Last three GOP House leaders left amid sex, ethics scandals. Still, Boehner the worst?

[rdean]

The only legislation Boehner passed was because of help from Democrats.

The first year in office, the House was the least productive in American history. Then it got worse every year after that. Just like every Republican anything for the last 40 years, nothing can be listed that's positive.



But you have to admit, he wasn't part of any sex or ethics scandal and left on his own terms. Probably the only thing of value in his entire stewardship of the House.

So what's next for the worst congress in history? What's their next big damage? Who are they going to elect? Will Democrats need to bail them out once again? Need I ask? The real question is "how soon?"

 

[ScienceRocks]

The best thing about Boehner is the reality that he kept the government open after the shutdown in 2013.

 

[whitehall]

Once again the radical left opens up a can o' worms that they forgot was on the bottom shelf. Sex scandal? The current top democrat presidential candidate survived for decades by threatening the lives of women who were molested by her husband. Bill Clinton is such a freaking joke that most Americans view him as that crazy pervert uncle that you don't want to be around alone.

 

[Zander]

We have a US CODE that is so large is takes 51 titles in multiples volumes - when you add in Obamacare, and case law, we have literally tens of millions of pages of LAWS. Useless, stupid,laws that nobody can ever comply with.

A congress that didn't pass more laws is a good one in my book.

Congress should be required to retire at least 10 laws for every new one.

 

[TheOldSchool]

No one will miss him. Thanks for failing the country Boehner. Now please go into exile.

 

[Zander]

This is just one Title of the US CODE. There are 51 titles....

 

[talksalot]

The 2014 elections gave the Republicans control of the Senate (and control of both houses of Congress) for the first time since the 109th Congress. With 247 seats in the House of Representatives and 54 seats in the Senate, this Congress began with the largest Republican majority since the 71st Congress of 1929–1931.
Combined with the GOP’s dominance at the state legislative level add the party’s control of 31 of 50 gubernatorial mansions.

How did that happen....?
People are waking up to the fact that Democrats suck. Any of the Republican candidates would make a much better president than a scandal-ridden criminal, a sorta Socialist and maybe..... senile Uncle Joe.

 

[OKTexas]

The only legislation Boehner passed was because of help from Democrats.

The first year in office, the House was the least productive in American history. Then it got worse every year after that. Just like every Republican anything for the last 40 years, nothing can be listed that's positive.



But you have to admit, he wasn't part of any sex or ethics scandal and left on his own terms. Probably the only thing of value in his entire stewardship of the House.

So what's next for the worst congress in history? What's their next big damage? Who are they going to elect? Will Democrats need to bail them out once again? Need I ask? The real question is "how soon?"

How about a link and stats to back up your ridiculous BS claims, or just admit you're pulling this crap out of your ass and you're nothing but a fucking liar.

 

[rdean]

Once again the radical left opens up a can o' worms that they forgot was on the bottom shelf. Sex scandal? The current top democrat presidential candidate survived for decades by threatening the lives of women who were molested by her husband. Bill Clinton is such a freaking joke that most Americans view him as that crazy pervert uncle that you don't want to be around alone.

Bill Clinton is not running.

 

[rdean]

The only legislation Boehner passed was because of help from Democrats.

The first year in office, the House was the least productive in American history. Then it got worse every year after that. Just like every Republican anything for the last 40 years, nothing can be listed that's positive.



But you have to admit, he wasn't part of any sex or ethics scandal and left on his own terms. Probably the only thing of value in his entire stewardship of the House.

So what's next for the worst congress in history? What's their next big damage? Who are they going to elect? Will Democrats need to bail them out once again? Need I ask? The real question is "how soon?"

How about a link and stats to back up your ridiculous BS claims, or just admit you're pulling this crap out of your ass and you're nothing but a fucking liar.

Yea, you're right. Seems the 113th wasn't the worst in history. That was the 112th.

Turns Out the 113th Congress Wasn’t the ‘Least Productive’

Hastert, sex and blackmail.
Livingston, sex
Gringrich, ethics, sex

Do I really need to provide links on Hastert, Livingston and Gringrich? Or you like being made to look like a stupid fuck?

 

[TheGreatGatsby]

We have a US CODE that is so large is takes 51 titles in multiples volumes - when you add in Obamacare, and case law, we have literally tens of millions of pages of LAWS. Useless, stupid,laws that nobody can ever comply with.

A congress that didn't pass more laws is a good one in my book.

Congress should be required to retire at least 10 laws for every new one.

rdean

 

[rdean]

The 2014 elections gave the Republicans control of the Senate (and control of both houses of Congress) for the first time since the 109th Congress. With 247 seats in the House of Representatives and 54 seats in the Senate, this Congress began with the largest Republican majority since the 71st Congress of 1929–1931.
Combined with the GOP’s dominance at the state legislative level add the party’s control of 31 of 50 gubernatorial mansions.

How did that happen....?
People are waking up to the fact that Democrats suck. Any of the Republican candidates would make a much better president than a scandal-ridden criminal, a sorta Socialist and maybe..... senile Uncle Joe.

How did that happen....?

Because no one voted dipshit. Just like all midterms.

What is wrong with you people. Delusional much?

 

[rdean]

We have a US CODE that is so large is takes 51 titles in multiples volumes - when you add in Obamacare, and case law, we have literally tens of millions of pages of LAWS. Useless, stupid,laws that nobody can ever comply with.

A congress that didn't pass more laws is a good one in my book.

Congress should be required to retire at least 10 laws for every new one.

rdean

Republicans repealed regulations and it led to the worst recession history, duh! You can't just repeal laws willy nilly because you just don't like laws.

Republicans can. Of course, look at the damage they leave behind.

 

[OKTexas]

The only legislation Boehner passed was because of help from Democrats.

The first year in office, the House was the least productive in American history. Then it got worse every year after that. Just like every Republican anything for the last 40 years, nothing can be listed that's positive.



But you have to admit, he wasn't part of any sex or ethics scandal and left on his own terms. Probably the only thing of value in his entire stewardship of the House.

So what's next for the worst congress in history? What's their next big damage? Who are they going to elect? Will Democrats need to bail them out once again? Need I ask? The real question is "how soon?"

How about a link and stats to back up your ridiculous BS claims, or just admit you're pulling this crap out of your ass and you're nothing but a fucking liar.

Yea, you're right. Seems the 113th wasn't the worst in history. That was the 112th.

Turns Out the 113th Congress Wasn’t the ‘Least Productive’

Hastert, sex and blackmail.
Livingston, sex
Gringrich, ethics, sex

Do I really need to provide links on Hastert, Livingston and Gringrich? Or you like being made to look like a stupid fuck?

The first year in office, the House was the least productive in American history. Then it got worse every year after that.

You said the house was the least productive, where are the stats on them, you provided only the number of bills that were enacted which require senate action and the presidents signature. Come on commie, put up or shut up.

 

[tyroneweaver]

Once again the radical left opens up a can o' worms that they forgot was on the bottom shelf. Sex scandal? The current top democrat presidential candidate survived for decades by threatening the lives of women who were molested by her husband. Bill Clinton is such a freaking joke that most Americans view him as that crazy pervert uncle that you don't want to be around alone.

Bill Clinton is not running.

oh yes he is. LOL
proxy/vicariously which ever you chose

 

[rdean]

The only legislation Boehner passed was because of help from Democrats.

The first year in office, the House was the least productive in American history. Then it got worse every year after that. Just like every Republican anything for the last 40 years, nothing can be listed that's positive.



But you have to admit, he wasn't part of any sex or ethics scandal and left on his own terms. Probably the only thing of value in his entire stewardship of the House.

So what's next for the worst congress in history? What's their next big damage? Who are they going to elect? Will Democrats need to bail them out once again? Need I ask? The real question is "how soon?"

How about a link and stats to back up your ridiculous BS claims, or just admit you're pulling this crap out of your ass and you're nothing but a fucking liar.

Yea, you're right. Seems the 113th wasn't the worst in history. That was the 112th.

Turns Out the 113th Congress Wasn’t the ‘Least Productive’

Hastert, sex and blackmail.
Livingston, sex
Gringrich, ethics, sex

Do I really need to provide links on Hastert, Livingston and Gringrich? Or you like being made to look like a stupid fuck?

The first year in office, the House was the least productive in American history. Then it got worse every year after that.

You said the house was the least productive, where are the stats on them, you provided only the number of bills that were enacted which require senate action and the presidents signature. Come on commie, put up or shut up.

I defined least productive as not passing legislation. A very good indicator indeed.
Who knows what exactly you are looking for? The good thing is "I don't care". The bad thing is "you are still a nitwit".

And I was right about the last three speakers.

If you want to find something I was wrong about, go for it. Don't expect me to find it for you. Especially when I know it's not there.

The truly funny part is I suspect you think closing down the government was being productive. That's just the way your kind thinks. It's OK, it's the propaganda speaking.

 

[Oldstyle]

Once again the radical left opens up a can o' worms that they forgot was on the bottom shelf. Sex scandal? The current top democrat presidential candidate survived for decades by threatening the lives of women who were molested by her husband. Bill Clinton is such a freaking joke that most Americans view him as that crazy pervert uncle that you don't want to be around alone.

Bill Clinton is not running.

Isn't he? God knows Hillary can't be running on HER record! She's running on the naive notion from you on the Left that another Clinton in the White House will bring back prosperity! She won't have the Dot Com Boom to make that happen and is a nightmare when it comes to ethics...so good luck on that!

 

[Oldstyle]

The only legislation Boehner passed was because of help from Democrats.

The first year in office, the House was the least productive in American history. Then it got worse every year after that. Just like every Republican anything for the last 40 years, nothing can be listed that's positive.



But you have to admit, he wasn't part of any sex or ethics scandal and left on his own terms. Probably the only thing of value in his entire stewardship of the House.

So what's next for the worst congress in history? What's their next big damage? Who are they going to elect? Will Democrats need to bail them out once again? Need I ask? The real question is "how soon?"

How about a link and stats to back up your ridiculous BS claims, or just admit you're pulling this crap out of your ass and you're nothing but a fucking liar.

Yea, you're right. Seems the 113th wasn't the worst in history. That was the 112th.

Turns Out the 113th Congress Wasn’t the ‘Least Productive’

Hastert, sex and blackmail.
Livingston, sex
Gringrich, ethics, sex

Do I really need to provide links on Hastert, Livingston and Gringrich? Or you like being made to look like a stupid fuck?

The first year in office, the House was the least productive in American history. Then it got worse every year after that.

You said the house was the least productive, where are the stats on them, you provided only the number of bills that were enacted which require senate action and the presidents signature. Come on commie, put up or shut up.

I defined least productive as not passing legislation. A very good indicator indeed.
Who knows what exactly you are looking for? The good thing is "I don't care". The bad thing is "you are still a nitwit".

And I was right about the last three speakers.

If you want to find something I was wrong about, go for it. Don't expect me to find it for you. Especially when I know it's not there.

The truly funny part is I suspect you think closing down the government was being productive. That's just the way your kind thinks. It's OK, it's the propaganda speaking.

The job of Congress isn't to pass legislation for the sake of passing legislation, R-Derp! That's how we ended up with BarryCare! I know this is hard for a big government progressive like yourself to grasp but most of the time...the less Congress does...the better it is for the country.

 

[OKTexas]

The only legislation Boehner passed was because of help from Democrats.

The first year in office, the House was the least productive in American history. Then it got worse every year after that. Just like every Republican anything for the last 40 years, nothing can be listed that's positive.



But you have to admit, he wasn't part of any sex or ethics scandal and left on his own terms. Probably the only thing of value in his entire stewardship of the House.

So what's next for the worst congress in history? What's their next big damage? Who are they going to elect? Will Democrats need to bail them out once again? Need I ask? The real question is "how soon?"

How about a link and stats to back up your ridiculous BS claims, or just admit you're pulling this crap out of your ass and you're nothing but a fucking liar.

Yea, you're right. Seems the 113th wasn't the worst in history. That was the 112th.

Turns Out the 113th Congress Wasn’t the ‘Least Productive’

Hastert, sex and blackmail.
Livingston, sex
Gringrich, ethics, sex

Do I really need to provide links on Hastert, Livingston and Gringrich? Or you like being made to look like a stupid fuck?

The first year in office, the House was the least productive in American history. Then it got worse every year after that.

You said the house was the least productive, where are the stats on them, you provided only the number of bills that were enacted which require senate action and the presidents signature. Come on commie, put up or shut up.

I defined least productive as not passing legislation. A very good indicator indeed.
Who knows what exactly you are looking for? The good thing is "I don't care". The bad thing is "you are still a nitwit".

And I was right about the last three speakers.

If you want to find something I was wrong about, go for it. Don't expect me to find it for you. Especially when I know it's not there.

The truly funny part is I suspect you think closing down the government was being productive. That's just the way your kind thinks. It's OK, it's the propaganda speaking.

So you keep pushing your lies, the house passed all kinds of legislation from jobs bills to the budget, most of which died in the obstructionist reids inbox because he refused to bring them to the floor of the senate for a vote. The house can do its job but they can't force the senate to do theirs. So your contention that they didn't pass legislation is a pure unadulterated lie.

 

[Care4all]

The only legislation Boehner passed was because of help from Democrats.

The first year in office, the House was the least productive in American history. Then it got worse every year after that. Just like every Republican anything for the last 40 years, nothing can be listed that's positive.



But you have to admit, he wasn't part of any sex or ethics scandal and left on his own terms. Probably the only thing of value in his entire stewardship of the House.

So what's next for the worst congress in history? What's their next big damage? Who are they going to elect? Will Democrats need to bail them out once again? Need I ask? The real question is "how soon?"

How about a link and stats to back up your ridiculous BS claims, or just admit you're pulling this crap out of your ass and you're nothing but a fucking liar.

Yea, you're right. Seems the 113th wasn't the worst in history. That was the 112th.

Turns Out the 113th Congress Wasn’t the ‘Least Productive’

Hastert, sex and blackmail.
Livingston, sex
Gringrich, ethics, sex

Do I really need to provide links on Hastert, Livingston and Gringrich? Or you like being made to look like a stupid fuck?

The first year in office, the House was the least productive in American history. Then it got worse every year after that.

You said the house was the least productive, where are the stats on them, you provided only the number of bills that were enacted which require senate action and the presidents signature. Come on commie, put up or shut up.

I defined least productive as not passing legislation. A very good indicator indeed.
Who knows what exactly you are looking for? The good thing is "I don't care". The bad thing is "you are still a nitwit".

And I was right about the last three speakers.

If you want to find something I was wrong about, go for it. Don't expect me to find it for you. Especially when I know it's not there.

The truly funny part is I suspect you think closing down the government was being productive. That's just the way your kind thinks. It's OK, it's the propaganda speaking.

The job of Congress isn't to pass legislation for the sake of passing legislation, R-Derp! That's how we ended up with BarryCare! I know this is hard for a big government progressive like yourself to grasp but most of the time...the less Congress does...the better it is for the country.

congressmen are legislators, that is their job title/description and what they are paid for...and they can legislate to remove previous legislation