BULLDOG
Diamond Member
- Jun 3, 2014
- 96,229
- 32,201
- 2,250
Of course it's relevant and in direct response to your point.
Cheney had private heads of oil corporations secretly determining public policy in terms of energy. Part and parcel with that was the invasion of Iraq, which the PNAC, a group that Cheney and many folks in the Bush administration were a part of, overtly advocated for.
And as to what replaces Capitalism? Who knows?
It's probably something that looks like a blend of both capitalism and socialism in the short term.
But over the longer term it will be as "radical" as the eventual evolution of capitalism out of monarchies.
so you don't know how or when...you just know it will happen...Ok, that's a safe position to take...you don't have to support anything..just say "I think such and such will happen....." LMAO
for the fifth (or 6th) time
Regarding importing oil from the ME;
Where DO we import the most oil from?
Why do we import ANY oil?
Are we out of oil in america?....or is there a political "reason"?
Sorry, really?
The point wasn't to grab oil for America..
The point was to keep oil from American enemies and create scarcity in the world.
Which, worked out very nicely.
American oil companies made a bundle.
you guys are Pavlovian.... even when you don't know what you're talking about, in a pinch...blame bush for everything.
...oil is a commodity..the price rises and falls regardless of what our enemies do..no one can micromanage the world oil supply..that's delusional..
The more one posses of a desired commodity, the better off one will be.
the more oil we produce here, the better for americans overall.
Now go ahead and tell me I'm wrong and "explain" how producing our own oil will be bad for the economy and importing oil is better....![]()
Canadian bitumen isn't ours, and it isn't oil.
Not what we're talking about, though, is it?
You were the one referring to our oil in a thread about XL, not me.