Kavanaugh accuser wants FBI investigation before hearing

Due process requires an investigation, fool.


Right now, there isn't enough information to justify an investigation.

Since President Trump isn't going to authorize the Taxpayers to pay for an investigation, why doesn't this broad ask Soros or some other deep pocketed liberal to fund this investigation instead?
Right now, there isn't enough information to justify an investigation.

Sure there is. There has been an allegation of sexual assualt made. That alone requires further investigation.

The accuser is willing to work with the FBI. Why isn't Kavanaugh?

Lying to the FBI is a felony. Liars don't typically volunteer to talk to the FBI.

Nobody's going to waste a moment on an alleged event from 36 years prior when the accuser can't remember any details.

The accuser remembers quite a few details., dope. More than enough for the FBI to interview several people.



What's wrong with the local police or sheriff's office investigating this? Sexual Assault is a state crime

Um, the fact that the statute of limitations has run out a long time ago, and they don't waste time and money on investigating things they can't prosecute.

It's almost like they take their taxpayer-funded budgets seriously, or something.
 
Totally crazy how we want to give him due process and give her an opportunity to make her claim.

Funny how you don't want that. It's almost like you do t care about a fair hearing

Due process requires an investigation, fool.


Right now, there isn't enough information to justify an investigation.

Since President Trump isn't going to authorize the Taxpayers to pay for an investigation, why doesn't this broad ask Soros or some other deep pocketed liberal to fund this investigation instead?
Right now, there isn't enough information to justify an investigation.

Sure there is. There has been an allegation of sexual assualt made. That alone requires further investigation.

The accuser is willing to work with the FBI. Why isn't Kavanaugh?

Lying to the FBI is a felony. Liars don't typically volunteer to talk to the FBI.

then why is Mueller talking to so many liars in his probe?

None of them solicited investigation from the FBI, dope.

One does not "solicit investigation" from the FBI. They aren't a private investigation firm.
 
I just heard something that brings the FBI actions into sharper focus. They don't do any backgound checks on juveniles under 18. Which is why Trump cannot order an investigation of a child.

^ Dumbest post ever.

Yikes.
I said that yesterday. the background checks go back to the age of 18. It's when a person becomes an adult. you should really know the subject if you want to discuss it.
 
First subpoena Ford and get her sworn testimony on record. That's the obvious thing to do.


I agree with that.

Getting down firm testimony will give the evidence needed for a perjury conviction if other witnesses prove she is lying
 
No one finds the timing of this odd?


Not really, the Democrats are pretty good at timing things, and with the goal of delaying this confirmation past the election, they couldn't have timed it better.

But they thought the same thing with their Access Hollywood scoop, and the Trumpster blew that up pretty well.
So what are you afraid of then?

The Democrats possibly dragged this out as planned hoping they would take over leadership of the Senate. Then it wouldn't matter what allegations are against Kavanaugh. He would never be confirmed.

That's why the Republicans need to take action now and not cater to these ridiculous demands.
So you think the American people would vote to change the control of the Senate?

Shouldn't the voters have a say in this then?

That was the "logic" behind blocking Obama's appointee for a full year...to "let the voters decide" ya know

It was wrong then, so why is it not wrong now?

No, the voters shouldn't have a say, because the Constitution gives that power to the president and the Senate, not the voters. Hiding behind, "the voters should have a say" when they don't is failing to perform the duties of the office. Garland should have had a vote, and so should Kavenaugh.

If Ford won't testify, hold the vote and get it out of committee.
 
Ford’s lawyers released a letter to committee chairman Chuck Grassley (R-Iowa), CNN reported, calling for an investigation to “ensure the crucial facts and witnesses in this matter are assessed in a non-partisan manner and that the committee is fully informed before conducting any hearing or making any decision.”

Speaking with CNN’s Anderson Cooper on Tuesday, attorney Lisa Banks reiterated that her client was “prepared to cooperate with the committee and with any law enforcement investigation.”

Christine Blasey Ford Calls On FBI To Investigate Kavanaugh Accusation Before Hearing

Good for her! Even Kavanaugh should want a thorough investigation - otherwise this cloud of doubt and suspicion will hang over him.
And I want a Cessna 401 for my birthday. How about a S 700 Mercedes
 
Seriously, did all these DNC leaders at the swamp forget there was already six FBI investigations already? Do they think the public is stupid to forget there has been?
Six investigations which did not uncover the slightest hint of this alleged sexual assault.

But now people are coming forward.

Time for a seventh.

One person came out and no evidence to backup her claim.
Good point.

Time to send the FBI out to talk to Mark Judge.

Time to subpoena Mark Judge to testify before Congress.

First subpoena Ford and get her sworn testimony on record. That's the obvious thing to do.
why, she doesn't want to testify, that's on her. you throw the finding out and move to a vote. there isn't any obligation on any senator to pursue something from a person who doesn't want to talk on their own allegation. you say fine, and move on.
 
Anybody notice the stark differences from the Roy Moore accusers to this one sole accuser who's against Kavanaugh? The Roy Moore accusers made clear descriptions on when and where. This one Kavanaugh accuser can't remember anything, while still in hiding possibly being coached by the DNC on how to act. Since clearly she has flawed evidence that this even happened.

That is so obvious. They told her to do the Hillary Clinton if asked. Don't remember who took her to the party, who she left with, what house the party was at, who the host of the party was, what year it even was, what city it was at.

In other words, the Democrats prepared her answers and claims so that there is no possible way to determine how much she's lying.

And I believe that's why she wants the FBI to investigate before she testifies, because she doesn't want her story to fall apart.
 
No one finds the timing of this odd?


Not really, the Democrats are pretty good at timing things, and with the goal of delaying this confirmation past the election, they couldn't have timed it better.

But they thought the same thing with their Access Hollywood scoop, and the Trumpster blew that up pretty well.
So what are you afraid of then?

The Democrats possibly dragged this out as planned hoping they would take over leadership of the Senate. Then it wouldn't matter what allegations are against Kavanaugh. He would never be confirmed.

That's why the Republicans need to take action now and not cater to these ridiculous demands.
So you think the American people would vote to change the control of the Senate?

Shouldn't the voters have a say in this then?

That was the "logic" behind blocking Obama's appointee for a full year...to "let the voters decide" ya know

It was wrong then, so why is it not wrong now?

No, the voters shouldn't have a say, because the Constitution gives that power to the president and the Senate, not the voters. Hiding behind, "the voters should have a say" when they don't is failing to perform the duties of the office. Garland should have had a vote, and so should Kavenaugh.

If Ford won't testify, hold the vote and get it out of committee.
Obama's pick for the position was blocked by Historical past acts that the Senate has used since day one.
 
We had the senate. You weren’t getting the votes for anyway. The people had already spoken just as they have now.

Then why the rush to ram this clown through?

You do know, don't you, that Kavenaugh has had praise from both sides of the aisle for his stellar judicial career? Your calling him a clown reveals your lack of understanding.
 
Not really, the Democrats are pretty good at timing things, and with the goal of delaying this confirmation past the election, they couldn't have timed it better.

But they thought the same thing with their Access Hollywood scoop, and the Trumpster blew that up pretty well.
So what are you afraid of then?

The Democrats possibly dragged this out as planned hoping they would take over leadership of the Senate. Then it wouldn't matter what allegations are against Kavanaugh. He would never be confirmed.

That's why the Republicans need to take action now and not cater to these ridiculous demands.
So you think the American people would vote to change the control of the Senate?

Shouldn't the voters have a say in this then?

That was the "logic" behind blocking Obama's appointee for a full year...to "let the voters decide" ya know

It was wrong then, so why is it not wrong now?

No, the voters shouldn't have a say, because the Constitution gives that power to the president and the Senate, not the voters. Hiding behind, "the voters should have a say" when they don't is failing to perform the duties of the office. Garland should have had a vote, and so should Kavenaugh.

If Ford won't testify, hold the vote and get it out of committee.
Obama's pick for the position was blocked by Historical past acts that the Senate has used since day one.
it's called precedence.
 
If the left is so outraged over this, why aren't they as outraged over Keith Ellison's domestic violence abuse that happened just last year?
Hypocrisy runs thick with these knuckleheads.
And they try to tell me that it isn't a political game. :auiqs.jpg:
 
Why would she do that, knowing full well that this is not within the FBI's jurisdiction?

It is within their jurisdiction, fool.
The FBI conducted his background check.
Trump simply needs to ask them to look into this new information as a part of that.
separate issues spanky. since when is a background check and an investigation the same? oh, since you need it to be.

game over, man.
Grassley Says He Won't Delay Kavanaugh Hearing As Moderate Republicans Fall In Line

A background check is an investigation, fool.

It's exactly what Trump had the FBI do when allegations against Rob Porter were made.

And the fbi has said they don't need to do more

That is not what they said, dope.
well sure it is, they already gave their report to the senate. you should actually learn the process, it's obvious you don't.
 
Why would she do that, knowing full well that this is not within the FBI's jurisdiction?

It is within their jurisdiction, fool.
The FBI conducted his background check.
Trump simply needs to ask them to look into this new information as a part of that.
separate issues spanky. since when is a background check and an investigation the same? oh, since you need it to be.

game over, man.
Grassley Says He Won't Delay Kavanaugh Hearing As Moderate Republicans Fall In Line

A background check is an investigation, fool.

It's exactly what Trump had the FBI do when allegations against Rob Porter were made.

And the fbi has said they don't need to do more

That is not what they said, dope.

Sorry, what do you think "We've updated it in the background check we provided to the White House, we decline to open a criminal investigation" means?
 
Not really, the Democrats are pretty good at timing things, and with the goal of delaying this confirmation past the election, they couldn't have timed it better.

But they thought the same thing with their Access Hollywood scoop, and the Trumpster blew that up pretty well.
So what are you afraid of then?

The Democrats possibly dragged this out as planned hoping they would take over leadership of the Senate. Then it wouldn't matter what allegations are against Kavanaugh. He would never be confirmed.

That's why the Republicans need to take action now and not cater to these ridiculous demands.
So you think the American people would vote to change the control of the Senate?

Shouldn't the voters have a say in this then?

That was the "logic" behind blocking Obama's appointee for a full year...to "let the voters decide" ya know

It was wrong then, so why is it not wrong now?

No, the voters shouldn't have a say, because the Constitution gives that power to the president and the Senate, not the voters. Hiding behind, "the voters should have a say" when they don't is failing to perform the duties of the office. Garland should have had a vote, and so should Kavenaugh.

If Ford won't testify, hold the vote and get it out of committee.
Obama's pick for the position was blocked by Historical past acts that the Senate has used since day one.

Merrick Garland wasn't accused of sexual assault, and the conservatives didn't try to ruin his life.
 

Forum List

Back
Top