Know Why The Left Hides History?

[P@triot]

Those "Democrats" all joined the Republican party in the 1950/60s.

They did...snowflake? Then why is there still a Dumbocrat Party? For your idiotic revisionist version to work, everyone in the Republican Party would have had to switch sides to the Dumbocrat Party.

 

[PoliticalChic]

1. Essentially, it's because they want to hide who they are, where they came from.

This sort of thing:

Liberal historian Eric Foner writes that the Klan was “…a military force serving the interests of the Democratic Party…” Foner, “Reconstruction: America’s Unfinished Revolution, 1863-1877,” p. 425




2. But, to pick up on today's headlines.....

....the KKK began with gun control as a major objective.

Guess whose guns they wanted to control?




3. "America’s most horrific racist organization, the Ku Klux Klan, began with gun control at the very top of its agenda. Before the Civil War, blacks in the South had never been allowed to possess guns. During the war, however, blacks obtained guns for the first time. Some served as soldiers in black units in the Union Army, which allowed its men, black and white, to take their guns home with them as partial payment of past due wages. Other Southern blacks bought guns in the underground marketplace, which was flooded with firearms produced for the war.

After the war, Southern states adopted discriminatory laws like the Black Codes, which among other things barred the freedmen from having guns. Racist whites began to form posses that would go out at night to terrorize blacks—and take away those newly obtained firearms. The groups took different names: the “Men of Justice” in Alabama; the “Knights of the White Camellia” in Louisiana; the “Knights of the Rising Sun” in Texas. The group formed in Pulaski, Tenn., became the most well-known: the Ku Klux Klan."
Adam Winkler, “Gun Fight” Author, On Gun Control’s Racism



4. "The night riders move through the darkness, white against the black road....they go about their business, their horsed draped, guns and bullwhips banging dully against saddles.

....this is the South Carolina of the 1870s, not of the turn of a new millennium, and the night riders are the terror of these times. They roam upcountry, visiting their version of justice on poor blacks and the Republicans that support them, refusing to bow to the requirements of the Fourteenth and Fifteenth Amendments."
From the novel "The White Road," by John Connolly



5. Of course, the sons of the KKK, the members of the Party of Jefferson Davis and Bull Connor, ride again....

....and for the same objective.....gun control.



6. Who do they want to disarm today?
Democrats who own guns are more likely to vote for a Republican.
If you're a woman, and you own a gun, you are more likely to vote for a Republican.
If you're African-American, and you own a gun, are more likely to vote for a Republican.

I think we need to start calling people like you, Tribalist.

You are perpetually stuck in this "us vs them" mentally.

You claim to love America but you clearly hate many of your fellow Americans.

A Tribalist finds it easier to hate the "other" when they are a different skin color or have head covering worn as a religious custom.

Let me tell you who hates history, the people who are destined to repeat it.

The Dems changed from a conservative southern party to the left-leaning urban and big city party over a long period of time. The southern Dems "Dixiecrats" switched sides in 1960's-70's. They switched because they lost. They lost the 'War of Northern Aggression' and 100 years later they lost the right to segregate. No one wants to be on a losing team. So when Nixon introduced the southern strategy to win over the lost and forgotten "Dixies" they changed parties. The major political parties have switched polarities TWICE in our history. (this is an oversimplified and imprecise statement but true)

Perhaps if you really loved History you'd know more about it...


Can you answer this: Does it matter if racist whites-only people call themselves Republican or Democrat. Does it really matter?

"I think we need to start calling people like you,......."


....educated.


We both know you are unable to find any errors in my posts.



There was no 'Southern Strategy.' It's the sort of myth that allows you to keep voting for the racist party, while denying that it is.


My public service: the southern strategy myth:

[…segregationist voters who blamed civil rights on the Democrats, swiched loyaties to new Republicans who now embraced their views. Republicans ran against busing, against afirmative action, against equal rights legislation…The south has been Republican ever since]

1. “In American politics, the Southern strategy refers to the Republican Party strategy of winning elections or to gain political support in the Southern section of the country by appealing to racism against African Americans….he strategy was first adopted under future Republican President Richard Nixon and Republican Senator Barry Goldwater[6] in the late 1960s.” Southern strategy - Wikipedia
2. According to this liberal myth, Goldwater and the Republicans were racists and used racism to appeal to racist southerners to change the electoral map. To believe the tale, one must be either a reliable Democrat voter, and/or be ignorant of the history of the time.
3. Goldwater was one of only six Republican senators to vote against the 1964 act. He did so on libertarian grounds, opposed to the act’s restrictions on private property which he believed beyond the Congress’s powers under the commerce clause. Five others supported the party’s presidential nominee.
   1. Goldwater went on to win five southern states in 1964: Alabama, Georgia, Louisiana, Mississippi, and South Carolina. But he lost eight.
   2. Democrats build the ‘southern strategy’ tale on the fact that the same states voted for ‘Dixiecrat’ Strom Thurmond in 1948 (less Georgia).
   3. Except that Nixon and Reagan lost, or almost lost the same states in ’68 and ’80…
   4. And Jimmy Carter and Clinton did pretty well in those states in ’76 and ’92.
   5. And the Goldwater states went right back to voting Democrat for decades…
4. So…if Republicans were racists and got racist southerners to vote for them, how to explain this: Republicans always did best in the southern states that Goldwater lost, which happened to be the same ones Republicans had been winning with some regularity since 1928.
   1. In ’28, ’52, ’56, and ’60, Republicans generally won Virginia, Florida, Texas, Kentucky and sometimes North Carolina or Louisiana. Did you notice that those years were before 1964?
   2. Four years after Goldwater, the segregationist vote went right back to Democrats: Humphrey got half of Wallace’s supporters on election day. Nixon got none of ‘em. “When the '68 campaign began, Nixon was at 42 percent, Humphrey at 29 percent, Wallace at 22 percent. When it ended, Nixon and Humphrey were tied at 43 percent, with Wallace at 13 percent. The 9 percent of the national vote that had been peeled off from Wallace had gone to Humphrey.” Pat Buchanan - The neocons & Nixon's southern strategy
   3. In ’76, Carter swept the South. Was Carter appealing to bigots….or is that only the case when Republicans win the South?
5. Reagan lost or barely won the Goldwater states…but Reagan won among young southern voters- but lost among seniors, those who has voted in ’48 and ’64. That meant that the segregationists never abandoned the Democrats: eventually they died or were outvoted by younger voters. Nope…after Thurmond’s run, the Dixiecrats went right back to voting for Democrats for another half century.
6. In writing about McGovern and Wallace, liberal luminary, Arthur Schlesinger, actually referred to Wallace voters as responding to their candidate’s “integrity”! “The primaries themselves, especially the success of McGovern and Wallace, provide the best evidence for the proposition that voters in 1972 care less about a candidate's stand on particular issues than they do about the candidate's integrity,…” How McGovern Will Win
   1. McGovern gave a tip-of-the-hat to the segregationist Wallace in his acceptance speech at the Democrat Convention. That was the exact midpoint between Goldwater and Reagan. So…what of the imaginary “southern strategy” where the Republicans were supposed to have a plan to appeal to racists?
   2. Democrat McGovern: “And I was as moved as well by the appearance in the Convention Hall of the Governor of Alabama, George Wallace. … Governor, we pray for your full recovery so you can stand up and speak out for all of those who see you as their champion.” ACCEPTANCE SPEECH OF SENATOR GEORGE MCGOVERN

Wise up, you dope.

View attachment 180098 1964...note the red states for Goldwater

View attachment 180099 1968...note the orange states for Wallace (NOT Democrat, btw...blue is Democrat)

View attachment 180100 1972...note the red states from 1964 also voting red in 1972 even tho Political Chic said they went back Democrat

View attachment 180101 1976...the exception that proves the rule (Carter was a southerner)

View attachment 180102 1980...Georgia voted for Carter...no surprise there

View attachment 1801031984....South all Republican red

View attachment 180104 1988...South all Republican red

View attachment 180105 1992...some Southern blue...Clinton was from Arkansas and Bush had destroyed the economy

View attachment 180106 1996...there's that GOP Southern block again

View attachment 180108 2000...and yet again

View attachment 180109 2004...and yet again

View attachment 180110 2008...and yet again

View attachment 180111 2012...and yet again

View attachment 180112 2016...and yet again

None of those dispute what I posted.

 

[PoliticalChic]

Condolezza Rice, yesterday, on 'The View:'

"She said that Democrat lawmaker “Bull” Connor and the Ku Klux Klan’s disdain black citizens who could defend themselves convinced her at a young age of the importance of gun rights.

“Let me tell you why I’m a defender of the Second Amendment,” former President George W. Bush’s top diplomat told the panel. “I was a little girl growing up in Birmingham, Alabama, in the late ‘50s, early ‘60s. There was no way that [Democrat] Bull Connor and the Birmingham police were going to protect you.”

Ms. Rice said that her father and his friends would fire their guns in the air when[Democrat] “night riders” with the [Democrat] KKK would come through the neighborhood.

“I’m sure if [Democrat] Bull Connor had known where those guns were, he would have rounded them up,” she said. “So I don’t favor some things like gun registration.”
Condoleezza Rice defends gun rights on ‘The View,’ reminds hosts about ‘Bull’ Connor



Democrats, the KKK and gun control.....all fit together.

 

[bodecea]

1. Essentially, it's because they want to hide who they are, where they came from.

This sort of thing:

Liberal historian Eric Foner writes that the Klan was “…a military force serving the interests of the Democratic Party…” Foner, “Reconstruction: America’s Unfinished Revolution, 1863-1877,” p. 425




2. But, to pick up on today's headlines.....

....the KKK began with gun control as a major objective.

Guess whose guns they wanted to control?




3. "America’s most horrific racist organization, the Ku Klux Klan, began with gun control at the very top of its agenda. Before the Civil War, blacks in the South had never been allowed to possess guns. During the war, however, blacks obtained guns for the first time. Some served as soldiers in black units in the Union Army, which allowed its men, black and white, to take their guns home with them as partial payment of past due wages. Other Southern blacks bought guns in the underground marketplace, which was flooded with firearms produced for the war.

After the war, Southern states adopted discriminatory laws like the Black Codes, which among other things barred the freedmen from having guns. Racist whites began to form posses that would go out at night to terrorize blacks—and take away those newly obtained firearms. The groups took different names: the “Men of Justice” in Alabama; the “Knights of the White Camellia” in Louisiana; the “Knights of the Rising Sun” in Texas. The group formed in Pulaski, Tenn., became the most well-known: the Ku Klux Klan."
Adam Winkler, “Gun Fight” Author, On Gun Control’s Racism



4. "The night riders move through the darkness, white against the black road....they go about their business, their horsed draped, guns and bullwhips banging dully against saddles.

....this is the South Carolina of the 1870s, not of the turn of a new millennium, and the night riders are the terror of these times. They roam upcountry, visiting their version of justice on poor blacks and the Republicans that support them, refusing to bow to the requirements of the Fourteenth and Fifteenth Amendments."
From the novel "The White Road," by John Connolly



5. Of course, the sons of the KKK, the members of the Party of Jefferson Davis and Bull Connor, ride again....

....and for the same objective.....gun control.



6. Who do they want to disarm today?
Democrats who own guns are more likely to vote for a Republican.
If you're a woman, and you own a gun, you are more likely to vote for a Republican.
If you're African-American, and you own a gun, are more likely to vote for a Republican.

I think we need to start calling people like you, Tribalist.

You are perpetually stuck in this "us vs them" mentally.

You claim to love America but you clearly hate many of your fellow Americans.

A Tribalist finds it easier to hate the "other" when they are a different skin color or have head covering worn as a religious custom.

Let me tell you who hates history, the people who are destined to repeat it.

The Dems changed from a conservative southern party to the left-leaning urban and big city party over a long period of time. The southern Dems "Dixiecrats" switched sides in 1960's-70's. They switched because they lost. They lost the 'War of Northern Aggression' and 100 years later they lost the right to segregate. No one wants to be on a losing team. So when Nixon introduced the southern strategy to win over the lost and forgotten "Dixies" they changed parties. The major political parties have switched polarities TWICE in our history. (this is an oversimplified and imprecise statement but true)

Perhaps if you really loved History you'd know more about it...


Can you answer this: Does it matter if racist whites-only people call themselves Republican or Democrat. Does it really matter?

"I think we need to start calling people like you,......."


....educated.


We both know you are unable to find any errors in my posts.



There was no 'Southern Strategy.' It's the sort of myth that allows you to keep voting for the racist party, while denying that it is.


My public service: the southern strategy myth:

[…segregationist voters who blamed civil rights on the Democrats, swiched loyaties to new Republicans who now embraced their views. Republicans ran against busing, against afirmative action, against equal rights legislation…The south has been Republican ever since]

1. “In American politics, the Southern strategy refers to the Republican Party strategy of winning elections or to gain political support in the Southern section of the country by appealing to racism against African Americans….he strategy was first adopted under future Republican President Richard Nixon and Republican Senator Barry Goldwater[6] in the late 1960s.” Southern strategy - Wikipedia
2. According to this liberal myth, Goldwater and the Republicans were racists and used racism to appeal to racist southerners to change the electoral map. To believe the tale, one must be either a reliable Democrat voter, and/or be ignorant of the history of the time.
3. Goldwater was one of only six Republican senators to vote against the 1964 act. He did so on libertarian grounds, opposed to the act’s restrictions on private property which he believed beyond the Congress’s powers under the commerce clause. Five others supported the party’s presidential nominee.
   1. Goldwater went on to win five southern states in 1964: Alabama, Georgia, Louisiana, Mississippi, and South Carolina. But he lost eight.
   2. Democrats build the ‘southern strategy’ tale on the fact that the same states voted for ‘Dixiecrat’ Strom Thurmond in 1948 (less Georgia).
   3. Except that Nixon and Reagan lost, or almost lost the same states in ’68 and ’80…
   4. And Jimmy Carter and Clinton did pretty well in those states in ’76 and ’92.
   5. And the Goldwater states went right back to voting Democrat for decades…
4. So…if Republicans were racists and got racist southerners to vote for them, how to explain this: Republicans always did best in the southern states that Goldwater lost, which happened to be the same ones Republicans had been winning with some regularity since 1928.
   1. In ’28, ’52, ’56, and ’60, Republicans generally won Virginia, Florida, Texas, Kentucky and sometimes North Carolina or Louisiana. Did you notice that those years were before 1964?
   2. Four years after Goldwater, the segregationist vote went right back to Democrats: Humphrey got half of Wallace’s supporters on election day. Nixon got none of ‘em. “When the '68 campaign began, Nixon was at 42 percent, Humphrey at 29 percent, Wallace at 22 percent. When it ended, Nixon and Humphrey were tied at 43 percent, with Wallace at 13 percent. The 9 percent of the national vote that had been peeled off from Wallace had gone to Humphrey.” Pat Buchanan - The neocons & Nixon's southern strategy
   3. In ’76, Carter swept the South. Was Carter appealing to bigots….or is that only the case when Republicans win the South?
5. Reagan lost or barely won the Goldwater states…but Reagan won among young southern voters- but lost among seniors, those who has voted in ’48 and ’64. That meant that the segregationists never abandoned the Democrats: eventually they died or were outvoted by younger voters. Nope…after Thurmond’s run, the Dixiecrats went right back to voting for Democrats for another half century.
6. In writing about McGovern and Wallace, liberal luminary, Arthur Schlesinger, actually referred to Wallace voters as responding to their candidate’s “integrity”! “The primaries themselves, especially the success of McGovern and Wallace, provide the best evidence for the proposition that voters in 1972 care less about a candidate's stand on particular issues than they do about the candidate's integrity,…” How McGovern Will Win
   1. McGovern gave a tip-of-the-hat to the segregationist Wallace in his acceptance speech at the Democrat Convention. That was the exact midpoint between Goldwater and Reagan. So…what of the imaginary “southern strategy” where the Republicans were supposed to have a plan to appeal to racists?
   2. Democrat McGovern: “And I was as moved as well by the appearance in the Convention Hall of the Governor of Alabama, George Wallace. … Governor, we pray for your full recovery so you can stand up and speak out for all of those who see you as their champion.” ACCEPTANCE SPEECH OF SENATOR GEORGE MCGOVERN

Wise up, you dope.

View attachment 180098 1964...note the red states for Goldwater

View attachment 180099 1968...note the orange states for Wallace (NOT Democrat, btw...blue is Democrat)

View attachment 180100 1972...note the red states from 1964 also voting red in 1972 even tho Political Chic said they went back Democrat

View attachment 180101 1976...the exception that proves the rule (Carter was a southerner)

View attachment 180102 1980...Georgia voted for Carter...no surprise there

View attachment 1801031984....South all Republican red

View attachment 180104 1988...South all Republican red

View attachment 180105 1992...some Southern blue...Clinton was from Arkansas and Bush had destroyed the economy

View attachment 180106 1996...there's that GOP Southern block again

View attachment 180108 2000...and yet again

View attachment 180109 2004...and yet again

View attachment 180110 2008...and yet again

View attachment 180111 2012...and yet again

View attachment 180112 2016...and yet again

None of those dispute what I posted.

Sure, hun

 

[PoliticalChic]

1. Essentially, it's because they want to hide who they are, where they came from.

This sort of thing:

Liberal historian Eric Foner writes that the Klan was “…a military force serving the interests of the Democratic Party…” Foner, “Reconstruction: America’s Unfinished Revolution, 1863-1877,” p. 425




2. But, to pick up on today's headlines.....

....the KKK began with gun control as a major objective.

Guess whose guns they wanted to control?




3. "America’s most horrific racist organization, the Ku Klux Klan, began with gun control at the very top of its agenda. Before the Civil War, blacks in the South had never been allowed to possess guns. During the war, however, blacks obtained guns for the first time. Some served as soldiers in black units in the Union Army, which allowed its men, black and white, to take their guns home with them as partial payment of past due wages. Other Southern blacks bought guns in the underground marketplace, which was flooded with firearms produced for the war.

After the war, Southern states adopted discriminatory laws like the Black Codes, which among other things barred the freedmen from having guns. Racist whites began to form posses that would go out at night to terrorize blacks—and take away those newly obtained firearms. The groups took different names: the “Men of Justice” in Alabama; the “Knights of the White Camellia” in Louisiana; the “Knights of the Rising Sun” in Texas. The group formed in Pulaski, Tenn., became the most well-known: the Ku Klux Klan."
Adam Winkler, “Gun Fight” Author, On Gun Control’s Racism



4. "The night riders move through the darkness, white against the black road....they go about their business, their horsed draped, guns and bullwhips banging dully against saddles.

....this is the South Carolina of the 1870s, not of the turn of a new millennium, and the night riders are the terror of these times. They roam upcountry, visiting their version of justice on poor blacks and the Republicans that support them, refusing to bow to the requirements of the Fourteenth and Fifteenth Amendments."
From the novel "The White Road," by John Connolly



5. Of course, the sons of the KKK, the members of the Party of Jefferson Davis and Bull Connor, ride again....

....and for the same objective.....gun control.



6. Who do they want to disarm today?
Democrats who own guns are more likely to vote for a Republican.
If you're a woman, and you own a gun, you are more likely to vote for a Republican.
If you're African-American, and you own a gun, are more likely to vote for a Republican.

I think we need to start calling people like you, Tribalist.

You are perpetually stuck in this "us vs them" mentally.

You claim to love America but you clearly hate many of your fellow Americans.

A Tribalist finds it easier to hate the "other" when they are a different skin color or have head covering worn as a religious custom.

Let me tell you who hates history, the people who are destined to repeat it.

The Dems changed from a conservative southern party to the left-leaning urban and big city party over a long period of time. The southern Dems "Dixiecrats" switched sides in 1960's-70's. They switched because they lost. They lost the 'War of Northern Aggression' and 100 years later they lost the right to segregate. No one wants to be on a losing team. So when Nixon introduced the southern strategy to win over the lost and forgotten "Dixies" they changed parties. The major political parties have switched polarities TWICE in our history. (this is an oversimplified and imprecise statement but true)

Perhaps if you really loved History you'd know more about it...


Can you answer this: Does it matter if racist whites-only people call themselves Republican or Democrat. Does it really matter?

"I think we need to start calling people like you,......."


....educated.


We both know you are unable to find any errors in my posts.



There was no 'Southern Strategy.' It's the sort of myth that allows you to keep voting for the racist party, while denying that it is.


My public service: the southern strategy myth:

[…segregationist voters who blamed civil rights on the Democrats, swiched loyaties to new Republicans who now embraced their views. Republicans ran against busing, against afirmative action, against equal rights legislation…The south has been Republican ever since]

1. “In American politics, the Southern strategy refers to the Republican Party strategy of winning elections or to gain political support in the Southern section of the country by appealing to racism against African Americans….he strategy was first adopted under future Republican President Richard Nixon and Republican Senator Barry Goldwater[6] in the late 1960s.” Southern strategy - Wikipedia
2. According to this liberal myth, Goldwater and the Republicans were racists and used racism to appeal to racist southerners to change the electoral map. To believe the tale, one must be either a reliable Democrat voter, and/or be ignorant of the history of the time.
3. Goldwater was one of only six Republican senators to vote against the 1964 act. He did so on libertarian grounds, opposed to the act’s restrictions on private property which he believed beyond the Congress’s powers under the commerce clause. Five others supported the party’s presidential nominee.
   1. Goldwater went on to win five southern states in 1964: Alabama, Georgia, Louisiana, Mississippi, and South Carolina. But he lost eight.
   2. Democrats build the ‘southern strategy’ tale on the fact that the same states voted for ‘Dixiecrat’ Strom Thurmond in 1948 (less Georgia).
   3. Except that Nixon and Reagan lost, or almost lost the same states in ’68 and ’80…
   4. And Jimmy Carter and Clinton did pretty well in those states in ’76 and ’92.
   5. And the Goldwater states went right back to voting Democrat for decades…
4. So…if Republicans were racists and got racist southerners to vote for them, how to explain this: Republicans always did best in the southern states that Goldwater lost, which happened to be the same ones Republicans had been winning with some regularity since 1928.
   1. In ’28, ’52, ’56, and ’60, Republicans generally won Virginia, Florida, Texas, Kentucky and sometimes North Carolina or Louisiana. Did you notice that those years were before 1964?
   2. Four years after Goldwater, the segregationist vote went right back to Democrats: Humphrey got half of Wallace’s supporters on election day. Nixon got none of ‘em. “When the '68 campaign began, Nixon was at 42 percent, Humphrey at 29 percent, Wallace at 22 percent. When it ended, Nixon and Humphrey were tied at 43 percent, with Wallace at 13 percent. The 9 percent of the national vote that had been peeled off from Wallace had gone to Humphrey.” Pat Buchanan - The neocons & Nixon's southern strategy
   3. In ’76, Carter swept the South. Was Carter appealing to bigots….or is that only the case when Republicans win the South?
5. Reagan lost or barely won the Goldwater states…but Reagan won among young southern voters- but lost among seniors, those who has voted in ’48 and ’64. That meant that the segregationists never abandoned the Democrats: eventually they died or were outvoted by younger voters. Nope…after Thurmond’s run, the Dixiecrats went right back to voting for Democrats for another half century.
6. In writing about McGovern and Wallace, liberal luminary, Arthur Schlesinger, actually referred to Wallace voters as responding to their candidate’s “integrity”! “The primaries themselves, especially the success of McGovern and Wallace, provide the best evidence for the proposition that voters in 1972 care less about a candidate's stand on particular issues than they do about the candidate's integrity,…” How McGovern Will Win
   1. McGovern gave a tip-of-the-hat to the segregationist Wallace in his acceptance speech at the Democrat Convention. That was the exact midpoint between Goldwater and Reagan. So…what of the imaginary “southern strategy” where the Republicans were supposed to have a plan to appeal to racists?
   2. Democrat McGovern: “And I was as moved as well by the appearance in the Convention Hall of the Governor of Alabama, George Wallace. … Governor, we pray for your full recovery so you can stand up and speak out for all of those who see you as their champion.” ACCEPTANCE SPEECH OF SENATOR GEORGE MCGOVERN

Wise up, you dope.

View attachment 180098 1964...note the red states for Goldwater

View attachment 180099 1968...note the orange states for Wallace (NOT Democrat, btw...blue is Democrat)

View attachment 180100 1972...note the red states from 1964 also voting red in 1972 even tho Political Chic said they went back Democrat

View attachment 180101 1976...the exception that proves the rule (Carter was a southerner)

View attachment 180102 1980...Georgia voted for Carter...no surprise there

View attachment 1801031984....South all Republican red

View attachment 180104 1988...South all Republican red

View attachment 180105 1992...some Southern blue...Clinton was from Arkansas and Bush had destroyed the economy

View attachment 180106 1996...there's that GOP Southern block again

View attachment 180108 2000...and yet again

View attachment 180109 2004...and yet again

View attachment 180110 2008...and yet again

View attachment 180111 2012...and yet again

View attachment 180112 2016...and yet again

None of those dispute what I posted.

Sure, hun

Folks must recognize that, sans lying.....you'd be mute.

 

[bodecea]

I think we need to start calling people like you, Tribalist.

You are perpetually stuck in this "us vs them" mentally.

You claim to love America but you clearly hate many of your fellow Americans.

A Tribalist finds it easier to hate the "other" when they are a different skin color or have head covering worn as a religious custom.

Let me tell you who hates history, the people who are destined to repeat it.

The Dems changed from a conservative southern party to the left-leaning urban and big city party over a long period of time. The southern Dems "Dixiecrats" switched sides in 1960's-70's. They switched because they lost. They lost the 'War of Northern Aggression' and 100 years later they lost the right to segregate. No one wants to be on a losing team. So when Nixon introduced the southern strategy to win over the lost and forgotten "Dixies" they changed parties. The major political parties have switched polarities TWICE in our history. (this is an oversimplified and imprecise statement but true)

Perhaps if you really loved History you'd know more about it...


Can you answer this: Does it matter if racist whites-only people call themselves Republican or Democrat. Does it really matter?

"I think we need to start calling people like you,......."


....educated.


We both know you are unable to find any errors in my posts.



There was no 'Southern Strategy.' It's the sort of myth that allows you to keep voting for the racist party, while denying that it is.


My public service: the southern strategy myth:

[…segregationist voters who blamed civil rights on the Democrats, swiched loyaties to new Republicans who now embraced their views. Republicans ran against busing, against afirmative action, against equal rights legislation…The south has been Republican ever since]

1. “In American politics, the Southern strategy refers to the Republican Party strategy of winning elections or to gain political support in the Southern section of the country by appealing to racism against African Americans….he strategy was first adopted under future Republican President Richard Nixon and Republican Senator Barry Goldwater[6] in the late 1960s.” Southern strategy - Wikipedia
2. According to this liberal myth, Goldwater and the Republicans were racists and used racism to appeal to racist southerners to change the electoral map. To believe the tale, one must be either a reliable Democrat voter, and/or be ignorant of the history of the time.
3. Goldwater was one of only six Republican senators to vote against the 1964 act. He did so on libertarian grounds, opposed to the act’s restrictions on private property which he believed beyond the Congress’s powers under the commerce clause. Five others supported the party’s presidential nominee.
   1. Goldwater went on to win five southern states in 1964: Alabama, Georgia, Louisiana, Mississippi, and South Carolina. But he lost eight.
   2. Democrats build the ‘southern strategy’ tale on the fact that the same states voted for ‘Dixiecrat’ Strom Thurmond in 1948 (less Georgia).
   3. Except that Nixon and Reagan lost, or almost lost the same states in ’68 and ’80…
   4. And Jimmy Carter and Clinton did pretty well in those states in ’76 and ’92.
   5. And the Goldwater states went right back to voting Democrat for decades…
4. So…if Republicans were racists and got racist southerners to vote for them, how to explain this: Republicans always did best in the southern states that Goldwater lost, which happened to be the same ones Republicans had been winning with some regularity since 1928.
   1. In ’28, ’52, ’56, and ’60, Republicans generally won Virginia, Florida, Texas, Kentucky and sometimes North Carolina or Louisiana. Did you notice that those years were before 1964?
   2. Four years after Goldwater, the segregationist vote went right back to Democrats: Humphrey got half of Wallace’s supporters on election day. Nixon got none of ‘em. “When the '68 campaign began, Nixon was at 42 percent, Humphrey at 29 percent, Wallace at 22 percent. When it ended, Nixon and Humphrey were tied at 43 percent, with Wallace at 13 percent. The 9 percent of the national vote that had been peeled off from Wallace had gone to Humphrey.” Pat Buchanan - The neocons & Nixon's southern strategy
   3. In ’76, Carter swept the South. Was Carter appealing to bigots….or is that only the case when Republicans win the South?
5. Reagan lost or barely won the Goldwater states…but Reagan won among young southern voters- but lost among seniors, those who has voted in ’48 and ’64. That meant that the segregationists never abandoned the Democrats: eventually they died or were outvoted by younger voters. Nope…after Thurmond’s run, the Dixiecrats went right back to voting for Democrats for another half century.
6. In writing about McGovern and Wallace, liberal luminary, Arthur Schlesinger, actually referred to Wallace voters as responding to their candidate’s “integrity”! “The primaries themselves, especially the success of McGovern and Wallace, provide the best evidence for the proposition that voters in 1972 care less about a candidate's stand on particular issues than they do about the candidate's integrity,…” How McGovern Will Win
   1. McGovern gave a tip-of-the-hat to the segregationist Wallace in his acceptance speech at the Democrat Convention. That was the exact midpoint between Goldwater and Reagan. So…what of the imaginary “southern strategy” where the Republicans were supposed to have a plan to appeal to racists?
   2. Democrat McGovern: “And I was as moved as well by the appearance in the Convention Hall of the Governor of Alabama, George Wallace. … Governor, we pray for your full recovery so you can stand up and speak out for all of those who see you as their champion.” ACCEPTANCE SPEECH OF SENATOR GEORGE MCGOVERN

Wise up, you dope.

View attachment 180098 1964...note the red states for Goldwater

View attachment 180099 1968...note the orange states for Wallace (NOT Democrat, btw...blue is Democrat)

View attachment 180100 1972...note the red states from 1964 also voting red in 1972 even tho Political Chic said they went back Democrat

View attachment 180101 1976...the exception that proves the rule (Carter was a southerner)

View attachment 180102 1980...Georgia voted for Carter...no surprise there

View attachment 1801031984....South all Republican red

View attachment 180104 1988...South all Republican red

View attachment 180105 1992...some Southern blue...Clinton was from Arkansas and Bush had destroyed the economy

View attachment 180106 1996...there's that GOP Southern block again

View attachment 180108 2000...and yet again

View attachment 180109 2004...and yet again

View attachment 180110 2008...and yet again

View attachment 180111 2012...and yet again

View attachment 180112 2016...and yet again

None of those dispute what I posted.

Sure, hun

Folks must recognize that, sans lying.....you'd be mute.

And there it is...the culmination of your frustration when you are checkmated....again and again and again.

Speaking of checkmate....got those uranium tonnage figures yet?

 

[PoliticalChic]

"I think we need to start calling people like you,......."


....educated.


We both know you are unable to find any errors in my posts.



There was no 'Southern Strategy.' It's the sort of myth that allows you to keep voting for the racist party, while denying that it is.


My public service: the southern strategy myth:

[…segregationist voters who blamed civil rights on the Democrats, swiched loyaties to new Republicans who now embraced their views. Republicans ran against busing, against afirmative action, against equal rights legislation…The south has been Republican ever since]

1. “In American politics, the Southern strategy refers to the Republican Party strategy of winning elections or to gain political support in the Southern section of the country by appealing to racism against African Americans….he strategy was first adopted under future Republican President Richard Nixon and Republican Senator Barry Goldwater[6] in the late 1960s.” Southern strategy - Wikipedia
2. According to this liberal myth, Goldwater and the Republicans were racists and used racism to appeal to racist southerners to change the electoral map. To believe the tale, one must be either a reliable Democrat voter, and/or be ignorant of the history of the time.
3. Goldwater was one of only six Republican senators to vote against the 1964 act. He did so on libertarian grounds, opposed to the act’s restrictions on private property which he believed beyond the Congress’s powers under the commerce clause. Five others supported the party’s presidential nominee.
   1. Goldwater went on to win five southern states in 1964: Alabama, Georgia, Louisiana, Mississippi, and South Carolina. But he lost eight.
   2. Democrats build the ‘southern strategy’ tale on the fact that the same states voted for ‘Dixiecrat’ Strom Thurmond in 1948 (less Georgia).
   3. Except that Nixon and Reagan lost, or almost lost the same states in ’68 and ’80…
   4. And Jimmy Carter and Clinton did pretty well in those states in ’76 and ’92.
   5. And the Goldwater states went right back to voting Democrat for decades…
4. So…if Republicans were racists and got racist southerners to vote for them, how to explain this: Republicans always did best in the southern states that Goldwater lost, which happened to be the same ones Republicans had been winning with some regularity since 1928.
   1. In ’28, ’52, ’56, and ’60, Republicans generally won Virginia, Florida, Texas, Kentucky and sometimes North Carolina or Louisiana. Did you notice that those years were before 1964?
   2. Four years after Goldwater, the segregationist vote went right back to Democrats: Humphrey got half of Wallace’s supporters on election day. Nixon got none of ‘em. “When the '68 campaign began, Nixon was at 42 percent, Humphrey at 29 percent, Wallace at 22 percent. When it ended, Nixon and Humphrey were tied at 43 percent, with Wallace at 13 percent. The 9 percent of the national vote that had been peeled off from Wallace had gone to Humphrey.” Pat Buchanan - The neocons & Nixon's southern strategy
   3. In ’76, Carter swept the South. Was Carter appealing to bigots….or is that only the case when Republicans win the South?
5. Reagan lost or barely won the Goldwater states…but Reagan won among young southern voters- but lost among seniors, those who has voted in ’48 and ’64. That meant that the segregationists never abandoned the Democrats: eventually they died or were outvoted by younger voters. Nope…after Thurmond’s run, the Dixiecrats went right back to voting for Democrats for another half century.
6. In writing about McGovern and Wallace, liberal luminary, Arthur Schlesinger, actually referred to Wallace voters as responding to their candidate’s “integrity”! “The primaries themselves, especially the success of McGovern and Wallace, provide the best evidence for the proposition that voters in 1972 care less about a candidate's stand on particular issues than they do about the candidate's integrity,…” How McGovern Will Win
   1. McGovern gave a tip-of-the-hat to the segregationist Wallace in his acceptance speech at the Democrat Convention. That was the exact midpoint between Goldwater and Reagan. So…what of the imaginary “southern strategy” where the Republicans were supposed to have a plan to appeal to racists?
   2. Democrat McGovern: “And I was as moved as well by the appearance in the Convention Hall of the Governor of Alabama, George Wallace. … Governor, we pray for your full recovery so you can stand up and speak out for all of those who see you as their champion.” ACCEPTANCE SPEECH OF SENATOR GEORGE MCGOVERN

Wise up, you dope.

View attachment 180098 1964...note the red states for Goldwater

View attachment 180099 1968...note the orange states for Wallace (NOT Democrat, btw...blue is Democrat)

View attachment 180100 1972...note the red states from 1964 also voting red in 1972 even tho Political Chic said they went back Democrat

View attachment 180101 1976...the exception that proves the rule (Carter was a southerner)

View attachment 180102 1980...Georgia voted for Carter...no surprise there

View attachment 1801031984....South all Republican red

View attachment 180104 1988...South all Republican red

View attachment 180105 1992...some Southern blue...Clinton was from Arkansas and Bush had destroyed the economy

View attachment 180106 1996...there's that GOP Southern block again

View attachment 180108 2000...and yet again

View attachment 180109 2004...and yet again

View attachment 180110 2008...and yet again

View attachment 180111 2012...and yet again

View attachment 180112 2016...and yet again

None of those dispute what I posted.

Sure, hun

Folks must recognize that, sans lying.....you'd be mute.

And there it is...the culmination of your frustration when you are checkmated....again and again and again.

Speaking of checkmate....got those uranium tonnage figures yet?

I assume you're changing the topic to an earlier thread, because you've lost this one, too.




For those who missed your earlier defeat, let me review:

I documented that Hillary Clinton, noted career criminal and congenital liar, and bag woman for the Clinton Crime Family, sold out America by taking a $145 million bribe from the Kremlin to hand over a huge portion of American uranium to Russia.

The best you could do.....and are still attempting......is to ask....repeatedly.....for the number or actual pounds of uranium.



When I asked why that was pertinent.....you simply repeated....."pounds?"over and over.




Are we up to date?

 

[bodecea]

View attachment 180098 1964...note the red states for Goldwater

View attachment 180099 1968...note the orange states for Wallace (NOT Democrat, btw...blue is Democrat)

View attachment 180100 1972...note the red states from 1964 also voting red in 1972 even tho Political Chic said they went back Democrat

View attachment 180101 1976...the exception that proves the rule (Carter was a southerner)

View attachment 180102 1980...Georgia voted for Carter...no surprise there

View attachment 1801031984....South all Republican red

View attachment 180104 1988...South all Republican red

View attachment 180105 1992...some Southern blue...Clinton was from Arkansas and Bush had destroyed the economy

View attachment 180106 1996...there's that GOP Southern block again

View attachment 180108 2000...and yet again

View attachment 180109 2004...and yet again

View attachment 180110 2008...and yet again

View attachment 180111 2012...and yet again

View attachment 180112 2016...and yet again

None of those dispute what I posted.

Sure, hun

Folks must recognize that, sans lying.....you'd be mute.

And there it is...the culmination of your frustration when you are checkmated....again and again and again.

Speaking of checkmate....got those uranium tonnage figures yet?

I assume you're changing the topic to an earlier thread, because you've lost this one, too.




For those who missed your earlier defeat, let me review:

I documented that Hillary Clinton, noted career criminal and congenital liar, and bag woman for the Clinton Crime Family, sold out America by taking a $145 million bribe from the Kremlin to hand over a huge portion of American uranium to Russia.

The best you could do.....and are still attempting......is to ask....repeatedly.....for the number or actual poundage.

When I asked why that was pertinent.....you simply repeated....."pounds?"


Are we up to date?

Nope...don't have a problem multi-tasking here. So...let's re-cap: You deny the racist Democrat South became the racist Republican South....(I guess the South is still blue then) and as icing on the cake.....you can't give the tonnage of uranium that went to Russia...the quid for the quo.

 

[Unkotare]

.......
And there it is...the culmination of your frustration when you are checkmated....again and again and again.

.....

How would you know, never having done it?

 

[PoliticalChic]

None of those dispute what I posted.

Sure, hun

Folks must recognize that, sans lying.....you'd be mute.

And there it is...the culmination of your frustration when you are checkmated....again and again and again.

Speaking of checkmate....got those uranium tonnage figures yet?

I assume you're changing the topic to an earlier thread, because you've lost this one, too.




For those who missed your earlier defeat, let me review:

I documented that Hillary Clinton, noted career criminal and congenital liar, and bag woman for the Clinton Crime Family, sold out America by taking a $145 million bribe from the Kremlin to hand over a huge portion of American uranium to Russia.

The best you could do.....and are still attempting......is to ask....repeatedly.....for the number or actual poundage.

When I asked why that was pertinent.....you simply repeated....."pounds?"


Are we up to date?

Nope...don't have a problem multi-tasking here. So...let's re-cap: You deny the racist Democrat South became the racist Republican South....(I guess the South is still blue then) and as icing on the cake.....you can't give the tonnage of uranium that went to Russia...the quid for the quo.

Of course your lie is evident.....Wallace was always a Democrat....a racialist Democrat.....and so those were Democrat votes.



Now....this obfuscation......."you can't give the tonnage of uranium that went to Russia...the quid for the quo."
There is no reason to hide what a lying dunce you are....so I suggest readers draw their own conclusions.
The thread is here:
The Clintons Didn’t Just Sell Our Uranium To Russia

And the last dozen pages will prove my point.



One more thing......to document what a low-life you are, you actually have the picture of the most racist President in the history of the nation as your avi....
Obama....the skin-color President, has been even more racist than either Democrat Buchanan or Democrat Woodrow Wilson.


Folks should remember that when the Democrat liars....you...... turn the truth upside down by applying that appellation to the other side.

 

[bodecea]

Sure, hun

Folks must recognize that, sans lying.....you'd be mute.

And there it is...the culmination of your frustration when you are checkmated....again and again and again.

Speaking of checkmate....got those uranium tonnage figures yet?

I assume you're changing the topic to an earlier thread, because you've lost this one, too.




For those who missed your earlier defeat, let me review:

I documented that Hillary Clinton, noted career criminal and congenital liar, and bag woman for the Clinton Crime Family, sold out America by taking a $145 million bribe from the Kremlin to hand over a huge portion of American uranium to Russia.

The best you could do.....and are still attempting......is to ask....repeatedly.....for the number or actual poundage.

When I asked why that was pertinent.....you simply repeated....."pounds?"


Are we up to date?

Nope...don't have a problem multi-tasking here. So...let's re-cap: You deny the racist Democrat South became the racist Republican South....(I guess the South is still blue then) and as icing on the cake.....you can't give the tonnage of uranium that went to Russia...the quid for the quo.

Of course you lie is evident.....Wallace was always a Democrat....a racialist Democrat.....and so those were Democrat votes.



Now....this obfuscation......."you can't give the tonnage of uranium that went to Russia...the quid for the quo."
There is no reason to hide what a lying dunce you are....so I suggest readers draw their own conclusions.
The thread is here:
The Clintons Didn’t Just Sell Our Uranium To Russia

And the last dozen pages will prove my point.



One more thing......to document what a low-life you are, you actually have the picture of the most racist President in the history of the nation as your avi....
Obama....the skin-color President, has been even more racist than either Buchanan or Woodrow Wilson.


Folks should remember that when the Democrat liars....you...... turn the truth upside down by applying that appellation to the other side.

Wallace did not run as a Democrat in 1968.....it's amazing that you refuse to admit that.

And now you are going all snowflakey on me over my avatar..... And the "more racist than either Buchanan or Woodrow Wilson" remark is Priceless!

 

[PoliticalChic]

Folks must recognize that, sans lying.....you'd be mute.

And there it is...the culmination of your frustration when you are checkmated....again and again and again.

Speaking of checkmate....got those uranium tonnage figures yet?

I assume you're changing the topic to an earlier thread, because you've lost this one, too.




For those who missed your earlier defeat, let me review:

I documented that Hillary Clinton, noted career criminal and congenital liar, and bag woman for the Clinton Crime Family, sold out America by taking a $145 million bribe from the Kremlin to hand over a huge portion of American uranium to Russia.

The best you could do.....and are still attempting......is to ask....repeatedly.....for the number or actual poundage.

When I asked why that was pertinent.....you simply repeated....."pounds?"


Are we up to date?

Nope...don't have a problem multi-tasking here. So...let's re-cap: You deny the racist Democrat South became the racist Republican South....(I guess the South is still blue then) and as icing on the cake.....you can't give the tonnage of uranium that went to Russia...the quid for the quo.

Of course you lie is evident.....Wallace was always a Democrat....a racialist Democrat.....and so those were Democrat votes.



Now....this obfuscation......."you can't give the tonnage of uranium that went to Russia...the quid for the quo."
There is no reason to hide what a lying dunce you are....so I suggest readers draw their own conclusions.
The thread is here:
The Clintons Didn’t Just Sell Our Uranium To Russia

And the last dozen pages will prove my point.



One more thing......to document what a low-life you are, you actually have the picture of the most racist President in the history of the nation as your avi....
Obama....the skin-color President, has been even more racist than either Buchanan or Woodrow Wilson.


Folks should remember that when the Democrat liars....you...... turn the truth upside down by applying that appellation to the other side.

Wallace did not run as a Democrat in 1968.....it's amazing that you refuse to admit that.

And now you are going all snowflakey on me over my avatar.....

Whoa!

You slipped up....now I've forced you to try to slither away with "....did not run...."

I didn't say he ran in that year as a Democrat.....he had always run as a Democrat, before and after that race.....and he always was a Democrat.

He changed his line when he was not offered the nomination.

But you knew that....and so committed your lie as obfuscation.

That's the truth....isn't it.




Let's prove...again....that I am never wrong.

"Wallace also harbored presidential aspirations. In 1968, he ran as an Independent candidate, supported mainly by white, working-class Southerners. In his 1972 campaign, however, he ran as a Democrat. While on the campaign trail in Maryland later that year, Wallace was shot by a would-be assassin named Arthur Bremer. His injuries left him permanently paralyzed below the waist. He managed to still complete the campaign, but ultimately lost the Democratic nomination to George McGovern (who then lost the presidential election to Richard Nixon).

In his third and final presidential attempt, in 1976, Wallace again ran as a Democrat; he was defeated in the primaries by fellow Southerner Jimmy Carter."
George C. Wallace



George Wallace...Democrat...."segregation now, segregation tomorrow, segregation forever."




Seems you've been 'checkmated'......again.

 

[bodecea]

And there it is...the culmination of your frustration when you are checkmated....again and again and again.

Speaking of checkmate....got those uranium tonnage figures yet?

I assume you're changing the topic to an earlier thread, because you've lost this one, too.




For those who missed your earlier defeat, let me review:

I documented that Hillary Clinton, noted career criminal and congenital liar, and bag woman for the Clinton Crime Family, sold out America by taking a $145 million bribe from the Kremlin to hand over a huge portion of American uranium to Russia.

The best you could do.....and are still attempting......is to ask....repeatedly.....for the number or actual poundage.

When I asked why that was pertinent.....you simply repeated....."pounds?"


Are we up to date?

Nope...don't have a problem multi-tasking here. So...let's re-cap: You deny the racist Democrat South became the racist Republican South....(I guess the South is still blue then) and as icing on the cake.....you can't give the tonnage of uranium that went to Russia...the quid for the quo.

Of course you lie is evident.....Wallace was always a Democrat....a racialist Democrat.....and so those were Democrat votes.



Now....this obfuscation......."you can't give the tonnage of uranium that went to Russia...the quid for the quo."
There is no reason to hide what a lying dunce you are....so I suggest readers draw their own conclusions.
The thread is here:
The Clintons Didn’t Just Sell Our Uranium To Russia

And the last dozen pages will prove my point.



One more thing......to document what a low-life you are, you actually have the picture of the most racist President in the history of the nation as your avi....
Obama....the skin-color President, has been even more racist than either Buchanan or Woodrow Wilson.


Folks should remember that when the Democrat liars....you...... turn the truth upside down by applying that appellation to the other side.

Wallace did not run as a Democrat in 1968.....it's amazing that you refuse to admit that.

And now you are going all snowflakey on me over my avatar.....

Whoa!

You slipped up....now I've forced you to try to slither away with "....did not run...."

I didn't say he ran in that year as a Democrat.....he had always run as a Democrat, before and after that race.....and he always was a Democrat.

He changed his line when he was not offered the nomination.

But you knew that....and so committed your lie as obfuscation.

That's the truth....isn't it.




Let's prove...again....that I am never wrong.

"Wallace also harbored presidential aspirations. In 1968, he ran as an Independent candidate, supported mainly by white, working-class Southerners. In his 1972 campaign, however, he ran as a Democrat. While on the campaign trail in Maryland later that year, Wallace was shot by a would-be assassin named Arthur Bremer. His injuries left him permanently paralyzed below the waist. He managed to still complete the campaign, but ultimately lost the Democratic nomination to George McGovern (who then lost the presidential election to Richard Nixon).

In his third and final presidential attempt, in 1976, Wallace again ran as a Democrat; he was defeated in the primaries by fellow Southerner Jimmy Carter."
George C. Wallace



George Wallace...Democrat...."segregation now, segregation tomorrow, segregation forever."

Yes...he was a Democrat when he said that. Very good....you win a cookie. BUT, he left the Democrat Party...as did many Dixiecrats....some, like him, created a 3rd party....others went to and stayed with the Republicans. Thank you for continuing to bring Wallace up so I can clearly show that Wallace is a perfect example of a racist who left the Democratic Party in the 60s. Kind of the whole point of the Southern Strategy.

Former Governor of Alabama George Wallace ran in the 1968 United States presidential election as the candidate for the American Independent Party. Wallace's pro-segregation policies during his term as Governor of Alabama were rejected by the mainstream of the Democratic Party.

from George Wallace presidential campaign, 1968 - Wikipedia

 

[PoliticalChic]

I assume you're changing the topic to an earlier thread, because you've lost this one, too.




For those who missed your earlier defeat, let me review:

I documented that Hillary Clinton, noted career criminal and congenital liar, and bag woman for the Clinton Crime Family, sold out America by taking a $145 million bribe from the Kremlin to hand over a huge portion of American uranium to Russia.

The best you could do.....and are still attempting......is to ask....repeatedly.....for the number or actual poundage.

When I asked why that was pertinent.....you simply repeated....."pounds?"


Are we up to date?

Nope...don't have a problem multi-tasking here. So...let's re-cap: You deny the racist Democrat South became the racist Republican South....(I guess the South is still blue then) and as icing on the cake.....you can't give the tonnage of uranium that went to Russia...the quid for the quo.

Of course you lie is evident.....Wallace was always a Democrat....a racialist Democrat.....and so those were Democrat votes.



Now....this obfuscation......."you can't give the tonnage of uranium that went to Russia...the quid for the quo."
There is no reason to hide what a lying dunce you are....so I suggest readers draw their own conclusions.
The thread is here:
The Clintons Didn’t Just Sell Our Uranium To Russia

And the last dozen pages will prove my point.



One more thing......to document what a low-life you are, you actually have the picture of the most racist President in the history of the nation as your avi....
Obama....the skin-color President, has been even more racist than either Buchanan or Woodrow Wilson.


Folks should remember that when the Democrat liars....you...... turn the truth upside down by applying that appellation to the other side.

Wallace did not run as a Democrat in 1968.....it's amazing that you refuse to admit that.

And now you are going all snowflakey on me over my avatar.....

Whoa!

You slipped up....now I've forced you to try to slither away with "....did not run...."

I didn't say he ran in that year as a Democrat.....he had always run as a Democrat, before and after that race.....and he always was a Democrat.

He changed his line when he was not offered the nomination.

But you knew that....and so committed your lie as obfuscation.

That's the truth....isn't it.




Let's prove...again....that I am never wrong.

"Wallace also harbored presidential aspirations. In 1968, he ran as an Independent candidate, supported mainly by white, working-class Southerners. In his 1972 campaign, however, he ran as a Democrat. While on the campaign trail in Maryland later that year, Wallace was shot by a would-be assassin named Arthur Bremer. His injuries left him permanently paralyzed below the waist. He managed to still complete the campaign, but ultimately lost the Democratic nomination to George McGovern (who then lost the presidential election to Richard Nixon).

In his third and final presidential attempt, in 1976, Wallace again ran as a Democrat; he was defeated in the primaries by fellow Southerner Jimmy Carter."
George C. Wallace



George Wallace...Democrat...."segregation now, segregation tomorrow, segregation forever."

Yes...he was a Democrat when he said that. Very good....you win a cookie. BUT, he left the Democrat Party...as did many Dixiecrats....some, like him, created a 3rd party....others went to and stayed with the Republicans. Thank you for continuing to bring Wallace up so I can clearly show that Wallace is a perfect example of a racist who left the Democratic Party in the 60s. Kind of the whole point of the Southern Strategy.

Former Governor of Alabama George Wallace ran in the 1968 United States presidential election as the candidate for the American Independent Party. Wallace's pro-segregation policies during his term as Governor of Alabama were rejected by the mainstream of the Democratic Party.

from George Wallace presidential campaign, 1968 - Wikipedia

"....he was a Democrat ..."

Always.


"....he left the Democrat Party..."

No he didn't.

He did what many pols do when they don't get that particular line.


Here's the proof:

"In his third and final presidential attempt, in 1976, Wallace again ran as a Democrat; he was defeated in the primaries by fellow Southerner Jimmy Carter."
George C. Wallace



"...I can clearly show that Wallace is a perfect example of a racist who left the Democratic Party in the 60s."

Now....watch me smash another custard pie in your kisser:

Bill Clinton has always been a Democrat....up to today.....and has always been a racist.
Nothing ever changed.

Let's prove it together: Bill Clinton....for three decades, the personification of the Democrat Party.....has been a lifelong racist.


1. Not only was the Democrat Party the home of slavers, segregationists, the Jim Crow folks, and the KKK....but the folks who try to lie their way out of the stain that attaches to all Democrats by claiming that it all changed in the 1960's, and the Democrats reversed themselves....

Clinton proves otherwise.

His 40 or so years as Democrat, up to and including the fact that he is so popular to Democrats that he was given the keynote speech at Obama's 2012 convention....

...and for his entire political life he has been a racist.


2. Now, "Democrats timeline:
a. Dixiecrats lost in 1948 (65 years ago)....then went right back to being Democrats.
Dixiecrats......not 'Dixidcans.'

3. Let's take a look at the Bill Clinton timeline....

a. Governor Clinton was among three state officials the NAACP sued in 1989 under the federal Voting Rights Act of 1965. “Plaintiffs offered plenty of proof of monolithic voting along racial lines, intimidation of black voters and candidates and other official acts that made voting harder for blacks,” the Arkansas Gazette reported December 6, 1989.

b. Bill Clinton had a Confederate flag-like issue, every year he was governor: 1979-1992 Arkansas Code Annotated, Section 1-5-107, provides as follows:

1. 
   (a) The Saturday immediately preceding Easter Sunday of each year is designated as ‘Confederate Flag Day’ in this state.
   
   (b) No person, firm, or corporation shall display an Confederate flag or replica thereof in connection with any advertisement of any commercial enterprise, or in any manner for any purpose except to honor the Confederate States of America. [Emphasis added.]
   
   (c) Any person, firm, or corporation violating the provisions of this section shall be guilty of a misdemeanor and upon conviction shall be fined not less than one hundred dollars ($100) nor more than one thousand dollars ($1,000).
   
   Bill Clinton took no steps during his twelve years as governor to repeal this law.
   Hillary Clinton's Confederacy Hypocrisy | The Gateway Pundit

Hillary Clinton's Confederacy Hypocrisy


[Let's Stop Pretending the Confederate Flag Isn't a Symbol of RacismJust to refresh everyone's memories, we're talking about the official national flag that was used to represent the Confederate States of America during the Civil War. You know, that awkward time period when the South was vehemently fighting to keep slavery around as a means of economic prosperity for white plantation owners.

I've heard arguments time and again about how the Confederate flag is no longer representative of slavery, and how it's now indicative of "Southern pride and heritage." But I'm really over the whole "respect your heritage" mantra, especially when your heritage is hate.

Let's Stop Pretending the Confederate Flag Isn't a Symbol of Racism | HuffPost]

4.

4.Governor Clinton invited Orval Faubus to his inauguration and they exchanged an almost South American abrazo, embrace, http://www.booknotes.org/Watch/72551-1/Paul+Greenberg.aspx
Governor Orval Faubus, progressive New Deal Democrat, blocked the schoolhouse door to the Little Rock Central High School with the state’s National Guard rather than allow nine black students to attend.

5. Clinton’s mentor was J. William Fulbright, a vehement foe of integration who had voted against the Civil Rights Act of 1964.

Orval Eugene Faubus, attended Bill Clinton’s 1979 gubernatorial inauguration, where the two pols hugged, as Arkansas Democrat-Gazette editorial page editor Paul Greenberg recalls.)
Know who Faubus was?
Yup...he used the National Guard to prevent blacks from going to school



6. Bill Clinton wrote his first letter, dated June 21, 1994, of congratulations to the UDC [Untied Daughters of the Confederacy] celebrating their 100th anniversary. Later Clinton wrote a letter September 8, 1994 letter of congratulation to the Georgia Division of the UDC celebrating their 100th anniversary, then August 9, 1995 welcoming to Washington, D.C. for their 1995 national convention. Each letter was given a full page with Clinton’s picture in the United Daughters of the Confederacy Magazine (UDC Magazine) giving legitimacy to the UDC.

For reference, the UDC magazine includes " a Ku Klux Klan praising book, not just the Klan of Reconstruction but the Klan of the 1920s, a book which recommends the racist books of Thomas Dixon, “The Clansman” ...
Anti-Neo-Confederate: Bill Clinton Enables Neo-Confederates & Betrays Carol Moseley-Braun: UPDATED





7. "Clinton praised Arkansas’ late Democratic senator J. William Fulbright, a notorious segregationist who opposed the 1964 Civil Rights Act and the 1965 Voting Rights Act. He also signed the Southern Manifesto, which denounced the U.S. Supreme Court’s landmark Brown vs. Board of Education school desegregation decision in 1954. Clinton called Fulbright “My mentor, a visionary, a humanitarian.”Dems Need to Houseclean - Deroy Murdock - National Review Online

and....

Fulbright was a full-bore segregationist, voting against the 1957, 1960, 1964, and 1965 civil rights bills.
But...in 1993, Bill Clinton gave the Medal of Freedom award to a lifelong segregationist, Democrat Wm. J. Fulbright. And another life-long segregationist, Democrat Albert Gore, Sr. was in attendance.




Hey...didn't Bill Clinton just recently speak at the Obama Democrat National Convention?



8. … President Bill Clinton

argued that Colin Powell, promoted

to brigadier general during Mr.

Alexander’s tenure, was the product

of an affirmative action program.
http://cdn.virtuallearningcourses.com/ivtcontent/images/edw12_ch05_e.pdf


9. Bill Clinton let on to his wishes about Obama.....
'BILL CLINTON: IN PAST, OBAMA WOULD BE 'CARRYING OUR BAGS'
Bill Clinton: In Past, Obama Would Be 'Carrying Our Bags' | Breitbart



10. Bill Clinton......lifelong racist, and personification of the modern Democrat Party.





Must be terribly embarrassing that you've been led around like a cow, with a ring through your nose....actually believing that the Republicans are the racists.

 

[bodecea]

You go on and on...but the FACT is that Wallace left the Democrats in 1968 because they rejected his racist stand....others left to join the Republicans that welcomed them with open arms.....Yes, Wallace went back to being a Democrat where he won the governorship of racist Alabama (the same state that just almost elected a racist pedophile for Senator)...but was AGAIN rejected for national office in 1972 by....you guessed it...the Democrats.

Interesting read, btw: Dixie's Long Journey From Democratic Stronghold To Republican Redoubt

 

[Wry Catcher]

I'm not convinced that you believe what you're saying. If you do then you're delusional. You're disputing proven history that no legitimate expert or historian would dispute. You haven't proven anything because you're operating outside the confines of reality.

Agreed.

"...no legitimate expert or historian would dispute."

Can you name several tomes you have read that you refer to here?

No?

Exactly my point.



"Liberals don't read books – they don't read anything … That's why they're liberals. They watch TV, absorb the propaganda, and vote on the basis of urges."
Coulter

How come you didn't know that Wallace wasn't a Democrat in 1968?

Your statement is an attempt to obfuscate, and hide your embarrassment.

It's the sort of lie you Leftist drones offer in place of truth.


George Corley Wallace Jr. (August 25, 1919 – September 13, 1998) was an American politician and the 45th Governor of Alabama, having served two nonconsecutive terms and two consecutive terms as a Democrat: 1963–1967, 1971–1979 and 1983–1987.
George Wallace - Wikipedia
George Wallace - Wikipedia


I'm sure you know the reason for his part affiliation 'alteration.'

Political party Democratic
Other political
affiliations
American Independent (1968
)



But his motto was always that of the Democrats:
"segregation now, segregation tomorrow, segregation forever"

How come you didn't know that Wallace wasn't a Democrat in 1968? How come you don't want to acknowledge he LEFT the Democrats....like many racist Southern politicians did?

Aren't you embarrassed that I caught you trying to deny that Wallace was a Democrat.....always a Democrat racist 'til the day he died.


No....you Democrats/Liberals are immune to shame or embarrassment.

Catch you in an attempted lie and you simply shrug.

Truly a low-life character.

Wallace was a Southern Democrat, as were Lester Maddow and Strom Thurman (until he left and joined the Republican Party), the difference was Wallace didn't die a racist. He recanted hate in his final years.

 

[PoliticalChic]

You go on and on...but the FACT is that Wallace left the Democrats in 1968 because they rejected his racist stand....others left to join the Republicans that welcomed them with open arms.....Yes, Wallace went back to being a Democrat where he won the governorship of racist Alabama (the same state that just almost elected a racist pedophile for Senator)...but was AGAIN rejected for national office in 1972 by....you guessed it...the Democrats.

Interesting read, btw: Dixie's Long Journey From Democratic Stronghold To Republican Redoubt

"....but the FACT is that Wallace left the Democrats in 1968 because they rejected his racist stand..."

Nonsense.

Self-serving nonsense, the spew of folks who have been tricked into supporting the party of Jefferson Davis, the Klan, and life-long racists such as Bill Clinton.

The Democrat Party is the party of slavery, segregation, and second-class citizenship.

 

[bodecea]

You go on and on...but the FACT is that Wallace left the Democrats in 1968 because they rejected his racist stand....others left to join the Republicans that welcomed them with open arms.....Yes, Wallace went back to being a Democrat where he won the governorship of racist Alabama (the same state that just almost elected a racist pedophile for Senator)...but was AGAIN rejected for national office in 1972 by....you guessed it...the Democrats.

Interesting read, btw: Dixie's Long Journey From Democratic Stronghold To Republican Redoubt

"....but the FACT is that Wallace left the Democrats in 1968 because they rejected his racist stand..."

Nonsense.

Self-serving nonsense, the spew of folks who have been tricked into supporting the party of Jefferson Davis, the Klan, and life-long racists such as Bill Clinton.

The Democrat Party is the party of slavery, segregation, and second-class citizenship.

Absolute truth.....but you know that already.....remember, you didn't even KNOW that Wallace was not running as a Democrat in 1968. I had to point that out to you.

 

[PoliticalChic]

You go on and on...but the FACT is that Wallace left the Democrats in 1968 because they rejected his racist stand....others left to join the Republicans that welcomed them with open arms.....Yes, Wallace went back to being a Democrat where he won the governorship of racist Alabama (the same state that just almost elected a racist pedophile for Senator)...but was AGAIN rejected for national office in 1972 by....you guessed it...the Democrats.

Interesting read, btw: Dixie's Long Journey From Democratic Stronghold To Republican Redoubt

"....but the FACT is that Wallace left the Democrats in 1968 because they rejected his racist stand..."

Nonsense.

Self-serving nonsense, the spew of folks who have been tricked into supporting the party of Jefferson Davis, the Klan, and life-long racists such as Bill Clinton.

The Democrat Party is the party of slavery, segregation, and second-class citizenship.

Absolute truth.....but you know that already.....remember, you didn't even KNOW that Wallace was not running as a Democrat in 1968. I had to point that out to you.

Stop lying....Wallace was always both a Democrat and a racist.....but that's redundant

 

[bodecea]

You go on and on...but the FACT is that Wallace left the Democrats in 1968 because they rejected his racist stand....others left to join the Republicans that welcomed them with open arms.....Yes, Wallace went back to being a Democrat where he won the governorship of racist Alabama (the same state that just almost elected a racist pedophile for Senator)...but was AGAIN rejected for national office in 1972 by....you guessed it...the Democrats.

Interesting read, btw: Dixie's Long Journey From Democratic Stronghold To Republican Redoubt

"....but the FACT is that Wallace left the Democrats in 1968 because they rejected his racist stand..."

Nonsense.

Self-serving nonsense, the spew of folks who have been tricked into supporting the party of Jefferson Davis, the Klan, and life-long racists such as Bill Clinton.

The Democrat Party is the party of slavery, segregation, and second-class citizenship.

Absolute truth.....but you know that already.....remember, you didn't even KNOW that Wallace was not running as a Democrat in 1968. I had to point that out to you.

Stop lying....Wallace was always both a Democrat and a racist.....but that's redundant

Former Governor of Alabama George Wallace ran in the 1968 United States presidential election as the candidate for the American Independent Party.Wallace's pro-segregation policies during his term as Governor of Alabama were rejected by the mainstream of the Democratic Party.

American Independent Party - Wikipedia

The American Independent Party is NOT the Democratic Party. I thought you were smart?