KItty Werthman, holocaust survivor, tells how gun control happened under the national socialist workers party (nazis.)

No, the Swiss just cashed in the gold the Nazis extracted from Jewish Teeth.


Nope.......Hitler would have invaded by his military told him not to.........

THE SWISS WERE PREPARED TO FIGHT FACISM TO THE BITTER END | FRONTLINE | PBS

That is why the Nazis despised Switzerland. Joseph Goebbels called Switzerland "this stinking little state" where "sentiment has turned very much against us." Adolf Hitler decided that "all the rubbish of small nations still existing in Europe must be liquidated," even if it meant he would later "be attacked as the 'Butcher of the Swiss.'"

The 1940 Nazi invasion plan, Operation Tannenbaum, was not executed, and SS Oberst Hermann Bohme's 1943 memorandum warned that an invasion of Switzerland would be too costly because every man was armed and trained to shoot. This did not stop the Gestapo from preparing lists of Swiss to be liquidated once the Nazis overran the country.

The other European nations were easily toppled and had little means to wage a partisan war against the occupation. Once their standing armies were defeated, the governments capitulated and the populaces were defenseless.


Only in Switzerland was the entire populace armed and prepared to wage a relentless guerrilla war against an invader. When the war began in 1939, Switzerland mobilized 435,000 citizen soldiers out of a population of 4.2 million. Production figures for Swiss service rifles, which had firepower equal to those of the Germans, demonstrate an ample supply of small arms. Swiss militiamen were instructed to disregard any alleged "official" surrender as enemy propaganda and, if necessary, to fight individually. This meant that a nation of sharpshooters would be sniping at German soldiers at long ranges from every mountain.


While neutral, Switzerland was prepared to fight a Nazi invasion to the end. The celebrated Swiss Gen. Henri Guisan developed the strategy known as defense du reduit--an initial opposition followed by a retreat into the Alps, where a relentless war to the death would be waged. Most Swiss strongly opposed Nazism. Death sentences were issued for fifth-column activities, and proclamations against anti-Semitism were passed at various official levels. There was no Holocaust on Swiss soil, something that can not be said for France, the Netherlands, Poland or most of Europe.
 
After WW1 the Weimar republic had very strict gun laws. Hitler took guns from Jews and Socialists but otherwise he made gun ownership much easier.



Yes....thanks for making our point....he took guns away from the people he planned on sending to death camps.......makes you wonder why the democrats want to take guns away from everyone.....
 
Nope.......Hitler would have invaded by his military told him not to.........

And there was no reason to.

Hey, did you know the Nazis also didn't invade Monaco, Liechtenstein, San Marino, Andorra... microstates they could have slapped down like bugs, but had no real reason to.

The Nazis also didn't invade Sweden. Why? Because there was no reason to. The Swedes were neutral, but they were happy to sell iron and other commodities to the Nazis.

They didn't invade Spain after Franco proved himself to be a pain in the ass, even though there would have been the tactical advantage of being able to cut off the Mediterrean from the British by taking Gibraltar? Why? They didn't want to open another front of the war if they didn't have to.

So why didn't the Germans invade Switzerland in either World War? Not because they were so afraid of those supposed Swiss guns, but because Switzerland was useful as the world's banker. All that loot they were taking from the rest of Europe didn't do them much good if they couldn't spend it. .
 
And there was no reason to.

Hey, did you know the Nazis also didn't invade Monaco, Liechtenstein, San Marino, Andorra... microstates they could have slapped down like bugs, but had no real reason to.

The Nazis also didn't invade Sweden. Why? Because there was no reason to. The Swedes were neutral, but they were happy to sell iron and other commodities to the Nazis.

They didn't invade Spain after Franco proved himself to be a pain in the ass, even though there would have been the tactical advantage of being able to cut off the Mediterrean from the British by taking Gibraltar? Why? They didn't want to open another front of the war if they didn't have to.

So why didn't the Germans invade Switzerland in either World War? Not because they were so afraid of those supposed Swiss guns, but because Switzerland was useful as the world's banker. All that loot they were taking from the rest of Europe didn't do them much good if they couldn't spend it. .


Yeah.....but if they could have they would have, Switzerland had cash.........and they couldn't take them because they were armed
 
Yeah.....but if they could have they would have, Switzerland had cash.........and they couldn't take them because they were armed

Why would they have? Germany only invaded countries where they had a specific goal, either

1) Countries that had territory Germany legitimatly considered theirs (Austria, Czechoslovakia, Poland)
2) Countries that had declared war on Germany (the UK, France)
3) Countries that were between them and countries that had declared war on them (Benelux, Denmark, Norway)
4) Or their ideological enemy, the USSR.

Some countries he didn't have to invade, they were happy to throw in with him. Italy, Bulgaria, Slovakia, Romania, Hungary , Finland)
Some countries he was happy to leave alone because they posed no threat to him, or even beneficially traded with him - Sweden, Spain, and Switzerland.



There was simply no tactical reason to go after Switzerland, and a lot of good reasons to leave it be.


When you're confused, raise your hand to ask a question.
Okay, what kind of fucked up home school told you it was about the "Anglican Church"?
 
Why would they have? Germany only invaded countries where they had a specific goal, either

1) Countries that had territory Germany legitimatly considered theirs (Austria, Czechoslovakia, Poland)
2) Countries that had declared war on Germany (the UK, France)
3) Countries that were between them and countries that had declared war on them (Benelux, Denmark, Norway)
4) Or their ideological enemy, the USSR.

Some countries he didn't have to invade, they were happy to throw in with him. Italy, Bulgaria, Slovakia, Romania, Hungary , Finland)
Some countries he was happy to leave alone because they posed no threat to him, or even beneficially traded with him - Sweden, Spain, and Switzerland.



There was simply no tactical reason to go after Switzerland, and a lot of good reasons to leave it be.



Okay, what kind of fucked up home school told you it was about the "Anglican Church"?
Try paying attention. I stated specifically the founders of this nation rebelled against dictatorial rule which was the Anglican church.
 
Try paying attention. I stated specifically the founders of this nation rebelled against dictatorial rule which was the Anglican church.

Which is probably the most retarded thing you've said yet, and that's saying something.

The United Kingdom at that point was a parliamentary democracy. The monarchy hadn't exercised any real power since the beginning of the century.
 
Which is probably the most retarded thing you've said yet, and that's saying something.

The United Kingdom at that point was a parliamentary democracy. The monarchy hadn't exercised any real power since the beginning of the century.
Another instance of your profound ignorance of history. The authority of the Anglican Church was the established religion in five of the thirteen original colonies.

You didn't know that the early colonists fought a war for independence from Britain and the authoritarian church?

I guess your leftist madrassah is not real strong on American history.
 
Another instance of your profound ignorance of history. The authority of the Anglican Church was the established religion in five of the thirteen original colonies.

Except it really wasn't an issue. The issues were that they didn't like paying their taxes for a war they started with France, and they didn't like the fact that the abolitionist movement was growing in England.
 
Except it really wasn't an issue. The issues were that they didn't like paying their taxes for a war they started with France, and they didn't like the fact that the abolitionist movement was growing in England.
Except you're backtracking and sidestepping. The fact is, the nascent US fought a war to rid itself of the oppressive Anglican church and British rule.
 
Except you're backtracking and sidestepping. The fact is, the nascent US fought a war to rid itself of the oppressive Anglican church and British rule.

Except the Anglican church continued after the British left. In fact, the country is still majority protestant.


1675528220955.jpeg
 
A
Except this nation fought a war to rid itself of British rule and the authoritarian church.

Not surprising your grasp of history is so weak. : And we can have Civil Unrest to force Globalist Socialism outta DC too ( Failzero)
 
Except this nation fought a war to rid itself of British rule and the authoritarian church.

Right, it was about the "Church", not taxes and other issues.

Here's the text of the Declaration of Independence.

Show me the part about the Anglican Church.

 
Right, it was about the "Church", not taxes and other issues.

Here's the text of the Declaration of Independence.

Show me the part about the Anglican Church.

Golly. I guess they don't stress Great Satan history at the Lenin Institute.

I guess you werent aware tbat the British monarchy was the ultimate authority over the Anglican Church in the 1700's.

Isn't there something in the Constitution about freedom of expression / freedom of religion?

Perhaps that was one of those "other matters" you were confused about?
 
Golly. I guess they don't stress Great Satan history at the Lenin Institute.

I guess you werent aware tbat the British monarchy was the ultimate authority over the Anglican Church in the 1700's.

Isn't there something in the Constitution about freedom of expression / freedom of religion?

Again, never mentioned in the Declaration of Independence, so it wasn't a grievance.

The British Monarch by 1776 was a figurehead. Parliament ran the country. The big complaint was 1) The colonies weren't represented, 2) They were making the rich pay their fair share for the war they started with France and the Native Americans, 3) They weren't letting colonists steal more of the Native Americans' land and 4) they were deathly afraid parliament would outlaw slavery.

They really didn't give a hoot about the Anglican Church.
 
Nope.......Hitler would have invaded by his military told him not to.........

THE SWISS WERE PREPARED TO FIGHT FACISM TO THE BITTER END | FRONTLINE | PBS

That is why the Nazis despised Switzerland. Joseph Goebbels called Switzerland "this stinking little state" where "sentiment has turned very much against us." Adolf Hitler decided that "all the rubbish of small nations still existing in Europe must be liquidated," even if it meant he would later "be attacked as the 'Butcher of the Swiss.'"

The 1940 Nazi invasion plan, Operation Tannenbaum, was not executed, and SS Oberst Hermann Bohme's 1943 memorandum warned that an invasion of Switzerland would be too costly because every man was armed and trained to shoot. This did not stop the Gestapo from preparing lists of Swiss to be liquidated once the Nazis overran the country.

The other European nations were easily toppled and had little means to wage a partisan war against the occupation. Once their standing armies were defeated, the governments capitulated and the populaces were defenseless.


Only in Switzerland was the entire populace armed and prepared to wage a relentless guerrilla war against an invader. When the war began in 1939, Switzerland mobilized 435,000 citizen soldiers out of a population of 4.2 million. Production figures for Swiss service rifles, which had firepower equal to those of the Germans, demonstrate an ample supply of small arms. Swiss militiamen were instructed to disregard any alleged "official" surrender as enemy propaganda and, if necessary, to fight individually. This meant that a nation of sharpshooters would be sniping at German soldiers at long ranges from every mountain.


While neutral, Switzerland was prepared to fight a Nazi invasion to the end. The celebrated Swiss Gen. Henri Guisan developed the strategy known as defense du reduit--an initial opposition followed by a retreat into the Alps, where a relentless war to the death would be waged. Most Swiss strongly opposed Nazism. Death sentences were issued for fifth-column activities, and proclamations against anti-Semitism were passed at various official levels. There was no Holocaust on Swiss soil, something that can not be said for France, the Netherlands, Poland or most of Europe.

The Swiss were prepared to blow up the passes and the tunnels.

Gun ownership was strict after WW1... It got easier after Hitler.

 

Forum List

Back
Top