Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
That used to be true, but an awful lot of extremist liberals are white.i would say the majority white jury will help him out
Did Kyle run down the street YELLING YOU ARE ALL PUSSIES...............
Did he run into a Biker Bar and go I JUST TRASHED YOUR BIKES............lmao
You are TRYING TO PROVE WILLFULL INTENT which means you are trying to NOW CHARGE HIM WITH MURDER.
You JUST STATED he WILLFULLY WENT THERE WITH THE INTENT TO KILL............Back that up with REAL EVIDENCE.
If he was there to kill why did he run.......
And again........had he dropped the weapon would he be alive today.
If you cannot answer that last question with YES HE'D BE ALIVE IN MY OPINION then it was Self Defense.
You went down the intent road in earlier posts. Vigilante I think you said...........That implies INTENT......HE INTENDED to go kill...................If that is the case........that by definition would be murder......homocide..........I don't know how you missed my point. I never said anything about murder, what I said is that he should be found guilty of manslaughter. My analogy was to point out when you carry a firearm, you cannot instigate a situation where you are forced to use it. When you do, that takes self-defense out of the picture. That's my point. This was part of my CCW training. When you carry a firearm in public, you must procure that weapon so using it is the last thing you have to do. Stay away from heated or violent situations. Don't play police officer. This kid did the exact opposite. Therefore IMO self-defense is out the window. He can't use that given he addressed the situation illegally armed.
kYLE SPRINTED AWAY AND THEY SPRINTED AFTER HIM.Clear self defense. All the videos show that. But the prosecution now doesn't want anyone to believe their lying eyes. This is wrong. It is unconstitutional and the feds know it.
You went down the intent road in earlier posts. Vigilante I think you said...........That implies INTENT......HE INTENDED to go kill...................If that is the case........that by definition would be murder......homocide..........
The man intended to kill that is why he was there. Perhaps you want to retract those words from other posts now??
have you ever heard of private security?? I guess not,,No. When Turtle said Rittenhouse had the right to protect property I pointed out that he did not. He was not a police officer and had no permission from the city to act as one. That's where my vigilante remark came in. He cannot assume the role of a police officer because he felt they nor the city were doing enough. Doing so makes you a vigilante.
While he had no intention to kill (that would be murder charges) he had to know by going against an angry mob there would be a good possibility that would happen. That's why he got his friends AK in the first place.
AFTER kyle killed a guy.kYLE SPRINTED AWAY AND THEY SPRINTED AFTER HIM.
have you ever heard of private security?? I guess not,,
LOLNo. When Turtle said Rittenhouse had the right to protect property I pointed out that he did not. He was not a police officer and had no permission from the city to act as one. That's where my vigilante remark came in. He cannot assume the role of a police officer because he felt they nor the city were doing enough. Doing so makes you a vigilante.
While he had no intention to kill (that would be murder charges) he had to know by going against an angry mob there would be a good possibility that would happen. That's why he got his friends AK in the first place.
doesnt matter,, he wasnt there to arrest people,, so not sure why youre claiming he was actin as a cop,,Was he hired as private security? He claimed the auto dealership did but they denied that claim.