Keystone is over

[dannyboys]

I learned to write Basic code and Fortran in the middle sixties. I worked for IBM. IBM contracted me out to the Department Of Energy ( Department Of Geological and Sedimentary Petroleum) in Calgary Alberta which had 6 360's working in series. The only other place in the world with that many 360's working in series at that time was NASA. I was then contracted as a Systems Engineer to the Department of Agriculture and worked in the data processing department.
I know what a fucking 286 was/is.

 

[rightwinger]

But you are against creating new jobs by building infrastructure?

pipeline is infrastructure

It's not OUR pipeline, Canadians would own it, and they can refuse shipment through it of American oil and give priority to Canadian oil.

While taking American lands away through eminent domain.

Do you have a 401k? do any investing,if so,very good chance you own a chunk of said company,don't be so stupid.

that's complete bull crap....and no reason for government to steal citizen's land that they want to keep!

SHAME ON YOU!

so it is ok for the government to steal ones wealth for social programs

but it is not ok to steal with payment ones land to further infrastucture

Basically. Yes

It is OK to collect taxes and it is not OK to confiscate someone's property so that another person can make a profit off of it

 

[Sallow]

What's laughable is that I have been in IT for 20 years and have some internet idiot talking about computers to me..

who the fuck cares

Apparently you do.

i didnt say i cared

i said you are laughable

Says an laughable poster..

so original lol

have the last word

Yup..

 

[jon_berzerk]

pipeline is infrastructure

It's not OUR pipeline, Canadians would own it, and they can refuse shipment through it of American oil and give priority to Canadian oil.

While taking American lands away through eminent domain.

Do you have a 401k? do any investing,if so,very good chance you own a chunk of said company,don't be so stupid.

that's complete bull crap....and no reason for government to steal citizen's land that they want to keep!

SHAME ON YOU!

so it is ok for the government to steal ones wealth for social programs

but it is not ok to steal with payment ones land to further infrastucture

Basically. Yes

It is OK to collect taxes and it is not OK to confiscate someone's property so that another person can make a profit off of it

The constitution says basically you are incorrect

 

[rightwinger]

It's not OUR pipeline, Canadians would own it, and they can refuse shipment through it of American oil and give priority to Canadian oil.

While taking American lands away through eminent domain.

Do you have a 401k? do any investing,if so,very good chance you own a chunk of said company,don't be so stupid.

that's complete bull crap....and no reason for government to steal citizen's land that they want to keep!

SHAME ON YOU!

so it is ok for the government to steal ones wealth for social programs

but it is not ok to steal with payment ones land to further infrastucture

Basically. Yes

It is OK to collect taxes and it is not OK to confiscate someone's property so that another person can make a profit off of it

The constitution says basically you are incorrect

You must be reading the wrong Constitution

You need to look for the one that begins...."We the People"

 

[jon_berzerk]

Do you have a 401k? do any investing,if so,very good chance you own a chunk of said company,don't be so stupid.

that's complete bull crap....and no reason for government to steal citizen's land that they want to keep!

SHAME ON YOU!

so it is ok for the government to steal ones wealth for social programs

but it is not ok to steal with payment ones land to further infrastucture

Basically. Yes

It is OK to collect taxes and it is not OK to confiscate someone's property so that another person can make a profit off of it

The constitution says basically you are incorrect

You must be reading the wrong Constitution

You need to look for the one that begins...."We the People"

libtards and their basic misunderstanding of the founding documents -sad really

eminent domain is clearly spelled out in the 5th Amendment

No person shall be held to answer for a capital, or otherwise infamous crime, unless on a presentment or indictment of a grand jury, except in cases arising in the land or naval forces, or in the militia, when in actual service in time of war or public danger; nor shall any person be subject for the same offense to be twice put in jeopardy of life or limb; nor shall be compelled in any criminal case to be a witness against himself, nor be deprived of life, liberty, or property, without due process of law; nor shall private property be taken for public use, without just compensation.

 

[Care4all]

that's complete bull crap....and no reason for government to steal citizen's land that they want to keep!

SHAME ON YOU!

so it is ok for the government to steal ones wealth for social programs

but it is not ok to steal with payment ones land to further infrastucture

Basically. Yes

It is OK to collect taxes and it is not OK to confiscate someone's property so that another person can make a profit off of it

The constitution says basically you are incorrect

You must be reading the wrong Constitution

You need to look for the one that begins...."We the People"

libtards and their basic misunderstanding of the founding documents -sad really

eminent domain is clearly spelled out in the 5th Amendment

No person shall be held to answer for a capital, or otherwise infamous crime, unless on a presentment or indictment of a grand jury, except in cases arising in the land or naval forces, or in the militia, when in actual service in time of war or public danger; nor shall any person be subject for the same offense to be twice put in jeopardy of life or limb; nor shall be compelled in any criminal case to be a witness against himself, nor be deprived of life, liberty, or property, without due process of law; nor shall private property be taken for public use, without just compensation.

What does, for PUBLIC USE mean to you?

 

[mudwhistle]

Crony Capitalism at work.

 

[jon_berzerk]

so it is ok for the government to steal ones wealth for social programs

but it is not ok to steal with payment ones land to further infrastucture

Basically. Yes

It is OK to collect taxes and it is not OK to confiscate someone's property so that another person can make a profit off of it

The constitution says basically you are incorrect

You must be reading the wrong Constitution

You need to look for the one that begins...."We the People"

libtards and their basic misunderstanding of the founding documents -sad really

eminent domain is clearly spelled out in the 5th Amendment

No person shall be held to answer for a capital, or otherwise infamous crime, unless on a presentment or indictment of a grand jury, except in cases arising in the land or naval forces, or in the militia, when in actual service in time of war or public danger; nor shall any person be subject for the same offense to be twice put in jeopardy of life or limb; nor shall be compelled in any criminal case to be a witness against himself, nor be deprived of life, liberty, or property, without due process of law; nor shall private property be taken for public use, without just compensation.

What does, for PUBLIC USE mean to you?

you are ;leaving out due process

 

[mudwhistle]

Woohoo
Just heard on TV.

Whoohooo.....80,000 more jobs just bit the dust.



Democraps are so good at destroying job growth it's hilarious! !!!

 

[jon_berzerk]

infras

Crony Capitalism at work.

is it crony capitalism or is it just cronyism

 

[Care4all]

Basically. Yes

It is OK to collect taxes and it is not OK to confiscate someone's property so that another person can make a profit off of it

The constitution says basically you are incorrect

You must be reading the wrong Constitution

You need to look for the one that begins...."We the People"

libtards and their basic misunderstanding of the founding documents -sad really

eminent domain is clearly spelled out in the 5th Amendment

No person shall be held to answer for a capital, or otherwise infamous crime, unless on a presentment or indictment of a grand jury, except in cases arising in the land or naval forces, or in the militia, when in actual service in time of war or public danger; nor shall any person be subject for the same offense to be twice put in jeopardy of life or limb; nor shall be compelled in any criminal case to be a witness against himself, nor be deprived of life, liberty, or property, without due process of law; nor shall private property be taken for public use, without just compensation.

What does, for PUBLIC USE mean to you?

you are ;leaving out due process

Answer my question please.

 

[jon_berzerk]

so it is ok for the government to steal ones wealth for social programs

but it is not ok to steal with payment ones land to further infrastucture

Basically. Yes

It is OK to collect taxes and it is not OK to confiscate someone's property so that another person can make a profit off of it

The constitution says basically you are incorrect

You must be reading the wrong Constitution

You need to look for the one that begins...."We the People"

libtards and their basic misunderstanding of the founding documents -sad really

eminent domain is clearly spelled out in the 5th Amendment

No person shall be held to answer for a capital, or otherwise infamous crime, unless on a presentment or indictment of a grand jury, except in cases arising in the land or naval forces, or in the militia, when in actual service in time of war or public danger; nor shall any person be subject for the same offense to be twice put in jeopardy of life or limb; nor shall be compelled in any criminal case to be a witness against himself, nor be deprived of life, liberty, or property, without due process of law; nor shall private property be taken for public use, without just compensation.

What does, for PUBLIC USE mean to you?

oh and to answer your question public works like a pipeline or power line or perhaps even water lines and fiber optic cables are all examples of public use

without eminent domain you would be dipping your drinking water from a pond

and posting by way of smoke signals

 

[jon_berzerk]

The constitution says basically you are incorrect

You must be reading the wrong Constitution

You need to look for the one that begins...."We the People"

libtards and their basic misunderstanding of the founding documents -sad really

eminent domain is clearly spelled out in the 5th Amendment

No person shall be held to answer for a capital, or otherwise infamous crime, unless on a presentment or indictment of a grand jury, except in cases arising in the land or naval forces, or in the militia, when in actual service in time of war or public danger; nor shall any person be subject for the same offense to be twice put in jeopardy of life or limb; nor shall be compelled in any criminal case to be a witness against himself, nor be deprived of life, liberty, or property, without due process of law; nor shall private property be taken for public use, without just compensation.

What does, for PUBLIC USE mean to you?

you are ;leaving out due process

Answer my question please.

i did look at post 205

 

[PaintMyHouse]

So sad, no gas for China in the We get the Pollution, they get the Gas deal.

"WASHINGTON -- President Barack Obama on Friday will officially reject TransCanada's application to build a massive pipeline to transport oil across the United States-Canada border, The Huffington Post has learned from multiple sources.

After seven years of reviewing the project, Obama is expected to make the announcement from the Roosevelt Room in the White House. His decision will come after meeting with Secretary of State John Kerry, whose department oversaw the review."

 

[Star]

.

Not sure at this point whether TransCanada has given up trying to build the pipeline because they're convinced Hillary will be the next president or...?

http://www.dailykos.com/story/2015/11/03/1443644/-TransCanada-requests-a-halt-of-Administration-s-review-of-Keystone-XL

TransCanada requests a halt to Administration's review of Keystone XL
Lefty Coaster
Nov 02, 2015 at 05:42 PM PST
.

It's just an itty bitty part line.

That's what is so funny about all of this. Keystone has it all from Alberta to the Gulf. This is a joke.

Planet Earth wins.
Keystone XL Pipeline? stick a fork in it.

Kerry rejects Keystone XL pipeline, spelling certain death for project
http://www.cnn.com/profiles/elise-labott-profile
Elise Labott
November 6, 2015


Washington (CNN)Secretary of State John Kerry is recommending the U.S. reject the Keystone XL pipeline, senior administration officials told CNN, concluding the controversial project is not in the country's national security interest.

Kerry will meet with President Barack Obama this morning, after which the President is expected to publicly speak about his top diplomat's decision.

Kerry's determination spells almost certain death for the massive project, a seven-year political fight that has pitted oil companies and Republicans against environmentalists and liberal activists.



<snip>

 

[PaintMyHouse]

Bye Bye, for now. Obama just announced it...

 

[PaintMyHouse]

And down she goes. for now, officially...

 

[Billy_Kinetta]

This administration is intent upon doing as much damage as possible to the nation on its way out. This is no surprise.

 

[Dot Com]

Good to hear. Communist China will have to get their petro chem's transshipped through a diff country.