Tommy Tainant
Diamond Member
Thats pretty much it.Trump created Khan in respect of this issue.He is an ANTAGONIST. So are either of us. What are we arguing about?I'm not running away. I'm right here. And you are pretending to be outraged as well as ignored. I answered your question, apparently that isn't well enough. What else can I do? Jump through a fiery hoop over a pit of alligators? Sorry.Actually, I did. Muslims extremist killed his son, not this phony hysteria on xenophobia. Muslims killed 3000 people on 9/11 on one fell swoop. Muslims aren't a new untouchable class because it offends some of you. They do bad things in real time to non muslims. Get real. Kahn's son died for a lost cause because Bush mislead a bunch of sheep to invade and destabilize Iraq. That doesn't make any of the rest of us any safer from real terrorist. Sorry, but's that's reality.
All of that is true, or most, but it still doesn't address my point, which was pointed directly at your post, which said, and I quote:
-- and you continue to run away from that once I called you on it. Just admit that that's what you're doing.
"Hiding behind his goldstar family status and Muslim religion to manipulate popular opinion."
You presented Khan as the antagonist. It's right there in your words. I pointed out that he was reacting in defense, and that Rump went first.
You can't admit that. You know it's true but can't admit you were wrong.
That's the end of it.
He's using his gold star and religious status to support Hillary Clinton. call me a little cynical, but Mr. Kahn isn't immune to scrutiny ( He is a bigtime Clinton supporter). I don't support nor will I ever vote for Trump.When I read about Clinton critics dying under mysterious circumstances,it makes me wonder WHO is the worse candidate here.
I don't actually give a flying shit who you think is the worse candidate. We're not even talking about that. Nor are we talking about whether Khan is a "bigtime Clinton supporter". Not my business and I don't care. We're not talking about who anybody votes for or who anybody should vote for.
What you're doing is ignoring the context that plainly spells out that Khan spoke IN REACTION TO already-established bigoted blanket rhetoric spewed repeatedly by Donald Rump, and you tried to sell this bullshit story that Khan started it.
Well he didn't, and I called you on it. And if you do it again -- so will I. Because it's dishonest.
What has happened here is that Trump has now given the knuckle draggers another bogey man. Meanwhile the rest of civilisation looks on and shakes their head.