Latest: 9th Circuit Bans CA officials from filing further appeals to February gun ruling

TemplarKormac

Political Atheist
Mar 30, 2013
50,223
13,600
In February, the 9th Circuit Court of Appeals ruled in Peruta v. County of San Diego, that California's concealed carry laws violated the Constitution. Today the same three judge panel stopped California Law enforcement authorities from filing further appeals. That means the law is effectively dead.

Law-abiding Californians may not need to justify their need to carry concealed weapons, after the same three-judge panel that struck down restrictions on the permits earlier this year ruled Wednesday that it is too late for new opponents to join the fight against the ruling.

The decision by the 9th U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals would bar other law enforcement officials, including state Attorney General Kamala Harris, from appealing its ruling in a case originally brought by an independent journalist who sued the San Diego County Sheriff’s Department over its policy of requiring a specific reason for being allowed to carry a concealed weapon in public.

New court decision likely ends California s restrictions on conceal-carry permits Fox News
 
Last edited:
Well, I thought at least Conservatives on this board would at least be jumping for joy here.
 
Well, I thought at least Conservatives on this board would at least be jumping for joy here.
You waited a whole 12 minutes to complain no one responded?

Yeah? And? It doesn't take 12 minutes to read the body of the thread.
And of course everyone on immediately read your thread and chose not to respond?

Feel free to add a relevant response if you so choose.
 
In February, the 9th Circuit Court of Appeals ruled in Peruta v. County of San Diego, that California's concealed carry laws violated the Constitution. Today the same three judge panel stopped California Law enforcement authorities from filing further appeals. That means the law is effectively dead.

Law-abiding Californians may not need to justify their need to carry concealed weapons, after the same three-judge panel that struck down restrictions on the permits earlier this year ruled Wednesday that it is too late for new opponents to join the fight against the ruling.

The decision by the 9th U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals would bar other law enforcement officials, including state Attorney General Kamala Harris, from appealing its ruling in a case originally brought by an independent journalist who sued the San Diego County Sheriff’s Department over its policy of requiring a specific reason for being allowed to carry a concealed weapon in public.

New court decision likely ends California s restrictions on conceal-carry permits Fox News

Wouldn't think demonstrating how you're fat and out of shape and thus incapable of self-defense without a firearm is why you need it would be all that difficult. :)

Of course, you felt it necessary to demonstrate how incapable you are of offering an intelligent response.

Felt it necessary to make fun of gun owners. People who spend an inordinant amount of time imagining the need to kill other people SHOULD be made fun of.

I wonder what would happen if your home was burglarized by an armed assailant? You would be wishing you had one.

They'd die horribly and quickly. (flexes) :)
 
In February, the 9th Circuit Court of Appeals ruled in Peruta v. County of San Diego, that California's concealed carry laws violated the Constitution. Today the same three judge panel stopped California Law enforcement authorities from filing further appeals. That means the law is effectively dead.

Law-abiding Californians may not need to justify their need to carry concealed weapons, after the same three-judge panel that struck down restrictions on the permits earlier this year ruled Wednesday that it is too late for new opponents to join the fight against the ruling.

The decision by the 9th U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals would bar other law enforcement officials, including state Attorney General Kamala Harris, from appealing its ruling in a case originally brought by an independent journalist who sued the San Diego County Sheriff’s Department over its policy of requiring a specific reason for being allowed to carry a concealed weapon in public.

New court decision likely ends California s restrictions on conceal-carry permits Fox News

Wouldn't think demonstrating how you're fat and out of shape and thus incapable of self-defense without a firearm is why you need it would be all that difficult. :)

Of course, you felt it necessary to demonstrate how incapable you are of offering an intelligent response.

Felt it necessary to make fun of gun owners. People who spend an inordinant amount of time imagining the need to kill other people SHOULD be made fun of.
Firearms owners do NOT spend time imaging killing people you retard.
 
In February, the 9th Circuit Court of Appeals ruled in Peruta v. County of San Diego, that California's concealed carry laws violated the Constitution. Today the same three judge panel stopped California Law enforcement authorities from filing further appeals. That means the law is effectively dead.

Law-abiding Californians may not need to justify their need to carry concealed weapons, after the same three-judge panel that struck down restrictions on the permits earlier this year ruled Wednesday that it is too late for new opponents to join the fight against the ruling.

The decision by the 9th U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals would bar other law enforcement officials, including state Attorney General Kamala Harris, from appealing its ruling in a case originally brought by an independent journalist who sued the San Diego County Sheriff’s Department over its policy of requiring a specific reason for being allowed to carry a concealed weapon in public.

New court decision likely ends California s restrictions on conceal-carry permits Fox News

Wouldn't think demonstrating how you're fat and out of shape and thus incapable of self-defense without a firearm is why you need it would be all that difficult. :)

Of course, you felt it necessary to demonstrate how incapable you are of offering an intelligent response.

Felt it necessary to make fun of gun owners. People who spend an inordinant amount of time imagining the need to kill other people SHOULD be made fun of.
Firearms owners do NOT spend time imaging killing people you retard.

Are if their weps are for self-defense. Or they're carrying concealed. That's exactly what they're thinking about.
 
Wouldn't think demonstrating how you're fat and out of shape and thus incapable of self-defense without a firearm is why you need it would be all that difficult. :)

Of course, you felt it necessary to demonstrate how incapable you are of offering an intelligent response.

Felt it necessary to make fun of gun owners. People who spend an inordinant amount of time imagining the need to kill other people SHOULD be made fun of.
Firearms owners do NOT spend time imaging killing people you retard.

Are if their weps are for self-defense. Or they're carrying concealed. That's exactly what they're thinking about.
No it is not. You are beyond stupid.

So the concealed weapon's being carried around on the offchance the opportunity to hunt presents itself? Not in case a person threatens them they can deal with it via force or deadly force?
 
In February, the 9th Circuit Court of Appeals ruled in Peruta v. County of San Diego, that California's concealed carry laws violated the Constitution. Today the same three judge panel stopped California Law enforcement authorities from filing further appeals. That means the law is effectively dead.

New court decision likely ends California s restrictions on conceal-carry permits Fox News

Wouldn't think demonstrating how you're fat and out of shape and thus incapable of self-defense without a firearm is why you need it would be all that difficult. :)

Of course, you felt it necessary to demonstrate how incapable you are of offering an intelligent response.

Felt it necessary to make fun of gun owners. People who spend an inordinant amount of time imagining the need to kill other people SHOULD be made fun of.

I wonder what would happen if your home was burglarized by an armed assailant? You would be wishing you had one.

They'd die horribly and quickly. (flexes) :)

Really? By quoting your local gun law to them?
 
Wouldn't think demonstrating how you're fat and out of shape and thus incapable of self-defense without a firearm is why you need it would be all that difficult. :)

Of course, you felt it necessary to demonstrate how incapable you are of offering an intelligent response.

Felt it necessary to make fun of gun owners. People who spend an inordinant amount of time imagining the need to kill other people SHOULD be made fun of.

I wonder what would happen if your home was burglarized by an armed assailant? You would be wishing you had one.

They'd die horribly and quickly. (flexes) :)

Really? By quoting your local gun law to them?

Some of those law books are pretty heavy. Don't knock the possibility a good whack upside the head with one could produce quite the booboo. :)
 

And? Didn't say there wasn't legit reason to be armed, just that the reason most people are armed is for use against other human beings. The rebuttal was they're not when as you just proved that's the primary reason.
 
You seriously haven'-t a clue.

And? Didn't say there wasn't legit reason to be armed, just that the reason most people are armed is for use against other human beings. The rebuttal was they're not when as you just proved that's the primary reason.
 
Of course, you felt it necessary to demonstrate how incapable you are of offering an intelligent response.

Felt it necessary to make fun of gun owners. People who spend an inordinant amount of time imagining the need to kill other people SHOULD be made fun of.
Firearms owners do NOT spend time imaging killing people you retard.

Are if their weps are for self-defense. Or they're carrying concealed. That's exactly what they're thinking about.
No it is not. You are beyond stupid.

So the concealed weapon's being carried around on the offchance the opportunity to hunt presents itself? Not in case a person threatens them they can deal with it via force or deadly force?
People carry for self defense not on the off chance they can go hunting people you retard.
 

Forum List

Back
Top