Kyle Rittenhouse sued by estate of Joseph Rosenbaum

[Bell Huey]

No...

It was the judge's eagerness to accommodate the defense by restricting testimony.

There's good reason why Rittenhouse couldn't legally buy a handgun. It defies all logic that he can buy a rifle designed for combat because "it looked cool".

The weapon he carried was not designed for combat.

But thanks for admitting this about how a weapon looks as opposed to how it functions. Kudos.

 

[Hollie]

Haven't we covered the bit about "fewer words, less of them to eat"?

We're at 92 counts....and counting....pace yourself.

Are you confusing Rittenhouse with Trump?

You appear easily confused.

 

[The5thHorseman]

No reason to get angry and emotive. I understand you wish to overturn the jury verdict but appeals to emotion and selective acceptance of the facts surrounding the case doesn't make an argument.

No reason for more, or any, of your color commentary.

 

[hadit]

Are you confusing Rittenhouse with Trump?

You appear easily confused.

I have noticed a tendency on the part of some to throw extraneous items into a discussion when they realize they have nothing substantive to add and their points are being steadily demolished.

 

[The5thHorseman]

The weapon he carried was not designed for combat.

But thanks for admitting this about how a weapon looks as opposed to how it functions. Kudos.

The weapon he carried was not designed for combat

An article of faith entirely unsupported by evidence.

But thanks for admitting this about how a weapon looks

It is the reason he gave, under oath, for BUYING it.

 

[The5thHorseman]

Are you confusing Rittenhouse with Trump?

You appear easily confused.

Are you confused as to my implication?

 

[Hollie]

No reason for more, or any, of your color commentary.

When you're befuddled about which thread your posting in and the topics relevant to those threads, maybe it's time for a nap.

 

[Hollie]

Are you confused as to my implication?

Are you confused about what thread you're posting in?

 

[The5thHorseman]

When you're befuddled about which thread your posting in and the topics relevant to those threads, maybe it's time for a nap.

Are you acknowledging that you aren't getting it?

 

[Bell Huey]

An article of faith entirely unsupported by evidence.




It is the reason he gave, under oath, for BUYING it.

It was a semi automatic rifle, A Smith and Wesson M&P 15 designed for civilians. Never used in the military.

 

[The5thHorseman]

Are you confused about what thread you're posting in?

Not at all.

Now answer my question.

 

[The5thHorseman]

It was a semi automatic rifle, A Smith and Wesson M&P 15 designed for civilians. Never used in the military.

There is no such thing as an "AR-15 designed for civilians".

 

[Auld Phart]

Yeah, yeah, if the judge disagrees with your vaunted legal opinion, there's something wrong with the judge, not your legal opinion. Where did you get your law degree that you have standing to say the judge is wrong?

Except the statute applied to guns with a shorter barrel. That's why the charge was thrown out. Come on, this has been public knowledge for a long time, where have you been? It sounds like you're just grabbing old headlines and throwing them out there, hoping something will change the record and that you'll be proven right despite history.

Where did you get your law degree that you have standing to say the judge is wrong?

 

[Bell Huey]

There is no such thing as an "AR-15 designed for civilians".

That is not an AR 15. Read the name again.

 

[Hollie]

Are you confused as to my implication?

Are you confused about what thread you're posting in?

Not at all.

Now answer my question.

You have to ask me nicely, Danny.

 

[The5thHorseman]

Yeah, yeah, if the judge disagrees with your vaunted legal opinion, there's something wrong with the judge, not your legal opinion. Where did you get your law degree that you have standing to say the judge is wrong?

Except the statute applied to guns with a shorter barrel. That's why the charge was thrown out. Come on, this has been public knowledge for a long time, where have you been? It sounds like you're just grabbing old headlines and throwing them out there, hoping something will change the record and that you'll be proven right despite history.

Where did you get your law degree that you have standing to say the judge is wrong

Ask Bell Huey how I've done analyzing recent legal issues.

Except the statute applied to guns with a shorter barrel. That's why the charge was thrown out

You're missing the point.

That he bought an AR because it is illegal for him to own a handgun is ridiculous...

As is clearly recognized by the fact that the person who did so on his behalf broke the law.

 

[The5thHorseman]

That is not an AR 15. Read the name again.

Not interested in a debate on a subject about which you are CONSISTENTLY wrong.

 

[The5thHorseman]

Are you confused about what thread you're posting in?

You have to ask me nicely, Danny.

Post the rule, and your stipulation to abide by it.

 

[Hollie]

Post the rule, and your stipulation to abide by it.

Stop spamming the thread with your off topic banter.

 

[Bell Huey]

Not interested in a debate on a subject about which you are CONSISTENTLY wrong.

This is the name:

M&P 15 SPORT II SERIES​

https://www.smith-wesson.com/product/m-p-15-sport-ii

The only company that can manufacture an AR 15 semi automatic rifle is Colt.

So you may run away now. And I have you to stop tagging me in your debates that are off topic.