix!​

​

The republican secretary of state of Georgia doesn't add the more than 11,000 votes that Trump demanded? He's in on the fix!​

​

Trump attorney general confirm that there was no evidence of voter fraud that would have changed the election outcome? He's in on the fix!​

​

Trump's own Cyber Infrastructure Council confirms that the 2020 election was the most secure in history? They're in on the fix too!​

​

Lower courts rule against Trump's dipshit lawsuits? They're in on the fix!​

​

Supreme Court rejects Texas dipshit brief? They're in on the fix!​

​

Arizona judge rules that Lake doesn't have the evidence to prove her claims of a stolen election? He's in on the fix!​

​

Anyone and anything that doesn't ape your conspiracy is folded into your conspiracy.

That's delusional.

 

[Lastamender]

Lying....according to who? Everytime someone contradicts you, you just fold them into your conspiracy. And start making shit up about them too.

Maricopa County's Election Board is overwhelmingly republican. You're literally arguing that republicans have been throwing elections for democrats.

I'm sorry, Tinfoil......but your rants aren't enough to factually establish any of your claims.

Yes I am. Did you just figure that out? Are you that dense?

 

[Skylar]

Funny that. WHY did they setup some machines for 19" ballots? They had two years to prepare. That dog don't hunt. you're a fraud as always.

Why did some cites use the wrong setting? Someone screwed up.

Thankfully, they have backup options in case there is a problem.

And every single ballot that was cast was counted by backup means if the machine wouldn't take them.

Where's the conspiracy? Where's the differing outcome? Where's the fraud?

You can't even demonstrate how the setting issue COULD have changed the outcome. Let alone provided any evidence that it did. Let alone that it was done intentionally to change the election outcome.

And you have to do ALL of those things to meet the legal standards around overturning elections. Y'all couldn't do ONE of them.

Which, of course, is why you lost.

 

[Tommy Tainant]

SOME ONE SAID, Is not a point of law.

Its jaw dropping that you need to make that point.

 

[Lastamender]

Why did some cites use the wrong setting? Someone screwed up.

Thankfully, they have backup options in case there is a problem.

And every single ballot that was cast was counted by backup means if the machine wouldn't take them.

Where's the conspiracy? Where's the differing outcome? Where's the fraud?

You can't even demonstrate how the setting issue COULD have changed the outcome. Let alone provided any evidence that it did. Let alone that it was done intentionally to change the election outcome.

And you have to do ALL of those things to meet the legal standards around overturning elections. Y'all couldn't do ONE of them.

Which, of course, is why you lost.

The legal standard is "if the results are uncertain". Proving uncertainty has already been done. The election should be tossed.

 

[Skylar]

That still does not fix the fact the machines caused ridiculously long lines.

The alternate sites within a 2 miles that no lines 'fix' that problem. Which is what lots of people did. Or they waited and voted.

Kari Lake scowered Arizona for folks that chose NOT to go to an alternate site where there was no line and NOT to wait in line to vote.

And found 3.

THREE people. She lost by 17,000.

This is why your ilk were laughed out of court. You can't establish ANY of the legal requirements of fraud. You can't establish that the issue was intentional, was done IN ORDER to change the election outcome, and that it COULD change the election outcome.

You just imagine it all. And your imagination isn't a legal standard, tinfoil.

Affidavits ignored by the court prove that. People went home and did not vote. That number is huge. Maricopa cannot estimate that correctly.

Again, there are 3 levels of review for signature verification....for a reason. If the first level doesn't pass them, they go to the second. And if it still doesn't go through, a third. You're laughably insisting that any level 2 or 3 review MUST be fraud.

Laughing....nope. You can't cite a single fraudulent vote. Not one.

You IMAGINE them. And then demand we disprove your imagination.

How's that working out for you?

 

[Mac1958]

Its jaw dropping that you need to make that point.

Welcome to our world.

 

[Tumblin Tumbleweed]

Why are you disregarding the way the election was run and all the errors whether intentional or not? It is too sloppy to have any integrity.

I don't believe a lying puke like yourself to be any arbiter of integrity.

 

[Lastamender]

Welcome to our world.

Your world is the same as mine. That you separate the two shows contempt and disrespect. No wonder why hacks suck.

 

[Lastamender]

I don't believe a lying puke like yourself to be any arbiter of integrity.

And the waste of skin you are is?

 

[Tommy Tainant]

Welcome to our world.

Cheer up. The steal was the majority view on here a few years back. They set up sub forums to track the court cases.

Now its just the real odd balls who believe it. People of faith !!.

Thats progress.

 

[Billiejeens]

Why are you disregarding the way the election was run and all the errors whether intentional or not? It is too sloppy to have any integrity.

Because their idiot won.