Kavanaugh accuser wants FBI investigation before hearing

At this point the deal should be closed. We gave you yesterday until 10:00pm, and extended it to today at 2:00pm and you're still jacking us around. Deal off. There will be no testimony.

It's called negotiating. Is it too late for Kavanaugh to apologize?

He has nothing to apologize for. She does perhaps, but not him.

They've been making arrangements for a week, that''s negotiating. Now it's pure stalling
 
At this point the deal should be closed. We gave you yesterday until 10:00pm, and extended it to today at 2:00pm and you're still jacking us around. Deal off. There will be no testimony.

It's called negotiating. Is it too late for Kavanaugh to apologize?

He has nothing to apologize for. She does perhaps, but not him.

They've been making arrangements for a week, that''s negotiating. Now it's pure stalling

No, it's still negotiating - especially considering how one-sided it is.
 
At this point the deal should be closed. We gave you yesterday until 10:00pm, and extended it to today at 2:00pm and you're still jacking us around. Deal off. There will be no testimony.

It's called negotiating. Is it too late for Kavanaugh to apologize?

He has nothing to apologize for. She does perhaps, but not him.

They've been making arrangements for a week, that''s negotiating. Now it's pure stalling

No, it's still negotiating - especially considering how one-sided it is.

Where do you live where a complainant gets to negotiate anything? This isn't for our benefit, it's for hers. The Republicans don't have to negotiate anything, they are doing so anyway, and now she's making demands on top of it.

Grassley should have said "you want to be heard, fine. This is the day, and this is the time, don't be late either." That's the way he should have handled it. Because he didn't, look at the silliness he's going through now.
 
At this point the deal should be closed. We gave you yesterday until 10:00pm, and extended it to today at 2:00pm and you're still jacking us around. Deal off. There will be no testimony.
Do you know this for a fact?

The truth is, that, despite their bluster, GOP leadership is $hitting their pants over this, and dare not pull the plug, now.
 
At this point the deal should be closed. We gave you yesterday until 10:00pm, and extended it to today at 2:00pm and you're still jacking us around. Deal off. There will be no testimony.
Do you know this for a fact?

The truth is, that, despite their bluster, GOP leadership is $hitting their pants over this, and dare not pull the plug, now.

Why would they be shitting themselves over anything? You have this loon who is making a claim with zero proof. What's to be scared of?
 
MSNBC: Grassley just granted Dr. Ford another extention.

The Republicans are accommodating a difficult witness. They should be rewarded with greater control of Congress in November.

Accommodating? That sadly funny - especially considering no investigation or witnesses allowed. Republicans just want to keep it a "she said, he said".
 
MSNBC: Grassley just granted Dr. Ford another extention.

The Republicans are accommodating a difficult witness. They should be rewarded with greater control of Congress in November.

Accommodating? That sadly funny - especially considering no investigation or witnesses allowed. Republicans just want to keep it a "she said, he said".
Because that is all it is...................Nice try ..........No dice........

 
The accuser set a precondition that the FBI investigate her claims prior to her testifying.

Since when does an accuser have the right to "set the preconditions" of a hearing? It doesn't work that way. The committee sets the preconditions of the hearing. You either accept or decline.

You're blind if you can't see that the Ford team set this up so they can make an excuse why they aren't coming.

The vastly more powerful Republican-controlled Senate denied her that righteous response and played chicken with her.

The Republicans had nothing to do with it. The FBI stated the case was laughable and is outside their purview. They don't investigate local teen house parties.
This is not about a house party but rather about a Supreme Court nominee. Every Senator should be screaming for the truth.
 
Thursday in public.

WASHINGTON — The Senate Judiciary Committee and lawyers for the woman who has accused Judge Brett M. Kavanaugh of sexually assaulting her decades ago reached a tentative agreement on Saturday for her to publicly testify on Thursday, an apparent breakthrough that could alter the course of a bitter confirmation fight.

After a brief call late on Saturday, the woman’s lawyers and aides to Senator Charles E. Grassley of Iowa, the Republican chairman of the Judiciary Committee, planned to talk again Sunday morning to continue the halting negotiations over the conditions of the testimony, according to three people familiar with the call. Aides to Senator Dianne Feinstein of California, the committee’s top Democrat, were also involved.

But in a possible setback for the woman, Christine Blasey Ford, Republicans on the committee received a statement on Saturday that seemed to eliminate any chance of corroboration of Dr. Blasey’s account by anyone who attended the high school party where she says she was assaulted.

A woman named Leland Keyser — who is believed to have been identified by Dr. Blasey as one of the five people at the party — told the committee through a lawyer that she “does not know Mr. Kavanaugh and she has no recollection of ever being at a party or gathering where he was present, with, or without, Dr. Ford.” Two men said to have been at the party have also told the committee that they have no recollection of the events.

Michael R. Bromwich, a prominent Washington lawyer, joined Dr. Blasey’s legal team on Friday. After doing so, he resigned from his law firm, Robbins Russell, amid objections within the firm about his work, including potential public appearances on Dr. Blasey’s behalf.

More: Tentative Deal Reached for Kavanaugh Accuser to Testify on Thursday
 
At this point the deal should be closed. We gave you yesterday until 10:00pm, and extended it to today at 2:00pm and you're still jacking us around. Deal off. There will be no testimony.

It's called negotiating. Is it too late for Kavanaugh to apologize?

He has nothing to apologize for. She does perhaps, but not him.

They've been making arrangements for a week, that''s negotiating. Now it's pure stalling

No, it's still negotiating - especially considering how one-sided it is.

There is literally nothing to negotiate. She either shows up or she doesnt
 
At this point the deal should be closed. We gave you yesterday until 10:00pm, and extended it to today at 2:00pm and you're still jacking us around. Deal off. There will be no testimony.

It's called negotiating. Is it too late for Kavanaugh to apologize?

He has nothing to apologize for. She does perhaps, but not him.

They've been making arrangements for a week, that''s negotiating. Now it's pure stalling

No, it's still negotiating - especially considering how one-sided it is.

There is literally nothing to negotiate. She either shows up or she doesnt

Why are you so afraid of fairness and "due process"?
 
At this point the deal should be closed. We gave you yesterday until 10:00pm, and extended it to today at 2:00pm and you're still jacking us around. Deal off. There will be no testimony.

It's called negotiating. Is it too late for Kavanaugh to apologize?

He has nothing to apologize for. She does perhaps, but not him.

They've been making arrangements for a week, that''s negotiating. Now it's pure stalling

No, it's still negotiating - especially considering how one-sided it is.

There is literally nothing to negotiate. She either shows up or she doesnt

Why are you so afraid of fairness and "due process"?

I'm not. You dont have any idea what did process, do you?
 
The accuser set a precondition that the FBI investigate her claims prior to her testifying.

Since when does an accuser have the right to "set the preconditions" of a hearing? It doesn't work that way. The committee sets the preconditions of the hearing. You either accept or decline.

You're blind if you can't see that the Ford team set this up so they can make an excuse why they aren't coming.

The vastly more powerful Republican-controlled Senate denied her that righteous response and played chicken with her.

The Republicans had nothing to do with it. The FBI stated the case was laughable and is outside their purview. They don't investigate local teen house parties.
This is not about a house party but rather about a Supreme Court nominee. Every Senator should be screaming for the truth.

Yes.....well.....nobody knows the truth and never will given the fact it's been over 35 years and Ford wants to make this an issue now.

So all we really have is he said/ she said, and nothing more.

If the nomination depends on this house party, it's not the business of the FBI as it is not a federal issue--especially since he too was a minor at the time.

Now if local agencies were involved, that's a different subject. Apparently nobody knew about this so-called attack so nothing was documented to make this about Kavanaugh's nomination.
 
The accuser set a precondition that the FBI investigate her claims prior to her testifying.

Since when does an accuser have the right to "set the preconditions" of a hearing? It doesn't work that way. The committee sets the preconditions of the hearing. You either accept or decline.

You're blind if you can't see that the Ford team set this up so they can make an excuse why they aren't coming.

The vastly more powerful Republican-controlled Senate denied her that righteous response and played chicken with her.

The Republicans had nothing to do with it. The FBI stated the case was laughable and is outside their purview. They don't investigate local teen house parties.
This is not about a house party but rather about a Supreme Court nominee. Every Senator should be screaming for the truth.

Yes.....well.....nobody knows the truth and never will given the fact it's been over 35 years and Ford wants to make this an issue now.

So all we really have is he said/ she said, and nothing more.

If the nomination depends on this house party, it's not the business of the FBI as it is not a federal issue--especially since he too was a minor at the time.

Now if local agencies were involved, that's a different subject. Apparently nobody knew about this so-called attack so nothing was documented to make this about Kavanaugh's nomination.
The fact that a woman can just jump up and claim sexual assault at the very moment the Demon-crats have exhausted every avenue and used every stall tactic and/or resistance known to them in order to stop Kavanaugh's confirmation is amazing really. It's so hard for me to believe that one of the strongest nation's in the world can be reduced to this kind of circus act as is seen now in this kind of bullcrap that is being seen in regards to our government operations and leadership.

The Demon-crats ought to be embarrassed, but then again they are the Demon-crats.
 
Last edited:
GOP Aide In Kavanaugh Confirmation Resigns As Sexual Harassment Claim Surfaces

Garrett Ventry’s exit marks another moment of turmoil in Kavanaugh’s confirmation.

Garrett Ventry, a communications adviser to the Senate Judiciary Committee, has abruptly resigned after NBC News inquired about a past sexual harassment allegation against him.

GOP AIDE FOR KAV HEARINGS RESIGNS: HARASSMENT PAST!

Another GOP pervert bites the dust.
Are we now going to investigate every Republican in the Senate and everyone who works for them?
 

Forum List

Back
Top