Ken Burns Roosevelt Documentary

[PoliticalChic]

What a bunch of bullshit. As if Stalin had this kind of power over FDR.

Yo, the USDDR was dependent on us, not the other way around.

Just more totally twisted Right-Wing propaganda that has no basis at all in reality.

" As if Stalin had this kind of power over FDR."

You're a moron.

I post facts.


1. There can be no doubt as to Stalin's manipulation, and the result of his forcing Roosevelt not to accept surrender feelers from anti-Nazi resistance leaders, like Canaris.Roosevelt's fear of "offending" Stalin resulted in his administration ordering that the German anti-Nazi resistance be totally disregarded.


a. "Archival evidence indicates that the Soviet’s wanted the war to continue long enough for them to conquer Eastern Europe and in order for Germany to be utterly destroyed or “pastoralized” which was called for in the Morgenthau Plan which was actually written by Soviet spy Harry Dexter White. The Soviets were also clamoring for a “second front” in France in order to deflect the allies out of Italy and the Balkans which was too close to Russia."
Chuck Morse Speaks: The Canaris Cover-up



2. "Standing as an obstacle to any negotiated surrender, as noted by Admiral Canaris, was Roosevelt’s stubborn adherence to the “unconditional surrender”demand that he had announced at the Casablanca Conference in January of 1943. But what could have lain behind a policy that made the achievement of the political aims of the war so much more difficult for the United States?

Roosevelt’s fundamental anti-German prejudice has been offered as one explanation. But that would not explain the rigid application of the same policy toward Japan,as well. Maybe one could credit that to the anti-Japanese attitude of Roosevelt’s Secretary of War, Henry Stimson, but no one forced Roosevelt to put the Republican war hawk Stimson in that position."
http://www.dcdave.com/article5/121031.htm



3. Let's look at a primary source, Allen Dulles,first civilian to head the CIA, and its longest serving director. In "Germany's Underground: The Anti-Nazi Resistance," Dulles wrote of that the German was the only anti-Nazi underground not supported by the United States. (p.22).

On page 140, Dulles states "The plotters (anti-Nazi German resistance)....were told clearly and repeatedly that we had made common cause with Russia...." as the reason they were frozen out.

a. The NYTimes told the same story, March 18, 1946: "Full Story of Anit-Hitler Plot Shows That Allies Refused To Assist."



4. Britain's intelligence chief said this about Canaris: 'It is said that had it not been for the Foreign Office's fear of offending Russia that he might have established direct contact with the admiral [Canaris] in 1942 on the removal of Hitler as a means of shortening the war."
“Gen. Menzies, Ex-British Intelligence Chief, Dies,” New York Times, May 31, 1968.


Did you see the date: 1942. When did the war with Germany finally end?

"May 7, 1945: Germany surrenders unconditionally to the Allies at Reims"Germany surrenders unconditionally to the Allies at Reims ? History.com This Day in History ? 5/7/1945

What prevented an earlier conclusion to the war?
"... fear of offending Russia..."

Fear of offending, it seems to me, suggests a relationship with one's superiors....
i.e., Roosevelt considered Stalin his superior.

No. You don't post facts. You spew propaganda, nothing less and nothing more.

You are the mistress of cut-and-paste and then that was just about that, moron.

And you quote one of the Dulles brothers.

That is hilarious.

But of course, as stupid as you appear to be, you don't even know WHY it is so hilarious.

You can see the two Asian connected FDR haters on the thread, can't you?

So....unable to rebut the truth....what is left for slime-bags like you?
Yup...your post.

There is no truth. You are merely trying to attempt to obscure history..by suggesting a variant into a known formula...

I've been very specific, with actual words from those who knew the truth....

Yet you haven't pointed to any with rebuttal.


Pretty much "oh, yeah....that's what you say!"

Brilliant.

 

[Moonglow]

" As if Stalin had this kind of power over FDR."

You're a moron.

I post facts.


1. There can be no doubt as to Stalin's manipulation, and the result of his forcing Roosevelt not to accept surrender feelers from anti-Nazi resistance leaders, like Canaris.Roosevelt's fear of "offending" Stalin resulted in his administration ordering that the German anti-Nazi resistance be totally disregarded.


a. "Archival evidence indicates that the Soviet’s wanted the war to continue long enough for them to conquer Eastern Europe and in order for Germany to be utterly destroyed or “pastoralized” which was called for in the Morgenthau Plan which was actually written by Soviet spy Harry Dexter White. The Soviets were also clamoring for a “second front” in France in order to deflect the allies out of Italy and the Balkans which was too close to Russia."
Chuck Morse Speaks: The Canaris Cover-up



2. "Standing as an obstacle to any negotiated surrender, as noted by Admiral Canaris, was Roosevelt’s stubborn adherence to the “unconditional surrender”demand that he had announced at the Casablanca Conference in January of 1943. But what could have lain behind a policy that made the achievement of the political aims of the war so much more difficult for the United States?

Roosevelt’s fundamental anti-German prejudice has been offered as one explanation. But that would not explain the rigid application of the same policy toward Japan,as well. Maybe one could credit that to the anti-Japanese attitude of Roosevelt’s Secretary of War, Henry Stimson, but no one forced Roosevelt to put the Republican war hawk Stimson in that position."
http://www.dcdave.com/article5/121031.htm



3. Let's look at a primary source, Allen Dulles,first civilian to head the CIA, and its longest serving director. In "Germany's Underground: The Anti-Nazi Resistance," Dulles wrote of that the German was the only anti-Nazi underground not supported by the United States. (p.22).

On page 140, Dulles states "The plotters (anti-Nazi German resistance)....were told clearly and repeatedly that we had made common cause with Russia...." as the reason they were frozen out.

a. The NYTimes told the same story, March 18, 1946: "Full Story of Anit-Hitler Plot Shows That Allies Refused To Assist."



4. Britain's intelligence chief said this about Canaris: 'It is said that had it not been for the Foreign Office's fear of offending Russia that he might have established direct contact with the admiral [Canaris] in 1942 on the removal of Hitler as a means of shortening the war."
“Gen. Menzies, Ex-British Intelligence Chief, Dies,” New York Times, May 31, 1968.


Did you see the date: 1942. When did the war with Germany finally end?

"May 7, 1945: Germany surrenders unconditionally to the Allies at Reims"Germany surrenders unconditionally to the Allies at Reims ? History.com This Day in History ? 5/7/1945

What prevented an earlier conclusion to the war?
"... fear of offending Russia..."

Fear of offending, it seems to me, suggests a relationship with one's superiors....
i.e., Roosevelt considered Stalin his superior.

No. You don't post facts. You spew propaganda, nothing less and nothing more.

You are the mistress of cut-and-paste and then that was just about that, moron.

And you quote one of the Dulles brothers.

That is hilarious.

But of course, as stupid as you appear to be, you don't even know WHY it is so hilarious.

You can see the two Asian connected FDR haters on the thread, can't you?

So....unable to rebut the truth....what is left for slime-bags like you?
Yup...your post.

There is no truth. You are merely trying to attempt to obscure history..by suggesting a variant into a known formula...

I've been very specific, with actual words from those who knew the truth....

Yet you haven't pointed to any with rebuttal.


Pretty much "oh, yeah....that's what you say!"

Brilliant.

You use quotes taken out of context...what's new..

 

[PoliticalChic]

No. You don't post facts. You spew propaganda, nothing less and nothing more.

You are the mistress of cut-and-paste and then that was just about that, moron.

And you quote one of the Dulles brothers.

That is hilarious.

But of course, as stupid as you appear to be, you don't even know WHY it is so hilarious.

You can see the two Asian connected FDR haters on the thread, can't you?

So....unable to rebut the truth....what is left for slime-bags like you?
Yup...your post.

There is no truth. You are merely trying to attempt to obscure history..by suggesting a variant into a known formula...

I've been very specific, with actual words from those who knew the truth....

Yet you haven't pointed to any with rebuttal.


Pretty much "oh, yeah....that's what you say!"

Brilliant.

You use quotes taken out of context...what's new..

Lying fool.

Let's see how easy it is to show that the most intelligent thing you do is drop your draws....

Britain's intelligence chief said this about Canaris:'It is said that had it not been for the Foreign Office's fear of offending Russia that he might have established direct contact with the admiral [Canaris] in 1942 on the removal of Hitler as a means of shortening the war."
“Gen. Menzies, Ex-British Intelligence Chief, Dies,” New York Times, May 31, 1968.


Go ahead....what context is that out of?



That was sooooo simple...much like you are.

 

[Moonglow]

You can see the two Asian connected FDR haters on the thread, can't you?

So....unable to rebut the truth....what is left for slime-bags like you?
Yup...your post.

There is no truth. You are merely trying to attempt to obscure history..by suggesting a variant into a known formula...

I've been very specific, with actual words from those who knew the truth....

Yet you haven't pointed to any with rebuttal.


Pretty much "oh, yeah....that's what you say!"

Brilliant.

You use quotes taken out of context...what's new..

Lying fool.

Let's see how easy it is to show that the most intelligent thing you do is drop your draws....

Britain's intelligence chief said this about Canaris:'It is said that had it not been for the Foreign Office's fear of offending Russia that he might have established direct contact with the admiral [Canaris] in 1942 on the removal of Hitler as a means of shortening the war."
“Gen. Menzies, Ex-British Intelligence Chief, Dies,” New York Times, May 31, 1968.


Go ahead....what context is that out of?



That was sooooo simple...much like you are.

Why are you trying to pin this upon FDR when clearly it's about ...Great Britain...??

 

[PoliticalChic]

So....unable to rebut the truth....what is left for slime-bags like you?
Yup...your post.

There is no truth. You are merely trying to attempt to obscure history..by suggesting a variant into a known formula...

I've been very specific, with actual words from those who knew the truth....

Yet you haven't pointed to any with rebuttal.


Pretty much "oh, yeah....that's what you say!"

Brilliant.

You use quotes taken out of context...what's new..

Lying fool.

Let's see how easy it is to show that the most intelligent thing you do is drop your draws....

Britain's intelligence chief said this about Canaris:'It is said that had it not been for the Foreign Office's fear of offending Russia that he might have established direct contact with the admiral [Canaris] in 1942 on the removal of Hitler as a means of shortening the war."
“Gen. Menzies, Ex-British Intelligence Chief, Dies,” New York Times, May 31, 1968.


Go ahead....what context is that out of?



That was sooooo simple...much like you are.

Why are you trying to pin this upon FDR when clearly it's about ...Great Britain...??

I have to remember not to say "how stupid can you be??" ...you take it as a challenge.

So....you imagine that Britain and America weren't allies?


Did you know that one of the first things FDR did (November 16, 1933) when elected was give Stalin his vote of confidence....after Stalin had starved 7 million to death?

 

[Moonglow]

There is no truth. You are merely trying to attempt to obscure history..by suggesting a variant into a known formula...

I've been very specific, with actual words from those who knew the truth....

Yet you haven't pointed to any with rebuttal.


Pretty much "oh, yeah....that's what you say!"

Brilliant.

You use quotes taken out of context...what's new..

Lying fool.

Let's see how easy it is to show that the most intelligent thing you do is drop your draws....

Britain's intelligence chief said this about Canaris:'It is said that had it not been for the Foreign Office's fear of offending Russia that he might have established direct contact with the admiral [Canaris] in 1942 on the removal of Hitler as a means of shortening the war."
“Gen. Menzies, Ex-British Intelligence Chief, Dies,” New York Times, May 31, 1968.


Go ahead....what context is that out of?



That was sooooo simple...much like you are.

Why are you trying to pin this upon FDR when clearly it's about ...Great Britain...??

I have to remember not to say "how stupid can you be??" ...you take it as a challenge.

So....you imagine that Britain and America weren't allies?


Did you know that one of the first things FDR did (November 16, 1933) when elected was give Stalin his vote of confidence....after Stalin had starved 7 million to death?

Daddy Koch wanted it along, with all the money Stalin could throw at him for his capitalist adventures in taking money from a murderer and eventually donating it to the GOP cause...His family are the leading donators to the right, and the money came from Stalin.....where is your inclusive details at character assassination for these people?
Selective outrage? Or the Koch's never put your relatives in a concentration camp? Like FDR...

 

[Camp]

You can see the two Asian connected FDR haters on the thread, can't you?

So....unable to rebut the truth....what is left for slime-bags like you?
Yup...your post.

There is no truth. You are merely trying to attempt to obscure history..by suggesting a variant into a known formula...

I've been very specific, with actual words from those who knew the truth....

Yet you haven't pointed to any with rebuttal.


Pretty much "oh, yeah....that's what you say!"

Brilliant.

You use quotes taken out of context...what's new..

Lying fool.

Let's see how easy it is to show that the most intelligent thing you do is drop your draws....

Britain's intelligence chief said this about Canaris:'It is said that had it not been for the Foreign Office's fear of offending Russia that he might have established direct contact with the admiral [Canaris] in 1942 on the removal of Hitler as a means of shortening the war."
“Gen. Menzies, Ex-British Intelligence Chief, Dies,” New York Times, May 31, 1968.


Go ahead....what context is that out of?



That was sooooo simple...much like you are.

This is an example of how you cherry pick a quote and use it to promote your agenda driven opinions. It is distorted because you omit other considerations such as the fact that most of the resistance to Hitler in Germany was controlled and coordinated from Moscow, Canaris's had almost no chance for success and the allies knew that fact, nor did he have any kind of reliability Persons that may have been helpful in the effort were unreliable or being used in other capacities and the allies had all ready determined that nothing other than an unconditional surrender would be acceptable in light of the horrible crimes against humanity that had been committed. Germany had been merciless in the murder of untold numbers of civilians all over Europe and negotiations for anything other than unconditional surrender was a decision already made.

 

[Moonglow]

There is no truth. You are merely trying to attempt to obscure history..by suggesting a variant into a known formula...

I've been very specific, with actual words from those who knew the truth....

Yet you haven't pointed to any with rebuttal.


Pretty much "oh, yeah....that's what you say!"

Brilliant.

You use quotes taken out of context...what's new..

Lying fool.

Let's see how easy it is to show that the most intelligent thing you do is drop your draws....

Britain's intelligence chief said this about Canaris:'It is said that had it not been for the Foreign Office's fear of offending Russia that he might have established direct contact with the admiral [Canaris] in 1942 on the removal of Hitler as a means of shortening the war."
“Gen. Menzies, Ex-British Intelligence Chief, Dies,” New York Times, May 31, 1968.


Go ahead....what context is that out of?



That was sooooo simple...much like you are.

Why are you trying to pin this upon FDR when clearly it's about ...Great Britain...??

I have to remember not to say "how stupid can you be??" ...you take it as a challenge.

So....you imagine that Britain and America weren't allies?


Did you know that one of the first things FDR did (November 16, 1933) when elected was give Stalin his vote of confidence....after Stalin had starved 7 million to death?

Just because they were allies does not attribute what Churchill did and FDR did. Several times Churchill did his own thing with Stalin behind FDR's back...

 

[Discombobulated]

I've been to Warm Springs, and who but the worst cynic wouldn't admire or even love President Roosevelt? He was a great icon in American history. Whatever happened to men like him, Truman, and Kennedy? That was the Democratic Party of old. Today we get America-hating shitbags like Clinton and Obama. We get Marxists who want to destroy America. Roosevelt must be spinning in his grave.

1. He extended the Depression rather than ended it.
2. He invalidated the Constitution, and made the Supreme Court into a rubber stamp
3.Through his efforts Joseph Stalin didn't just survive...he thrived, and FDR encouraged and promoted communists in government.
4. He changed the relationship between the people and the government...and not in a good way
5. He extended WWII by at least two years, therefore responsible for the loss of blood and treasure over those years.

Any of that in the documentary?

Not much of a historian are you. Extended the Second World War by two years? I can hardly wait to hear the half wit explanation for that one.

 

[Camp]

I've been to Warm Springs, and who but the worst cynic wouldn't admire or even love President Roosevelt? He was a great icon in American history. Whatever happened to men like him, Truman, and Kennedy? That was the Democratic Party of old. Today we get America-hating shitbags like Clinton and Obama. We get Marxists who want to destroy America. Roosevelt must be spinning in his grave.

1. He extended the Depression rather than ended it.
2. He invalidated the Constitution, and made the Supreme Court into a rubber stamp
3.Through his efforts Joseph Stalin didn't just survive...he thrived, and FDR encouraged and promoted communists in government.
4. He changed the relationship between the people and the government...and not in a good way
5. He extended WWII by at least two years, therefore responsible for the loss of blood and treasure over those years.

Any of that in the documentary?

Not much of a historian are you. Extended the Second World War by two years? I can hardly wait to hear the half wit explanation for that one.

She did a whole thread of that nonsense and the stupid idea was destroyed with an abundance of links and sources to actual history. That doesn't stop her. She is a political hack, not a historian or even a history buff.

 

[Discombobulated]

I've been to Warm Springs, and who but the worst cynic wouldn't admire or even love President Roosevelt? He was a great icon in American history. Whatever happened to men like him, Truman, and Kennedy? That was the Democratic Party of old. Today we get America-hating shitbags like Clinton and Obama. We get Marxists who want to destroy America. Roosevelt must be spinning in his grave.

1. He extended the Depression rather than ended it.
2. He invalidated the Constitution, and made the Supreme Court into a rubber stamp
3.Through his efforts Joseph Stalin didn't just survive...he thrived, and FDR encouraged and promoted communists in government.
4. He changed the relationship between the people and the government...and not in a good way
5. He extended WWII by at least two years, therefore responsible for the loss of blood and treasure over those years.

Any of that in the documentary?

Not much of a historian are you. Extended the Second World War by two years? I can hardly wait to hear the half wit explanation for that one.

She did a whole thread of that nonsense and the stupid idea was destroyed with an abundance of links and sources to actual history. That doesn't stop her. She is a political hack, not a historian or even a history buff.

She's certainly not a buff......more like a bluff.

 

[PoliticalChic]

I've been very specific, with actual words from those who knew the truth....

Yet you haven't pointed to any with rebuttal.


Pretty much "oh, yeah....that's what you say!"

Brilliant.

You use quotes taken out of context...what's new..

Lying fool.

Let's see how easy it is to show that the most intelligent thing you do is drop your draws....

Britain's intelligence chief said this about Canaris:'It is said that had it not been for the Foreign Office's fear of offending Russia that he might have established direct contact with the admiral [Canaris] in 1942 on the removal of Hitler as a means of shortening the war."
“Gen. Menzies, Ex-British Intelligence Chief, Dies,” New York Times, May 31, 1968.


Go ahead....what context is that out of?



That was sooooo simple...much like you are.

Why are you trying to pin this upon FDR when clearly it's about ...Great Britain...??

I have to remember not to say "how stupid can you be??" ...you take it as a challenge.

So....you imagine that Britain and America weren't allies?


Did you know that one of the first things FDR did (November 16, 1933) when elected was give Stalin his vote of confidence....after Stalin had starved 7 million to death?

Daddy Koch wanted it along, with all the money Stalin could throw at him for his capitalist adventures in taking money from a murderer and eventually donating it to the GOP cause...His family are the leading donators to the right, and the money came from Stalin.....where is your inclusive details at character assassination for these people?
Selective outrage? Or the Koch's never put your relatives in a concentration camp? Like FDR...

So...you've avoided the post?

Guess that means I win this one, too.

 

[PoliticalChic]

So....unable to rebut the truth....what is left for slime-bags like you?
Yup...your post.

There is no truth. You are merely trying to attempt to obscure history..by suggesting a variant into a known formula...

I've been very specific, with actual words from those who knew the truth....

Yet you haven't pointed to any with rebuttal.


Pretty much "oh, yeah....that's what you say!"

Brilliant.

You use quotes taken out of context...what's new..

Lying fool.

Let's see how easy it is to show that the most intelligent thing you do is drop your draws....

Britain's intelligence chief said this about Canaris:'It is said that had it not been for the Foreign Office's fear of offending Russia that he might have established direct contact with the admiral [Canaris] in 1942 on the removal of Hitler as a means of shortening the war."
“Gen. Menzies, Ex-British Intelligence Chief, Dies,” New York Times, May 31, 1968.


Go ahead....what context is that out of?



That was sooooo simple...much like you are.

This is an example of how you cherry pick a quote and use it to promote your agenda driven opinions. It is distorted because you omit other considerations such as the fact that most of the resistance to Hitler in Germany was controlled and coordinated from Moscow, Canaris's had almost no chance for success and the allies knew that fact, nor did he have any kind of reliability Persons that may have been helpful in the effort were unreliable or being used in other capacities and the allies had all ready determined that nothing other than an unconditional surrender would be acceptable in light of the horrible crimes against humanity that had been committed. Germany had been merciless in the murder of untold numbers of civilians all over Europe and negotiations for anything other than unconditional surrender was a decision already made.

My "agenda" is the truth.

You can't say that....well, you can lie.

 

[Moonglow]

You use quotes taken out of context...what's new..

Lying fool.

Let's see how easy it is to show that the most intelligent thing you do is drop your draws....

Britain's intelligence chief said this about Canaris:'It is said that had it not been for the Foreign Office's fear of offending Russia that he might have established direct contact with the admiral [Canaris] in 1942 on the removal of Hitler as a means of shortening the war."
“Gen. Menzies, Ex-British Intelligence Chief, Dies,” New York Times, May 31, 1968.


Go ahead....what context is that out of?



That was sooooo simple...much like you are.

Why are you trying to pin this upon FDR when clearly it's about ...Great Britain...??

I have to remember not to say "how stupid can you be??" ...you take it as a challenge.

So....you imagine that Britain and America weren't allies?


Did you know that one of the first things FDR did (November 16, 1933) when elected was give Stalin his vote of confidence....after Stalin had starved 7 million to death?

Daddy Koch wanted it along, with all the money Stalin could throw at him for his capitalist adventures in taking money from a murderer and eventually donating it to the GOP cause...His family are the leading donators to the right, and the money came from Stalin.....where is your inclusive details at character assassination for these people?
Selective outrage? Or the Koch's never put your relatives in a concentration camp? Like FDR...

So...you've avoided the post?

Guess that means I win this one, too.

see avatar with lips pressed upon..

 

[PoliticalChic]

I've been very specific, with actual words from those who knew the truth....

Yet you haven't pointed to any with rebuttal.


Pretty much "oh, yeah....that's what you say!"

Brilliant.

You use quotes taken out of context...what's new..

Lying fool.

Let's see how easy it is to show that the most intelligent thing you do is drop your draws....

Britain's intelligence chief said this about Canaris:'It is said that had it not been for the Foreign Office's fear of offending Russia that he might have established direct contact with the admiral [Canaris] in 1942 on the removal of Hitler as a means of shortening the war."
“Gen. Menzies, Ex-British Intelligence Chief, Dies,” New York Times, May 31, 1968.


Go ahead....what context is that out of?



That was sooooo simple...much like you are.

Why are you trying to pin this upon FDR when clearly it's about ...Great Britain...??

I have to remember not to say "how stupid can you be??" ...you take it as a challenge.

So....you imagine that Britain and America weren't allies?


Did you know that one of the first things FDR did (November 16, 1933) when elected was give Stalin his vote of confidence....after Stalin had starved 7 million to death?

Just because they were allies does not attribute what Churchill did and FDR did. Several times Churchill did his own thing with Stalin behind FDR's back...

You don't know what you're talking about.



But, hey, you chalked up another post.

 

[Moonglow]

You use quotes taken out of context...what's new..

Lying fool.

Let's see how easy it is to show that the most intelligent thing you do is drop your draws....

Britain's intelligence chief said this about Canaris:'It is said that had it not been for the Foreign Office's fear of offending Russia that he might have established direct contact with the admiral [Canaris] in 1942 on the removal of Hitler as a means of shortening the war."
“Gen. Menzies, Ex-British Intelligence Chief, Dies,” New York Times, May 31, 1968.


Go ahead....what context is that out of?



That was sooooo simple...much like you are.

Why are you trying to pin this upon FDR when clearly it's about ...Great Britain...??

I have to remember not to say "how stupid can you be??" ...you take it as a challenge.

So....you imagine that Britain and America weren't allies?


Did you know that one of the first things FDR did (November 16, 1933) when elected was give Stalin his vote of confidence....after Stalin had starved 7 million to death?

Just because they were allies does not attribute what Churchill did and FDR did. Several times Churchill did his own thing with Stalin behind FDR's back...

You don't know what you're talking about.



But, hey, you chalked up another post.

Do you delete yours???

 

[PoliticalChic]

I've been to Warm Springs, and who but the worst cynic wouldn't admire or even love President Roosevelt? He was a great icon in American history. Whatever happened to men like him, Truman, and Kennedy? That was the Democratic Party of old. Today we get America-hating shitbags like Clinton and Obama. We get Marxists who want to destroy America. Roosevelt must be spinning in his grave.

1. He extended the Depression rather than ended it.
2. He invalidated the Constitution, and made the Supreme Court into a rubber stamp
3.Through his efforts Joseph Stalin didn't just survive...he thrived, and FDR encouraged and promoted communists in government.
4. He changed the relationship between the people and the government...and not in a good way
5. He extended WWII by at least two years, therefore responsible for the loss of blood and treasure over those years.

Any of that in the documentary?

Not much of a historian are you. Extended the Second World War by two years? I can hardly wait to hear the half wit explanation for that one.

Get ready for a real education....

Why Did Roosevelt Extend WWII By 2 Years US Message Board - Political Discussion Forum

 

[PoliticalChic]

I've been to Warm Springs, and who but the worst cynic wouldn't admire or even love President Roosevelt? He was a great icon in American history. Whatever happened to men like him, Truman, and Kennedy? That was the Democratic Party of old. Today we get America-hating shitbags like Clinton and Obama. We get Marxists who want to destroy America. Roosevelt must be spinning in his grave.

1. He extended the Depression rather than ended it.
2. He invalidated the Constitution, and made the Supreme Court into a rubber stamp
3.Through his efforts Joseph Stalin didn't just survive...he thrived, and FDR encouraged and promoted communists in government.
4. He changed the relationship between the people and the government...and not in a good way
5. He extended WWII by at least two years, therefore responsible for the loss of blood and treasure over those years.

Any of that in the documentary?

Not much of a historian are you. Extended the Second World War by two years? I can hardly wait to hear the half wit explanation for that one.

She did a whole thread of that nonsense and the stupid idea was destroyed with an abundance of links and sources to actual history. That doesn't stop her. She is a political hack, not a historian or even a history buff.

" destroyed with an abundance of links and sources to actual history."

Liar.

 

[Discombobulated]

I've been to Warm Springs, and who but the worst cynic wouldn't admire or even love President Roosevelt? He was a great icon in American history. Whatever happened to men like him, Truman, and Kennedy? That was the Democratic Party of old. Today we get America-hating shitbags like Clinton and Obama. We get Marxists who want to destroy America. Roosevelt must be spinning in his grave.

1. He extended the Depression rather than ended it.
2. He invalidated the Constitution, and made the Supreme Court into a rubber stamp
3.Through his efforts Joseph Stalin didn't just survive...he thrived, and FDR encouraged and promoted communists in government.
4. He changed the relationship between the people and the government...and not in a good way
5. He extended WWII by at least two years, therefore responsible for the loss of blood and treasure over those years.

Any of that in the documentary?

Not much of a historian are you. Extended the Second World War by two years? I can hardly wait to hear the half wit explanation for that one.

She did a whole thread of that nonsense and the stupid idea was destroyed with an abundance of links and sources to actual history. That doesn't stop her. She is a political hack, not a historian or even a history buff.

" destroyed with an abundance of links and sources to actual history."

Liar.

Your shallow revisionist interpretations in no way represent actual history.

 

[Camp]

I've been to Warm Springs, and who but the worst cynic wouldn't admire or even love President Roosevelt? He was a great icon in American history. Whatever happened to men like him, Truman, and Kennedy? That was the Democratic Party of old. Today we get America-hating shitbags like Clinton and Obama. We get Marxists who want to destroy America. Roosevelt must be spinning in his grave.

1. He extended the Depression rather than ended it.
2. He invalidated the Constitution, and made the Supreme Court into a rubber stamp
3.Through his efforts Joseph Stalin didn't just survive...he thrived, and FDR encouraged and promoted communists in government.
4. He changed the relationship between the people and the government...and not in a good way
5. He extended WWII by at least two years, therefore responsible for the loss of blood and treasure over those years.

Any of that in the documentary?

Not much of a historian are you. Extended the Second World War by two years? I can hardly wait to hear the half wit explanation for that one.

She did a whole thread of that nonsense and the stupid idea was destroyed with an abundance of links and sources to actual history. That doesn't stop her. She is a political hack, not a historian or even a history buff.

" destroyed with an abundance of links and sources to actual history."

Liar.

That was the thread where you used a McCarthy era source and ignored more recent published works after various classified documents such as the Venona papers and Russian documents debunked the claims of your source. You also used your old standby conspiracy theory book by West, a rw commentator. In addition you seemed to have no knowledge of the Italian and Southern France invasions and absolutely no knowledge that NKFD or BDK existed, let alone what they were. You claimed Harry Hopkins was a spy for Stalin as if it was a fact and disregarded the declassified documents that proved that allegation to be untrue. All of this was documented in your thread and that is why your idea was destroyed and turned from the original purpose and degenerated into a thread of basic FDR bashing nonsense that deflects from intelligent discussion and debate, just like this one.