Asclepias
Diamond Member
I stopped giving this guy any credit the day he claimed Vancouver was in europe.Ms. Davis made it known in her court filings that she would have no problem with a deputy clerk issuing the licenses so long as her name wasn't on them. The status report shows that the deputy clerks removed her name and issued the licenses. Kim Davis and her counsel said the licenses are void and not worth the paper they're written on, but they are wrong. The applicants qualified for the licenses, they paid for the licenses, they received the licenses, they will have their marriages solemnized, and their marriages will be recorded upon return of the paperwork to the clerk's office. The only people who would have standing to challenge the validity of the marriages are the parties to the marriage. Thus, the judge may release Kim Davis from jail and she has no reason to interfere with the rights of future applicants for licenses. After all, even if she attempted to enforce her "no marriage license" policy and order her deputies not to issue licenses, the judge made it clear to the deputy clerks that would be an unlawful order and they would be in contempt of his order to issue the licenses. The judge also made it clear that Kim Davis could not lawfully retaliate against them in their employment with the county.
Keeping Davis in jail is a bit like keeping a lump of plutonium in your pocket. The judge had nothing to gain and everything to lose by keeping a political prisoner locked up.
There are two types of contempt: Criminal (punitive) and Civil (remedial, i.e., coercive).
The deputy clerks were instructed by the judge that Kim Davis's "no marriage license" policy was unlawful. The judge had the deputy clerks in the courtroom to watch as he placed Kim Davis into custody and had the federal authorities escort her to jail. He put the deputy clerks on notice that he would hold them in contempt if they reinstated her unlawful policy and violated his lawful order. He also put the deputy clerks on notice that Kim Davis could not retaliate against them in their employment; it would not be a wise thing for her to attempt such a thing.
The deputy clerks removed Kim Davis's name from the marriage licenses (appeasing their boss's demands) and issued the marriage licenses. Thus, the situation has been remedied through the judge's swift action. Upon receiving official word this morning through a status report that the situation is resolved, there is no reason to continue to keep Ms. Davis in jail because it would no longer be remedial (it would be punitive). She is released and may stay released so long as she doesn't take steps to enforce an unlawful policy and thereby harm someone. For instance, if she attempts to fire her deputy clerks who agreed to follow the court's order, she will probably go back to jail until she promises not to retaliate against the employees.
Your reference to Kim Davis as a "political prisoner" only places your ignorance on display, again ... and probably for the millionth plus time you have done that.