Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
She did a whole thread of that nonsense and the stupid idea was destroyed with an abundance of links and sources to actual history. That doesn't stop her. She is a political hack, not a historian or even a history buff.Not much of a historian are you. Extended the Second World War by two years? I can hardly wait to hear the half wit explanation for that one.I've been to Warm Springs, and who but the worst cynic wouldn't admire or even love President Roosevelt? He was a great icon in American history. Whatever happened to men like him, Truman, and Kennedy? That was the Democratic Party of old. Today we get America-hating shitbags like Clinton and Obama. We get Marxists who want to destroy America. Roosevelt must be spinning in his grave.
1. He extended the Depression rather than ended it.
2. He invalidated the Constitution, and made the Supreme Court into a rubber stamp
3.Through his efforts Joseph Stalin didn't just survive...he thrived, and FDR encouraged and promoted communists in government.
4. He changed the relationship between the people and the government...and not in a good way
5. He extended WWII by at least two years, therefore responsible for the loss of blood and treasure over those years.
Any of that in the documentary?
" destroyed with an abundance of links and sources to actual history."
Liar.
Your shallow revisionist interpretations in no way represent actual history.
That was the thread where you used a McCarthy era source and ignored more recent published works after various classified documents such as the Venona papers and Russian documents debunked the claims of your source. You also used your old standby conspiracy theory book by West, a rw commentator. In addition you seemed to have no knowledge of the Italian and Southern France invasions and absolutely no knowledge that NKFD or BDK existed, let alone what they were. You claimed Harry Hopkins was a spy for Stalin as if it was a fact and disregarded the declassified documents that proved that allegation to be untrue. All of this was documented in your thread and that is why your idea was destroyed and turned from the original purpose and degenerated into a thread of basic FDR bashing nonsense that deflects from intelligent discussion and debate, just like this one.She did a whole thread of that nonsense and the stupid idea was destroyed with an abundance of links and sources to actual history. That doesn't stop her. She is a political hack, not a historian or even a history buff.Not much of a historian are you. Extended the Second World War by two years? I can hardly wait to hear the half wit explanation for that one.I've been to Warm Springs, and who but the worst cynic wouldn't admire or even love President Roosevelt? He was a great icon in American history. Whatever happened to men like him, Truman, and Kennedy? That was the Democratic Party of old. Today we get America-hating shitbags like Clinton and Obama. We get Marxists who want to destroy America. Roosevelt must be spinning in his grave.
1. He extended the Depression rather than ended it.
2. He invalidated the Constitution, and made the Supreme Court into a rubber stamp
3.Through his efforts Joseph Stalin didn't just survive...he thrived, and FDR encouraged and promoted communists in government.
4. He changed the relationship between the people and the government...and not in a good way
5. He extended WWII by at least two years, therefore responsible for the loss of blood and treasure over those years.
Any of that in the documentary?
" destroyed with an abundance of links and sources to actual history."
Liar.
She did a whole thread of that nonsense and the stupid idea was destroyed with an abundance of links and sources to actual history. That doesn't stop her. She is a political hack, not a historian or even a history buff.Not much of a historian are you. Extended the Second World War by two years? I can hardly wait to hear the half wit explanation for that one.1. He extended the Depression rather than ended it.
2. He invalidated the Constitution, and made the Supreme Court into a rubber stamp
3.Through his efforts Joseph Stalin didn't just survive...he thrived, and FDR encouraged and promoted communists in government.
4. He changed the relationship between the people and the government...and not in a good way
5. He extended WWII by at least two years, therefore responsible for the loss of blood and treasure over those years.
Any of that in the documentary?
" destroyed with an abundance of links and sources to actual history."
Liar.
Your shallow revisionist interpretations in no way represent actual history.
What an imbecile!
First you said "I can hardly wait to hear the half wit explanation for that one," then, like a true government school grad.....
...before reading, you pass judgement on same.
"Your shallow revisionist interpretations in no way represent actual history."
Actually....they do.
I post sources, links, documentation....unlike all of you 'is not, is not' ignoramuses.
And a fellow by the last name of Koch worked for Stalin...That was the thread where you used a McCarthy era source and ignored more recent published works after various classified documents such as the Venona papers and Russian documents debunked the claims of your source. You also used your old standby conspiracy theory book by West, a rw commentator. In addition you seemed to have no knowledge of the Italian and Southern France invasions and absolutely no knowledge that NKFD or BDK existed, let alone what they were. You claimed Harry Hopkins was a spy for Stalin as if it was a fact and disregarded the declassified documents that proved that allegation to be untrue. All of this was documented in your thread and that is why your idea was destroyed and turned from the original purpose and degenerated into a thread of basic FDR bashing nonsense that deflects from intelligent discussion and debate, just like this one.She did a whole thread of that nonsense and the stupid idea was destroyed with an abundance of links and sources to actual history. That doesn't stop her. She is a political hack, not a historian or even a history buff.Not much of a historian are you. Extended the Second World War by two years? I can hardly wait to hear the half wit explanation for that one.1. He extended the Depression rather than ended it.
2. He invalidated the Constitution, and made the Supreme Court into a rubber stamp
3.Through his efforts Joseph Stalin didn't just survive...he thrived, and FDR encouraged and promoted communists in government.
4. He changed the relationship between the people and the government...and not in a good way
5. He extended WWII by at least two years, therefore responsible for the loss of blood and treasure over those years.
Any of that in the documentary?
" destroyed with an abundance of links and sources to actual history."
Liar.
"... Harry Hopkins was a spy for Stalin.."
True, dat.
She did a whole thread of that nonsense and the stupid idea was destroyed with an abundance of links and sources to actual history. That doesn't stop her. She is a political hack, not a historian or even a history buff.Not much of a historian are you. Extended the Second World War by two years? I can hardly wait to hear the half wit explanation for that one.
" destroyed with an abundance of links and sources to actual history."
Liar.
Your shallow revisionist interpretations in no way represent actual history.
What an imbecile!
First you said "I can hardly wait to hear the half wit explanation for that one," then, like a true government school grad.....
...before reading, you pass judgement on same.
"Your shallow revisionist interpretations in no way represent actual history."
Actually....they do.
I post sources, links, documentation....unlike all of you 'is not, is not' ignoramuses.
You never read any books on the subject, that much is obvious, you don't know anything. The only thing your posts prove is that you can't learn nearly as much as you thought from web sites.
She did a whole thread of that nonsense and the stupid idea was destroyed with an abundance of links and sources to actual history. That doesn't stop her. She is a political hack, not a historian or even a history buff.
" destroyed with an abundance of links and sources to actual history."
Liar.
Your shallow revisionist interpretations in no way represent actual history.
What an imbecile!
First you said "I can hardly wait to hear the half wit explanation for that one," then, like a true government school grad.....
...before reading, you pass judgement on same.
"Your shallow revisionist interpretations in no way represent actual history."
Actually....they do.
I post sources, links, documentation....unlike all of you 'is not, is not' ignoramuses.
You never read any books on the subject, that much is obvious, you don't know anything. The only thing your posts prove is that you can't learn nearly as much as you thought from web sites.
I love it when you Libs tell lies that are so easy to perforate.....
OK, Einstein.....why do I find sources so easy to find if I don't read books?
BTW....I'm usually working on 4-6 books a week....more than half non-fiction.
"Liberals don't read books – they don't read anything … That's why they're liberals. They watch TV, absorb the propaganda, and vote on the basis of urges."
Coulter
" destroyed with an abundance of links and sources to actual history."
Liar.
Your shallow revisionist interpretations in no way represent actual history.
What an imbecile!
First you said "I can hardly wait to hear the half wit explanation for that one," then, like a true government school grad.....
...before reading, you pass judgement on same.
"Your shallow revisionist interpretations in no way represent actual history."
Actually....they do.
I post sources, links, documentation....unlike all of you 'is not, is not' ignoramuses.
You never read any books on the subject, that much is obvious, you don't know anything. The only thing your posts prove is that you can't learn nearly as much as you thought from web sites.
I love it when you Libs tell lies that are so easy to perforate.....
OK, Einstein.....why do I find sources so easy to find if I don't read books?
BTW....I'm usually working on 4-6 books a week....more than half non-fiction.
"Liberals don't read books – they don't read anything … That's why they're liberals. They watch TV, absorb the propaganda, and vote on the basis of urges."
Coulter
We don't even read what you post!! See how accurate you is???
Your shallow revisionist interpretations in no way represent actual history.
What an imbecile!
First you said "I can hardly wait to hear the half wit explanation for that one," then, like a true government school grad.....
...before reading, you pass judgement on same.
"Your shallow revisionist interpretations in no way represent actual history."
Actually....they do.
I post sources, links, documentation....unlike all of you 'is not, is not' ignoramuses.
You never read any books on the subject, that much is obvious, you don't know anything. The only thing your posts prove is that you can't learn nearly as much as you thought from web sites.
I love it when you Libs tell lies that are so easy to perforate.....
OK, Einstein.....why do I find sources so easy to find if I don't read books?
BTW....I'm usually working on 4-6 books a week....more than half non-fiction.
"Liberals don't read books – they don't read anything … That's why they're liberals. They watch TV, absorb the propaganda, and vote on the basis of urges."
Coulter
We don't even read what you post!! See how accurate you is???
"We don't even read what you post!!"
Even your lies smell of moth balls and camphor....
She did a whole thread of that nonsense and the stupid idea was destroyed with an abundance of links and sources to actual history. That doesn't stop her. She is a political hack, not a historian or even a history buff.
" destroyed with an abundance of links and sources to actual history."
Liar.
Your shallow revisionist interpretations in no way represent actual history.
What an imbecile!
First you said "I can hardly wait to hear the half wit explanation for that one," then, like a true government school grad.....
...before reading, you pass judgement on same.
"Your shallow revisionist interpretations in no way represent actual history."
Actually....they do.
I post sources, links, documentation....unlike all of you 'is not, is not' ignoramuses.
You never read any books on the subject, that much is obvious, you don't know anything. The only thing your posts prove is that you can't learn nearly as much as you thought from web sites.
I love it when you Libs tell lies that are so easy to perforate.....
OK, Einstein.....why do I find sources so easy to find if I don't read books?
BTW....I'm usually working on 4-6 books a week....more than half non-fiction.
"Liberals don't read books – they don't read anything … That's why they're liberals. They watch TV, absorb the propaganda, and vote on the basis of urges."
Coulter
" destroyed with an abundance of links and sources to actual history."
Liar.
Your shallow revisionist interpretations in no way represent actual history.
What an imbecile!
First you said "I can hardly wait to hear the half wit explanation for that one," then, like a true government school grad.....
...before reading, you pass judgement on same.
"Your shallow revisionist interpretations in no way represent actual history."
Actually....they do.
I post sources, links, documentation....unlike all of you 'is not, is not' ignoramuses.
You never read any books on the subject, that much is obvious, you don't know anything. The only thing your posts prove is that you can't learn nearly as much as you thought from web sites.
I love it when you Libs tell lies that are so easy to perforate.....
OK, Einstein.....why do I find sources so easy to find if I don't read books?
BTW....I'm usually working on 4-6 books a week....more than half non-fiction.
"Liberals don't read books – they don't read anything … That's why they're liberals. They watch TV, absorb the propaganda, and vote on the basis of urges."
Coulter
If you ever in your life read a book it's apparent that you didn't understand what you were reading.
They are "framed" as the actual news stories and accounts from the 1930s. PBS isn't interpreting anything.It's how the accounts are framed. PBS is notoriously left wing. Left wingers' denial of that obvious reality is what makes anything they say dubious.Actual news accounts from the 1930s are "lefty propaganda"?A single cent of tax money used to subsidize lefty propaganda is too much.
This is why the Right-Wing is a joke whom no one takes seriously, except other wingnuts.
Only one Roosevelt is associated with Warm Springs.I've been to Warm Springs, and who but the worst cynic wouldn't admire or even love President Roosevelt?
Which Roosevelt?
Nope. Wingnuttery belongs in the Washington Examiner, not in factual documentaries.I've been to Warm Springs, and who but the worst cynic wouldn't admire or even love President Roosevelt? He was a great icon in American history. Whatever happened to men like him, Truman, and Kennedy? That was the Democratic Party of old. Today we get America-hating shitbags like Clinton and Obama. We get Marxists who want to destroy America. Roosevelt must be spinning in his grave.
1. He extended the Depression rather than ended it.
2. He invalidated the Constitution, and made the Supreme Court into a rubber stamp
3.Through his efforts Joseph Stalin didn't just survive...he thrived, and FDR encouraged and promoted communists in government.
4. He changed the relationship between the people and the government...and not in a good way
5. He extended WWII by at least two years, therefore responsible for the loss of blood and treasure over those years.
Any of that in the documentary?
If you wonder why you aren't taken seriously, it's sentences like that.Stalin refused to allow FDR to communicate with him.
If you wonder why you aren't taken seriously, it's sentences like that.Stalin refused to allow FDR to communicate with him.
Opinions from the fringe? Correct. None of that in the documentary.Of course we know none of that will be in the documentary.
Nope. Wingnuttery belongs in the Washington Examiner, not in factual documentaries.I've been to Warm Springs, and who but the worst cynic wouldn't admire or even love President Roosevelt? He was a great icon in American history. Whatever happened to men like him, Truman, and Kennedy? That was the Democratic Party of old. Today we get America-hating shitbags like Clinton and Obama. We get Marxists who want to destroy America. Roosevelt must be spinning in his grave.
1. He extended the Depression rather than ended it.
2. He invalidated the Constitution, and made the Supreme Court into a rubber stamp
3.Through his efforts Joseph Stalin didn't just survive...he thrived, and FDR encouraged and promoted communists in government.
4. He changed the relationship between the people and the government...and not in a good way
5. He extended WWII by at least two years, therefore responsible for the loss of blood and treasure over those years.
Any of that in the documentary?
Opinions from the fringe? Correct. None of that in the documentary.Of course we know none of that will be in the documentary.
