Kurt Vonnegut on "Equality"

why do you want the vast majority of talent in this country to be wasted?
 
They have gone so insane they dont kn ow what a fact is.

they cant even function anymore so they want the whole world arround them to shut down too.


Time to kick these idiots to the curb.



Captain! Captain! The autorantic moonbat is ready to explode!
 
Because your a selfish piece of work with no integirty when you say you love this country
 
Simply more evidence that Conservatism does in fact support economic policies that make the rich richer and the poor poorer.

The freedom to get rich, the freedom to get poor, the freedom to be merely average.... and I support all those but will not support you getting to take from others in some scheme to try and equalize outcome to ANY degree

You don't want the rich to get rich.. beat them at the game... you don't weigh down their playing piece or glue it to the board
 
Yes Im angry and so is most of the country.

Your party is acting like lying brain fevered rats.
 
You will get this country no where by destroying our biggest asset.

OUR kids
 
I just dont understand why all this pretending that caring for your neighbor is a crime.


Caring voluntarily for your neighbor is great

Being forced to pay for, subsidize, provide, or handle completely their personal responsibilities is indeed criminal

Everything is 'forced' to the people who lose the elections. boohoo.

We have democratically decided to help the poor in this country. If you want a system of government that does not allow us to democratically decide to help the poor,

then you should get enough votes together to democratically implement such a system.

And you unconstitutionally did so. there is no power held by the federal government to take care of personal needs of individuals.. no matter how much you try and corrupt government to make it so... and you will always have people like me fighting for the freedoms against your oppression
 
Simply more evidence that Conservatism does in fact support economic policies that make the rich richer and the poor poorer.

The freedom to get rich, the freedom to get poor, the freedom to be merely average.... and I support all those but will not support you getting to take from others in some scheme to try and equalize outcome to ANY degree

You don't want the rich to get rich.. beat them at the game... you don't weigh down their playing piece or glue it to the board



Then you are in the wrong country.


This country decided that one long ago


refuse to support the constitution then GET OUT
 
It is not in the constitution to take care of personal needs.. sorry.. even though you and your ilk have empowered government to do so outside of what is clearly stated in the constitution. you and your ilk have never shied away from handing out extra power to government
 
Actually, [nutballs] seem to get the satire, but not Vonnegut's irony behind the satire.

Vonnegut was a real liberal nothing like the partisan grifters driving today's left into disrepute, and likely Vonnegut held some REAL Libertarian instincts unlike clan Paul and the anti-abortion scum degrading Libertarianism today, which means government takes care of education and roads, national defense, etc., and stays the fuck out of abortion and legislating finish lines.

What the nutballs embarrassing today's Republican party are too stupid to understand is how tax rates in the 90% range created the strongest nation in global history, and the fake-liberals undermining today's Democratic party are too morally degenerate to admit is that an essential right is the right to fail absolutely, then die poor and miserable in the gutter.

Once those differences are reconciled among the partisan scum of the earth, the rest of us can begin to live with less fear of the filthy god damned parasites working in government today (and playing both extremes AGAINST THE MIDDLE).

 
Last edited:
Simply more evidence that Conservatism does in fact support economic policies that make the rich richer and the poor poorer.

The freedom to get rich, the freedom to get poor, the freedom to be merely average.... and I support all those but will not support you getting to take from others in some scheme to try and equalize outcome to ANY degree

You don't want the rich to get rich.. beat them at the game... you don't weigh down their playing piece or glue it to the board



Then you are in the wrong country.


This country decided that one long ago


refuse to support the constitution then GET OUT


Your ire is misdirected.

Contact the White House.
 
Caring voluntarily for your neighbor is great

Being forced to pay for, subsidize, provide, or handle completely their personal responsibilities is indeed criminal

Everything is 'forced' to the people who lose the elections. boohoo.

We have democratically decided to help the poor in this country. If you want a system of government that does not allow us to democratically decide to help the poor,

then you should get enough votes together to democratically implement such a system.

And you unconstitutionally did so. there is no power held by the federal government to take care of personal needs of individuals.. no matter how much you try and corrupt government to make it so... and you will always have people like me fighting for the freedoms against your oppression

The Constitution provides for the determination of constitutionality. You have no idea what you're talking about.
 
Simply more evidence that Conservatism does in fact support economic policies that make the rich richer and the poor poorer.


Hey, buddy.....you should visit the United States.....it sure isn't like that here!



The greatness of America: no permanent unerclasss.

1. More than three-quarters of those working Americans whose incomes were in the bottom 20 percent in 1975 were also in the top 40 percent of income earners at some point by 1991, says Sowell.
Source: Thomas Sowell, "How Media Misuse Income Data To Match Their Preconceptions," Investor's Business Daily, January 12, 2010.
For text:
How Media Misuse Income Data To Match Their Preconceptions - Investors.com


2. When all sources of income are included -- wages, salaries, realized capital gains, dividends, business income and government benefits -- and taxes paid are deducted, households in the lowest income quintile saw a roughly 25% increase in their living standards from 1983 to 2005. ( data is from the Congressional Budget Office's "Comprehensive Household Income.) This fact alone refutes the notion that the poor are getting poorer. They are not.

That's only because Conservatives were unable to put the philosophy I referred to into law.

Thanks for reinforcing my point.
 
The freedom to get rich, the freedom to get poor, the freedom to be merely average.... and I support all those but will not support you getting to take from others in some scheme to try and equalize outcome to ANY degree

You don't want the rich to get rich.. beat them at the game... you don't weigh down their playing piece or glue it to the board



Then you are in the wrong country.


This country decided that one long ago


refuse to support the constitution then GET OUT


Your ire is misdirected.

Contact the White House.

tell us how the cumberland road was Not constitutional?
 
Everything is 'forced' to the people who lose the elections. boohoo.

We have democratically decided to help the poor in this country. If you want a system of government that does not allow us to democratically decide to help the poor,

then you should get enough votes together to democratically implement such a system.

And you unconstitutionally did so. there is no power held by the federal government to take care of personal needs of individuals.. no matter how much you try and corrupt government to make it so... and you will always have people like me fighting for the freedoms against your oppression

The Constitution provides for the determination of constitutionality. You have no idea what you're talking about.

No.. it really does not...

You have tried this argument before, and failed...

The government does not just get to grant itself power willy nilly.. that is why we have the amendment process that is purposely HARD.. so that the fed cannot easily gain more power
 

Forum List

Back
Top