John Edgar Slow Horses
Diamond Member
- Apr 11, 2023
- 28,981
- 15,070
- 1,288
In NJ until 1793 and then not until 1870 in WY territory.They could in some states.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
In NJ until 1793 and then not until 1870 in WY territory.They could in some states.
Why were men allowed to vote yet not the wives?In NJ until 1793 and then not until 1870 in WY territory.
I plan to do that.Get back to us when you read it all
I have not read that yet.Were those statements in that book?
Yes or no
... because they had the political power. The streaming series "Jamestown" season one gives a vivid demonstration of male domination of the political and cultural process favoring men.Why were men allowed to vote yet not the wives?
Then shut upI have not read that yet.
People are too obsessed with dogs, and with animals in general.
They care more for dogs than a human baby in the womb.
It is not the killing of the dog as much as her thinking that putting that in a book was a good idea that is troublesome.
Poor Judgement, Conservatives have to know better.
Plus, the whole North Korea thing.
She will not be the VP candidate.
You guys are so scatter brained and absurd it is hard to tell when you are joking.You really are as dumb as I thought. Liberals really don't get sarcasm
I’m sure you’ll still admire her (probably more) when she details murdering her puppy in a gravel pit instead of calling animal control (like a sane person would).
Self reliance--to you--is murdering a 14 month old puppy with a shotgun in a gravel pit.I find it funny as hell on how clueless you folks are about how the real world works outside your citified cocoon. There's not always someone else handy to take care of your problems on farms and ranches. But hey, it's understandable why you commies don't understand self reliance.
The comical twists of logic you guys put yourself through is hilarious.I worked at a rendering plant back in the mid 70s. A guy brought in a perfectly healthy thoroughbred race horse. Said he wasn't leaving till the horse was dead. And he wasn't breaking a single law. His reason, he was a breeder and wouldn't chance that horse racing against him in the future. Long story short, shortly there after the horse was dead, skinned, dressed and ground up for fresh frozen pet food. Not every story can end with cotton candy and lollipops
Self reliance--to you--is murdering a 14 month old puppy with a shotgun in a gravel pit.
Wow.
The comical twists of logic you guys put yourself through is hilarious.
This horse had to die because the guy didn’t want to worry about racing against that horse in the future.
Red state insanity at it’s finest.
Here is the part where you justify murdering a horse now. Again...nobody forces you guys to assume these ridiculous postures....you could just say that the governor of South Dakota was wrong. She is human. Humans make errors and really dumb decisions sometimes. But you won’t even though you know what she and this horse trainer did were barbaric acts by any modern standard. Why? Because you have some sort of genetic brain defect I guess to where you can never admit an error.
^^^ not a fucking clue of what people thinkI find it funny as hell on how clueless you folks are about how the real world works outside your citified cocoon. There's not always someone else handy to take care of your problems on farms and ranches. But hey, it's understandable why you commies don't understand self reliance.
I worked at a rendering plant back in the mid 70s. A guy brought in a perfectly healthy thoroughbred race horse. Said he wasn't leaving till the horse was dead. And he wasn't breaking a single law. His reason, he was a breeder and wouldn't chance that horse racing against him in the future. Long story short, shortly there after the horse was dead, skinned, dressed and ground up for fresh frozen pet food. Not every story can end with cotton candy and lollipops
^^^ not a fucking clue of what people think
So she shot the puppy she hated in the face because she was poor??At 14 months it was a full grown dog. And the story I related to you happened in one of the bluest of blue States, CO. Also not having first hand information, I don't know if she was wrong or not. And as an employee at the rendering plant, I had no say in the matter. There have been times in my life that I had to put an animal down, I didn't have the money at that time to take them to a vet. I didn't like it, but it needed to be done. You commies just love to judge, but heaven forbid anyone judge you.
.
So she shot the puppy she hated in the face because she was poor??
Who says it's about killing animals?That is all the press focused on. Guess why they did that to her? I have her book. It is not about killing innocent animals.
Bit member? You mean it bit humans 24 times.
More Trump Deflection Syndrome.Okay, enough about the dead dog....let's talk about killing unborn babies.
After that fiasco, Noem backpedaled on this.Who says it's about killing animals?
All reports are asking and talking about her choice to gun down her young puppy for no good reason.
There is huge BIPARTISAN agreement on the horror of her choice, which she VOLUNTEERED to put in her book to look tough to rightwingers.
Well, it backfired.