Skylar
Diamond Member
- Jul 5, 2014
- 52,660
- 15,666
- 2,180
No state is going to get away with not sanctioning any marriages as we have been trying to drive home to you.
You can keep trying to drive it home. We're going to stop State sanctioning of marriage.
No, you're not. The State of Alabama still recognizes marriage under the new law. All Alabama is doing is eliminating the licensing portion. They aren't eliminating ANY of their statutes regarding marriage, child support, benefits, divorce, property, or anything else.
And any changes they make to marriage apply to both straights and gays. Regardless of what Alabama calls marriage.....they can't prevent gays from entering into it. Nor can they refuse to recognize marriages performed in any other state, straight or gay.
You're once again arguing what you think the Obergefell ruling 'shoulda' said. And ignoring what it actually does say. And this is why your predictions of legal outcomes are always wrong.
As no one gives a shit what you think the ruling 'oughta' say.
Then we will see if you can force states to sponsor your sexual behavior. I'm betting we see they don't have to. In the meantime, we are all entertained by your bombastic opinions but you haven't backed anything up with the Constitution.
The USSC has already answered the question you think you're posing them with this terminology change.
"The Constitution, however, does not permit the State to bar same-sex couples from marriage on the same terms as accorded to couples of the opposite sex."
Obergefell v. Hodges
Call marriage whatever you like. License, contract, compact, agreement, it doesn't matter. If straight couples can enter into it....so can same sex couples. The same terms apply for both.
You can't get around that. All you can do is ignore it. Which is gloriously irrelevant to the outcome of any case.