Was the terrorist Rittenhouse, LEGALLY allowed to be carrying, much-less open-carrying at his age? This is the only key fact here.You do realize that calling people "terrorists" is not changing the reality that he is innocent and will not stop people from being horrified and outraged if he goes to jail for self defense, right?
You can play pretend all you want, but shit is getting real, marc. Those punks that got themselves shot, I bet they spent a lot of time talking shit to each other.
All that talk, didn't help them, when they went out and decided to put their beliefs into action.
1. He is not a terrorist you bloodthirsty hack.
2. Don't know, don't care. I am glad he had that gun, legal or not, so that he could defend himself from the barbarians.
3. The key fact is that you are either identify with the bloodthirsty mob, or not. YOU do. YOu look at a blood thirsty mob, and you see yourself reflected.