Kavanaugh accuser wants FBI investigation before hearing

[jc456]

It wouldn't be a criminal investigation, fool.

why else would they be expected to investigate then?

Dude why do you wish to look so foolish for someone you don't know or affects your life? you're strange.

why else would they be expected to investigate then?

To find any and all facts related to the alleged incident, fool.

what is the incident? And why does the fbi need to investigate? why does she need them to investigate ahead of her testimony? she's the person involved right? she should be telling them.

Because you dopes as well as the Republican senators have already dismissed her allegation. Testimony at this time would be pointless.

Testimony at a later time backed up by an FBI report would not be so easily dismissed.

I find it very telling that the only person calling for an investigation is the alleged victim herself.

Testimony now can drive an FBI investigation, changing it into something real that can be checked out relatively quickly, instead of the vague, "he did something bad to me sometime at some house and maybe some people saw it happen" thing that it is now. At least we would have her entire story from her mouth instead of the drips and drops let loose by democrat handlers trying to derail Kavenaugh.

he's still going to give you the 'Who' line and we'll have to say 'First Base"

 

[Cecilie1200]

Totally crazy how we want to give him due process and give her an opportunity to make her claim.

Funny how you don't want that. It's almost like you do t care about a fair hearing

Due process requires an investigation, fool.

it also puts burden of proof on the accuser, fool.

Sure. Backed with facts gathered by the FBI.
Why are you afraid of that?

she is the only one with facts. She isn't cooperating. What do you expect to be done?

She is cooperating, liar.

“She’s not prepared to talk with them at a hearing on Monday,” said Lisa J. Banks, one of Ford's lawyers. “No legitimate investigation is going to happen between now and Monday.”

You and I must have different definitions of "cooperating".

 

[Hutch Starskey]

Due process requires an investigation, fool.

Ummmm, no, no it doesn't

Sure it does. A single hearing with two witnesses does not get to any of the facts.
An investigation will.

What are you afraid of?

ummmmmm, probably not

Why are you afraid of an investigation?

Why is Ford afraid of testifying on her behalf at the hearings Monday?

Who said she was?
She said she would like the FBI to investigate as they have in the past.

 

[hadit]

Susan Collins: ‘It’s Not Fair’ To Kavanaugh If Accuser Doesn’t Testify Monday

What about Dr. Ford?

What about her? She made a serious accusation and was given a platform to talk about it. Sounds fair to me. Overly fair, given the multitude of problems with her story.

 

[Cecilie1200]

what year was it again?
who's house was it?
how did she get to the party? who drove?

she has given zero specifics other than 2 names, both of which have said it never happened.

it's also a local matter, not FBI. asking for FBI means you're stalling, not wanting justice. if you wanted justice, follow proper channels.

Don't forget that the two names never came up until AFTER Kav was nominated.

we know more of what we don't know than what we know.

we know more of what we don't know than what we know.

Hence the need for an investigation.

ummmmmm no. The alleged victim has produced one piece of evidence. That's right, EXACTLY ONE. Then the stupid twat made that single shred of evidence, the therapists notes, useless by stating there were gross errors in it.

If this case was a food item, I'm thinking it would be toast.

The allegation is all that is needed to warrant further investigation.

Which would be why the investigatory body that actually has jurisdiction over this situation has asked her to present herself to them and answer questions. Too bad she's not interested enough in "further investigation" to actually facilitate it.

 

[Meister]

its about delay n block. thats it.

Well, there's a credible allegation of sexual assault as well. That needs to be addressed.

Credible? In what way?

How is it not?
Where has it been disproven?

How has it not?

Not telling anybody about it when it supposedly happened.
Not telling anybody about it for over 30 years.
Her therapy records show she indicated 4 men attacked her and not 2.
Her therapy records show she never mentioned Kavanaugh's name.
The only witness to the supposed attack called her a kook.
She is a strong Democrat supporter and erased her entire Facebook account to hide her activities.

Yes, I would say she's not creditable based on the above.

None of that is testimony, dope. Hell, it's not even accurate news.

In my opinion, the fact that she is asking to be interviewed by the FBI gives her great credibility.

Liars usually don't seek investigations into their allegations.

Liars will lie as long as it's for political expediency, and she doesn't lie under oath in front of congress.

Hmmmm, that kinda sounds like what is going on with Ford.

 

[Cecilie1200]

Totally crazy how we want to give him due process and give her an opportunity to make her claim.

Funny how you don't want that. It's almost like you do t care about a fair hearing

Due process requires an investigation, fool.

Ummmm, no, no it doesn't

Sure it does. A single hearing with two witnesses does not get to any of the facts.
An investigation will.

What are you afraid of?

It does when her testimony is literally the only facts to this case

It does when her testimony is literally the only facts to this case

That's why an investigation to gather facts is necessary and why the accuser is asking for one, dope. My god you dopes are dense.

No, the accuser is asking for delays. If she really wanted facts to be gathered, she would be providing said facts herself to the appropriate investigatory body, which is the Senate Judiciary Committee, not the FBI.

 

[Meister]

Ummmm, no, no it doesn't

Sure it does. A single hearing with two witnesses does not get to any of the facts.
An investigation will.

What are you afraid of?

ummmmmm, probably not

Why are you afraid of an investigation?

Why is Ford afraid of testifying on her behalf at the hearings Monday?

Who said she was?
She said she would like the FBI to investigate as they have in the past.

You're confused, son.

 

[Cecilie1200]

Totally crazy how we want to give him due process and give her an opportunity to make her claim.

Funny how you don't want that. It's almost like you do t care about a fair hearing

Due process requires an investigation, fool.

Ummmm, no, no it doesn't

Sure it does. A single hearing with two witnesses does not get to any of the facts.
An investigation will.

What are you afraid of?

ummmmmm, probably not

Why are you afraid of an investigation?

Why are YOU afraid of a REAL one?

 

[jc456]

Ummmm, no, no it doesn't

Sure it does. A single hearing with two witnesses does not get to any of the facts.
An investigation will.

What are you afraid of?

ummmmmm, probably not

Why are you afraid of an investigation?

Why is Ford afraid of testifying on her behalf at the hearings Monday?

Who said she was?
She said she would like the FBI to investigate as they have in the past.

they don't investigate nominees. That is the role of the senate. damn, could you learn your constitution please?

See the dems skipped the step to use the FBI. They already announced a find, and now the senate investigates it. Anything found in the background checks is investigated by the senate, not the fbi. unless there is a crime. this isn't a crime. so too a bad a for you and her.

 

[Cecilie1200]

we already have that. Six FBI background checks. never came up. victory for kavanaugh.

Yea...cause he was able to hide sexual assault...until now.

Why are the Republicans afraid to have The Kav's friend (Mark Judge) testify by the way?

Kavanaugh hasn't hidden a damned thing. FORD is the one who hid it.

Why are Democrats afraid to have HER testify, by the way?

 

[hadit]

...The only cloud is on the whore and her bogus claim.

Typical TrumpBot Misogyny... paying attention, Ladies? Remember this in November.

Yes, remember the cynical exploitation of women by the democrats willing to destroy a family for politics.

 

[Hutch Starskey]

Seriously, did all these DNC leaders at the swamp forget there was already six FBI investigations already? Do they think the public is stupid to forget there has been?

Six investigations which did not uncover the slightest hint of this alleged sexual assault.

But now people are coming forward.

Time for a seventh.

One person came out and no evidence to backup her claim.

One person came out and no evidence to backup her claim.

Hmm...just like Kavanaugh.

 

[Meister]

Seriously, did all these DNC leaders at the swamp forget there was already six FBI investigations already? Do they think the public is stupid to forget there has been?

Six investigations which did not uncover the slightest hint of this alleged sexual assault.

But now people are coming forward.

Time for a seventh.

One person came out and no evidence to backup her claim.

One person came out and no evidence to backup her claim.

Hmm...just like Kavanaugh.

Remember....Kav is innocent until proven guilty. Remember that, it's important

 

[Pop23]

Seriously, did all these DNC leaders at the swamp forget there was already six FBI investigations already? Do they think the public is stupid to forget there has been?

Six investigations which did not uncover the slightest hint of this alleged sexual assault.

But now people are coming forward.

Time for a seventh.

One person came out and no evidence to backup her claim.

One person came out and no evidence to backup her claim.

Hmm...just like Kavanaugh.

Actually two have come forwarded to back up the claim that the assault never happened.

So go fuck yourself. At least that would be productive

 

[hadit]

Seriously, did all these DNC leaders at the swamp forget there was already six FBI investigations already? Do they think the public is stupid to forget there has been?

No they didn't forget. Also, the investigation went back to his high school days and interviewed his classmates, he came out squeaky clean

I'm sure they went farther back than that. A son of a friend of mine tried to get a job with the state troopers. They sent people to his parents house where he grew up, intervened family members including cousins, aunts and uncles, talked to neighbors up to ten houses away from where he lived. They asked questions about his childhood and if he ever got into trouble.

I'm sure that's nothing compared to how the FBI investigates.

The only trouble with that is that investigators miss stuff all the time; they're only human.

It may very well be, that they missed this incident...

Not because it never happened (entirely possible), but because it was not widely known, and friends were unlikely to "out" him on such a thing.

The only way to put this one to be is to investigate it more thoroughly.

If the Pubs have an ounce of brains in their heads, they will do just that.

November is coming.

No matter what investigations are done, there are the agitators who will demand more, as long as they can delay this.

 

[Cecilie1200]

Totally crazy how we want to give him due process and give her an opportunity to make her claim.

Funny how you don't want that. It's almost like you do t care about a fair hearing

Due process requires an investigation, fool.

Right now, there isn't enough information to justify an investigation.

Since President Trump isn't going to authorize the Taxpayers to pay for an investigation, why doesn't this broad ask Soros or some other deep pocketed liberal to fund this investigation instead?

Right now, there isn't enough information to justify an investigation.

Sure there is. There has been an allegation of sexual assualt made. That alone requires further investigation.

The accuser is willing to work with the FBI. Why isn't Kavanaugh?

Lying to the FBI is a felony. Liars don't typically volunteer to talk to the FBI.

Nobody's going to waste a moment on an alleged event from 36 years prior when the accuser can't remember any details.

The accuser remembers quite a few details., dope. More than enough for the FBI to interview several people.

Which brings us back to WHY the FBI would interview anyone, given that this is not their job.

The appropriate investigative body, whose job this ACTUALLY is - the Senate Judiciary Committee - would like to interview people . . . starting with Dr. Ford, just as soon as she decides this is really as important as she claims it is, and agrees to do so.

 

[Hutch Starskey]

I just heard something that brings the FBI actions into sharper focus. They don't do any backgound checks on juveniles under 18. Which is why Trump cannot order an investigation of a child.

^ Dumbest post ever.

Yikes.

 

[jc456]

we already have that. Six FBI background checks. never came up. victory for kavanaugh.

Yea...cause he was able to hide sexual assault...until now.

Why are the Republicans afraid to have The Kav's friend (Mark Judge) testify by the way?

where did he hide it?

 

[hadit]

Seriously, did all these DNC leaders at the swamp forget there was already six FBI investigations already? Do they think the public is stupid to forget there has been?

Six investigations which did not uncover the slightest hint of this alleged sexual assault.

But now people are coming forward.

Time for a seventh.

One person came out and no evidence to backup her claim.

Good point.

Time to send the FBI out to talk to Mark Judge.

Time to subpoena Mark Judge to testify before Congress.

First subpoena Ford and get her sworn testimony on record. That's the obvious thing to do.